Difference between revisions of "Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/HeavyMetals"

Line 236: Line 236:
 
<i>In vivo</i> we could show that the addition of different concentrations of chromium have different effects to transcription of sfGFP.</p>
 
<i>In vivo</i> we could show that the addition of different concentrations of chromium have different effects to transcription of sfGFP.</p>
  
<figure style="width: 600px">
+
 
 +
<div class="row">
 +
    <div class="col-md-6 text-center" style="margin-bottom: 50px"> <figure style="width: 600px">
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/82/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_chromium.jpg" data-lightbox="heavymetals" data-title="Time course of the induction of a chromium biosensor with sfGFP for different chromium concentrations in vivo. The data are measured with BioLector and normalized on OD600. Error bars represent the standard deviation of two biological replicates. ."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/82/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_chromium.jpg" alt="Adjusting the detection limit"></a>
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/82/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_chromium.jpg" data-lightbox="heavymetals" data-title="Time course of the induction of a chromium biosensor with sfGFP for different chromium concentrations in vivo. The data are measured with BioLector and normalized on OD600. Error bars represent the standard deviation of two biological replicates. ."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/82/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_chromium.jpg" alt="Adjusting the detection limit"></a>
 
<figcaption>Time course of the induction of a chromium biosensor with sfGFP for different chromium concentrations in vivo. The data are measured with BioLector and normalized on OD600. Error bars represent the standard deviation of two biological replicates.</figcaption>
 
<figcaption>Time course of the induction of a chromium biosensor with sfGFP for different chromium concentrations in vivo. The data are measured with BioLector and normalized on OD600. Error bars represent the standard deviation of two biological replicates.</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
 
+
    </div>
 +
    <div class="col-md-6 text-center" style="margin-bottom: 50px">
 
<figure style="width: 600px">
 
<figure style="width: 600px">
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/73/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_chromium_Balkendiagramm.jpg" data-lightbox="heavymetals" data-title="Fluorescence levels at three different stages of cultivation. Shown are levels after 60 minutes, 150 minutes and 650 minutes. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/73/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_chromium_Balkendiagramm.jpg" alt="Adjusting the detection limit"></a>
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/73/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_chromium_Balkendiagramm.jpg" data-lightbox="heavymetals" data-title="Fluorescence levels at three different stages of cultivation. Shown are levels after 60 minutes, 150 minutes and 650 minutes. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/73/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Biolector_chromium_Balkendiagramm.jpg" alt="Adjusting the detection limit"></a>
 
<figcaption>Fluorescence levels at three different stages of cultivation. Shown are levels after 60 minutes, 150 minutes and 650 minutes. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.</figcaption>
 
<figcaption>Fluorescence levels at three different stages of cultivation. Shown are levels after 60 minutes, 150 minutes and 650 minutes. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
 +
        </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 
</br><p>Our data lead to the conclusion that in a cell based system it is possible to detect chromium.
 
</br><p>Our data lead to the conclusion that in a cell based system it is possible to detect chromium.
 
In contrast to our expectations with higher chromium concentrations we got lower fluorescence levels. These observations needed further investigation. </p>
 
In contrast to our expectations with higher chromium concentrations we got lower fluorescence levels. These observations needed further investigation. </p>
Line 285: Line 295:
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
<figure style="width: 600px">
+
<div class="row">
 +
    <div class="col-md-6 text-center" style="margin-bottom: 50px">
 +
<figure style="width: 500px">
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/bd/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_induction_chromium_in_chrB_optimized_cell_extract2.jpg" data-lightbox="heavymetals" data-title="Chromium sensor with alternative repressor build by team Dundee 2015, which has only the first 15 codons optimized in chromium specific cell extract under the induction withdifferent chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/bd/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_induction_chromium_in_chrB_optimized_cell_extract2.jpg" alt="Adjusting the detection limit"></a>
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/bd/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_induction_chromium_in_chrB_optimized_cell_extract2.jpg" data-lightbox="heavymetals" data-title="Chromium sensor with alternative repressor build by team Dundee 2015, which has only the first 15 codons optimized in chromium specific cell extract under the induction withdifferent chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/bd/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_induction_chromium_in_chrB_optimized_cell_extract2.jpg" alt="Adjusting the detection limit"></a>
 
<figcaption>Chromium sensor with alternative repressor build by team Dundee 2015, which has only the first 15 codons optimized in chromium specific cell extract under the induction withdifferent chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.</figcaption>
 
<figcaption>Chromium sensor with alternative repressor build by team Dundee 2015, which has only the first 15 codons optimized in chromium specific cell extract under the induction withdifferent chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
 
+
    </div>
<figure style="width: 600px">
+
    <div class="col-md-6 text-center" style="margin-bottom: 50px">
 +
<figure style="width: 540px">
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/fe/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Corr-induction-Cr-in-ChrBopt-CE.jpeg" data-lightbox="heavymetals" data-title="Chromium sensor with alternative repressor build by team Dundee 2015, which has only the first 15 codons optimized in chromium specific cell extract under the induction withdifferent chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.Data are normalised on chromiums influence to the cell extrat. "><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/fe/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Corr-induction-Cr-in-ChrBopt-CE.jpeg" alt="Adjusting the detection limit"></a>
 
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/fe/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Corr-induction-Cr-in-ChrBopt-CE.jpeg" data-lightbox="heavymetals" data-title="Chromium sensor with alternative repressor build by team Dundee 2015, which has only the first 15 codons optimized in chromium specific cell extract under the induction withdifferent chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.Data are normalised on chromiums influence to the cell extrat. "><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/fe/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Corr-induction-Cr-in-ChrBopt-CE.jpeg" alt="Adjusting the detection limit"></a>
 
<figcaption>Chromium sensor with alternative repressor build by team Dundee 2015, which has only the first 15 codons optimized in chromium specific cell extract under the induction withdifferent chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.Data are normalised on chromiums influence to the cell extrat.</figcaption>
 
<figcaption>Chromium sensor with alternative repressor build by team Dundee 2015, which has only the first 15 codons optimized in chromium specific cell extract under the induction withdifferent chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.Data are normalised on chromiums influence to the cell extrat.</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
 +
        </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 +
  
  

Revision as of 12:43, 17 September 2015

iGEM Bielefeld 2015


Heavy Metals

Zusammenfassung in ganz wenigen Worten.

The different sensors we worked with were characterized in vivo as well as in vitro.



We tested the influence of each heavy metal on our sensors in vivo Therefore we used heavy metal concentrations based on heavy metal occurrences measured all over the world.


Adjusting the detection limit
Influence of heavy metals on the growth of E.coli KRX shown is the standard deviation of three biological replicates. For induction concentrations of 20 µg/L lead, 60 µg/L mercury, 60 µg/L chromium, 80 µg/L nickel, 40 mg/L copper which represent ten times of the WHO guideline were used.


The tested heavy metal concentrations had no negative effect on E. colis growth. Moreover there is no significant difference between the curves with heavy metals and the controls. This first experiment showed us, in vivo characterization with these sensors under the tested heavy metal concentrations is possible. Most of our sensors were cultivated in the BioLector. Due to the accuracy of this device we could measure our sample in duplicates.



Click on the test strip for more information about the heavy metals and how they can be detected:

teststrip

To sum it all up

We have characterized different heavy metal sensors for arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, mercury and nickel. The results for our nickel characterization indicated that the constructed nickel sensor is not suitable for our test strip. The sensors for lead and chromium showed great potential to become fitting sensors, as they show responses to chromium or lead. Copper our new heavy metal sensor already works as expected and detects different copper concentrations by difference in fluorescence. The already well working sensors for arsenic and mercury were tested, too. While arsenic needs some optimization to exploit its full potential even if it works in vitro as well as in vivo. Mercury showed that a fully optimized sensor which is adjusted to our in vitro system works desirable and has potential to detect even lower concentrations than in vivo.