Difference between revisions of "Team:SPSingapore/Notebook-Week-12"
Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
+ | <tr class = "tablenotebook"><td><div class = "paper"> | ||
+ | ▪ Aug 9 | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <span class = "brown"> Anaerobic Promoter</span> | ||
+ |    | ||
+ | <font style = "color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:11pt;">☀ Chi Yan ☀</font> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <div class = "divnbcontent"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <table class = "nbtable" style = "margin-left:50px;"> | ||
+ | <tr><td colspan = 2><b> OD600 of 10X dilution </b> </td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td> BL21 clone 1 0.013 </td><td> 1.04x10^8 cells/cm^3 </td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td> BL21 clone 2 0.094 </td><td> 7.52x10^8 cells/cm^3 </td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td> dH5alpha clone 1 0.054 </td><td> 4.32x10^8 cells/cm^3 </td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td> dH5alpha clone 2 1.123 1ug </td><td> 9.84x10^8 cells/cm^3 </td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td> BL21 0.084 </td><td> 6.72x10^8 cells/cm^3 </td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td> dH5alpha 0.046 </td><td> 3.68x10^8 cells/cm^3 </td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td> BL21 + pGFPuv 0.036 </td><td> 2.88x10^8 cells/cm^3 </td></tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <span>(OD600 of 1 = 10^8 cells/cm^3)</span> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <span class = "nbcontent"> | ||
+ | The cultures were diluted 100X and 500X in a volume of 200ul in a 24well plate and grown in the anaerobic chamber at 30degrees and 225rpm for 2, 4, 6, 8 hours | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <span class = "nbcontent"> | ||
+ | Replicating the iGEM Valencia Team - growing cultures under sterile oil (filtered through 0.22um filter) | ||
+ | <br> 0.5mL of stationary culture + 2.5mL LB, with 1mL of sterile oil added above | ||
+ | <br> Grown at 28 degrees, 200rpm for 2 days | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <span class = "nbcontent"> | ||
+ | Results | ||
+ | <br> ▶ GFP signal is expressed in cultures with the anaerobic sensitive promoter grown in anaerobic conditions overnight, but signal was weak. | ||
+ | <br> ▶ After 6 hours in anaerobic growth, the BL21 + pNirB clone 1 had highest GFP signal when observed with the GFP microscope. | ||
+ | <br> ▶ BL21 strain had no signal | ||
+ | <br> ▶ After 24 hours in anaerobic conditions, dH5alpha had highest signal compared to control | ||
+ | <br> ▶ Control - colonies picked directly from plates (aerobic conditions) had no GFP signal | ||
+ | <br> ▶ After 2 days there was no gfp expression | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div style = "border-top: 2px solid turquoise;"></div> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
<!----------------------new day------------------------------> | <!----------------------new day------------------------------> | ||
Revision as of 03:17, 18 September 2015
Research Notebook |
Week 12 (9/8 - 15/8)
|