Matching and Testing
Introduction of purpose
The basic idea of Micro-time system is to separate a long-period timing into small invertase device modules, and through appropriate combination of them, we can obtain a wide range of aimed time length for users to choose. However, for both E. coli and yeast, a successful timer must be based on precise definition and measurement of “time unit” – how long each invertase module exactly represents. Hence, the major consideration of our testing group is to measure the time unit for different invertase modules, and provide a systematic solution with optimized synthetic elements to gain a Micro-timer for any length of time (see Fig-T1).
![Fig-T-1:The mission of testing and optimization group. We design different invertase modules, and fathom into their dynamics, providing valuable information to optimize our timing system.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/1/1c/LDW-1.png/543px-LDW-1.png)
Fig-T-1:The mission of testing and optimization group. We design different invertase modules, and fathom into their dynamics, providing valuable information to optimize our timing system.
System construction
The real-time invertase dynamics testing system contains two different plasmids in E. coli (see Fig-T2). The first one is an invertase generation vector, namely pInv-gen, that produces invertase-EGFP fusion protein through induction. The second one is called pInv-rep, a reporter vector that produce mcherry signal to indicate the inversion successfully happens. The invertase-EGFP on pInv-gen is controlled by an inducible promoter (T7-LacO promoter or Pbad). The target sequence (RTS) of corresponding invertase locates in the pInv-rep, surrounding a mcherry gene which is yet upside-down and transcribed by a constructive promoter (e.g. BBa_J23101). This mcherry-coding sequence can be inverted and restored to 5’ – 3’ direction at the existence of Cre-GFP, rendering red signal. Additionally, an ssra tag that intensifies the protein degradation may be fused to the C-terminus of invertase-EGFP and mcherry to be in tune with our final device that aims to clean up the redundant invertase not participating in a second round inversion.
![Fig-T-2: The construction of our real-time invertase dynamics testing system. A bacteria containing two vectors, one expressing invertase when induced and another as target and reporter.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/3/34/LDW-2.jpeg/800px-LDW-2.jpeg)
Fig-T-2: The construction of our real-time invertase dynamics testing system. A bacteria containing two vectors, one expressing invertase when induced and another as target and reporter.
Once if the inducer is added into the culture, the green fluorescence will increase at first due to the expression of invertase-EGFP. Then, the red fluorescence is generated because the Cre-EGFP restores the reversed mcherry sequence (see Fig-T-3). The length of interval between green and red indicates the corresponding single timing length of the invertase module. In our study, the variants to render different time length are invertase itself, promoter, and the degrading rate by ssra. Specifically, the activity level of invertase directly determines the time need to invert most of pInv-reps, and the promoter decides the rate of generation of invertase, which also contribute sigfificant to the speed of module. The ssra-tag, on the contrary, reduces the speed of inversion while effectively inhibiting the leakage expression when inducer is not in the culture.
![Fig-T-3: A typical pattern of expression of both Cre-EGFP fusions and mcherry in reporter. When inducer is added into the culture, the green signal begin to accumulate, and when its product – restored mcherry CDS – is enough to reach the resolution of plate reader, red signal can be detected. K1, time of 1/2 max increasing rate of mcherry; K2, time of max increasing rate of mcherry; K3, beginning of plateau phase of red signal; K4, beginning of plateau phase of green signal.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/0/0c/LDW-3.jpeg/320px-LDW-3.jpeg)
Fig-T-3: A typical pattern of expression of both Cre-EGFP fusions and mcherry in reporter. When inducer is added into the culture, the green signal begin to accumulate, and when its product – restored mcherry CDS – is enough to reach the resolution of plate reader, red signal can be detected. K1, time of 1/2 max increasing rate of mcherry; K2, time of max increasing rate of mcherry; K3, beginning of plateau phase of red signal; K4, beginning of plateau phase of green signal.
Achievement
We uses this system to measure totally 21 pairs of different combination of pInv-gens and pInv-reps. There are 6 different invertases we have tested using the Real-time system. While Cre and Flp are most commonly used recombinases in Biobrick plates, we newly contributed 4 brand-new invertases: Dre, Vcre, Scre, and Vika, all of which are Cre-family recombinases with different and non-intervolving RTS. We successfully proved that all these invertase work pretty good in our system, which you can see in RESULTS. All of the data we gather are analyzed by modeling group to render its corresponding time length. This work could guide other groups for their final design.
![Fig-T-4: All recombinases (invertases) used in this study. Each invertase has their own recognition sites and will not interfere with one another.](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/3/38/LDW-4.jpeg/562px-LDW-4.jpeg)
Fig-T-4: All recombinases (invertases) used in this study. Each invertase has their own recognition sites and will not interfere with one another.
Prokaryotic Timer
Introduction
A report from Science [1] , by which we were inspired, tries to explain that synthetic gene networks can be constructed to emulate a cellular counter that would enable complex synthetic programming and a variety of biotechnology applications.
One of the figures from this article, with introduction of Single Invertase Memory Module (SIMM), indicates how genes can work in a counting system by flipping of recombinases. Two recombinases in the circuit, Flpe and Cre, in conjunction with their specific targeting sites, FRT and loxP, accomplishes the whole flipping process in a plasmid they call DIC 3-Counter (Fig-P-1A, 1B) . We made a slight improvement on the circuit mentioned above and we call it circuit 1 (Fig-P-1C) , which we construct to verify its feasibility.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c7/LdwPT1.jpeg)
Fig-P-1 Plasmid construction and circuit mechanism. (A) DIC 3-Counter construction mentioned in the Science report. (B) Mechanism of SIMM. (C)Circuit 1 plasmid.
Based on circuit 1, we originally designed what we call circuit 2 (Fig. 2) , which is, to our perspective, more functional and less induced, by principally altering sites.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/6b/LdwPT22.jpeg)
Fig-P-2 Three stages of Circuit 2
A. Stage 0 In this stage, flpe and ECFP express, while no Cre, mCherry and GFP can express without a promoter. Only ECFP signal can be detected.
B. Stage 1 When the concentration of flpe reaches a threshold, sequence between two FRT can be flipped. In this flipping, a pBAD change its position and initiate the expression of Cre and mCherry. In this stage, we can find a decline of ECFP signal and an increase of mCherry signal.
C. Stage 2 Similar to Stage 1, Cre accumulates, reaches a threshold, and finally triggers a second flipping. This flipping reverses the sequence between two loxP. After this flipping, GFP is expressed robustly with the turn-off of flpe and Cre expression.
Circuit 2 continues transcripting and flipping in a circulation once induced. It happens theoretically because it may be bothered by objective resistance, but it provides us with a possibility to time gene reaction and control certain protein expression in a time scale.
Circuit 2 can transfer certain DNA sequences unit after unit. Imagine if there is a target gene between the first FRT and loxP in the initial phase, it would pass continuously unit after unit.
Construction
For circuit 2, we added florescent protein ECFP (BBa_E0422) and mCherry (BBa_J06602) right in the downstream of the ssrA-tag of recombinase gene flpe and cre, respectively, for enhanced sensitivity and robust of the system. And we add a final GFP (BBa_E0840) as a reporter. pSB1C3 was used as vector for cloning and we tried to transfer the entire circuit to pSB3K3 in order to test its viability (Fig-P-3) .
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/89/LdwPT3.jpeg)
Fig-P-3 Circuit 2 plasmid.
Worth of attention, we created a "2A" assembly by using DNA clean up and joining gene segments with different resistances (Fig-P-4) , initially as a result of facing with inaccessiblity through 3A assembly during our experiment.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e9/LdwPT4.jpeg)
Fig-P-4 Process of “2A” assembly.
Testing
Experimental proof must be accomplished after construction and circuits can be tested by the methods below.
1.Measurement of the intensity of fluorescence of ECFP, mCherry and GFP. The result, from which we infer that flipping actually happens, exhibit an expression of each fluorescence with a rise and then a decrease in different time scale (Fig-P-5).
Analyse by Real-time Quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Fig-P-6A). With primers designed, shown in the picture , we can get 3 different kinds of amplification curves, whose tendency presented may almost be the same as the fluorescence intensity.
Digestion (Fig-P-6B, 6C) . When sequences flip, certain restriction endonuclease cutting sites remain constant while what have, in fact, changed, are their locations. Gene length can be altered when sequences flip, which can be visualized in an electrophoretic way.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/52/LdwPT5.jpeg)
Fig-P-5 Simulation of the result we planned to test on the intensity of fluorescences.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/84/LdwPT6.jpeg)
Fig-P-6 Testing by qPCR and digestion. (A) Ideograph for theoretical model of qPCR testing. Parallel primers were designed at the initial phase and PCR product would produce after flipping. (B) Ideograph for theoretical model of digestion testing. (C) Simulated agarose gel for digestion in EcoRV of different stages of circuit 2.
Yeast Timer
(Our project, micro-timer, is to construct a counter on DNA that can imprint time on microbes.)
Micro timer 2.0 (Eu-timer) is constructed by DNA-based counting motifs that are inserted into different sites of chromosomes, creating a relatively large-scale system with more motifs than that in Micro timer 1.0.
The Eu-timer uses recombinases from Ser family such as Bxb1, which typically catalyzes site-specific recombination between an attachment site on the infecting phage chromosome (attP) and an attachment site in the host chromosome (attB) in natural system. The resulting integration reaction inserts the phage genome into the host chromosome bracketed by newly formed attL and attR (LR) sites. When attB and attP are engineered to be opposite BP sites, the integrase alone catalyzes the inversion of sequences flanked by BP sites, changing BP sites into LR sites, and will not revert the DNA flanked by LR sites.
In the design of Eu-timer (Fig 1) , each inverted promoter flanked by BP sites is downstream of an inverted reporter gene and followed by a ser integrase gene. The reporter i(inverted reporter gene)-attP-promoter i-attB-integrase unit is defined as a counting motif, named eu-timer integrase motif (EIM).
The circuit can be programmed to record time by counting a specific type of events like the expression of cyclins. Once the motifs are activated, the downstream expression can work automatically and will not be terminated or reset by the hosts themselves, which is the reason why we believe that such a system can imprint “the same time” on microbes derived from a single clone.
We then designed an telomere-like device by making little changes upon Micro timer 1.0, named Micro timer 1.1 (Fig 2) , in which the flanking site are of same direction. With every cell division, this device will sequentially truncate a part of the sequence, and finally lead to cell death, working like telomere.
Sponsor
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/8/81/Sui_genstar.png/320px-Sui_genstar.png)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/6/68/Sui_oribio.png/320px-Sui_oribio.png)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d6/IGEM_official_logo.png)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0c/Sui_logo_a1.png)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/1/1e/Sui_logo_3.png/245px-Sui_logo_3.png)
Address: No. 135, Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510275, P. R. China
Contact: nichy5@mail2.sysu.edu.cn