Difference between revisions of "Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Design"
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
<div class="col-md-4"> | <div class="col-md-4"> | ||
| − | <p> Therefore we bought a <a href=" http://www.leefilters.com/lighting/colour-details.html#071" | + | <p> Therefore we bought a <a href="http://www.leefilters.com/lighting/colour-details.html#071">lee color filter</a></li> catalog, so we can test various filter combinations in the next step. A preselection of the filters was possible, because we had access to the light transmitting spectra of almost every filter. Apart we designed a handcraft black carton for taking photos under defined conditions and a constant dark background. </p> |
| Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
| − | <p> We showed that fluorescence imaging of liquids in quite high amounts is possible with our approach. But does it also work with small volumes and on paper? To assess this we took normal laboratory filter papers. (MN 827 B from Macherey and Nagel, C 350 L and FN3 from Munktell and a laboratory filter paper from Merck), put the lysates on the paper and took photos with our filter systems. Exemplary the results of the laboratory filter paper from Merck are shown in the figure below. The other filter papers showed the same results. | + | <p> We showed that fluorescence imaging of liquids in quite high amounts is possible with our approach. But does it also work with small volumes and on paper? To assess this we took normal laboratory filter papers. (MN 827 B from Macherey and Nagel, C 350 L and FN3 from Munktell and a laboratory filter paper from Merck), put 5 µL of the lysates on the paper and took photos with our filter systems. Exemplary the results of the laboratory filter paper from Merck are shown in the figure below. The other filter papers showed the same results. In the first row dilution series of purified GFP were added to the paper discs. In the second row sfGFP lysate were added, in the third row mRFP lysate was used and in the last row lysat without sfGFP and mRFP were added to the paper discs. The top photo was taken without any filter. As you can see, there is no fluorescence visible. The picture in the middle was taken with the filter combination for sfGFP. In this picture you can see two glowing paper discs in the first and in the second row. So fluorescence detection of 5 µL GFP on paper works up to a concentration of 17,5 mmol/L.In the bottom picture the mRFP filters were used. Three paper discs of the third row are red. So it's possible to detect the mRFP lysate up to a 1:10 dilution. </p> |
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
<figure style="margin:auto; width: 350px"> | <figure style="margin:auto; width: 350px"> | ||
| − | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_test_on_paper.png" data-lightbox="detection" data-title="We added 5 µL of lysate to the paper disc and photographed it with the different filter combinations. In the first row | + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_test_on_paper.png" data-lightbox="detection" data-title="We added 5 µL of lysate to the paper disc and photographed it with the different filter combinations. In the first row dilution series of purified GFP were added to the paper discs. In the second row sfGFP lysate were added, in the third row mRFP lysate was used and in the last row lysat without sfGFP and mRFP were added to the paper discs. The top photo was taken without any filter. As you can see, there is no fluorescence visible. The picture in the middle was taken with the filter combination for sfGFP. In this picture you can see two glowing paper discs in the first and in the second row. In the bottom picture the mRFP filters were used. Three paper discs of the third row are red. So it's possible to detect the mRFP lysate up to a 1:10 dilution."><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_test_on_paper.png" ></a> |
| − | <figcaption> We added 5 µL of lysate to the paper disc and photographed it with the different filter combinations. In the first row | + | <figcaption> We added 5 µL of lysate to the paper disc and photographed it with the different filter combinations. In the first row dilution series of purified GFP were added to the paper discs. In the second row sfGFP lysate were added, in the third row mRFP lysate was used and in the last row lysat without sfGFP and mRFP were added to the paper discs. The top photo was taken without any filter. As you can see, there is no fluorescence visible. The picture in the middle was taken with the filter combination for sfGFP. In this picture you can see two glowing paper discs in the first and in the second row. In the bottom picture the mRFP filters were used. Three paper discs of the third row are red. So it's possible to detect the mRFP lysate up to a 1:10 dilution. |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p> Now we wanted to find out if it is possible to photograph the fluorescence from a | <p> Now we wanted to find out if it is possible to photograph the fluorescence from a | ||
| − | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/CFPS#paperCFPS">Cell-free Protein Synthesis (CFPS) on Paper</a> . After a CFPS run on paper, we took the paper discs and took the photo shown below. </p> | + | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/CFPS#paperCFPS">Cell-free Protein Synthesis (CFPS) on Paper</a> . After a CFPS run on paper, we took the paper discs and took the photo shown below. We took the paper discs of paper from the experiment on paper, took a photo and it worked, hence we can take a photo of the sfGFP generated in a CFPS experiment. In the first row you can see purified GFP, a dilution of the GFP and sfGFP lysat. We used this row for comparison. In the second row is the negativ control. We need the negativ control to visualize the |
| + | self-fluorescence of the cell extract. In the third row are the paper discs where our self made extract were added for the CFPS. In the last row you can see the paper disc with the commercial cell extract for CFPS. So it's possible to take an image of sfGFP produced during a CFPS reaction with an smartphone. Hence it's possible to take this as a device to analyze our <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/it-really-works">paper based biosensor</a>.</p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 03:12, 19 September 2015
Output Signal processing
A Prototype for easy fluorescence detection
The problem
The aim of our project was to design a convenient test strip using fluorescence as an output signal. The green fluorescent protein (GFP) is one of the most frequently used reporter proteins and it has already been used in numerous iGEM projects, e.g. iGEM Aachen 2014. Instruments for fluorescence-measurement are not readily available outside of the lab. So our aim was to develop an easy and cheap method for analyzing a fluorescence output. Therefore we developed an easy and cheap method for analyzing a fluorescence output. Therefore we developed a smartphone app in combination with two light filters. One filter is used to ensure the correct extinction of GFP by putting it in front of the flash, while the other filter passes only the evaluable emission spectrum of GFP for minimizing the background noise. Thereby it is put in front of the camera of the smartphone.
The first steps
When startiing with our project, we wanted to verify if fluorescence of sfGFP can be measured by a smartphone. So in the first step we measured the extinction and emission spectra from sfGFP to test if the smartphone flash can excites sfGFP. Although the characteristic curve of the flash of the smartphone s5 mini, do not covers the hole sfGFP exciting curve, it is possible to extinct sfGFP with the flash. Because the maximum turning point is covered from the characteristic curve
Next we tested some filters from the light engineering of the women cultural center Bielefeld e.V. ("Frauenkulturzentrum Bielefeld e.V."). We tested various filters in front of either the camera or the camera or the flashlight by taking picture of purified GFP, sfGFP lysate and lysate without sfGFP (for generating the lysates see here). Different hues and different levels of brightness can be identified in the picture below. With this first impression, we decided to test different filters. The goal was to find one filter or filtercombination which was perfectly suited for sfGFP imaging, cutting out as much of the background signal as possible.
Therefore we bought a lee color filter catalog, so we can test various filter combinations in the next step. A preselection of the filters was possible, because we had access to the light transmitting spectra of almost every filter. Apart we designed a handcraft black carton for taking photos under defined conditions and a constant dark background.
The filter combinations
The essential requirements for taking comparable photos are achieved. Now we had to find the ideal filter combination. We made a lot of photos with the preselected Filters. We tested every combination of 5 filters for emission with 12 filters for extinction. A lot of pictures had a lot of background or the you can't see any fluorescence, therefore it was important to test different filter combinations to find the right for sfGFP imaging via smartphone with less background as possible. All together we tested 60 combination to find the optimal filter combination. Afterwards we had to identify the perfect filter combination. Hence we analyzed the pictures with the imaging procesing software Fiji. We measured all fluorescence of every reaction tube in every picture we took. After analyzing the photos with the image processing software Fiji, the optimal filter combination was found Tokyo blue (071) in front of the flash and twickenham green (736) in front of the camera provided the best result for sfGFP.
In the picture below you can see the test of different filter combinations to image sfGFP. On the top the picture was taken without any filters. In the middle the picture was taken with fluorescence green (219) in front of the camera and deep blue (120) in front of the flash. The bottom photo was taken with the optimal filter combinition of tokyo blue (71) in front of the flash and twickenham green (736) in front of the camera.
As you can see in the pictures above it is really important to choose the right filters to get a high fluorescence signal and a low background signal. But is it only possible to photograph sfGFP and GFP? To find out, we took photos of the monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP) lysate as well. We tested the combination of 4 different filter for extinction with 8 filters for emission. All in all we tested 32 filter combinations to find the optimal filter combination. After this we analyzed again the fluorescence of the different reaction tube of the pictures with the image processing software Fiji. The best filter combination for imaging mRFP with a smartphone are Twickenham green (736) in front of the flash and light red (182) in front of the camera.
In the picture you can see the test of different filtercombinations to photograph mRFP. On the top the picture is taken without any filters. The picture in the middle was taken with light red in front of the camera and dark yellow green in front of the flash. The bottom photo was taken with the optimal filter combinition twickenham green in front of the flash and light red in front of the camera.
Does fluorescence photography work on paper?
We showed that fluorescence imaging of liquids in quite high amounts is possible with our approach. But does it also work with small volumes and on paper? To assess this we took normal laboratory filter papers. (MN 827 B from Macherey and Nagel, C 350 L and FN3 from Munktell and a laboratory filter paper from Merck), put 5 µL of the lysates on the paper and took photos with our filter systems. Exemplary the results of the laboratory filter paper from Merck are shown in the figure below. The other filter papers showed the same results. In the first row dilution series of purified GFP were added to the paper discs. In the second row sfGFP lysate were added, in the third row mRFP lysate was used and in the last row lysat without sfGFP and mRFP were added to the paper discs. The top photo was taken without any filter. As you can see, there is no fluorescence visible. The picture in the middle was taken with the filter combination for sfGFP. In this picture you can see two glowing paper discs in the first and in the second row. So fluorescence detection of 5 µL GFP on paper works up to a concentration of 17,5 mmol/L.In the bottom picture the mRFP filters were used. Three paper discs of the third row are red. So it's possible to detect the mRFP lysate up to a 1:10 dilution.
Now we wanted to find out if it is possible to photograph the fluorescence from a Cell-free Protein Synthesis (CFPS) on Paper . After a CFPS run on paper, we took the paper discs and took the photo shown below. We took the paper discs of paper from the experiment on paper, took a photo and it worked, hence we can take a photo of the sfGFP generated in a CFPS experiment. In the first row you can see purified GFP, a dilution of the GFP and sfGFP lysat. We used this row for comparison. In the second row is the negativ control. We need the negativ control to visualize the self-fluorescence of the cell extract. In the third row are the paper discs where our self made extract were added for the CFPS. In the last row you can see the paper disc with the commercial cell extract for CFPS. So it's possible to take an image of sfGFP produced during a CFPS reaction with an smartphone. Hence it's possible to take this as a device to analyze our paper based biosensor.
The App
Now it's possible to photograph fluorescence, but sometimes it's difficult to see the differences between the divers paper discs. Additionally analyzing the pictures with the image processing software Fiji requires know-how of the user. For both the program and the interpretation. We solved this problem with a smartphone app. We coded the app with Android Studio 1.2.2 and can be installed on smartphones on Android 4.2 (Jelly bean) and later. The app determines the median of the greenvalue of a area of pixels in the sensorspot and compares it to the pixels of the negative control (the not induced sensor). If the ratio of a sample and the negative control is above a certain theshold (10%), a valid biosensor signal is detected. Additionally it is checked, if the value for the positive control (drop of sfGFP) is above a certain value, confirming the functionality of the biosensor. Furthermore the app displays specific information regarding the different heavymetals and date rape drugs to inform the user. You can download it by clicking on the button below. You need to unzip the file on your phone, since .apk files can not be uploaded. Alternatively download it here and delete the fileextension ".txt".
The 3D print
We showed that, the fluorescence detection works fine, but it's not very practical to take the photo. The filters have to be in the exact right position directly in front of the camera and the flash. It also has to be quite dark for high quality pictures. Therefore we designed a black case and realized it with a 3D printer. Marco Radukic designed the case in exact accordance with our guidline. The top smartphone inlay can be specifically changed for different smartphone types. The test stripe can be placed on the push loading drawer and inserted into the box. Thus it is quite easy to use. The smartphone is put on the top inlay, the test strip is inserted and the taken photo provides information about the contamination. To download the model for the 3D printing click here.
