Difference between revisions of "Demo Judging Expectations 2016"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<h1>Judging Expectations</h1> | <h1>Judging Expectations</h1> | ||
| − | <p>Understanding and fairly evaluating the various aspects of the projects that iGEM teams carry out can be difficult for both novice and experienced judges. We therefore provide judges with a Judging Handbook to provide some guidance on how to navigate this process. For 2016, we will also provide a wide range of example projects from previous years that judges are welcome to look through before and during the main competition months. Our goal is to provide this content by January 2016, so please check back for updates!</p> | + | <p>Understanding and fairly evaluating the various aspects of the projects that iGEM teams carry out can be difficult for both novice and experienced judges. We therefore provide judges with a Judging Handbook to provide some guidance on how to navigate this process. For 2016, we will also provide a wide range of example projects from previous years that judges are welcome to look through before and during the main competition months. Our goal is to provide this content by January 2016, so please check back for updates! |
| + | |||
| + | <br><br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | We recommend that judges look at previous years' results to get a sense of the types of projects iGEM teams work on. Judges can easily look at <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Results">2015 Results</a> as well as the results from <a href="https://igem.org/Results?year=2014®ion=All&division=igem">2008 to 2014</a> online.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | |||
<div class="twoColumns"> | <div class="twoColumns"> | ||
<h2>Examples from 2015 iGEM</h2> | <h2>Examples from 2015 iGEM</h2> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>Below are a handful of teams from the 2015 iGEM season.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 15:12, 30 October 2015
Loading ...
Judging Expectations
Understanding and fairly evaluating the various aspects of the projects that iGEM teams carry out can be difficult for both novice and experienced judges. We therefore provide judges with a Judging Handbook to provide some guidance on how to navigate this process. For 2016, we will also provide a wide range of example projects from previous years that judges are welcome to look through before and during the main competition months. Our goal is to provide this content by January 2016, so please check back for updates!
We recommend that judges look at previous years' results to get a sense of the types of projects iGEM teams work on. Judges can easily look at 2015 Results as well as the results from 2008 to 2014 online.
Examples from 2015 iGEM
Below are a handful of teams from the 2015 iGEM season.
Examples from 2014 iGEM
test
Georgia State
text
BABS UNSW Australia
Text
2014 team 1
Text.
2014 team 2
Text
Cork Ireland
Text.
Tec Monterrey
Text
2014 team 3
Text.
2014 team 4
Text