Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong-CUHK/Description"
S1155046866 (Talk | contribs) |
S1155046866 (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Hong_Kong-CUHK}} | {{Hong_Kong-CUHK}} | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
− | <h2 | + | <h2><u>ABCDE(<i>AzotoBacter vinelandii</i> in Carbon Dioxide to methane Energy) </h2></u> |
− | <h5>Objective</h5> | + | <h5><u>Objective</h5></u> |
− | <p>This project utilize modified nitrogenase in Azotobacter vinelandii to convert carbon dioxide( | + | <p>This project utilize modified nitrogenase in Azotobacter vinelandii to convert carbon dioxide(CO2) to methane(CH4).</p> |
− | <h5>Significance</h5> | + | <h5>Background and Significance</h5> |
− | <p> | + | <p>With the exploitation of carbon based fossil fuels, we sought for an alternative solution to combat the global energy crisis by utilizing a gas pollutant – CO2 through carbon fixation. To maintain current living standard, alternative energy sources are unprecedentedly demanding. We are now engineering a bacteria <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> to econvert CO2 into CH4 inside the bacteria Azotobacter vinelandii. <i>A.vinelandii</i> is a facultative areobe with an intracellular anaerobic environment which is essential for the reduction reactions.</p> |
<p>As we all know, hydrogen is another popular choice as an alternative energy, because it is considered as a ‘clean fuel’, since it does not produce greenhouse gases during combustion. However, since our product have the ability to convert the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide into methane, it eliminates the original disadvantage of using methane as a fuel. With the use of our product, methane can be considered as a better fuel than hydrogen gas because hydrogen gas has a much lower boiling point than methane, hence it would require more energy to liquefy hydrogen for storage. In other words, the storage of hydrogen would be more difficult and more expensive. Additionally, the car engines we are using nowadays were originally designed for the use of hydrocarbon fuels. If we want to use hydrogen to power our vehicles, changes of car engines would need to be made. Whereas methane could be readily used since it is a hydrocarbon.</p> | <p>As we all know, hydrogen is another popular choice as an alternative energy, because it is considered as a ‘clean fuel’, since it does not produce greenhouse gases during combustion. However, since our product have the ability to convert the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide into methane, it eliminates the original disadvantage of using methane as a fuel. With the use of our product, methane can be considered as a better fuel than hydrogen gas because hydrogen gas has a much lower boiling point than methane, hence it would require more energy to liquefy hydrogen for storage. In other words, the storage of hydrogen would be more difficult and more expensive. Additionally, the car engines we are using nowadays were originally designed for the use of hydrocarbon fuels. If we want to use hydrogen to power our vehicles, changes of car engines would need to be made. Whereas methane could be readily used since it is a hydrocarbon.</p> | ||
− | |||
<h5>Goal</h5> | <h5>Goal</h5> |
Revision as of 18:07, 14 July 2015