Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/HeavyMetals

iGEM Bielefeld 2015


Heavy metals Date rape drugs CFPS PRIA Miscellaneous

Heavy Metals



  • We transformed BioBricks from the distribution:
    • BBa_J33201 (arsR)
    • BBa_K516030 (mRFP1 with RBS and terminator)
    • Colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
    • Plasmids were isolated using a miniprep kit.
  • ArsR (BBa_J33201) and RFP (BBa_K516030) were combined using 3A assembly:
    • Restriction digest of arsR, RFP and pSB1K3.m1
    • PCR Clean-up
    • Ligation: 2 µL per fragment, 30 min
    • Transformation by electroporation and heat shock (for comparison)
    • No colonies, therefore the ligation was repeated with significantly more DNA. Incubation overnight.
    • Electroporation resulted in colonies, which were screened with a colony PCR.
    • A product length of 1705 bp was expected. The gel shows that most plasmids seem to be correct.
    • This result was confirmed by sequencing.
  • Insertion of a second repressor binding site into BBa_J33201
    • Two primer pairs (Cm_fwd, Ars_1_rev, Ars_2_fwd, Cm_rev) were used to amplify the plasmid and introduce a second repressor binding site after arsR
    • A PCR with Phusion Polymerase failed. A gradient PCR did not show any improvement.
    • A comparison of Phusion and Q5 showed that Q5 works very well.
    • However, an upscalling of the reaction to produce more product did not work.
    • Therefore, two 20 µL reactions were used per fragment. This PCR worked well and the products were extracted from the gel.
    • We performed a Gibson assembly reaction with the two fragments and transformed the mix via heat shock.
    • A colony PCR was performed with five colonies, but only one reaction yielded product.
    • Five colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
    • Plasmids were isolated from the cultures and a restriction digest was performed to check them.
    • The bands were as expected for all colonies.
    • One plasmid was handed in for sequencing, which confirmed its correctness.
  • 3A assembly of the modified arsR and RFP (BBa_K516030)
    • Restriction digest of the modified arsR with EcoRI-HF and SpeI-HF
    • Heat inactivation: 20 min at 80 °C
    • Ligation with RFP and pSB1K3 (from week 3)
    • Electroporation with 2 µL ligation mix
    • Only one colony grew on the plates, which according to a colony PCR was not correct.
    • 5 and 20 µL of the ligation mix were transformed again into chemocompetent cells.
    • This time there were plenty of colonies. 10 were screened with a colony PCR and most appeared to be correct.
  • First test with arsenic sensor
    • 5 ml cultures (LB + kan) were prepared from glycerol stocks of E. coli harboring pSB1K3-arsR-RFP and pSB1K3-arsR-arsO-RFP and cultured at 37 °C.
    • After 16 h, cultures were diluted 1:100 with fresh LB + kan.
    • After 1 h at 37 °C, arsenic at 1000 µg/L was added.
    • After 24 h at 37 °C, the cultures were centrifuged (5 min, 5000xg).
    • The cell pellets were clearly red, indicating that the arsenic sensors are functional.
    • Cell pellets
  • Arsenic sensor test in 96 well plate
    • Dilutions of a 50 mM sodium arsenite solution were prepared
    • As for the first test, 5 mL cultures of the two strains were inoculated from glycerol stocks.
    • After 18 h, the cultures were diluted to reach an OD600 of 0.4.
    • After 30 min at 37 °C, 100 µL culture and 100 µL sodium arsenite solution were combined in a black 96 well plate.
    • The final arsenic concentrations ranged from 0 to 1000 µg/L.
    • Every combination of strain and concentration was measured in triplicate.
    • The plate was incubated at 37 °C for 4 h.
    • RFP fluorescence was measured in a plate reader.
    • No increase of fluorescence with the arsenic concentration was observable.
    • Measuring different dilutions of an RFP culture supernatant showed that the linear range was very small. Therefore, this instrument does not seem to be suitable for RFP measurements.
  • Optimization of arsenic sensor for CFPS
    • We decided to modify the arsenic sensor so that it is likely to work better in the CFPS.
    • The devices we decided to clone are:
      • An sfGFP under the control of the T7 promoter and the arsenic operator including the UTR which, as we showed, improves the sfGFP expression in the CFPS.
      • An sfGFP with the UTR behind arsR and its natural promoter.
      • A his-tagged arsR for purification and controlled addition to the CFPS reaction.
    • In the first step, the T7 promoter needed to be inserterd in front of arsR. Therefore, BBa_I719005 (T7 promoter) from the distribution was transformed by heat shock.
    • A colony PCR showed bands which matched the expected length.
    • Overnight cultures were inoculated with the colonies and plasmids were isolated.
    • Restriction digest:
      • pSB1A2-pT7 with EcoRI-HF and SpeI
      • pSB1K3-arsR-RFP with XbaI and PstI
      • pSB1C3 (linearized) with EcoRI-HF, PstI and DpnI (+ FastAP)
    • Ligation of the tree fragments and heat shock transformation resulted in small colonies, which were not correct according to a Colony PCR.
  • Optimization of arsenic sensor for CFPS
    • The ligation of T7 promoter, arsR and pSB1C3 was repeated, and this time there were several colonies which showed the expected band after a colony PCR.
    • Several PCRs were performed to create fragments for Gibson Assembly:
      1. Ars_3_fwd and Cm_rev on BBa_J33201
      2. Cm_fwd and Ars_3_rev on BBa_J33201
      3. Cm_fwd and UTR_noT7_rev on BBa_I746909
      4. UTR_fwd and Cm_rev on BBa_I746909
    • All reactions worked very well and the products were extracted from the gel.
    • The products from PCR 1+2 and 3+4 were combined by Gibson Assembly.
    • Following heat shock transformation, plenty of colonies grew on the plates.
    • Some were checked by Colony PCR and all seemed to be correct.
    • 3 overnight cultures per construct were inoculated and plasmids were isolated.
    • The isolated plasmids were used for further cloning steps:
    • A restriction digest was performed with the isolated pSB1C3-UTR-sfGFP (XbaI and PstI) and pSB1K3 (EcoRI-HF, PstI, DpnI, FastAP)
    • Ligation:
      • arsR-arsO2 + RFP + pSB1K3
      • arsR + UTR-sfGFP + pSB1K3
    • PCR:
    • The products were extracted from the gel and combined via Gibson Assembly.
    • The Gibson Assembly and ligation mixes were transformed via heat shock.
  • Optimization of arsenic sensor for CFPS
    • The colonies which had grown after Gibson assembly and transformation were checked with a colony PCR. The bands were as expected.
    • Overnight cultures were inoculted and the plasmids were isolated and handed in for sequencing.
    • The sequencing results for arsR-UTR-sfGFP were slighly unclear at one position, but likely the device is correct.
    • All other devices were clearly correct.
  • Cloning of a his-tagged arsenic repressor
    • To get an arsenic repressor which can be purified and added to the CFPS, a his-tagged version under the control of the T7 promoter was cloned.
    • The first step were the following PCRs:
    • The products were extracted from the gel.
    • Gibson Assembly and heat shock transformation were performed.
    • A colony PCR indicated that the cloning was successful, which was confirmed by sequencing.
  • Expression of arsenic repressor
    • An overnight culture was inoculated from the glycerol stock which had been prepared the previous week.
    • Two 200 mL cultures in 1 L shaking flasks were inoculated to an OD600 of 0.1. and cultivated at 37 °C and 180 rpm.
    • At an OD of 0.6, expression of the T7 polymerase was induced by adding rhamnose to a final concentration of 0.1 %.
    • The cultures were grown overnight at 18 °C and 130 rpm.
    • After 24 h, the bacteria were harvested by centrifugation (10 min, 5500xg).
    • The cells were lysed by sonification.
    • Purifiaction was carried out with the Macherey-Nagel Protino Ni-TED 1000 Packed Columns kit.
    • An SDS-PAGE was done to analyze the purification.
  • Measurement of the arsenic sensors´ background signal
    • To reduce the background signal of the arsenic sensor, a second operator site had been introduced downstream of arsR. Due to different information concerning the exact position of the operator, two versions had been prepared.
    • To find out if this had an effect, the following devices were tested:
      • pSB1C3-arsR
      • pSB1K3-arsR-RFP
      • pSB1K3-arsR-arsO1-RFP (first version of the second operator)
      • pSB1K3-arsR-arsO2-RFP (second version of the second operator)
    • Single colonies were obtained from the glycerol stocks by plating.
    • Five cultures per device were inoculated with single colonies.
    • After 15 h, the RFP fluorescence and the OD600 were measured with a Tecan Infinite M200.
    • The RFU was normalized by diving it by the OD and subtracting the singal of plain LB medium.
    • The results showed that the modifications had not reduced the background signal. Instead, it was even higher than that of the unmodified device.
    • Background fluorescence of arsenic devices
  • Optimization of arsenic repressor for CFPS
    • The UTR was inserted between the T7 promoter and arsR-his for expression in a CFPS reaction.
    • A PCR was performed with BBa_K1758301 as template and the following primer combinations:
    • The PCR did not work with Q5 and Phusion in HF buffer. However, it worked with Phusion in GC Buffer.
    • The fragments were extracted from the gel, combined by Gibson Assembly and transformed via heat shock.
  • Characterization of arsenic sensor in vivo
    • Glycerol stocks of pSB1C3-arsR and pSB1K3-arsR-RFP were streaked on plates in order to obtain single colonies.
    • Three overnight cultures per construct were inoculated with single colonies.
    • On the following day, 50 mL culutes in LB with the correct antibiotic were inoculated to an OD600 of 0.1.
    • When the cultures had reached an OD of 0.6-0.7, arsenic solutions were added to the arsR-RFP cultures to final concentrations of 0 µg/L, 10 µg/L, 50 µg/L, 100 µg/L, 500 µg/L and 1000 µg/L.
    • Every 1.5-2 h, the OD600 and the RFP fluorescence was measured in a Tecan Reader.