Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/HeavyMetals

iGEM Bielefeld 2015


Heavy Metals

We detect several heavy metals with a single test strip.

Occurrence

Arsenic is found in nature in both organic and inorganic forms, typically as arsenite (AsIII) or arsenate (AsV). The average arsenic concentration in sea water is about 1-2 µg/L (Kaur et al. 2015). Inorganic arsenic is naturally present at high levels in the groundwater of a number of countries, including Argentina, Bangladesh, China, India, Mexico, and the USA (World Health Organization 2012). Arsenic contamination is most dramatic in Bangladesh, where over one million people suffer from arsenic poisoning. Strong local and seasonal fluctuations in arsenic concentrations make it necessary to test each well regularly (van der Meer 2003).

Health effects

Inorganic arsenic compounds are highly toxic. Acute effects of arsenic intake can range from gastrointestinal distress to death. Chronic exposure can result in skin lesions, vascular diseases and cancer. These chronic effects are referred to as arsenicosis, and there is no effective therapy for them. Due to its toxicity and frequency, arsenic ranks first on the Priority List of Hazardous Substances prepared by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). The World Health Organization recommends a limit of 10 µg/L in drinking water, but some countries have adopted a national standard of 50 µg/L (World Health Organization 2012; Chen, Rosen 2014).

Detection

Arsenic can be accurately detected by means of techniques such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), atomic fluorescence spectrometry or high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). However, they are expensive and not suitable for field testing (Chen, Rosen 2014). Chemical test kits are available, which mostly rely on the Gutzeit method. This method is based on the generation of arsine gas from a sample solution. Arsine then reacts with a mercuric bromide impregnated test strip, which results in a color change (Kearns 2010). The accuracy and reliability of this method has been called into question (Rahman et al. 2002). The need for an inexpensive and realible detecion method has led to the development of various arsenic biosensors. Among them are both whole-cell-based and cell-free biosensors. For a recent review, refer to Kaur et al. 2015.

Our arsenic biosensor

We choose to work with the chromosomal arsenic operon of E. coli, which was used by the team from Edinburgh in 2006. This operon encodes an efflux pump which confers resistance against arsenic. The expression is controlled by the repressor ArsR, which negatively autoregulates its own expression. AsIII can bind to three cysteine residues in ArsR. The resulting conformational change deactivates the repressor (Chen, Rosen 2014).

References

Chen, Jian; Rosen, Barry P. (2014): Biosensors for inorganic and organic arsenicals. In Biosensors 4 (4), pp. 494–512. DOI: 10.3390/bios4040494.

Kaur, Hardeep; Kumar, Rabindra; Babu, J. Nagendra; Mittal, Sunil (2015): Advances in arsenic biosensor development--a comprehensive review. In Biosensors & bioelectronics 63, pp. 533–545. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.08.003.

Kearns, James Kalman (2010): Field Portable Methods for the Determination of Arsenic in Environmental Samples. Dissertation.

Rahman, Mohammad Mahmudur; Mukherjee, Debapriyo; Sengupta, Mrinal Kumar; Chowdhury, Uttam Kumar; Lodh, Dilip; Chanda, Chitta Ranjan et al. (2002): Effectiveness and Reliability of Arsenic Field Testing Kits: Are the Million Dollar Screening Projects Effective or Not? In Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (24), pp. 5385–5394. DOI: 10.1021/es020591o.

van der Meer, Jan Roelof (2003): EAWAG news 56e: Bacterial Biosensors to Measure Arsenic in Potable Water.

World Health Organization (2012): Arsenic fact sheet. Available online at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs372/en/, checked on 8/12/2015.

Occurrence

Chromium is an essential part of the earth´s crust.It is the sixth most abundant one and used inmetallurgical, chemical and refractory form. The three most important oxidative forms of chromium are the elemental metal (Cr), the trivalent (CrIII) and the hexavalent(CrVI) (Mitchell D. Cohen et al.).

Health effects

While the trivalent form is an essential dietary mineral and themost common natural form, we are interested in the hexavalent form because of its potential toxicity and carcinogenetic effects. Most of it is produced trough industrial uses(Paustenbach et al. 2003). Chromium intoxication can result in damage to the nervous system, fatigue and mental instability (Singh et al. 2011). It´s potential cancerogenity results out of chromium VI being able to enter the cells while it is not possible for chromium III compounds. Chromium VI in the cells is reduced to chromium III and can´t leave the cells anymore (Mitchell D. Cohen et al.). Because of its toxicity the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a limit of 50 µg/l chromium in drinking water. In contrast to this guideline concentrations as high as 120µg/l chromium were detected in drinking water (Guidelines for drinking-water quality 2011) .

Detection

Chromium in drinking water is detected trough atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) or Ion chromatography with post column derivatization and UV visible spectroscopic detection (U.S. EPA, OW, OGWDW, SRMD, Technical Support Center). Moreover chromium detection at home can be detected by a basic titrimetric method using a iodide reaction for measurement (GIORGIA).

Our chromium biosensor

We work with the chromate inducible operon of Ochrobactrumtritici5bvl1which enables a resistance for chromium VI and superoxide which was introduced to iGEM by BIT 2013 team. The parts which are of interest to us are the Chromium dependent Repressor ChrB and its associated Promoter (Branco et al. 2008) The output of our sensor system works through fluorescence.

Publication bibliography

Blaha, Didier; Arous, Safia; Blériot, Camille; Dorel, Corinne; Mandrand-Berthelot, Marie-Andrée; Rodrigue, Agnès (2011): The Escherichia coli metallo-regulator RcnR represses rcnA and rcnR transcription through binding on a shared operator site: Insights into regulatory specificity towards nickel and cobalt. In Biochimie 93 (3), pp. 434–439. DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.10.016. cavillona (2005): Nickel in Drinking-water, checked on 9/9/2015. EPA, U. S.; OAR; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (2013): Nickle Compounds | Technology Transfer Network Air Toxics Web site | US EPA. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/airtoxics/hlthef/nickel.html, updated on 10/18/2013, checked on 9/10/2015. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, Fourth Edition, checked on 9/9/2015. Iwig, Jeffrey S.; Rowe, Jessica L.; Chivers, Peter T. (2006): Nickel homeostasis in Escherichia coli - the rcnR-rcnA efflux pathway and its linkage to NikR function. In Molecular microbiology 62 (1), pp. 252–262. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05369.x. kreusche: Trinkwasser-Installation 27.6.07 Endfassung.qxd, checked on 9/10/2015. US: Technical Factsheet on: Nickel, checked on 9/9/2015.

Menu 2

Some content in menu 2.

Menu 1

Some content in menu 1.

Occurrence

The amount of natural occurring nickel is quite low even if it is anelement of the earth’s crust. Therefore small amounts of it are found in food water soil and air. Nickel-concentration in drinking water is normally less than 0.02 mg/l, although troughreleases from taps and fittings the nickel may contribute to concentrations up to 1 mg/l. There may be higher concentrations in drinking-water in special cases of release from natural or industrial nickel deposits in theground and therefore a higher guideline value of 0.07 mg/l (70 μg/l)(Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, Fourth Edition)

Health effects

Evan if nickel is essential for mammals and part of human nutrition it may cause dermatitis as well as itching of fingers, hands and forearms in some people who had long term skin contact. The main source of nickel exposure is food or water but most people have contact to nickel trough everyday products as jewelry or stainless steel dishware or trough smoking tobacco(US; EPA et al. 2013).In Germany most drinking water pollutions by nickel happen in the last meters of the plumbing system. Wrong tapware is the main source of nickel contamination in drinking water (kreusche)

Detection

The two most commonly used analytical methods for nickel in water are atomicabsorption spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma atomic emissionspectrometry. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emissionspectroscopy is used for the determination of nickel etection limit ofabout 10 μg/litre (ISO, 1996). Flame atomic absorption spectrometry is suitable in the range of 0.5–100 μg/litre (ISO, 1986). A limit of detection of 0.1 μg/ can be achieved using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Alternatively, electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry can beused. (cavillona 2005)