The different sensors we worked with were characterized in vivo as well as in vitro.
We tested the influence of each heavy metal on our sensors in vivo Therefore we used heavy metal concentrations based on heavy metal occurrences measured all over the world.
Influence of heavy metals on the growth of E.coli KRX shown is the standard deviation of three biological replicates. For induction concentrations of
20 µg/L lead, 60 µg/L mercury, 60 µg/L chromium, 80 µg/L nickel, 40 mg/L copper which represent ten times of the WHO guideline were used.
The tested heavy metal concentrations had no negative effect on E. colis growth. Moreover there is no significant difference between the curves with heavy metals and the controls. This first experiment showed us, in vivo characterization with these sensors under the tested heavy metal concentrations is possible. Most of our sensors were cultivated in the BioLector. Due to the accuracy of this device we could measure our sample in duplicates.
Arsenic
in vivo
Time course of the induction of an arsenic biosensor with RFP for different arsenic concentrations in vivo. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.
in vitro
Chromium
in vivo
Our sensor for chromium detection consists of ChrB the repressor and the chromate specific promoter ChrP. The promoter is regulated by the ChrB, which binds Cr-ions. Behind the promoter is a sfGFP for detection of a fluorescence signal.
In vivo we could show that the addition of different concentrations of chromium have different effects to transcription of sfGFP.
Time course of the induction of a chromium biosensor with sfGFP for different chromium concentrations in vivo. The data are measured with BioLector and normalized on OD600. Error bars represent the standard deviation of two biological replicates.Fluorescence levels at three different stages of cultivation. Shown are levels after 60 minutes, 150 minutes and 650 minutes. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.
Our data lead to the conclusion that in a cell based system it is possible to detect chromium.
In contrast to our expectations with higher chromium concentrations we got lower fluorescence levels. These observations needed further investigation.
in vitro
Influence of different chromium concentrations on our crude cell extract. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.Chromium specific cell extract made from E. coli cells which already expressed the repressor before cell extract production. Induction with different chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.Chromium specific cell extract made from E. coli cells which already expressed the repressor before cell extract production. Induction with different chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.Data are normalised on chromiums influence to the cell extrat.Chromium sensor with alternative repressor build by team Dundee 2015, which has only the first 15 codons optimized in chromium specific cell extract under the induction withdifferent chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.Chromium sensor with alternative repressor build by team Dundee 2015, which has only the first 15 codons optimized in chromium specific cell extract under the induction withdifferent chromium concentrations. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.Data are normalised on chromiums influence to the cell extrat.
Copper
in vivo
Our sensor for copper detection consists of CueR a MerR like activator and the copper specific promoter CopAP. The promoter is regulated by the CueR, which binds Cu-ions. We also used a sfGFP behind the promoter for detection trough a fluorescence signal.
TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.In vivo we could show that the adding different concentrations of chromium has different effects on the transcription of sfGFP.
TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.
in vitro
TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.
Lead
in vivo
TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.
Mercury
in vivo
TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.
in vitro
TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.
Nickel
in vivo
TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.TEXT. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three biological replicates.
