Demo Judging Expectations 2016

×

Loading ...

Judging Expectations

Understanding and fairly evaluating the various aspects of the projects that iGEM teams carry out can be difficult for both novice and experienced judges. We therefore provide judges with a Judging Handbook to provide some guidance on how to navigate this process. For 2016, we will also provide a wide range of example projects from previous years that judges are welcome to look through before and during the main competition months. Our goal is to provide this content by January 2016, so please check back for updates!

We recommend that judges look at previous years' results to get a sense of the types of projects iGEM teams work on. Judges can easily look at 2015 Results as well as the results from 2008 to 2014 online.

A Range of Projects

As you look through previous years' results, you'll notice that there is a large range of projects that the teams work hard on during the summer months. Below are a few snapshots of previous projects you can look through if you find looking through all of the results a little daunting. We have not included the Grand Prizer Winners, as those are easy to find on our Results page.

Examples from 2015 iGEM

Below are a handful of teams from the 2015 iGEM season.

Examples from 2014 iGEM

Below are a handful of teams from the 2014 iGEM season.

Georgia State

text

BABS UNSW Australia

Text

2014 team 1

Text.

2014 team 2

Text

Cork Ireland

Text.

Tec Monterrey

Text

2014 team 3

Text.

2014 team 4

Text