Difference between revisions of "Team:Uniandes Colombia/Practices"

(Prototype team page)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
<h2> Human Practices </h2>
+
<br><br>
 +
<b> <font color="#8A0808" size="7" >Human Practices</font></b>
 +
<br><br>
  
<p>iGEM teams are unique and leading the field because they "go beyond the lab" to imagine their projects in a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.</p>
+
<br><br>
<p>Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest. </p>
+
<b><font color="#8A0808" size="5" >Low Budget iGEM</font></b>
<p>For more information, please see the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Practices_Hub">Practices Hub</a>.</p>
+
<br><br>
 +
It is well known that doing science is expensive and lot of economical resources are needed, specially in Synthetic Biology.Processes like PCR, DNA extraction, miniPrep, among others, need specialized equipment and chemical compounds that have considerably high prices and only a few people can afford them. Costs in materials affect the development in Latin American researches in the Synthetic Biology field and the formation of new iGEM teams in Latin America.  
 +
<br><br>
 +
Considering this we to organized the second edition of our Low Budget iGEM competition, that aimed to demonstrate that most of the protocols may have a new and cheaper way go being conducted.  
  
<div class="highlightBox">
+
<br><br>
<h4>Note</h4>
+
<b> What was the competition about? </b>
<p>You must fill out this page in order to be considered for all <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Judging/Awards">awards</a> for Human Practices:</p>
+
<br><br>
<ul>
+
The teams that accepted this challenge had to design a new and cheaper way to make a normal protocol in the lab. We received excellent and very interesting results, we invite you to check out the process. 
<li>Human Practices silver medal criterion</li>
+
<li>Human Practices gold medal criterion</li>
+
<li>Best Integrated Human Practices award</li>
+
<li>Best Education and Public Engagement award</li>
+
</ul>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 +
The following teams participated:
 +
Paris Bettencourt → developed a cheap spectrophotometer
 +
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzXC3dagmgE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  
<h5>Some Human Practices topic areas </h5>
+
GSU in collaboration with students of Emory University→ grow broth (J-Broth)
<ul>
+
<li>Philosophy</li>
+
<li>Public Engagement / Dialogue</li>
+
<li>Education</li>
+
<li>Product Design</li>
+
<li>Scale-Up and Deployment Issues</li>
+
<li>Environmental Impact</li>
+
<li>Ethics</li>
+
<li>Safety</li>
+
<li>Security</li>
+
<li>Public Policy</li>
+
<li>Law and Regulation</li>
+
<li>Risk Assessment</li>
+
</ul>
+
  
<h5>What should we write about on this page?</h5>
+
Nagahama→ miniprep with alkaline solution
<p>On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement).</p>
+
  
 +
Tec Monterrey→ miniprep, EDTA, loading dye and SB buffer using cilantro extract + electrophoresis chamber
 +
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bD3GYEEJ_g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  
<h5>Inspiration</h5>
 
<p>Read what other teams have done:</p>
 
<ul>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Dundee/policypractice/experts">2014 Dundee </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:UC_Davis/Policy_Practices_Overview">2014 UC Davis </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Manchester/HumanPractices">2013 Manchester </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Cornell/outreach">2013 Cornell </a></li>
 
</ul>
 
  
<h3>Integrated Human Practices</h3>
+
TU Darmstadt→ Real time electrophoresis chamber
  
<p>Do you want to be considered for the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Judging/Awards#SpecialPrizes">Best Integrated Human Practices award</a>? Make it easy for the judges to find any wiki content that is relevant to this prize. Highlight this content with a header or separate section.</p>
+
BBK → Extraction of metabolites directly from agar
 +
Despite the fact that they did not have quantitative results, they still created a new protocol that can be tested by people who are interested in the matter. We consider their effort as valuable.  
  
<h3>Education and Public Engagement</h3>
+
All the participants received this sticker:
  
<p>Do you want to be considered for the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Judging/Awards#SpecialPrizes">Best Education and Public Outreach award</a>? Make it easy for the judges to find any wiki content that is relevant to this prize. Highlight this content with a header or separate section.</p>
+
AAAND The winner will be announced at the Jamboree! Thank you all for participating!
 +
 
 +
<b><font color="#8A0808" size="5" >Artistic Contest</font></b>
 +
<p>
 +
Instead of doing the standard polls about people’s perception of synthetic biology, we launched an artistic contest, where each participant developed his or her idea in a short story, a drawing or both.
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<p>
 +
We had two participants, that each developed opposite ideas about the questions synthetic biology raises fro the future. We chose César Nieto as our winner, for his better structured and more appealing short story called “the human software” (not for his posture!). It is noteworthy that our other participant, Alirio Lugo, with his short story “Pandemonium” made us think about how synthetic biology might merge in political discussions, threatening human life with what is known as “biological weapons”, as well as the importance of regulation in the development of these sinthetic biology projects, so that it posses no harm to humans or the environment.  
 +
</p>
  
</div>
 
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 03:10, 19 September 2015

iGEM Uniandes-Colombia



Human Practices



Low Budget iGEM

It is well known that doing science is expensive and lot of economical resources are needed, specially in Synthetic Biology.Processes like PCR, DNA extraction, miniPrep, among others, need specialized equipment and chemical compounds that have considerably high prices and only a few people can afford them. Costs in materials affect the development in Latin American researches in the Synthetic Biology field and the formation of new iGEM teams in Latin America.

Considering this we to organized the second edition of our Low Budget iGEM competition, that aimed to demonstrate that most of the protocols may have a new and cheaper way go being conducted.

What was the competition about?

The teams that accepted this challenge had to design a new and cheaper way to make a normal protocol in the lab. We received excellent and very interesting results, we invite you to check out the process.
The following teams participated: Paris Bettencourt → developed a cheap spectrophotometer GSU in collaboration with students of Emory University→ grow broth (J-Broth) Nagahama→ miniprep with alkaline solution Tec Monterrey→ miniprep, EDTA, loading dye and SB buffer using cilantro extract + electrophoresis chamber TU Darmstadt→ Real time electrophoresis chamber BBK → Extraction of metabolites directly from agar Despite the fact that they did not have quantitative results, they still created a new protocol that can be tested by people who are interested in the matter. We consider their effort as valuable. All the participants received this sticker: AAAND The winner will be announced at the Jamboree! Thank you all for participating! Artistic Contest

Instead of doing the standard polls about people’s perception of synthetic biology, we launched an artistic contest, where each participant developed his or her idea in a short story, a drawing or both.

We had two participants, that each developed opposite ideas about the questions synthetic biology raises fro the future. We chose César Nieto as our winner, for his better structured and more appealing short story called “the human software” (not for his posture!). It is noteworthy that our other participant, Alirio Lugo, with his short story “Pandemonium” made us think about how synthetic biology might merge in political discussions, threatening human life with what is known as “biological weapons”, as well as the importance of regulation in the development of these sinthetic biology projects, so that it posses no harm to humans or the environment.