Difference between revisions of "Team:UMaryland/Results"

 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 174: Line 174:
 
<div style="float:left;width:450px;height:550px;">
 
<div style="float:left;width:450px;height:550px;">
 
<p><img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/UMDBL21A.png"></p>
 
<p><img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/UMDBL21A.png"></p>
<p style = "font-size:18px">Figure 10. Fluorescence measurements of K1783002 (Constitutive unstable RFP) in BL21 cells grown in media containing antibiotic. All measurements are blank-subtracted. Fluorescence is variable throughout testing suggesting an uncorrected factor influencing results. Note: Our initial tests using the BL21 cell line were inconclusive due to a variety of factors, including the need to calibrate our testing protocol. We are including them here to demonstrate the higher level of RFP fluorescence in a cell line engineered to express proteins well.</p>
+
<p style = "font-size:18px">Figure 10. Fluorescence measurements of K1783002 (Constitutive unstable RFP) in BL21 cells grown in media containing antibiotic. All measurements are blank-subtracted. Fluorescence is variable throughout testing suggesting an uncorrected factor influencing results. Note: Our initial tests using the BL21 cell line were inconclusive due the need to calibrate our testing protocol.</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 235: Line 235:
 
<div style="text-align:center;">
 
<div style="text-align:center;">
 
<p style="font-size:48px;text-align:center;font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;"><b>Sequence Analysis</b></p>
 
<p style="font-size:48px;text-align:center;font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;"><b>Sequence Analysis</b></p>
<p style = "font-size:24px">Gels generally show that plasmids are kept whenever a form of pressure is placed on the cell. Why then, is RFP not being expressed? Our sequencing results showed random mutations in the promoter and coding region of the RFP construct. This is a valuable lesson that, with any BioBrick construct, mutations and evolution is inevitable. However, plasmids that were maintained with Hok-Sok alone (no chloramphenicol) did not display mutations in the RFP construct. The large difference in protein expression over multiple days, as shown by our fluorescence and plating tests, suggests to us that the presence of Hok-Sok, combined with the absence of chloramphenicol pressure, is putting a smaller evolutionary pressure on the  bacterium.</p>
+
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/1/19/UMDHS2gel.png/666px-UMDHS2gel.png.jpeg">
 +
<p style = "font-size:24px">Top right bands of above gel are of negative control in DH5-alpha. They demonstrate that the cells no longer have the plasmid of interest. Gels generally show that plasmids are kept whenever a form of pressure is placed on the cell. Why then, is RFP not being expressed? Our sequencing results showed random mutations in the promoter and coding region of the RFP construct. This is a valuable lesson that, with any BioBrick construct, mutations and evolution is inevitable. However, plasmids that were maintained with Hok-Sok alone (no chloramphenicol) did not display mutations in the RFP construct. The large difference in protein expression over multiple days, as shown by our fluorescence and plating tests, suggests to us that the presence of Hok-Sok, combined with the absence of chloramphenicol pressure, is putting a smaller evolutionary pressure on the  bacterium.</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 245: Line 246:
 
<div id='contentbox'>
 
<div id='contentbox'>
 
<p style="font-size:48px;text-align:center;font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;">Conclusions and Future Plans
 
<p style="font-size:48px;text-align:center;font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;">Conclusions and Future Plans
 
+
<p style = "font-size:32px">Conclusion</p>
 +
<p style = "font-size:24px">Through our plating tests and fluorescence measurements, we were able to successfully observe the plasmid maintenance ability of the Hok-Sok system. In comparison to a negative control grown without chloramphenicol pressure, cells containing Hok-Sok were able to maintain their antibiotic resistance for a significant period of time, as shown from our plating tests. In addition, we noted the ability of Hok-Sok had a negative effect on protein production, as shown from our fluorescence study. However, this level of production was consistent over a long period of time, contrasting with traditional pressure systems where mutations were able to build up quickly, shutting down production of RFP, which has no biological usefulness for the cell. We thus suggest that the downregulation of RFP production via Hok-Sok is capable of decreasing the evolutionary pressure against the removal on non-essential genes. This effect will be further studied in later experiments, where the distance between the hok-sok cassette and a gene of interest is lengthened. Overall, we suggest use of the Hok-Sok system as an effective method for internal plasmid maintenance without the use of antibiotics.</p>
  
 
<p style="font-size:32px;text-align:center;font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;">Considerations
 
<p style="font-size:32px;text-align:center;font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;">Considerations

Latest revision as of 04:00, 19 September 2015