Difference between revisions of "Team:British Columbia/Growing"

Line 15: Line 15:
 
<div id="UBCbody">
 
<div id="UBCbody">
 
<p>
 
<p>
For our probiotic, we chose the betaproteobacteria, <i>Snodgrassella alvi</i>, and the gammaproteobacteria, <i>Gilliamella apicola</i>, both of which are specific to <i>Apis mellifera</i>. By implementing our system in these microaerophiles which are native and unique to the honey bee gut, we are inhibiting other insects from acquiring our engineered, imidacloprid resistant strains. However, due to the small amount of existing literature on <i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i>, our project revolved around discovering methods of culturing the bacteria, inducing competence, and transforming them with a compatible plasmid.
+
For the probiotic, the β-proteobacteria, <i>Snodgrassella alvi</i>, and the γ-proteobacteria, <i>Gilliamella apicola</i>, were chosen since it is distinctly endogenous to the midgut of the European honey bee, <i>Apis mellifera</i> (1). Since these microaerophiles are native and unique to the honey bee gut, introducing imidacloprid and 6-CNA degradation genes into these candidate bacteria would minimize the chance of resistance genes spreading to other insects. Due to the limited amount of existing literature on <i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i>, the project focused on discovering methods to make these bacteria genetically tractable. This included culturing the bacteria on different growth mediums, testing methods to induce competence, and transformation techniques with a variety of plasmids.
 +
 
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<h4>Culturing:</h4>
 
<h4>Culturing:</h4>
<p>Due to the novel nature of using <i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i> for the project (as opposed to <i>E. coli</i>), our first step was to determine the optimal method of culturing either bacteria. </p>
+
<p>Due to the novel nature of using <i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i> for the project (as opposed to <i>E. coli</i>), the first step was to determine the optimal method of culturing either bacteria. </p>
  
 
           <div class="tab-pane" id="a"><div class="panel-group" id="accordion" role="tablist" aria-multiselectable="true">
 
           <div class="tab-pane" id="a"><div class="panel-group" id="accordion" role="tablist" aria-multiselectable="true">
Line 31: Line 32:
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseOne" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingOne">
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseOne" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingOne">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
             <p>The bacterial strains, plated on blood agar (tryptic soy agar supplemented with 5% sheep’s blood) were generously provided by Waldan K. Kwong from Yale University. Initially, we tried a variety of methods of culturing both <i>S. alvi</i>  and <i>G. apicola</i>: LB plates, TSA plates, blood agar plates (5% sheep blood). Following the methods from Kwong <i>et al.</i>, we incubated the inoculated agar plates in a microaerophilic chamber flushed with 5% CO<sub>2</sub> balanced with N<sub>2</sub>. After numerous trials of growing the bacteria on different media, we determined <i>G.apicola</i> grew best on TSA plates and <i>S.alvi</i> grew best on blood agar plates. <i>G.apicola</i> plates showed significant growth after two days, whereas <i>S.alvi</i> plates showed significant growth after four days. Due to <i>G. apicola</i>’s faster growth rate and its larger colony diameter, we decided to proceed with the transformations using <i>G. apicola</i>.
+
             <p>The bacterial strains, plated on blood agar (tryptic soy agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood) were generously provided by Waldan K. Kwong from Yale University. Initially, a variety of media was tried to culture <i>S. alvi</i>  and <i>G. apicola</i>: LB plates, TSA plates and blood agar plates. Following the methods from Kwong <i>et al.</i> <a href="#ref">(1)</a>, streaked agar plates were incubated in an anaerobic jar equilibrated with 5% CO<sub>2</sub> balanced with N<sub>2</sub>. <i>G.apicola</i> grew best on TSA plates and <i>S. alvi</i> grew best on blood agar plates incubated at 37°C. <i>G.apicola</i> plates showed growth after 48 hrs, whereas <i>S. alvi</i> plates showed growth after four days. Further tests to induce competence for transformation were performed with <i>G. apicola</i> due to the faster growth rate and larger colony size.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
           </div>
 
           </div>
Line 46: Line 47:
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseTwo" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingTwo">
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseTwo" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingTwo">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
             <p></p>  
+
             <p>The various liquid media tested included brain heart infusion broth, Mueller Hinton broth, LB, Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB), and Super Optimal Broth with Catabolite repression (SOC). Media was prepared in a sealed Hungate tube and flushed with 5% CO<sub>2</sub> balanced with N<sub>2</sub> gas to remove O<sub>2</sub> that was dissolved in the media. Using a syringe, media was inoculated with <i>G. apicola</i> or <i>S. alvi</i> and incubated at 37°C for 48 hrs. <i>S. alvi</i> was not culturable in any of the liquid media tested. <i>G. apicola</i> did grow under anaerobic conditions in TSB requiring 48 hrs to form visible growth.
 +
</p>  
 
           </div>
 
           </div>
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
   
+
<h4>Growth Curve</h4>
 +
<p>The growth curve of <i>G. apicola</i> was monitored on a plate reader that measured the OD value at 600nm over 36 hours. <i>G. apicola</i> was inoculated into a TSB culture that was previously flushed with 5% CO<sub>2</sub> balanced with N<sub>2</sub>. Additionally, 5% CO<sub>2</sub> balanced with N<sub>2</sub> was blown onto the plate whilst sealing to ensure the lowest possible amount of oxygen was present in the plate.
 +
</p>   
 +
 
 
<h4>Inducing Competence in <i>G.apicola</i> and <i>S.alvi</i></h4>
 
<h4>Inducing Competence in <i>G.apicola</i> and <i>S.alvi</i></h4>
<p>After identifying the optimal way to culture <i>G. apicola</i>, we moved on to attempting various ways of inducing competence in the bacteria. Due to no existing literature on methods of inserting a plasmid into <i>G. apicola</i>, we attempted various protocols known to work on other gram-negative gammaproteobacteria, as well as a protocol for microaerophilic bacteria.   
+
<p>After identifying the optimal way to culture <i>G. apicola</i>, we moved on to attempting various ways of inducing competence in the bacteria. Due to no existing literature on methods of inserting a plasmid into <i>G. apicola</i>, various protocols known to work on other gram-negative gammaproteobacteria, as well as a protocol for microaerophilic bacteria were attempted.   
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
       <div class="panel panel-default">
 
       <div class="panel panel-default">

Revision as of 19:07, 13 September 2015

UBC iGEM 2015

 

Genetic Tool Development

 

For the probiotic, the β-proteobacteria, Snodgrassella alvi, and the γ-proteobacteria, Gilliamella apicola, were chosen since it is distinctly endogenous to the midgut of the European honey bee, Apis mellifera (1). Since these microaerophiles are native and unique to the honey bee gut, introducing imidacloprid and 6-CNA degradation genes into these candidate bacteria would minimize the chance of resistance genes spreading to other insects. Due to the limited amount of existing literature on G. apicola and S. alvi, the project focused on discovering methods to make these bacteria genetically tractable. This included culturing the bacteria on different growth mediums, testing methods to induce competence, and transformation techniques with a variety of plasmids.

Culturing:

Due to the novel nature of using G. apicola and S. alvi for the project (as opposed to E. coli), the first step was to determine the optimal method of culturing either bacteria.

Growth Curve

The growth curve of G. apicola was monitored on a plate reader that measured the OD value at 600nm over 36 hours. G. apicola was inoculated into a TSB culture that was previously flushed with 5% CO2 balanced with N2. Additionally, 5% CO2 balanced with N2 was blown onto the plate whilst sealing to ensure the lowest possible amount of oxygen was present in the plate.

Inducing Competence in G.apicola and S.alvi

After identifying the optimal way to culture G. apicola, we moved on to attempting various ways of inducing competence in the bacteria. Due to no existing literature on methods of inserting a plasmid into G. apicola, various protocols known to work on other gram-negative gammaproteobacteria, as well as a protocol for microaerophilic bacteria were attempted.

Transforming

Results

Acknowledgements