Difference between revisions of "Team:UMaryland/Description"

 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 159: Line 159:
 
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/64/Circle.png">
 
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/64/Circle.png">
 
<h4>Hok/Sok</h4>
 
<h4>Hok/Sok</h4>
<p>A Plasmid retention system
+
<p>An internal plasmid retention system
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</a>
 
</a>
Line 213: Line 213:
 
<p align = "center"><img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/19/UMDhokprotein.png"></p>
 
<p align = "center"><img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/19/UMDhokprotein.png"></p>
 
<p style = "font-size:18px" align = center><b>Hok: Small protein - Big effect</b></p>
 
<p style = "font-size:18px" align = center><b>Hok: Small protein - Big effect</b></p>
<p style="font-size:20px">In order to stay alive, cells need to be able to block translation of the hok transcript. Located on the same locus as hok is mok, which modulates whether or not hok is properly translated. Mok is located on a different reading frame than hok and the two genes are always co-transcribed as part of a single mRNA transcript.</p>
+
<p style="font-size:20px">In order to stay alive, cells need to be able to block translation of the hok transcript. Located on the same locus as hok is mok, which modulates whether or not hok is properly translated by the ribosome. Mok is located on a different reading frame than hok and the two genes are always co-transcribed as part of a single mRNA transcript.</p>
<p style="font-size:20px">Mok is then recognized by sok, a short ssRNA "antitoxin" transcribed on the reverse strand of the Hok-Sok cassette. Sok is capable of forming a double-stranded RNA duplex near the 5'-end of the mok transcript. This duplex formation indirectly blocks the hok open reading frame, preventing the transcript from being read. The dsRNA duplex is then recognized by RNAse III, leading to enzymatic degradation of the silenced transcript.</p>
+
<p style="font-size:20px">Mok is then recognized by sok, a short ssRNA "antitoxin" transcribed under a strong constitutive promoter on the reverse strand of the Hok-Sok cassette. Sok is capable of forming a double-stranded RNA duplex near the 5'-end of the mok transcript. This duplex formation indirectly blocks the hok open reading frame, preventing the transcript from being read. The dsRNA duplex is then recognized by RNAse III, leading to enzymatic degradation of the silenced transcript.</p>
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/d/d0/RockEmUMD.png/764px-RockEmUMD.png">
+
<p align = "center"><img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d0/RockEmUMD.png"></p>
 +
<p style = "font-size:18px" align = center><b>"Hok-Em, Sok-Em Robots"</b></p>
  
 
<p style = "font-size:20px">Below is a simplified diagram of how the Hok-Sok system maintains a plasmid:</p>
 
<p style = "font-size:20px">Below is a simplified diagram of how the Hok-Sok system maintains a plasmid:</p>
Line 222: Line 223:
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<p style="font-size:20px">How does this lead to plasmid maintenance? Hok mRNA, due to a high degree of secondary structure, has a long half-life, measured at 20 minutes. Sok, on the other hand, has a half-life of only 30 seconds. The cell must thus retain the coding region for Sok in order to produce enough Sok to continue blocking Hok translation. If the plasmid is lost, then both the Hok and Sok coding regions will be lost; however, previously transcribed Hok mRNA will still be present. With previously transcribed Sok rapidly degrading, Hok mRNA will be translated, killing the daughter cell that did not maintain the plasmid.
+
<p style="font-size:20px">How does this process lead to plasmid maintenance? Hok mRNA, due to a high degree of secondary structure, has a long half-life, measured at 20 minutes, or approximately the time of one growth cycle. Sok, on the other hand, has a half-life of only 30 seconds. Thus in order to continue suppressing hok translation, the cell must retain the sok gene, and consequently the plasmid, through cell division if it is to constantly produce enough sok to continue inhibiting hok translation. If the plasmid is "lost", or not passed down to the daughter cell, then both the Hok and Sok coding regions will be lost. However, due to its long half-life, previously transcribed Hok mRNA will remain in the cell while previously transcribed sok rapidly degrades. No longer silenced, hok mRNA will be then translated, killing the daughter cell that did not maintain the plasmid. In nature, this is how the Hok-Sok system maintains antibiotic resistance in <i>E. coli</i> in the absence of antibiotic pressure.</p>
  
<p style = "font-size:20px">Our wet project for 2015 was to demonstrate that the Hok-Sok system could maintain a plasmid over many generations as well as typical antibiotic maintenance systems. We hypothesized that the Hok-Sok system could thus serve as a cheap, ethical alternative to antibiotic pressure.</p>
+
<p style = "font-size:20px">Our wet lab project for 2015 was to demonstrate that the Hok-Sok system could maintain a recombinant plasmid containing BioBricks over many generations of bacterial division. We also wanted to compare the effectiveness of Hok-Sok to traditional antibiotic maintenance systems. We thus hypothesized that the Hok-Sok system could thus serve as an ethical alternative to antibiotic pressure.</p>
  
 
<div style="text-align:center;">
 
<div style="text-align:center;">
Line 245: Line 246:
  
 
<p style="font-size:20px">
 
<p style="font-size:20px">
PCR is a common tool used in the laboratory environment as it is a vital component in DNA amplification and any cloning procedure. However, the majority of PCR machines used in the lab are bulky and expensive and are rarely seen outside of biology-based labs. These issues inspired the development of UMD PCR, a compact PCR machine that is as fast and proficient at amplifying DNA as lab based machines, but constructible for the fraction of the price of lab-grade PCR machines and a great tool for teaching-based applications.
+
PCR is a common tool used in the laboratory environment as it is a vital component in DNA amplification and any cloning procedure. However, the majority of PCR machines used in the lab are bulky and expensive and are rarely seen outside of biology-based labs. Making the device cheaper would give more people accessibility to this valuable lab tool, enabling research in more places around the globe. These factors, and the desire to expand the efforts of the DIY Bio movement, inspired the development of the UMaryland team thermocycler. While our machine is firstly a PCR machine, it is also able to function as an incubator. Our machine is a dual purpose, compact PCR machine that is as fast and proficient at amplifying DNA as lab based machines, but constructible for the fraction of the price of lab-grade PCR machines and a great tool for teaching-based applications.
 
+
Fast— Our PCR machine is able to reach 95℃ in under a minute due to the utilization of the heating element of a hair dryer. It also cools to annealing temperature in a few minutes.
 +
<br>
 +
Cheap— The main components of our machine consist of a hair dryer ($25), an Arduino UNO ($25), a temperature sensor ($2), two electronic relays ($5 each), and a soda can ($1). The combined cost of these materials is under $60.
 +
<br>
 +
Open— Our machine provides a solution to the financial and logistical difficulty of bringing these machines into the classroom. PCR is an extremely important topic in biotechnology, but it is typically also one that requires one to "see it to believe it." However, schools often cannot afford to purchase thermocyclers due to their high cost. By manufacturing a cheap, DIY thermocycler that can be assembled at a low cost, we can help bring this technology into schools that would otherwise be unable to afford it.
 +
<br>
 +
Two-Fold— Although originally intended for PCR exclusively, we were able to slightly modify our machine to also serve as an incubator by inserting it horizontally into the side of a shoe box. The temperature was maintained in the same way as the PCR and it is a more ideal set up since it is cheaper than lab incubators and there is more airflow across a large area than an incubator lamp could provide
 +
<br>
 +
Click the button below for more details.
 
<div style="text-align:center;">
 
<div style="text-align:center;">
 
<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:UMaryland/Design">
 
<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:UMaryland/Design">
Line 261: Line 270:
  
 
<p style="font-size:20px">
 
<p style="font-size:20px">
Certain images used under <a href = "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode">Creative Commons license</a>.
+
Robot image used under <a href = "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode">Creative Commons license</a>.
 +
<br>
 +
hok protein image from RaptorX server, cited: Morten Kallberg, Haipeng Wang, Sheng Wang, Jian Peng, Zhiyong Wang, Hui Lu & Jinbo Xu. Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nature Protocols, 7(8): 1511-1522, 2012.
 
</p>
 
</p>
  

Latest revision as of 03:56, 19 September 2015