Team:Freiburg/Labjournals/SurChem/July

""

Labjournal Surchem July

Experiment 39b: PDITC iRIf slides for measurement with PhyA

Considerations

  • preparing 4 iRIf PDITC slides for measurement
  • spot PhyA on 2 slides

2015.07.30

Experiment/protocol

  • 4 PDITC iRIf slides were prepared according to protocol
  • plasma activation for 5 min at 80 L/h
  • slides were incubated in APTES for 30 min
  • slides were incubated in PDITC for 2 h
  • slides were stored o/n in desiccator

2015.07.31

Experiment/protocol

  • for storage until Sunday 02.08.2015 the slides were taken out of the desiccator and put in a slideholder under N2-atmosphere at 4 °C

2015.08.02

  • 3 µL of samples (1-3,6) and controls (GFP,bBSA) were spotted and incubated o/n at 4 °C. For samples 4-5 and 10-11 4 µl were spotted.

spotting pattern:

# spot Elution no. Concentration Antibody AB-conc.[µg/ml]
1-2 Phy A 2 6.6 mg/ml 5 µg/ml
3 Phy A 3 2.3. mg/ml 5 µg/ml
4-5 Promega 104 anti-tYFP 20
6 rabbit AB (anti-HCV) 1 mg/mL anti-rabbit 20
7 Max GFP 1.0 mg/mL a-GFP (goat;biotinylated) 5
8 His-GFP Lysate a-GFP (goat;biotinylated) 5
9 bBSA 0.1 mg/mL Strep-Cy5 10
10-11 Promega 104 + feed anti-tYFP 20
anti-His (mouse)20

2015.08.03

Experiment/Protocol

  • protein solution was removed with pipette and spots were blocked 2x 5 min with BSA 10 mg/ml in PBS
  • slides were blocked in 10 mg/mL BSA in PBS for 30 min
  • slides were washed in PBS for 10 min
  • slides were washed 2x in diluted PBS 1/10 for 10 min
  • slides were dried with wafer gun and measured in iRIf

Measurement

Slide 1
Reagent Step Flow rate (ul/min) Priming time Concentration
Buffer1809401x
BSA 24560010 mg/ml
Buffer 3606001x
Anti-GFP(goat;biotinylated)4257205 ug/ml
Buffer 5603001x
Anti-tYFP (rabbit)615120020 ug/ml
Buffer 7603001x
Anti-PhyA (rabbit)82090020 ug/ml
Buffer 9603001x
Anti-Rabbit 10306005 ug/ml
Buffer 11603001x
StrepCy5 12306005 ug/ml
Buffer 13603001x
slide 2
Reagent Step Flow rate (ul/min) Priming time Concentration
Buffer1809401x
BSA 24550010 mg/ml
Buffer 3606001x
Anti-GFP(goat;biotinylated)4257205 ug/ml
Buffer 5603001x
Anti-tYFP (rabbit)615120020 ug/ml
Buffer 7603001x
Anti-PhyA (rabbit, N-terminal)8209005 ug/ml
Buffer 9603001x
Anti-Rabbit 103060015 ug/ml
Buffer 11603001x
StrepCy5 12306005 ug/ml
Buffer 13603001x
  • another anti-Phy was used, because the one which was used in the first measurement was empty and also Phillip told us, that this one should bind better

Results

  • Binding of anti-phyA to phyA was not observed in RIfs
  • much of the protein was washed away from the spotted spot.
    • We have to take lower concentrations for spotting (100-400 ug/ml)
  • no Anti-tYFP to tYFP binding could be detected
    • to few tYFP on the slides because all proteins in Lysate bind to PDITC
    • should use specific surface (e.g. Ni-NTA, Halo) next time, where only tYFP binds
Slide 303: ROI selection
Slide 303: binding curves
Slide 303: Inverted QP during initial buffer step: Shows that already much of the PhyA is flushed away from the spot

Experiment 39a: PDITC iRIf slides for measurement with purified antigens

Considerations

  • preparing 4 iRIf PDITC slides for measurement
  • spot antigens on 2 slides

2015.07.30

Experiment/protocol

  • 4 PDITC iRIf slides were prepared according to protocol
  • plasma activation for 5 min at 80 L/h
  • slides were incubated in APTES for 30 min
  • slides were incubated in PDITC for 2 h
  • 4 µL of antigens and bBSA were spotted and incubated o/n at 4 °C. For GFP Spot7 was 4 µl and spot8 was 3 µl
  • in contrast to Experiment 37a the antigens of Tetanus (11) and Salmonella (15) were heatshocked before spotting.

spotting pattern:

# spot Elution no. Concentration Antibody AB-conc.[µg/ml]
1-2 HIV(17) 1 1.0 mg/mL?? gp41 DDX1306 20
3-4 HCV(10) 1 0.74 mg/mL?? 20
5-6 Tetanus(11) 1 3.75 mg/mL?? HYB 278-01 20
7-8 GFP 1.0 mg/mL a-GFP (goat;biotinylated) 5
9 bBSA 0.1 mg/mL Strep-Cy5 (Strep-Cy5) 10
10-11 Salmonella(15) 2 6.7 mg/mL a-Salmonella-(pIG15_1301) 100
anti-His (mouse)20

2015.07.31

Experiment/protocol

  • spots were blocked 2x 5 min with PDITC blocking solution
  • slides were blocked in 10 mg/mL BSA in PBS for 30 min
  • slides were washed in PBS for 10 min
  • slides were washed in diluted PBS 2x 10 min
  • slides were stored in Petri dish at 4 °C (humid atmosphere) until they could be measured in iRIf

Measurement

Flush protocol (Slide 208):

Reagent Step Flow rate (ul/min) Priming time Concentration
Buffer1809401x
BSA 24560010 mg/ml
Buffer 3606001x
Anti-GFP(goat;biotinylated)4306005 ug/ml
Buffer 5603001x
Anti-HIV (monoclonal)62090020 ug/ml
Buffer 7603001x
Anti-HCV (monoclonal)82090020 ug/ml
Buffer 9603001x
Anti-Tetanus (monoclonal)103060020 ug/ml
Buffer 11603001x
Anti-HIV (polyclonall)122090020 ug/ml
Buffer 13603001x
Anti-HCV (polyclonal)142090020 ug/ml
Buffer 15603001x
Anti-Salmonella (1301 Elu1)16209001:3
Buffer 17603001x
….further steps were skipped

For second slide flush protocol was changed→ added anti-His step and further dilutions of anti-Salmonella (but threw out a-HIV/a-HCV/anti-Tet) Flush protocol (Slide 12):

Reagent Step Flow rate (ul/min) Priming time Concentration
Buffer1606001x
BSA 26060010 mg/ml
Buffer 3606001x
Anti-GFP(goat;biotinylated)4306005 ug/ml
Buffer 5603001x
Anti-His 63060020 ug/ml
Buffer 7603001x
Anti-Salm (Elu 3)8209001:5
Buffer 9603001x
Anti-Salm (Elu 3)10306001:2
Buffer 11603001x
Anti-Salm (Elu 1)12306001:10
Buffer 13603001x
Anti-Salm (Elu 1)14209001:3
Buffer 15603001x
StrepCy516306005 ug/ml
Buffer 17603001x

Results

  • Anti-His at least confirmed that something with a His-Tag is within the HIV and HCV spots (see binding curves of slide 12).
Slide 208: Binding curves; flushing with anti-Salmonella lysate screwed up the measurement → protocol only to this step
Slide 208: Selection of ROIs: As can be seen we faced some problems during that measurement ;)


Slide 12: Binding curves
Slide 12: Selection of ROIs


Experiment 38: Measurement of different GFPs with NanoDrop

2015.07.29

Considerations

  • determine exact GFP concentration of used stock solution

Experiment/protocol

  • measured concentration of GFP from different sources via NanoDrop
  • determined absorption at 488 nm of different GFP solutions and calculated concentration
  • extinction coefficient EGFP ε = 55000 M-1cm-1
  • layer thickness d= 1 mm
  • M(GFP)= 26900 g/mol

Results

This measurement:

GFP concentration [mg/ml] error [mg/ml]
Max GFP0.880.053 (6%)
Lysate HisGFP0.810.051 (6%)
Lysate noTag GFP1.250.039 (3%)
Weber GFP 8.64.050.204(5%)
Weber GFP 6000.380.018(5%)

Last measurement from experiment 32 (plate reader):

GFP concentration [mg/ml] error [mg/ml]
Lysate HisGFP0.620.17 (27%)
Lysate noTag GFP1.200.31 (26%)
Weber GFP 6.87.762.04 (26%)
Weber GFP 60070.6014.22 (20%)

Experiment 37a: PDITC iRIf slides for measurement with antigens

Considerations

  • preparing 4 iRIf PDITC slides for measurement
  • spot freshly purified antigens from ProtPur-group on 2 slides and measure with polyclonal antibodies for HIV and HCV antigen and with monoclonal antibodies for Tetanus and Salmonella (same antibodies that were used in Experiment 36a)

2015.07.29

Experiment/Protocol

  • prepared 4 iRIf slides with PDITC according to protocol
  • plasma activation for 5 min at 80 L/h
  • slides were incubated in APTES solutiion for 1 h 10 min instead of 30 min
  • slides were incubated in PDITC solution for 2 h 30 min instead of 2 h
  • 3 µL of antigens and controls (Max-GFP and bBSA) were spotted and incubated o/n at 4 °C

spotting pattern:

# spot Elution no. Concentration Antibody AB-conc.[µg/ml]
1-2 HIV(17) 2 1.0 mg/mL gp41 DDX1306 20
3-4 HCV(10) 2 0.74 mg/mL 20
5-6 Tetanus(11) 2 3.75 mg/mL HYB 278-01 20
7-8 GFP 1.0 mg/mL a-GFP (goat;biotinylated) 5
9 bBSA 0.1 mg/mL Strep-Cy5 (Strep-Cy5) 10
10-11 Salmonella(15) 2 6.7 mg/mL a-Salmonella-(pIG15_1301) 100
anti-His (mouse)20

2015.07.30

Experiment/Protocol

  • After 23 h of incubation spots were blocked 2x 5 min with PDITC blocking solution
  • blocked slides 45 min in 10 mg/mL BSA solution
  • washed 2x in PBS
  • slide 467 was washed 1x in deluted PBS
  • slide 215 was washed 2x in deluted PBS
  • slides were measured in iRIF

Measurement

Step Solution Concentration Amount
1buffer
2BSA10 mg/ml330 µl
3buffer
4anti-GFP5 mg/mL300 µL
5buffer
6anti-HIV20 µg/mL300 µL
7buffer
8anti-HCV20 µg/mL300 µL
9buffer
10anti-Tetanus20 µg/mL300 µL
11buffer
12anti-Salmonella1:2300 µL
13buffer
14StrepCy55 µg/ml (in PBS:BSA = 1:1)

Resuslts

  • Experiment was conducted in duplicate. Both measurements showed no antibody/antigen binding. Positive

controls (GFP/anti-GFP, bBSA/Strep) performed well.

Slide 215: Binding curves
Slide 215: ROI selection


Slide 467: Binding curves
Slide 467: ROI selection


Experiment 37b: PDITC iRIf slides for measurement with mouse and rabbit antibodies

Considerations

  • spot mouse and rabbit antibodies on remaining 2 slides from Experiment 37a and measure with anti-mouse/anti-rabbit

2015.07.29

Experiment/Protocol

  • 3 µL of a antibody out of mouse, the HCV antibody (out of rabbit), GFP-antibody (out of goat - negative control) and positive controls (GFP, bBSA) were spotted on 2 PDITC iRIf slides and incubated o/n at 4 °C

spotting pattern:

# spot Concentration Antibody AB-conc.[µg/ml]
1-3 mouse AB 1 mg/mL anti-mouse 20
4-6 rabbit AB (anti-HCV) 1 mg/mL anti-rabbit 20
7-9 Max-GFP 1.0 mg/mL a-GFP (mouse;0.5 mg/ml) 5
10 Goat AB (anti-GFP) 0.2 mg/mL - -
11 bBSA 0.1 mg/mL Strep-Cy5 (Strep-Cy5) 10

2015.07.30

Experiment/Protocol

  • After 23 h of incubation spots were blocked 2x 5 min with PDITC blocking solution
  • blocked slides 45 min in 10 mg/mL BSA solution
  • washed 2x in PBS
  • washed 1x in deluted PBS
  • slides were measured in iRIF
  • slide 1: 121 , slide 2: 287

Measurement

Step Solution Concentration Amount
1buffer
2BSA10 mg/ml470 µl
3buffer
4anti-Mouse20 µg/ml (in PBS:BSA = 1:1)330 µl
5buffer
6anti-Rabbit20 µg/ml (in PBS:BSA = 1:1)330 µl
7buffer
8anti-GFP5 µg/ml (in PBS:BSA = 1:1)330 µl
9buffer
10StrepCy55 µg/ml (in PBS:BSA = 1:1)330 µl
11buffer

Results

  • The secondary antibodies bound properly to their corresponding antibodies derived from mouse/rabbit.
Slide 121: binding curves
Slide 121: ROI selection


Slide 287: binding curves - different a-GFP was tested which did not bind to GFP
Slide 287: ROI selection


Experiment 36b: Ni-NTA slides for iRIf group - cell free expressed tYFP

2015.07.27

Considerations

  • Spot cell free expressed YFP and mCherry-Lysate on remaining 2 iRIf slides from experiment 36a

Experiment/Protocol

  • 3 µL of cell free expressed protein, mCherry and controls were spotted on the Ni-NTA slides from 2015.07.23. and incubated o/n

spotting pattern:

# spot
1 pIG15-104 Bernhard
2 pIG15-105 Bernhard
3 mCherry Lysate (HA-Tag)
4 pIG15-104 Promega
5 pIG15-105 Promega
6 negative control with Promega
10 pIG15-104 Retikulo
11 pIG15-105 Retikulo
7+8 Max-GFP 1mg/mL
9 bBSA 100µg/mL
  • protein spots incubated for 24 h at 4 °C

2015.07.28

Experiment/Protocol

  • Spots were blocked 2x 5 min with BSA 10 mg/ml at room temperature
  • Slides were flushed with PBS 1x and spotting mask was removed
  • Washing steps in slideholder at 4°C followed: 10 min PBS 1x, 10 min PBS + 20 mM Imidazol and 10 min 1/10 diluted PBS (in aqua dest)
  • Then blocking for 30 min in BSA 10 mg/ml at 4°C followed
  • Slides were washed for 10 min in PBS 1x and 10 min in 1/10 diluted PBS (in aqua dest) at 4°C
  • After drying with wafer gun, fluorescence of YFP was checked in Microarray Scanner
  • Slides were then measured in iRIf

Measurement

Slide 1

Step Solution Concentration Amount
1buffer
2BSA10 mg/ml330 µl
3buffer
4anti tYFP20 µg/ml (in PBS)340 µl
5buffer
6anti-His10 µg/ml (in PBS)
7buffer
8anti-GFP (goat, biotinylated)(in PBS:BSA = 1:1)5 µg/ml
9buffer
10anti-HA??? von Norman, 3 weeks old
11buffer
12StrepCy55 µg/ml (in PBS:BSA = 1:1)



Slide 2

Step Solution Concentration Amount
1buffer
2BSA10 mg/ml330 µl
3buffer
4anti tYFPca. 17 µg/ml (in PBS)350 µl
5buffer
6anti-GFP (goat, biotinylated)(in PBS:BSA = 1:1)5 µg/ml340 µl
7buffer
8StrepCy55 µg/ml (in PBS:BSA = 1:1)330 µl

Results

  • there might be a very weak a-tYFP/tYFP binding
  • concentration of expressed tYFP is too low for a convincing signal
Binding curve for S1: Only with lots of zooming anti-tYFP can be seen to bind tYFP (spot 4) within the binding curves (Exp. 36b)
Quotient picture (before/after anti-tYFP): Weak signal for Spot 4 can be seen
Binding curve for S2: Only with lots of zooming anti-tYFP can be seen to bind tYFP (spot 4) within the binding curves (Exp. 36b)
Quotient picture that was taken for spot marking
Quotient picture (before/after anti-tYFP): Weak signal for Spot 4 can be seen

Experiment 36a: Ni-NTA slides for iRIf group - antigens

2015.07.22

Considerations

  • prepare Ni-NTA slides for the iRIf group to check the antibody binding to our expressed antigens

Experiment/Protocol

  • prepared 4 iRIf PDITC slides according to protocol
  • plasma activation time: 5 min
  • sandwiched them with NTA and incubated o/n at 4°C

2015.07.23

Experiment/Protocol

  • slides were blocked in APTES blocking solution for 1h in slideholder
  • washed 2x 10 min with PBS (shaky, shaky)
  • incubated slides in freshly prepared 1% NiSO4 solution for 1h
  • washed slides 2x 10 min in PBS and then 1x in 1/10 diluted PBS (shaky, shaky)
  • spotted 3 µl antigen samples and controls (Max GFP, bBSA)and incubated them overnight

spotting pattern:

# spot Elution no. Concentration Antibody AB-conc.
1-2 HIV(17) 2 0.36 mg/ml gp41 DDX1306 20 ug/ml
3-4 HCV(10) Mix (1-3) 0.13 mg/ml 20 ug/ml
5-6 Tetanus(11) Mix (1-3) 0.55 mg/ml 20 ug/ml
7-8 GFP 1.0 mg/ml a-GFP (goat) 5 ug/ml
9 bBSA 0.2 mg/ml Strep-Cy5 10 ug/ml
10-11 Salmonella(15) 2 3.2 mg/ml a-Salmonella-Lysate (13) 400 ug/ml (lysate conc.)
  • 803 - (0.13 mg/ml) - not spotted
  • Two slides were spotted. For first slide the (max.) concentrations of the Antigens were used. For the second slide the second spot of each Antigen was spotted diluted (100 ug/ml).

2015.07.24

Experiment/Protocol

  • After incubating for 13h at 4°C all spots were removed with pipette
  • slides were then blocked with BSA (10 mg/ml) 2x 10 min at room temperature
  • 1x PBS buffer was flooded over slides before removing the spotting mask and washing in PBS 2x 10 min (each time stored at 4°C)
  • Then a washing step in 1/10 diluted PBS (with aqua dest.) followed (also at 4°C)
  • Slides were dried with wafer gun and stored at 4°C in humid atmosphere
  • After 15 min slides were put back in PBS for 10 min because of Stefan
  • Talking to Günter confirmed that storing the slides dry prevents the His-Tag from leaving Ni/NTA so the slides were dipped into PBS (1/10 diluted, dried with wafer gun and stored at 4°C in humid atmosphere
  • slides were blocked again in BSA 10 mg/ml for 30 min
  • Then they were washed 10 min in PBS 1x and 10 min in 1/10 diluted PBS (in aqua dest), eacht time at 4°C
  • Slides were dried and measured in iRIf

Measurement

Flush protocol for both slides

Reagent Step Flow rate (ul/min) Priming time Concentration
Buffer1809401x
BSA 26050010 mg/mL
Buffer 3605101x
Anti-GFP(goat;biotinylated)4209205 ug/mL
Buffer 5603001x
Anti-HIV (polyclonal)62090020 ug/mL
Buffer 7603001x
Anti-HCV (polyclonal)82090020 ug/mL
Buffer 9603001x
Anti-Tetanus (mk: HYB 278-15)102090020 ug/mL
Buffer 11603001x
Strep-Cy512306005 ug/mL
Buffer 13603001x
Anti-His 143060020 µg/mL
Buffer 15603001x
Anti-Salmonella (1301 Elu2)16209001.6 mg/mL 1:4
Buffer 17603001x

Results

  • No specific antigen/antibody binding
  • positive control (GFP) worked
  • negative control didn't work (bBSA was detectable with Strep-Cy5 although it should not bind to Ni-NTA)
  • Anti-His at least bound to Tetanus and Samonella
  • monoclonal antibodies did'nt bind
  • for HIV, HCV: maybe concentration was too low
Binding curve of the second slide: No specific antibody/antigen binding can be seen
Binding curve of S1: results are equal to S2 (anti-Salm not present within this plot, since huge airbubble before the step destroyed further measurement)

Experiment 35: Influence of focus on fluorescence intensity

2015.07.21

Considerations

  • check if there is an impact on the fluorescence intensity when the photo is taken out of focus (compared to in focus photo)

Experiment/Protocol

  • three photos of a spot were taken and evaluated, one of them in focus, the others out of focus

Results

Compared fluorescence intensities of images from the same spot taken with different focus calibrations
  • there is no dependency between the fluorescence intensity and the focusing

Experiment 34: Influence of objcetive on fluorescence intensity

2015.07.21

Considerations

  • check if fluorescence images made with the 10x objective are brighter than with the 4x objective
  • how much brighter

Experiment/Protocol

  • made image of the same spot with 10x objective as well as the 4x objective
  • measured 3 spots and compared fluorescence intensities

Results

Compared fluorescence intensities of images from the same spot taken with the 10x objective and the 4x objective
  • as expected the images taken with the 10xobjective are brigther
  • 3-10 time as bright as the 4x objective images
  • comparison of images taken with the 4x and 10x objectives is difficult → use only one objective for spot evaluation

Experiment 33: Photobleaching of GFP

2015.07.21

Considerations

  • determine impact of photobleaching on the fluorescence measurement of GFP

Experiment/Protocol

  • took a photo every minute of 3 individual spots for 10 min while constantly illuminating them with blue light
  • slides from experiment 30 were used

Results

Impact of photobleaching of GFP spots on measured fluorescence intensities.

→ photobleaching effect negligible for the duration of our experiments

Experiment 32: Dilution series of GFP III and fluorescence measurement

2015.07.20

Considerations

  • repeat dilution series with different range of dilutions since no linearity could be observed in the previous experiment 29

Experiment/Protocol

Scheme for dilutions in plate reader:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
APBSPBSPBS
B Max GFPpure1:21:41:81:101:151:201:30
C Max GFPpure1:21:41:81:101:151:201:30
D Max GFPpure1:21:41:81:101:151:201:30
E Lysate His-GFP1:21:21:51:51:101:101:201:201:401:40
F Lysate GFP no Tag1:21:21:51:51:101:101:201:201:401:40
G Weber GFP 8.6 mg/ml1:201:201:501:501:1001:1001:2001:2001:5001:500
H Weber GFP 600 mg/ml1:2001:2001:5001:5001:10001:10001:20001:20001:40001:4000

Results

First Measurement

Second Measurement with shaking (30s)

2015.07.21

Evaluation

  • Measured fluorescence values were corrected by mean intensity for PBS
  • for each dilution the mean value of the corrected intensities was calculated
  • A calibration curve was made from the values for Max GFP (c = 1mg/ml)


  • The concentrations of the other GFP solutions were calculated by using the equation obtained from the calibration and multiplying with the dilution factor.
  • The final concentration was obtained by calculating the mean value for all 5 dilutions. The error corresponds to the standard deviation of these 5 values.
GFP concentration [mg/ml] error [mg/ml]
Lysate HisGFP0.620.17 (27%)
Lysate noTag GFP1.200.31 (26%)
Weber GFP 6.87.762.04 (26%)
Weber GFP 60070.6014.22 (20%)

Experiment 31: Ni/NTA slides for iRIf

2015.07.19

Experiment/Protocol

  • 2 iRIf slides were made until after loading the NTA surface with Ni
  • slides were plasma activated for 5 min at gas flow 80 L/h
  • Spotting pattern:

# spot
1-3 APTES+PDITC+NTA+Ni+Lysate His-GFP
4-6 APTES+PDITC+Lysate His-GFP
7-9 APTES+PDITC+NTA+Ni+Max GFP
10 APTES+PDITC+NTA+bBSA
11 APTES+PDITC+bBSA
  • slides were incubated in PDITC solution for 3h15min
  • NTA solution from 04.07.2015 was used
  • spotted slides were incubated overnight in the fridge at 4°C and humid atmosphere

2015.07.20

Experiment/Protocol

  • slides were blocked by spotting APTES blocking solution on all spots (also PDITC-spots).
  • slides were washed 2x in PBS in petri dish
  • NiSO4 was spotted on the NTA-spots and incubated for 1h15min
  • Slides were washed 2x with PBS + 1x with diluted PBS in glass vase
  • GFPs were spotted according to spotting pattern and incubated o/n at 4°C

2015.07.21

Experiment/Protocol

  • GFP was removed from slide and spots were incubated 2x with BSA (10 mg/mL)for 5 min
  • slides were floated with PBS, then washed 2x with PBS in slide holder for 10 min
  • slides were washed with deluted PBS (1:10) + Imidazole (20 mM)
  • slide 1 was again washed in deluted PBS (1:10) and then measured in iRIf
  • slide 2 was stored in deluted PBS (1:10)

Measurement

Step Solution Concentration Amount
1buffer
2BSA10 mg/ml330 µl
3buffer
4anti-GFP (goat, biotinylated)(in PBS:BSA = 1:1)5 µg/ml340 µl
5buffer
6StrepCy55 µg/ml (in PBS:BSA = 1:1)330 µl

Results

slide 1
slide 2


  • slide 1 was full of salt, therefore slide 2 was washed longer in deluted PBS
  • for slide 2 the blocking step wasn't long enough, we should block more

Experiment 30: SaNSibar 2.0

2015.07.19

Experiment/Protocol

  • replicate experiment 27 from 30.6.2015
  • Each slide was treated only by one person.
  • Spotting pattern:

# spot
1-3 HisGFP lysate on Ni/NTA
4-6 GFP no tag lysate
7-9 Max GFP
10-12 Weber GFP 600 mg/ml
13-15 HisGFP lysate only on APTES/PDITC, no NTA
16-18 GFP no tag lysate
19-21 Max GFP
22-24 Weber GFP 600 mg/ml
25 bBSA on Ni/NTA
26 bBSA only on APTES/PDITC, no NTA
  • slides were incubated in PDITC solution for 3h15min
  • NTA solution from 04.07.2015 was used
  • spotted slides were incubated overnight in the fridge at 4°C and humid atmosphere

2015.07.20

Experiment/Protocol

  • slides were blocked by spotting APTES blocking solution on the NTA-spots for 1 hour
  • on Sa-slide the blocking solution was also spotted on the PDITC-spots
  • slides were washed 2x in PBS in petri dish
  • NiSO4 was spotted on the NTA-spots and incubated for 1h15min
  • Slides were washed 2x with PBS + 1x with diluted PBS in glass vase
  • GFPs were spotted according to spotting pattern and incubated o/n at 4°C
  • on Sa-slide there is 1 additional His-GFP-Lysate spot below spot nr. 15

2015.07.21

Experiment/Protocol

  • GFP was removed from slide and spots were incubated 2x with BSA (10 mg/mL)for 5 min
  • slides were floated with PBS, then washed 2x with PBS in slide holder for 10 min
  • slides were washed with deluted PBS (1:10) + Imidazole (20 mM)
  • GFP fluorescence was measured
  • slides were incubated with Strep-Cy5 for 45 min and washed according to protocol
  • Cy5 fluorescence was measured

2015.07.21

Results

Mean GFP Fluorescence Intensity of all slides + Mean Background for each slide.
Mean Cy5 Fluorescence Intensity of all slides + Mean Background for each slide
  • on Si slide the second bBSA spot (on PDITC) is missing (wasn't spotted)

Experiment 29: Measured fluorescence of dilution series of GFP to determine concentration

2015.07.18

Scheme for dilutions in plate reader:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
AH2OMax GFP 1:10Max GFP 1:20Max GFP 1:30Max GFP 1:40Max GFP 1:50Max GFP 1:60Max GFP 1:70Max GFP 1:80Max GFP 1:90Max GFP 1:100
BPBSLysate His-GFP 1:10Lysate His-GFP 1:20Lysate His-GFP 1:40Lysate His-GFP 1:80Lysate His-GFP 1:100
C Lysate GFP no Tag 1:10Lysate GFP no Tag 1:20Lysate GFP no Tag 1:40Lysate GFP no Tag 1:80Lysate GFP no Tag 1:100
D Weber GFP 8.6 mg/ml 1:50Weber GFP 8.6 mg/ml 1:100Weber GFP 8.6 mg/ml 1:200Weber GFP 8.6 mg/ml 1:500Weber GFP 8.6 mg/ml 1:1000
E Weber GFP 600 mg/ml 1:100Weber GFP 600 mg/ml 1:500Weber GFP 600 mg/ml 1:700Weber GFP 600 mg/ml 1:1000Weber GFP 600 mg/ml 1:2000

Results


  • No linear correlation was obtained for the Max GFP dilutions.
  • The fluorescence intensity of the majority of the chosen Max GFP dilutions was very low.
  • –> Experiment should be repeated with different dilutions (less diluted) and triplicates in order to obtain a calibration curve.

Experiment 28: Comparison of different GFPs on old Ni/NTA surfaces from 2015.06.15

2015.07.06

  • 2 GOPTS and 2 APTES/PDITC slides, each modified with Ni/NTA from 15.06.2015, Experiment 18 (Had been stored in the fridge at 4°C since then)
  • For spotting 11-well spotting mask was used. Each well was filled with 3 µl solution.
  • Spotting pattern:

# spot
1-3 HisGFP lysate
4-6 GFP lysate no Tag
7-9 Weber GFP 8.6 mg/mL / For 2 slides 600 mg/mL (marked with black points in upper left-hand corner)
10 bBSA
11 bBSA

2015.07.07.

  • protein solutions were removed with pipette
  • spots were blocked with 10 mg/ml BSA solution for 5 min
  • spotting masks were removed
  • slides were washed 2×10 min in PBS buffer

Results

Mean Fluorescence Intensity of different GFPs on old NTA slides_all slides each spot.
Mean Fluorescence Intensity of different GFPs on old NTA slides_only PDITC slides Mean of 3 spots per GFP.
Mean Fluorescence Intensity of bBSA-Strep-Cy5 on old NTA slides.

Experiment 27: Comparison of different GFPs on Ni/NTA APTES/PDITC surface, replicate 1 (SaNSibar)

2015.07.06

  • 3 slides were prepared according to the protocols.
  • Each slide was treated only by one person.
  • Spotting pattern:

# spot
1-3 HisGFP lysate on Ni/NTA
4-6 GFP no tag lysate
7-9 Max GFP
10-12 Weber GFP 8.6 mg/ml
13-15 HisGFP lysate only on APTES/PDITC, no NTA
16-18 GFP no tag lysate
19-21 Max GFP
22-24 Weber GFP 8.6 mg/ml
25 bBSA on Ni/NTA
26 bBSA only on APTES/PDITC, no NTA
  • spotted slides were incubated overnight in the fridge at 4°C and humid atmosphere

2015.07.07

  • protein solutions were removed with pipette
  • slides were blocked with BSA 5 mg/ml + 5% ethanolamine in PBS for 45 min
  • slides were washed 2×10 min in PBS buffer without removing spotting mask

Results

Mean GFP Fluorescence Intensity out of three spots + mean background over whole slides.
Mean Cy5 Fluorescence Intensity + mean background.

–> His-GFP-Lysate binds best on Ni-NTA, Weber GFP binds best on PDITC.

Experiment 26: Spotted NTA on PDITC slides to determine amount of unspecific binding

2015.07.02

considerations

  • determine unspecific binding on Ni-NTA surface

Experiment/Protocols

  • prepared 3 APTES/PDITC slides according to APTES + PDITC surface
  • spotted 2 µl NTA (457 mM in 1 M NaHCO3)using the spotting templates
  • spotting pattern:

# spot
1-3 PDITC + NTA + Blocking + His-GFP lysate
4-6 PDITC + NTA + Blocking + Weber His-GFP 8 mg/mL
7-8 PDITC + NTA + Blocking + nT-GFP lysate
9 PDITC + BSA
10 PDITC + Spotting control (cy5 labeled DNA)
11 PDITC + positive control (nT-GFP lysate)

2015.07.03

Experiment/Protocol

  • slides were washed with PBS according to Ni-NTA with spotting mask still on slide
  • 1 % Nickelsulfate solution was spotted on top of the NTA spots (Spot 1-8)
  • slides were again washed with PBS according to Ni-NTA with spotting mask still on slide
  • GFP, His-GFP, BSA and Cy5-labeled DNA were spotted as mentioned in the table above (Experiment 25, 2.7.2015)

2015.07.04

Experiment/Protocol

  • removed protein and DNA solution with pipette
  • incubated twice with 4 µl of BSA (10mg/ml) for 5 min
  • washed twice with PBS for 10 min
  • washed with 10% PBS with 20mM imidazole (27,2 mg in 20 ml PBS) for 10 min
  • washed with 10% PBS for 10 min
  • dried slides with nitrogengun and measured GFP fluorescence

Results

  • in the diagrams the results for slide 2 and 3 are shown. On slide 1 not all spots were visible.
Mean Fluorescence Intensities of slides 2 and 3 with measured background for each spot.


Mean Fluorescence Intensities of slides 2 and 3 with background already substracted.


  • The diagramm shows, that His-GFP was successfully immobilized on the Ni-NTA surface, while GFP without Tag didn't bind very good
  • the fluorescence of our lysate was much stronger than that of the purified His-GFP
  • the positive control (nT-GFP on PDITC) didn't show intense fluorescence, because nT-GFP-Lysate was used

To-Do

  • Repeat dilution series (2 slides, 5 concentrations: 2 spots each, 1:1, 1:4, 1:16, 1:64, 1:256)
  • shutterspeed linearity –> ask Max
  • re-evaluate shutterspeed linearity with NEF-Data from the old dataset (26.05.15)
  • Talk to Günther
    • about what to do next
    • reference values for their Cy5 (How good are our slides?)
    • GFP - why no homogenous spots but rings
    • test if His binds to Ni or to PDITC/NTA by making NTA-spots without Ni

Store slides for GFP incubation in fridge in plastic dishes with top of the dish beneath the slide (dish upside down)

spin GFP before use to separate conglomerates from solution

Experiment 25: Check detectibility of GFP bound on PDITC slides in the iRIf setup

2015.07.01

Considerations

  1. repeat experiment from 2015.06.30 (different GFPs, mCherry, bBSA, bDNA, Cy5DNA on PDITC) on 2 iRIf slides

New 2 ml Eppi of fresh APTES from abcr was prepared and used

Experiment/Protocols

  • 3 iRIf slides
  • surface was prepared according to Plasma activation and APTES + PDITC surface
  • incubation in PDITC solution was 5h instead of 2h
  • slides were spotted (2 µl spots) according to the following pattern:

# spot
1 Lysate GFP no tag
2 Lysate GFP-2x6His
3 Max' GFP-His
4 Weber GFP 8.6 mg/mL
5 Weber GFP 600 mg/mL
6 mCherry
7 BSA 10 mg/mL
8+9 bBSA 50 ng/µL
10 spotting control 2 µL
11 binding control 0.5 µL

Missing corner of spotting mask was in the upper left hand corner of the slide (slide 1: number on left side,


Results

  • due to defects of the iRIf setup no measurement was taken
  • the iRIf-slides were cleaned for reuse

Experiment 24: Compare quality of own PDITC surface with that of AG Roth

2015.07.01

Considerations

  1. compare our slides with slides from Norman

New 2 ml Eppi of fresh APTES from abcr was prepared and used

Experiment/Protocol

  • one of Norman's slides prepared by Norman and one of our slides prepared by us
  • 2 of the prepared iRIf-PDITC-slides were spotted according to the following pattern/table
  • GFP was taken away from well with pipette and immediately replaced by 10 µl of BSA (10 mg/ml)
  • this step was carried out 2x
  • slides were then washed with PBS from squeeze bottle, the spotting mask was removed and the slides were immediately put into a slideholder filled with PBS/BSA for 15 min
  • GFP stock concentrations with 0.5 mg/mL
  • on our slide the BSA spot is left to the bBSA spot
  • on Normans slide the BSA spot is right to the bBSA Spot

# spot
1 GFP Norman 1:10
2 GFP Norman 1:30
3 GFP Norman 1:100
4 GFP Max 1:10
5 GFP Max 1:30
6 GFP Max 1:100
7 GFP Weber 1:10
8 GFP Weber 1:30
9 GFP Weber 1:100
10 bBSA 0.5 mg/mL, 50 %
11 BSA 10 mg/mL

2015.07.02

Experiment/Protocol

  • used slides prepared and spotted on 1.7.2015
  • GFP was taken away from well with pipette and immediately replaced by 10 µl of BSA (10 mg/ml)
  • this step was carried out 2x
  • slides were then washed with PBS from squeeze bottle, the spotting mask was removed and the slides were immediately put into a slideholder filled with 5mg/ml BSA/PBS for ca. 15 min
  • washed slides with aqua dest before putting it into the iRIf setup
  • iRIf programm:
    • blocking with 330 µl BSA (5mg/ml in PBS)
    • flushing with 330 µl anti-gfp (5 µg/ml in 5 mg/ml BSA in PBS)
    • flushing with 330 µl streptavidin-cy5 (5 µg/ml in 5 mg/ml BSA in PBS)

Results

blocking step iGEM slide
Anti-GFP binding iGEM slide
Strep-Cy5 binding iGEM slide


Strep-Cy5 Fluorescence 100% Laser iGEM slide
Strep-Cy5 Fluorescence 100% Laser Norman slide

Experiment 23: Second Replicate: Comparison between different GFPs (Own,Max,Weber), replicate 2 of experiment 22

2015.07.02

Considerations

  • check reproducibility of strong fluorescence intensities from experiment 21

Experiment/Protocols

2015.07.03

Experiment/Protocols

  • the o/n with GFP, mCherry, etc.incubated slides were used
  • GFP was taken away from well with pipette and immediately replaced by 10 µl of BSA (10 mg/ml)
  • this step was carried out 2x
  • slides were then washed with PBS from squeeze bottle, the spotting mask was removed and the slides were immediately put into a slideholder filled with PBS/BSA for 15 min
  • fluorescence intensity was measured

Results

Evaluation of GOPTS slides
Evaluation of PDITC slides