Difference between revisions of "Team:Stanford-Brown/Interlab"

Line 130: Line 130:
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 +
<div class="row featurette">
 +
  <div class="col-md-7">
 +
    <h2 class="featurette-heading">Experiment <span class="small"> From synthetic to biological </span></h2>
 +
    <p class="lead">
 +
There were two experiments, recreating HYDRAs from the Chen <i>et al. </i> publication, and creating bioHYDRAS, which are fully biological versions of HYDRAs.
 +
</p>
 +
  </div>
 +
  <div class="col-md-1"></div>
 +
  <div class="col-md-4">
 +
    <img class="featurette-image img-responsive center-block img-rounded" src="http://lorempixel.com/300/300" alt="Generic placeholder image">
 +
  </div>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<p>
 +
Recreating HYDRAs: By expanding on the protocol by Chen <i> et al.</i> (1) to create HYDRAs, we then used desiccant and wet paper towels in separate chambers to create humidity variance for these HYDRAs to expand and contract, and recorded our results using a ruler and a humidity sensor.
 +
</p>
 +
<p>
 +
 +
BioHYDRAs:
 +
The goal of BioHYDRA was to replace all the parts of HYDRAs by biologically produced substances. We sought out to replace polyamide tape by bacterially cellulose, and the glue by cellulose binding domains on the surface of the spore coat.
 +
Thus, the first step involved cloning a <i> Bacillus </i> construct in <i> Escherichia coli </i> of a fusion protein sequencing consisting of a spore coat protein, cotZ (building off work done on Sporobeads by the LMU Munich 2012 iGEM team), and a cellulose binding domain (CIPA). Additionally, we decided to add aeBlue, a chromogenic protein, between cotZ and CIPA to be able to see with the naked eye whether Bacillus is in a vegetative or a spore state. The plasmid would thereafter need to be transformed and expressed in <i> Bacillus </i>.
 +
We then needed to produce bacterial cellulose. For more details, refer to our Cellulose page.
 +
Finally, our project would consist of testing for the binding affinity of the spores on the cellulose before we could construct our bioHYDRAs. To do so, we used the cellulose binding affinity protocol that the 2015 Edinburgh team sent us in light of our collaboration.
 +
</p>
  
 
   <div class="row featurette">
 
   <div class="row featurette">

Revision as of 06:01, 11 September 2015

SB iGEM 2015

InterLab Measurement Study 2015

Overview

How do standard promoters behave in Mountain View, California, USA? We participated in the 2nd Annual InterLab Measurement study to contribute our results to a body of data from teams from around the world!

See our BioBricks
Generic placeholder image

Background

The purpose of the 2015 InterLab Study is to measure the fluorescence of three devices: a high-, medium-, and low-strength promoters fused to a green fluorescent protein (GFP) generator. iGEM teams from around the world construct the same devices and compare results.

Generic placeholder image

The three devices are:

Device 1: J23101 + I13504, in pSB1C3

Device 2: J23106 + I13504, in pSB1C3

Device 3: J23117 + I13504, in pSB1C3

For our positive control, we used the one suggested: GFP device BBa_I20270. For our negative control, we also used the one suggested: TetR repressible promoter.

All devices and parts were obtained from the 2015 Distribution Kit. Please see the link to our lab notebook below for more detailed information on device assembly. The results were confirmed with DNA sequencing by Elim Bio.

We also participated in the Extra Credit Opportunity.

Experiment From synthetic to biological

There were two experiments, recreating HYDRAs from the Chen et al. publication, and creating bioHYDRAS, which are fully biological versions of HYDRAs.

Generic placeholder image

Recreating HYDRAs: By expanding on the protocol by Chen et al. (1) to create HYDRAs, we then used desiccant and wet paper towels in separate chambers to create humidity variance for these HYDRAs to expand and contract, and recorded our results using a ruler and a humidity sensor.

BioHYDRAs: The goal of BioHYDRA was to replace all the parts of HYDRAs by biologically produced substances. We sought out to replace polyamide tape by bacterially cellulose, and the glue by cellulose binding domains on the surface of the spore coat. Thus, the first step involved cloning a Bacillus construct in Escherichia coli of a fusion protein sequencing consisting of a spore coat protein, cotZ (building off work done on Sporobeads by the LMU Munich 2012 iGEM team), and a cellulose binding domain (CIPA). Additionally, we decided to add aeBlue, a chromogenic protein, between cotZ and CIPA to be able to see with the naked eye whether Bacillus is in a vegetative or a spore state. The plasmid would thereafter need to be transformed and expressed in Bacillus . We then needed to produce bacterial cellulose. For more details, refer to our Cellulose page. Finally, our project would consist of testing for the binding affinity of the spores on the cellulose before we could construct our bioHYDRAs. To do so, we used the cellulose binding affinity protocol that the 2015 Edinburgh team sent us in light of our collaboration.

Data and Results Optimizing the production of biological PHA

Donec ullamcorper nulla non metus auctor fringilla. Vestibulum id ligula porta felis euismod semper. Praesent commodo cursus magna, vel scelerisque nisl consectetur. Fusce dapibus, tellus ac cursus commodo.

Generic placeholder image

Donec tincidunt aliquet justo, sit amet mollis purus varius ac. Quisque ac sapien eu ante convallis cursus congue vel odio. Sed efficitur sapien ut eros sodales ornare. Vestibulum pellentesque lorem sed nulla interdum, non tincidunt velit sagittis. Vestibulum cursus, enim eu porta euismod, enim lectus facilisis diam, at sodales metus ligula sit amet eros. Sed ullamcorper, mauris nec mollis pretium, justo ligula dapibus nulla, non elementum nisl libero ut elit. Proin mi urna, finibus at scelerisque quis, porttitor at mauris. Nulla laoreet venenatis cursus. Vivamus et pellentesque quam, eget malesuada ex. Quisque eu massa ligula. Nam interdum dui sed laoreet efficitur. Aliquam sed vulputate orci. Pellentesque sed sollicitudin lectus. Vivamus nec tortor risus. Vestibulum malesuada feugiat lorem a dignissim. In diam mauris, venenatis at vulputate eget, venenatis sit amet metus. Suspendisse ut mi in ipsum sagittis malesuada at nec erat. Etiam volutpat risus quis nisi hendrerit porttitor vel eu tortor. Donec venenatis, risus sit amet ullamcorper scelerisque, tellus erat consequat nibh, vel dictum velit augue id leo. In eleifend tristique ipsum sed dignissim. Duis mattis, ipsum nec aliquet varius, turpis orci tempus nulla, in sodales libero massa at diam. Nulla maximus eros sed venenatis congue. Phasellus diam nunc, ullamcorper vitae tempor eget, sagittis eu odio. Praesent a mauris porttitor, mattis sem a, sodales massa. Proin et justo lectus. Proin varius magna ac leo ullamcorper accumsan. Proin id diam eget dolor vulputate mattis. Suspendisse pellentesque, nunc sit amet blandit feugiat, risus eros egestas massa, nec condimentum ante sapien ac velit. Vivamus efficitur justo dolor, at gravida lorem venenatis at. Aenean at ligula sapien. Mauris eget eleifend justo, eget faucibus ante. Ut mattis ante vitae dignissim maximus. Integer feugiat arcu purus, a viverra dui elementum vitae. Phasellus mattis porttitor iaculis. In eu nisi eu augue lacinia fringilla venenatis at nunc. Nam est erat, hendrerit ac dignissim sed, mollis eu eros. Morbi vel egestas dui, consectetur posuere nisi. Aliquam vitae tortor vulputate, fringilla est vel, faucibus diam. Suspendisse potenti. Donec sed commodo nulla. Duis feugiat, diam eu pulvinar rhoncus, arcu erat pretium orci, ut porta diam elit eu mi. Etiam eros massa, egestas eu mattis id, hendrerit at ligula. Duis placerat felis nec risus volutpat lobortis. Sed elementum, dolor non feugiat placerat, libero sapien pharetra diam, sed faucibus est ex tristique sem. Vivamus rutrum libero eget mollis sodales. Pellentesque vel scelerisque felis, a imperdiet erat. Fusce quis nisl magna. Sed non libero ultrices sapien hendrerit suscipit aliquet convallis leo. Quisque nec aliquam libero, in commodo ex. In eget nulla consequat, commodo quam id, hendrerit velit. Vestibulum non interdum enim. Ut elit justo, suscipit vel pretium vitae, rutrum sed dui. Donec vehicula sit amet ex ac finibus. Donec ultrices tellus et laoreet dictum.

See our Picture Gallery!

Protocols

The chassis we used for the InterLab Study was E. coli NEB5-alpha, which is Biosafety Level 1. The personal protective equipment used included gloves and long pants. We used BioBricks assembly to construct all of the devices, and verified the sequences with sequencing done by Elim Bio.

To grow up the cells, we completed the following steps as specified in the InterLab Study Protocol Form:

1. Streak out one plate of LB agar with appropriate antibiotic per device and control.
2. Incubate plates for 17 hours at 37C (New Brunswick INNOVA 4200 Shaker Incubator).
3. Inoculate three biological replicates of 4mL liquid cultures in LB + chloramphenicol 15mL conical tubes.
4. Incubate liquid cultures for 18 hours at 37C, shaking at 190RMP and placed at an angle.
5. Samples were placed in 4C fridge for 24 hours before testing.
6. Samples were diluted 1:20 in LB and measured on a flow cytometer.
7. Use a plate reader and 96-well plate to perform OD600 and fluorescence measurements, using 200uL of samples and LB + chloramphenicol blanks.
8. Set instrument to read OD600, take measurements, calculate the dilution required to reach an OD600 of .5 ± 5%, perform the dilutions, and re-measure. Repeat this step until the OD600s are all .5 ± 5%.
9. Place 96-well plate with samples into fluorometer and measure with excitation at 485nm, emission 528nm, cut-off 495nm.
10. Plate reader data was processed using Microsoft Excel.

See our Lab Notebook!


Copyright © 2015 Stanford-Brown iGEM Team