Difference between revisions of "Team:Edinburgh/Attributions"

Line 93: Line 93:
 
             <div class="row">
 
             <div class="row">
 
               <div class="col-md-12">
 
               <div class="col-md-12">
                 <h1 class="brand-heading">Our Story</h1>
+
                 <h1 class="brand-heading">ATTRIBUTIONS</h1>
 
                 <p class="intro-text">
 
                 <p class="intro-text">
                  From its very inception, Edinburgh iGEM 2015 has been steeped in controversy. What makes our team truly unique, however, is the way in which we have not shied away from its presence, but rather embodied it as the cornerstone of the work we strive to build.
+
                <br>
 +
<br>
 
                 </p>
 
                 </p>
 
               </div>
 
               </div>

Revision as of 12:43, 11 September 2015

ATTRIBUTIONS



Foreword

With controversy comes important questions. Some have asked whether our test would implicitly condone drug use, and this has allowed for a fascinating exploration into the moral implications of harm reduction. Consequently, we have become facilitators of a debate regarding the nature of responsible drug policy, which we believe is paramount to a city so stricken by drug use as the one we have come to know, love, and call home.

Internally, this debate is at once restraining and liberating: it constantly forces us to stop and reevaluate what should be the next step forward, as we attempt to balance seemingly disparate beliefs within our own group. Yet, by doing so, we come to learn so much about ourselves, as we uncover ingrained prejudices we never knew existed.

There are endless ways in which our narrative could unfold. Indeed, with each new chapter there will be an audience who stands and applauds with approval, and one which remains seated and scorns with discontent. Who will belong to which audience is difficult to say; however, one thing is certain: we are the authors, and it is our story to tell.