Difference between revisions of "Team:Austin UTexas/Project/Strain Study"

Line 17: Line 17:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
All four strains were transformed with three plasmids that were designed and constructed in spring of 2015. The plasmids contained the same backbone-pSB1C3- and the same vector- a medium promoter and ribosome binding site. The three plasmids differed in only the type of yellow fluorescent protein used: Yellow Fluorescent Protein, Super Yellow Fluorescent Protein, and Enhanced Yellow Fluorescent Protein. These three were selected because of the variance in stability patterns they expressed in the spring semester. [[Image:2015_Austin_UTexas_PLACEHOLDERFIGURE.png|200px|thumb|right|<b>Fig.1</b> description here]] After each strain was transformed with each plasmid, they were grown into over-night culture tubes and then preserved in glycerol stocks. After stocks were made, the four strains that were transformed using the Super-Yellow Fluorescent Protein, each of the strains were grown in media in replicates of six. There were twenty four samples in all. Each culture was grown overnight, a sample was used to carry forward to the next day, a sample was taken for flow cytometry, and glycerol stocks were made. Samples were taken to be analyzed for remaining fluorescence using flow cytometry. The first three days of samples are seen in Figure 1.  The x-axis is the magnitude of fluorescence and the y-axis is the count of cells or objects in sample  with a particular fluorescence. By looking at the counts of positive fluorescence from day to day, it is clear that the Top-Ten strain is quickly breaking down, while the MDS strain has remained stable. After four days, the Top-Ten group of SYFP appeared to have a population that was mostly none fluorescent (SEE Figure 2). On the sixth day, all of the MDS strains, the third and fifth BL-21 strains, and the second BW-25113 strain were carried forward and recorded using the flow cytometer.
 
All four strains were transformed with three plasmids that were designed and constructed in spring of 2015. The plasmids contained the same backbone-pSB1C3- and the same vector- a medium promoter and ribosome binding site. The three plasmids differed in only the type of yellow fluorescent protein used: Yellow Fluorescent Protein, Super Yellow Fluorescent Protein, and Enhanced Yellow Fluorescent Protein. These three were selected because of the variance in stability patterns they expressed in the spring semester. [[Image:2015_Austin_UTexas_PLACEHOLDERFIGURE.png|200px|thumb|right|<b>Fig.1</b> description here]] After each strain was transformed with each plasmid, they were grown into over-night culture tubes and then preserved in glycerol stocks. After stocks were made, the four strains that were transformed using the Super-Yellow Fluorescent Protein, each of the strains were grown in media in replicates of six. There were twenty four samples in all. Each culture was grown overnight, a sample was used to carry forward to the next day, a sample was taken for flow cytometry, and glycerol stocks were made. Samples were taken to be analyzed for remaining fluorescence using flow cytometry. The first three days of samples are seen in Figure 1.  The x-axis is the magnitude of fluorescence and the y-axis is the count of cells or objects in sample  with a particular fluorescence. By looking at the counts of positive fluorescence from day to day, it is clear that the Top-Ten strain is quickly breaking down, while the MDS strain has remained stable. After four days, the Top-Ten group of SYFP appeared to have a population that was mostly none fluorescent (SEE Figure 2). On the sixth day, all of the MDS strains, the third and fifth BL-21 strains, and the second BW-25113 strain were carried forward and recorded using the flow cytometer.
−
[[Image:2015_Austin_UTexas_PLACEHOLDERFIGURE.png|200px|thumb|left|<b>Fig.2</b> description here]]
+
[[Image:2015 Austin UTexas flowcyto-placeholder.png|200px|thumb|left|<b>Fig.2</b> description here]]

Revision as of 20:20, 11 September 2015

---this is a first draft.---

Summer 2015 Data Set

Methods 1 (come up with name)



Methods


Four strains of E. coli were selected to be transformed for the:Top-Ten, MDS-42, BL-21 (DE3), and BW-25113. These Top-Ten, BL-21 (DE3), and BW-25113 were all selected because of the fact that they are commonly used strains in research of synthetic biology. The MDS-42 strain was selected because that strain has many of it’s IS elements removed from its genome. Previous research in the spring has shown that a major cause of mutation in genetic devices is transposable elements inserting into the plasmid. So the hypothesis is that the MDS strain will exhibit greater longevity in terms of fluorescence than the three other strains.

All four strains were transformed with three plasmids that were designed and constructed in spring of 2015. The plasmids contained the same backbone-pSB1C3- and the same vector- a medium promoter and ribosome binding site. The three plasmids differed in only the type of yellow fluorescent protein used: Yellow Fluorescent Protein, Super Yellow Fluorescent Protein, and Enhanced Yellow Fluorescent Protein. These three were selected because of the variance in stability patterns they expressed in the spring semester.
Fig.1 description here
After each strain was transformed with each plasmid, they were grown into over-night culture tubes and then preserved in glycerol stocks. After stocks were made, the four strains that were transformed using the Super-Yellow Fluorescent Protein, each of the strains were grown in media in replicates of six. There were twenty four samples in all. Each culture was grown overnight, a sample was used to carry forward to the next day, a sample was taken for flow cytometry, and glycerol stocks were made. Samples were taken to be analyzed for remaining fluorescence using flow cytometry. The first three days of samples are seen in Figure 1. The x-axis is the magnitude of fluorescence and the y-axis is the count of cells or objects in sample with a particular fluorescence. By looking at the counts of positive fluorescence from day to day, it is clear that the Top-Ten strain is quickly breaking down, while the MDS strain has remained stable. After four days, the Top-Ten group of SYFP appeared to have a population that was mostly none fluorescent (SEE Figure 2). On the sixth day, all of the MDS strains, the third and fifth BL-21 strains, and the second BW-25113 strain were carried forward and recorded using the flow cytometer.
Fig.2 description here