Difference between revisions of "Team:Freiburg/Project/Surface Chemistry"
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | < | + | <h1>The challenge</h1> |
<p> | <p> | ||
Immobilization of proteins is a major task in the development of diagnostic devices. For our approach we needed a chemical surface on the glass slide that allowed the immobilization of our antigens at a distinct spot, strong enough to prevent the antigens from being washed away during the iRIf measurement. Therefore, we wanted to use a covalent binding system for the immobilization of the antigens. On the other hand, using cell-free expression required a surface that was able to bind the generated antigens selectively and no other protein of the expression mix. Working with tag systems fulfilled both criteria. | Immobilization of proteins is a major task in the development of diagnostic devices. For our approach we needed a chemical surface on the glass slide that allowed the immobilization of our antigens at a distinct spot, strong enough to prevent the antigens from being washed away during the iRIf measurement. Therefore, we wanted to use a covalent binding system for the immobilization of the antigens. On the other hand, using cell-free expression required a surface that was able to bind the generated antigens selectively and no other protein of the expression mix. Working with tag systems fulfilled both criteria. | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <h1>Unspecific Surfaces</h3> | ||
<h3>PDITC surface</h3> | <h3>PDITC surface</h3> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | <div class="image_box right"> | |
− | + | <div class="thumb2 tcenter" style="width:510px"> | |
+ | <div class="thumbinner"> | ||
+ | <a class="media" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/25/Freiburg_binding_mechanism_amine_to_PDITC.png" title="Freiburg_binding_mechanism_amine_to_PDITC.png"><img alt="" class="mediabox2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/25/Freiburg_binding_mechanism_amine_to_PDITC.png" width="500"/> | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | <div class="thumbcaption"> | ||
+ | Figure 1: Binding meachanism of proteins to the PDITC surface. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | To enable a detection of an antibody-antigen-interaction in iRIf, the purified antigens can be immobilized on the surface of the iRIf slide with PDITC (p-phenyldiisothiocyanate). The two isothiocyanate groups of PDITC serve as a linker for amino groups (see the binding mechanism shown in figure 1). Therefore, it is often used for the production of a surface, that is able to bind proteins covalently. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | + | <p> | |
− | + | In order to bind PDITC on the surface of the iRIf slides we first activated them with oxygen plasma. This creates very reactive hydroxyl groups on the glass. If a silane is added to the activated glass slide the hydroxyl groups bind to the silicium atoms. By using the silane APTES (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane), an amino group that can bind the PDITC to the surface is created. With this surface (figure 2) we were not only able to immobilize our purified antigens but also to establish a specific Ni-NTA surface on its basis. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <div class="flexbox"> | |
− | </div> | + | <div class="thumb2 tcenter" style="width:510px"> |
− | </div> | + | <div class="thumbinner"> |
+ | <a class="media" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a3/Freiburg_files-20150903_pditc_surface.png" title="files:20150903_pditc_surface.png"><img alt="" class="mediabox2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a3/Freiburg_files-20150903_pditc_surface.png" width="500"/> | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | <div class="thumbcaption"> | ||
+ | Figure 2: PDITC surface | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | < | + | </p> |
− | < | + | |
− | + | <p> | |
− | + | Additionally the PDITC chemistry can also be used for the immobilization of DNA. We linked the DNA constructs for cell-free expression to an amino group which enabled binding to PDITC. On the PDMS slide (polydimethylsiloxane), which represents the upper part of our two-slide-system, a PDITC surface can be created thus allowing to the immobilization of DNA. This way, we can directly express proteins in our flow chamber.<sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__1" id="fnt__1" name="fnt__1">1)</a></sup> | |
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h3>GOPTS surface</h3> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The GOPTS (3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane) surface (figure 3) is produced in a very similar manner to the PDITC surface. By plasma activation reactive hydroxyl groups are created on the glass surface. These bind silanes that are added later. In contrast to the PDITC surface the silane GOPTS carries an epoxy- instead of an amino group. The epoxy group is a highly strained three atom triangle and therefore very reactive. This allows for the coupling of a variety of different ligands with different functional groups.<sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__4" id="fnt__4" name="fnt__4">4)</a></sup> For our application we need to immobilize proteins on the surface of the iRIf slide. This is achieved by the covalent binding of amines, thioles or hydroxy groups of a protein to the epoxy groups on the glass surface. Because there is no need for an additional linker between silane and protein like PDITC the GOPTS surface can be produced much faster. Furthermore, GOPTS surfaces normally exhibit less unspecific binding than other silane surfaces due to the formation of a very dense layer.<sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__5" id="fnt__5" name="fnt__5">5)</a></sup> <br/> | ||
In our experiments the GOPTS surface was able to immobilize proteins, however, the PDITC surface showed better binding capacities and worked better as basis for the Ni-NTA/His-tag system, so that we focused on this surface type. | In our experiments the GOPTS surface was able to immobilize proteins, however, the PDITC surface showed better binding capacities and worked better as basis for the Ni-NTA/His-tag system, so that we focused on this surface type. | ||
</p> | </p> |
Revision as of 13:38, 16 September 2015
Surface Chemistry - Designing a Specific Surface
könnt ihr hier eventuell solche bilder wie in der Präsi verwenden, wo die einzelnen Schichten der Chemie eingezeichnet sind? An die Chemiker, kann man eventuell noch den Reaktionsmechanismus darstellen, wie letztlich ein molekül an der Oberfläche bindet? Es wäre auch cool zu sehen, wie ein Protein oder eine DNA an die Oberflächen binden kann. Z.B. Macht doch an die Schlangenlinie des HIS tags noch ein schematisches Protein dran. Ich glaube dass ein nicht Chemiker sonnst schwierigkeiten hat es zu verstehen.(Stefan) Ich glaube, es heißt chlorOalkane.. (Luisa)
The challenge
Immobilization of proteins is a major task in the development of diagnostic devices. For our approach we needed a chemical surface on the glass slide that allowed the immobilization of our antigens at a distinct spot, strong enough to prevent the antigens from being washed away during the iRIf measurement. Therefore, we wanted to use a covalent binding system for the immobilization of the antigens. On the other hand, using cell-free expression required a surface that was able to bind the generated antigens selectively and no other protein of the expression mix. Working with tag systems fulfilled both criteria.
Though there are many different possibilities to bind a protein to a chemical surface, a lot of testing is required in order to find the surface that fits best to your needs. Therefore we built up different types of chemical surfaces. They varied in their specificity and the layer thickness.
Unspecific Surfaces
PDITC surface
To enable a detection of an antibody-antigen-interaction in iRIf, the purified antigens can be immobilized on the surface of the iRIf slide with PDITC (p-phenyldiisothiocyanate). The two isothiocyanate groups of PDITC serve as a linker for amino groups (see the binding mechanism shown in figure 1). Therefore, it is often used for the production of a surface, that is able to bind proteins covalently.
In order to bind PDITC on the surface of the iRIf slides we first activated them with oxygen plasma. This creates very reactive hydroxyl groups on the glass. If a silane is added to the activated glass slide the hydroxyl groups bind to the silicium atoms. By using the silane APTES (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane), an amino group that can bind the PDITC to the surface is created. With this surface (figure 2) we were not only able to immobilize our purified antigens but also to establish a specific Ni-NTA surface on its basis.
Additionally the PDITC chemistry can also be used for the immobilization of DNA. We linked the DNA constructs for cell-free expression to an amino group which enabled binding to PDITC. On the PDMS slide (polydimethylsiloxane), which represents the upper part of our two-slide-system, a PDITC surface can be created thus allowing to the immobilization of DNA. This way, we can directly express proteins in our flow chamber.1)
GOPTS surface
The GOPTS (3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane) surface (figure 3) is produced in a very similar manner to the PDITC surface. By plasma activation reactive hydroxyl groups are created on the glass surface. These bind silanes that are added later. In contrast to the PDITC surface the silane GOPTS carries an epoxy- instead of an amino group. The epoxy group is a highly strained three atom triangle and therefore very reactive. This allows for the coupling of a variety of different ligands with different functional groups.4) For our application we need to immobilize proteins on the surface of the iRIf slide. This is achieved by the covalent binding of amines, thioles or hydroxy groups of a protein to the epoxy groups on the glass surface. Because there is no need for an additional linker between silane and protein like PDITC the GOPTS surface can be produced much faster. Furthermore, GOPTS surfaces normally exhibit less unspecific binding than other silane surfaces due to the formation of a very dense layer.5)
In our experiments the GOPTS surface was able to immobilize proteins, however, the PDITC surface showed better binding capacities and worked better as basis for the Ni-NTA/His-tag system, so that we focused on this surface type.
Ni-NTA - His Tag system
The Nickel-NTA (Nitrolotriacetic acid) system is very commonly used for protein purification. Here the coordination of the Imidazole-residue of Histidine to Nickel ions is utilized to bind proteins with a His-tag reversible to Ni-NTA covered columns. The proteins can be eluted with Imidazole which conquers with the Histidine-tag.2) The same coordination can be used to fuse proteins to a surface. We used this to produce specific surfaces on the glass slide of our DiaCHIP. For in our approach we are producing the antigens against which we want to test on demand by cell-free expression, we want our surface to only bind our freshly expressed antigens and not all the other proteins present in the cell-free mix. This is why we need a specific surface. All our antigens were cloned with a 10xHis-tag, so they can bind to a Ni-NTA surface.
We established our own protocol for the preparation of this Ni-NTA surface based on a PDITC surface. On the unspecific PDITC surface NTA with a Lysine-residue (AB-NTA) was immobilized and loaded with Ni-ions. The general setup of the surface is shown in fig. 4.3)
Halo surface
The Halo surface is based on the Halo Tag system developed by Promega. The system consists of a 34 kDa enzyme called the HaloTag that binds covalently to a chloroalkane ligand. The binding between this two parts is fast, highly specific and irreversible due to slight modifications of the reactive center of the HaloTag enzyme that prevent dissociation. The drawback of this system is the relatively huge tag, which has to be fused to the protein you want to study. It can interfere with folding, solubility or functionality of the targeted protein.6) 7)
To immobilize proteins specifically on a glass surface we coated the surface with the HaloTag ligand (fig. 5). The ligand is bound to the surface after oxygen plasma activation, as described for PDITC and GOPTS. The HaloTag, which is fused to the protein we want to immobilize, binds to its ligand and therefore preserves the protein of interest on the surface.
We experimented with a variety of different HaloTag ligands, which differed in length of the alkane chain and surface attachment method. The surface consisting of (3-Chloropropyl)triethoxysilane shown in fig. 5 showed the most promising results. We were able to immobilize Halo tagged proteins on the surface, but the main challenge to overcome for this surface was minimizing unspecific protein binding. The necessary optimizations, for this surface to be specific enough to be used in our project, could not be performed due to time limitations
Spy surface
The Spy surface is based on the SpyTag/Catcher system. It was created by splitting the CnaB2 domain of the FbaB-protein from Streptococcus pyogenes in two, followed by rational modifications of the fragments. The SpyTag binds to the SpyCatcher through the spontaneous formation of an isopeptide bond within minutes. Due to the covalent nature of this hybridization the binding is irreversible. 8) To immobilize proteins on a surface using the Spy system we tagged the desired protein with the SpyTag. Then the purified SpyCatcher is bound to a protein binding surface like GOPTS or PDITC. Through the binding of SpyTag and SpyCatcher the desired protein is kept at the surface and stably immobilized. Due to troubles during the cloning and purification of the SpyCatcher we were not able to test the Spy surface.