Difference between revisions of "Team:Glasgow/Interlab"
Line 414: | Line 414: | ||
<div class="text"> | <div class="text"> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <b>Charlotte Flynn</b>- Carried out cloning of devices, measurements of devices and completed the relevant forms and content of wiki page. </div> | + | <b>Charlotte Flynn</b> - Carried out cloning of devices, measurements of devices and completed the relevant forms and content of wiki page. </div> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
Line 441: | Line 441: | ||
</h5> | </h5> | ||
<div class="text"> | <div class="text"> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>17/08/2015 (Day 1)</b> - Made TOP-10 competent cells using overnights. Got the parts J23101, J23106, J23117, I13504, I20270 and R0040 off the iGEM distributions plates. Transformed the resuspended DNA into the competent cells, plated them with the appropriate antibiotic and grew them overnight. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>18/08/2015 (Day 2)</b> - Picked a single colony of each part, inoculated broth and grew over night. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>19/08/2015 (Day 3)</b> - Carried out mini preps of each part from overnights and made glycerol stocks. Digested promoters J23101, J23106 and J23117 with Pst1 and Spe1 and I13504 with Xba1 and Pst1. J23106 and I13504 didn't cut correctly therefore set up more overnights to repeat digestion. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>20/08/2015 (Day 4)</b> - Carried out mini preps I13504 and J23106 and re digested each part. Carried out gel extractions, purifications and ligated each promoter to the GFP part I13504. Set up over nights of TOP-10. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>21/08/2015 (Day 5)</b> - Transformed TOP-10 cells with each device (I13504:J23101, I13504:J23106 and I13504:J23117) and positive/negative controls and plated them. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>24/08/2015 (Day 6)</b> - Set up overnights and restreaks of 1 colony of each device. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>25/08/2015 (Day 7)</b> - Prepared samples of each device and controls for measurement by two methods; measuring the A600 of devices in broth and diluting to 0.5 and diluting samples of devices in PBS and measuring their A600 to determine to most accurate method. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>26/08/2015 (Day 8)</b> - Set up overnights of colony 1,2 and 3 of each device, positive and negative control and technical replicants. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>27/08/2015 (Day 9)</b> - Carried out mini preps of colony 1 of each device and controls and sent for sequencing. Prepared samples of each device (colony1-3) for measurement along with two technical replicants using the PBS method. Carried out GFP fluorescence readings on a 96 well plate of each device, positive and negative control and a dilution series of LOV proteins and FAM labelled oligonucleoutide. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>28/08/2015 (Day 10)</b> - Calculated absolute values of fluorescence of GFP and submitted the completed InterLab Worksheet and Protocol forms. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o < | + | o <b>31/08/2015 -13/08/2015</b> – Completed wiki page. |
</br> | </br> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 479: | Line 479: | ||
Model and manufacturer: | Model and manufacturer: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | o Incubator – 2cm shaking diameter | + | o <b>Incubator</b> – 2cm shaking diameter |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o | + | o <b>BioMate™ 3S Spectrophotometer: Life Science Analyzer</b> – Used to measure absorbance at 600nm of each sample. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | o Typhoon FLA 9500 | + | o <b>Typhoon FLA 9500: GE Healthcare Life Sciences</b> - Wavelength used to excite cells - 475nm. Filter/channel used to capture the light emission from the cells - Filter BPB1 (530DF20). |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 496: | Line 496: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/24/2015_InterLab_13.png"> | <center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/24/2015_InterLab_13.png"> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 1</b>: Spectrophotometer calibration curve |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
Line 512: | Line 512: | ||
<center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/62/2015-Glasgow-interlab1.png"> | <center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/62/2015-Glasgow-interlab1.png"> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 2</b>: Fluorescence readings of a dilution series of phiLOV. 67.5µg = 67.5µg phiLOV in 100µl PBS. Each concentration was carried out twice. |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/af/2015-Glasgow-interlab3.png" height='60%' width='60%'/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/af/2015-Glasgow-interlab3.png" height='60%' width='60%'/> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Table 1</b>: Summary of the fluorescence readings of phiLOV protein. |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b8/2015-Glasgow-interlab2.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b8/2015-Glasgow-interlab2.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 3</b>: Calibration curve of fluorescence of phiLOV |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 538: | Line 538: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/70/2015-Glasgow-interlab4.jpg" height="40%" width="40%"/> | <center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/70/2015-Glasgow-interlab4.jpg" height="40%" width="40%"/> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Table 2</b>: Summary of BioBrick used</figcaption> |
</br> | </br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/21/2015-Glasgow-interlab5.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/21/2015-Glasgow-interlab5.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 4</b>: Device cloning strategy</figcaption> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 581: | Line 581: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<center><figure><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8d/2015-Glasgow-interlab6.png"> | <center><figure><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8d/2015-Glasgow-interlab6.png"> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 5</b>: Fluorescence readings of a dilution series of FAM labelled oligonucleotide. 10pmol = 10pmol FAM labelled oligonucleotide in 100µl PBS.</figcaption> |
</br> | </br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f2/2015-Glasgow-Interlab20.png" height="60%" width="60%"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f2/2015-Glasgow-Interlab20.png" height="60%" width="60%"> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Table 3</b>: Fluorescence readings of FAM labelled oligonucleotide.</figcaption> |
</br> | </br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0c/2015-Glasgow-interlab8.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0c/2015-Glasgow-interlab8.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Figure 6</b>: Confirmation of linear relationship between FAM labelled oligonucleotide concentration and measured fluorescence on the Typhoon. Gradient of this calibration curve is the conversion factor for fluorescence as measured by the Typhoon to equivalent pmol of FAM labelled oligo.</figcaption> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 604: | Line 604: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d0/2015-Glasgow-interlab9.png"> | <center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d0/2015-Glasgow-interlab9.png"> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Table 4</b>: Absorbance at 600nm for each biological and technical replicates of the devices and controls. Units are arbitrary.</figcaption> |
</br> | </br> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
Line 613: | Line 613: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/2015-Glasgow-interlab23.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/2015-Glasgow-interlab23.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Table 5</b>: Summary of fluorescence data measured for the three devices and controls.</figcaption> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 632: | Line 632: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/ff/2015-Glasgow-interlab21.png" height="70%" width="70%"/> | <center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/ff/2015-Glasgow-interlab21.png" height="70%" width="70%"/> | ||
− | <figcaption>< | + | <figcaption><b>Table 6</b>: Derived measurements of devices and controls.</figcaption> |
</br> | </br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/78/2015-Glasgow-Interlab25.png" height="50%" width="50%"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/78/2015-Glasgow-Interlab25.png" height="50%" width="50%"/> | ||
− | <figcaption> < | + | <figcaption> <b>Figure 8</b>: </figcaption> |
</br> | </br> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 649: | Line 649: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/2015-Glasgow-Interlab24.png" height="70%" width="70%"/> | <center><figure> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/2015-Glasgow-Interlab24.png" height="70%" width="70%"/> | ||
− | <figcaption> < | + | <figcaption> <b>Table 7</b>: Summary of absolute number of GFP molecules per cell.</figcaption> |
In order to estimate the absolute number of GFP molecules per cell the following calculations were carried out: | In order to estimate the absolute number of GFP molecules per cell the following calculations were carried out: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
Line 681: | Line 681: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
⇒ 1 OD600 of TOP10 = 4x10^8 cells per 200 ul | ⇒ 1 OD600 of TOP10 = 4x10^8 cells per 200 ul | ||
− | <ul><li> So 1 cell contains 4.4 x 10^14 / 4 x10^8 = < | + | <ul><li> So 1 cell contains 4.4 x 10^14 / 4 x10^8 = <b>1 million copies of GFP</b></li></ul> |
</br> | </br> | ||
⇒ 1 million molecules of GFP = (1000000/6.02x10^23) = 1.7x10^-18 moles GFP | ⇒ 1 million molecules of GFP = (1000000/6.02x10^23) = 1.7x10^-18 moles GFP | ||
Line 687: | Line 687: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
⇒ typical total protein content of bacterial cell = 100 femto grams | ⇒ typical total protein content of bacterial cell = 100 femto grams | ||
− | <ul><li> So < | + | <ul><li> So <b>approximately half of all cellular protein is GFP</b></li></ul> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 705: | Line 705: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
⇒ 1 OD600 of TOP10 = 4x10^8 cells per 200 ul | ⇒ 1 OD600 of TOP10 = 4x10^8 cells per 200 ul | ||
− | <ul><li> So 1 cell contains 1.08x10^14 / 4 x10^8 = 272,405 = < | + | <ul><li> So 1 cell contains 1.08x10^14 / 4 x10^8 = 272,405 = <b>270,000 copies of GFP</b></li></ul> |
</br> | </br> | ||
⇒ 270,000 molecules of GFP = (270,000/6.02x10^23) = 4.48x10^-19 moles GFP | ⇒ 270,000 molecules of GFP = (270,000/6.02x10^23) = 4.48x10^-19 moles GFP | ||
Line 711: | Line 711: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
⇒ typical total protein content of bacterial cell = 100 femto grams | ⇒ typical total protein content of bacterial cell = 100 femto grams | ||
− | <ul><li> so < | + | <ul><li> so <b>12% of cellular protein is GFP</b></li></ul> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 731: | Line 731: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
⇒ 1 OD600 of TOP10 = 4x10^8 cells per 200 ul | ⇒ 1 OD600 of TOP10 = 4x10^8 cells per 200 ul | ||
− | <ul><li> So 1 cell contains 1.08 x 10^12 / 4 x10^8 = < | + | <ul><li> So 1 cell contains 1.08 x 10^12 / 4 x10^8 = <b>2,700 copies of GFP</b></li></ul> |
</br> | </br> | ||
⇒ 1 million molecules of GFP = (2,700/6.02x10^23) = 4.48x10^-21 moles GFP | ⇒ 1 million molecules of GFP = (2,700/6.02x10^23) = 4.48x10^-21 moles GFP | ||
Line 737: | Line 737: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
⇒ typical total protein content of bacterial cell = 100 femto grams | ⇒ typical total protein content of bacterial cell = 100 femto grams | ||
− | <ul><li> so < | + | <ul><li> so <b>1.2x10^-3 % of all cellular protein is GFP</b></li></ul> |
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 12:42, 18 September 2015
Interlab Study
Home > Measurement > Interlab Study
Overview
All 2015 iGEM teams have been invited to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology. Each lab will obtain fluorescence data for the same three GFP-coding devices with different promoters varying in strength. The objective is to assess the robustness of standard parts and the variability of measurements among different research groups using different lab techniques.
Introduction
This year iGEM Glasgow have participated in the InterLab study and Extra Credit. The three devices required were cloned, as specified, and using a plate reader measurements were obtained in absolute units in terms of moles of FAM labelled oligonucleotide.
Release
Individuals responsible for conducting InterLab study
Others who should be credited, e.g., in a publication based on this data
Dates of InterLab Study
Detailed Lab Book
Equipment
Equipment used to acquire measurements
o Incubator – 2cm shaking diameter o BioMate™ 3S Spectrophotometer: Life Science Analyzer – Used to measure absorbance at 600nm of each sample. o Typhoon FLA 9500: GE Healthcare Life Sciences - Wavelength used to excite cells - 475nm. Filter/channel used to capture the light emission from the cells - Filter BPB1 (530DF20).
Spectrophotometer calibration
Typhoon FLA 9500 calibration
Methodology
Protocol for cloning devices
Preparation for measurements
Protocol for measurements
The controls
Protocol for calculating a conversion factor for absolute units
Measurements
Direct Measurement (Raw Data)
Derived Measurements (Conversion to Absolute units)
Estimation of absolute number of GFP molecules per cell
References
Buckley, A. Petersen, J. Roe, A. Douce, G. Christie, J. (2015). LOV-based reporters for fluorescence imaging. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 27 (1), p39–45.