To chose the appropriate therapy for a patient suffering from an autoimmune disease the identification of antibodies targeting his own cells is crucial. This task is severely complicated as the variability of autoantibodies is greatly increased due to pathways of inter- and intramolecular epitope spreading 16) . Therefore, a diagnostic assay does not only have to test for one kind of target but for a whole spectrum. This leads to a high demand for multiplexed detection systems that may detect all autoantibodies at once, thus providing fast aid in choosing the appropriate therapy while limiting costs and the needed amount of sample material. Today's methods to guide medical professionals in their diagnosis of autoimmune diseases are all variations of the same basic principle: Autoantibodies from a patient’s blood sample are captured by antigens derived from HEP-2 or liver cell lines that are immobilized on a solid support. In the Line Immunoassay (LIA) approach antigens are applied as thin lines on cut nylon membranes. These membrane stripes are then flushed with the sample that is to be analyzed and processed as in conventional immunoblotting 17) . Scaling down this approach results in immobilization of the antigens on protein microarrays or microbeads. For protein microarrays antigens are spotted using the same techniques as in the preparation of DNA microarrays. The identity of each antigen is coded by its location on the array. The detection pattern on the array thus provides information about antigen-antibody interactions. Once more, antibody binding is detected by specific secondary antibodies labeled with a fluorescent dye. When immobilizing antigens on microbeads their identity can be encoded by different techniques. In Laser-microbead-arrays microspheres of up to 100 different laser-reactive colors are coated with one type of antigen each, thus keeping the identity information 16). These microspheres are mixed and incubated with a serum sample and a fluorescence labeled secondary antibody before the analysis is realized making use of dual laser flow cytometry. As the first laser reads the identity information from the microbead's color and the second the signal strength from the fluorescence labeled secondary antibody, again full information about the interaction is achievable.
Difference between revisions of "Team:Freiburg/Project/Diagnostics details"
(25 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Freiburg/wiki_content_start}} | {{Freiburg/wiki_content_start}} | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
− | + | <!--========= BEGIN: GoBack button ==========--> | |
+ | <div class="button_back"> | ||
+ | <a style="color:#FFF" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Design"> << Back</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <!--========= END: GoBack button ==========--> | ||
<style> | <style> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
/*========= BEGIN: style for navigation bar ==========*/ | /*========= BEGIN: style for navigation bar ==========*/ | ||
#project { | #project { | ||
Line 20: | Line 26: | ||
/*========= END: style for navigation bar ==========*/ | /*========= END: style for navigation bar ==========*/ | ||
+ | horizontal_menu { | ||
+ | margin: 0px auto; | ||
+ | padding: 5%; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | .horizontal_menu ul{ | ||
+ | margin: 0px auto; | ||
+ | padding: 0px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | .horizontal_menu li { | ||
+ | margin: 5px auto; | ||
+ | padding: 2.1%; | ||
+ | width: 120px; | ||
+ | list-style: none; | ||
+ | display: inline-block; | ||
+ | position: relative; | ||
+ | text-align: center; | ||
+ | border: 2px groove #0051A2; | ||
+ | border-radius: 8px; | ||
+ | } | ||
/*h2{ | /*h2{ | ||
− | + | color: #EEE; | |
− | + | font-size: 200%; | |
} | } | ||
*/ | */ | ||
</style> | </style> | ||
− | <div class=" | + | <div class="kommentar"> |
− | + | Julika arbeitet dran! Finger weg! :) | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="content_box"> | + | <div class="content_box"> |
− | <h1>Today's Applications of Immunodiagnostics</h1> | + | <h1>Today's Applications of Immunodiagnostics</h1> |
− | <p> | + | <p> |
− | In the poorest countries | + | In the world's poorest countries more than half of the deaths are due to infectious diseases – in the wealthiest countries it is less than 5% |
− | </p> | + | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__1" id="fnt__1" name="fnt__1">1)</a> |
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | <div class="horizontal_menu"> | + | <div class="horizontal_menu"> |
− | <ul> | + | <ul> |
− | + | <li><a href="#Introduction">Introduction</a></li> | |
− | + | <li><a href="#Current_Methods">Current Methods<a></li> | |
− | + | <li><a href="#Limitations">Limitations</a></li> | |
− | + | <li><a href="#DiaCHIP_Contribution">DiaCHIP Contribution</a></li> | |
− | + | <li><a href="#Outlook">Outlook</a></li> | |
− | </ul> | + | </ul> |
− | </div> | + | </div> |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="content_box"> | + | <div class="content_box"> |
− | <!-- EDIT1 SECTION "Today's Applications of Immunodiagnostics" [1-206] --> | + | <!-- EDIT1 SECTION "Today's Applications of Immunodiagnostics" [1-206] --> |
− | <h2 class="sectionedit2">The Field of Diagnostics</h2> | + | <span id="Introduction" class="anchor"></span> |
− | + | <h2 class="sectionedit2">The Field of Diagnostics</h2> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <p> | |
− | <p> | + | Medical diagnostics comprise the whole process of tracing the source leading to a patient's symptoms. Usually, it is understood as the identification of a pathogen or a malfunction responsible for the illness. <br> |
− | Medical diagnostics comprise the whole process of tracing the source leading to a patient's symptoms. Usually, it is understood as the identification of a pathogen or a malfunction responsible for the illness. <br> | + | To achieve an efficient disease treatment, clinical diagnostics are mostly divided into the following steps: |
− | To achieve an efficient disease treatment, clinical diagnostics are mostly divided into the following steps: | + | </p> |
− | </p> | + | <p> |
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>A clinician, interviewing the patient and considering his medical history, risk factors and current problems, proposes a certain differential diagnosis, thus pre-limiting the spectrum of possible diseases.<br><br> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li>This is usually followed by the performance of diagnostic tests (normally in a central laboratory) to confirm the differential diagnosis and to clearly identify or at least further limit possible causes of the symptoms.<br><br> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li >Finally, this leads to a treatment consisting of medication, surgery, hospitalization or discharge.<br> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="image_box right"> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3a/Freiburg_Patient.jpeg" width="500px"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Interest in the so called Point-Of-Care (POC) diagnostics increased dramatically | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__2" id="fnt__2" name="fnt__2">2)</a> | ||
+ | </sup> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__3" id="fnt__3" name="fnt__3">3)</a> | ||
+ | </sup> | ||
+ | in the last decades. POC diagnostics (or bedside diagnostics) are diagnostic tests that can be performed directly at a patient's side or even bedside. The output of such a test is immediately available – thus circumventing the usually necessary sending of samples to external labs. | ||
+ | The term POC encompasses many possible end-use settings outside of a centralized testing facility like emergency settings, regional health clinics, medical practices as well as home or mobile use. <br> | ||
+ | These tests consist of common devices that are present in everyday life, such as AB0-testing, blood glucose testing, blood gas and electrolytes analysis, pregnancy testing and cholesterol screening. <br> | ||
+ | For the near future an increase in the amount of products for POC diagnostic is predicted | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__4" id="fnt__4" name="fnt__4">4)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>, | ||
+ | thereby confirming the need for such applications. | ||
+ | In the face of aging populations, spreading of infectious diseases especially in the developing world, biohazard threats and increasing numbers of autoimmune diseases and allergies in the developed world | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__5" id="fnt__5" name="fnt__5">5)</a> | ||
+ | </sup> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__6" id="fnt__6" name="fnt__6">6)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>, | ||
+ | POC tests become inevitable.<br> | ||
+ | But these devices also are convenient methods for improving everyday life: a drop of blood could easily reveal the physical cause of feelings of discomfort, such as a the lack of certain metabolic substances. A simple diet suggestion may thus increase life quality and health in one go. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 89: | Line 129: | ||
<div class="content_box"> | <div class="content_box"> | ||
<!-- EDIT2 SECTION "What are diagnostics" [207-3044] --> | <!-- EDIT2 SECTION "What are diagnostics" [207-3044] --> | ||
− | <h2>Current Diagnostic Methods</h2> | + | <span id="Current_Methods" class="anchor"></span> |
− | <p> | + | <h2>Current Diagnostic Methods</h2> |
− | The four most common centralized laboratory techniques are blood chemistry, immunoassays, nucleic-acid amplification tests and flow cytometry <sup><a class="fn_top" href="# | + | <p> |
− | As the <a class="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/System" title="DiaCHIP">DiaCHIP</a> is an immunodiagnostic method we will focus on this part of diagnostics and compare it to commonly applied methods in today's clinics and labs. | + | The four most common centralized laboratory techniques are blood chemistry, immunoassays, nucleic-acid amplification tests and flow cytometry |
− | + | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__2" id="fnt__2" name="fnt__2">2)</a> | |
− | < | + | </sup>. |
− | </p> | + | As the |
+ | <a class="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/System" title="DiaCHIP">DiaCHIP | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | is an immunodiagnostic method we will focus on this part of diagnostics and compare it to commonly applied methods in today's clinics and labs. Immunodiagnostics are based on antigen-antibody interactions, which might be present within the body fluids of a patient. By detecting and identifying key proteins within a patient's sample like blood or urine, these tests enable to distinguish between major classes of diseases like infectious diseases, metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases or cancer | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__3" id="fnt__3" name="fnt__3">3)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | Immunodiagnostics are realized by immunoassays, which summarize a wide range of formats, allowing quantification and monitoring of small molecules, large proteins and even whole pathogens | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__2" id="fnt__2" name="fnt__2">2)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | Three prominent examples of immunoassays are lateral flow tests, ELISAs and miniaturized immunoassays (microarrays). | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | <div class="image_box left"> | + | <div class="image_box left"> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | </p> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/62/Freiburg_Schwangerschaftstest.jpeg" width="320px"> |
− | </br> | + | </div> |
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <strong>Lateral flow test - simple and rapid, no multiplexing, limited sensitivity</strong>: | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The lateral flow test is commonly known as strip test. It is rather complicated in its setup, but extremely easy to use as only a drop of liquid has to be added to get a result that is easy to interpret within minutes. The test confirms its validity and the presence or absence of the target molecule through the appeareance of colored stripes. Prominent examples are pregnancy tests, but also drug-abuse tests, HIV diagnostics in developing countries | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__4" id="fnt__4" name="fnt__4">4)</a> | ||
+ | </sup> | ||
+ | or blood-glucose tests. Stripe tests can be seen as the gold standard for Point-Of-Care devices - easy to store, use and easy to read out. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | < | + | <div class="image_box right"> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b7/Freiburg_Diagnostics_ELISA.jpg" width="380px"> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | ||
− | </ | + | |
− | + | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <strong>ELISA - sensitive but time consuming, no multiplexing</strong>: | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is seen as the state-of-the-art technique for highly sensitive serological diagnosis. ELISA is based on the interaction of a pathogenic antigen and its corresponding antibodies.</br> | ||
+ | The typically used “sandwich” ELISA requires an antigen with at least two binding sites and a pair of antibodies binding these sites. At first, a capture antibody is immobilized on the surface of a microplate well. <br> | ||
+ | After incubation with the sample and the binding of the respective antigen, the seconardy antibody is added. Either this secondary antibody or a third one, binding the second, yields a signal enhancement, mostyl by enzyme coupled reactions, if the antigen was present in the sample. This procedure increases the sensitivity about 10,000 fold down to pg/ml scales | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__7" id="fnt__7" name="fnt__7">7)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | ELISA is a very sensitive and specific test, most commonly used in serological diagnostics, e.g. for <a class="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/Diseases#Zoster">Varicella Zoster</a> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__8" id="fnt__8" name="fnt__8">8)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>, | ||
+ | Hepatitis B | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__9" id="fnt__9" name="fnt__9">9)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>, | ||
+ | Toxoplasmosis | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__10" id="fnt__10" name="fnt__10">10)</a> | ||
+ | </sup> | ||
+ | or Ebola | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__11" id="fnt__11" name="fnt__11">11)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | Depending on the assay protocol used, a whole ELISA can be carried out within some hours to one day. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | + | <p> | |
− | < | + | <strong>Miniaturized Immunoassay (Microarray) and Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC)</strong>: |
− | < | + | <br><br> |
− | < | + | Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC) refers to the idea that many processes in the lab can be improved and automated by miniaturizing them on or into a chip. A microarry is a multiplexed or multiparallel LOC-device |
− | + | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__12" id="fnt__12" name="fnt__12">12)</a> | |
− | < | + | </sup>. |
− | </ | + | <br> |
− | + | Many scientists consider LOC-based methods to be the most likely technological driver to fundamentally transform the Point-Of-Care diagnostic industry | |
− | </ | + | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__4" id="fnt__4" name="fnt__4">4)</a> |
− | + | </sup> | |
− | < | + | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__13" id="fnt__13" name="fnt__13">13)</a> |
− | + | </sup>. | |
− | + | Nowadays, miniaturized immunoassays are one of the most important analysis platforms for proteins | |
− | + | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__3" id="fnt__3" name="fnt__3">3)</a> | |
− | + | </sup>. | |
− | < | + | <br> |
− | + | The development of Lab-on-a-Chip systems is closely linked to the emergence of microfluidics. Microfluidic techniques use small, compact, low-power and mass-producible chips, which are designed for small sample sizes and rapid but at the same time sensitive analysis | |
− | </ | + | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__14" id="fnt__14" name="fnt__14">14)</a> |
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | Various LOC diagnostic modules have been integrated within microfluidic chips, providing devices with immense multiplexing probabilities and high functionality | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__4" id="fnt__4" name="fnt__4">4)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | However, up to date complex microfluidics and LOC systems have not yet fulfilled people’s expectations to revolutionize the healthcare industry, even though more simplistic lateral flow assays are a huge succes. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | For diagnostic systems, a broad and diverse field of methods and techniques is available. As this is far more than we are able to describe here, we want to refer to the overview article of Roth <i>et al.</i> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__15" id="fnt__15" name="fnt__15">15)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | Furthermore, we will focus on immunodiagnostics as this is the main application field for the DiaCHIP. To begin we introduce one specific field of immunodiagnostics: the detection of autoimmune diseases. | ||
− | </p> | + | <div class="accordion"> |
+ | <div class="accordion-section"> | ||
+ | <a class="accordion-section-title" href="#accordion-1">Autoimmune diseases require sophisticated diagnostics</a> | ||
+ | <div id="accordion-1" class="accordion-section-content" style="display:none; padding:15px;"> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | To chose the appropriate therapy for a patient suffering from an autoimmune disease the identification of antibodies targeting his own cells is crucial. This task is severely complicated as the variability of autoantibodies is greatly increased due to pathways of inter- and intramolecular epitope spreading | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__16" id="fnt__16" name="fnt__16">16)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | Therefore, a diagnostic assay does not only have to test for one kind of target but for a whole spectrum. This leads to a high demand for multiplexed detection systems that may detect all autoantibodies at once, thus providing fast aid in choosing the appropriate therapy while limiting costs and the needed amount of sample material. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | Today's methods to guide medical professionals in their diagnosis of autoimmune diseases are all variations of the same basic principle: | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | Autoantibodies from a patient’s blood sample are captured by antigens derived from HEP-2 or liver cell lines that are immobilized on a solid support. In the Line Immunoassay (LIA) approach antigens are applied as thin lines on cut nylon membranes. These membrane stripes are then flushed with the sample that is to be analyzed and processed as in conventional immunoblotting | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__17" id="fnt__17" name="fnt__17">17)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | Scaling down this approach results in immobilization of the antigens on protein microarrays or microbeads. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | For protein microarrays antigens are spotted using the same techniques as in the preparation of DNA microarrays. The identity of each antigen is coded by its location on the array. The detection pattern on the array thus provides information about antigen-antibody interactions. Once more, antibody binding is detected by specific secondary antibodies labeled with a fluorescent dye. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | When immobilizing antigens on microbeads their identity can be encoded by different techniques. In Laser-microbead-arrays microspheres of up to 100 different laser-reactive colors are coated with one type of antigen each, thus keeping the identity information | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__16" id="fnt__16" name="fnt__16">16)</a></sup>. These microspheres are mixed and incubated with a serum sample and a fluorescence labeled secondary antibody before the analysis is realized making use of dual laser flow cytometry. As the first laser reads the identity information from the microbead's color and the second the signal strength from the fluorescence labeled secondary antibody, again full information about the interaction is achievable. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div><!-- end accordion-section-content --> | ||
+ | </div><!-- end accordion-section --> | ||
+ | </div> <!-- end accordion --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="content_box"> | + | <div class="content_box"> |
<!-- EDIT3 SECTION "What are current diagnostic methods" [3045-11352] --> | <!-- EDIT3 SECTION "What are current diagnostic methods" [3045-11352] --> | ||
− | <h2>Limitations of Currently Available (Immunodiagnostic) Tests</h2> | + | <span id="Limitations" class="anchor"></span> |
+ | <h2>Limitations of Currently Available (Immunodiagnostic) Tests</h2> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Even though current diagnostic methods provide reliable information on a broad range of diseases, there are still applications where current methods encounter various restrictions. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | The commonly used ELISA only provides a limited capacity for multiplexing (as only one interaction per well can be detected) and takes at least several hours. Additionally, large amounts of sample material as well as of antibodies (about 0.3 µg antibody per data point) are needed. Lateral flow tests are much faster but can only detect one molecule of interest and are known to perform poorly in terms of sensitivity. Miniaturized immunoassays (microarrays) combined with microfluidic bioanalysis have been shown to have a great potential regarding future diagnostics | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__3" id="fnt__3" name="fnt__3">3)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | Yet, immunoassays based on peptides suffer from poor peptide purity (and thus high unspecificity), instability and storage issues. Furthermore, diagnostics via microarray based immunoassays is scarcely used for seldom diseases after conventional ELISA tests have proven no result. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="image_box left"> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/2a/Freiburg_3rdworldneunochmal.png" width="450px"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | <div class="image_box | + | In contrast, a fast diagnosis is essential for an immediate onset of an appropriate treatment that can be critical for the patients' health and life. |
− | + | Moreover, improved diagnostics are not only required regarding the health of a patient: 70% of healthcare expenses are linked to diagnostic tests | |
− | </div> | + | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__14" id="fnt__14" name="fnt__14">14)</a> |
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | Therefore, improvements in diagnostic technologies have the potential to drastically reduce the overall healthcare costs while increasing health as such. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | Diagnostic tests are usually developed for the utilization in air-conditioned laboratories with refrigerated storage of chemicals, a constant supply of calibrators and reagents, highly trained personal and rapid transportation of samples. This setting is not available for most developing countries | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__2" id="fnt__2" name="fnt__2">2)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | Thus, most of the substantial progress that has been achieved in the public health and POC sector has only been advantageous to the more developed part of the world. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <div class="image_box right"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/81/Freiburg_DEATHne.png" width="400px"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | + | According to the WHO, 2.5 out of 6 billion people lack basic sanitation, 2 billions do not have access to electricity and more than 1 billion lack basic healthcare services and clean drinking water | |
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__18" id="fnt__18" name="fnt__18">18)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | Moreover, 50% of all deaths in the most impoverished developing countries result from infectious diseases, whereas in the wealthiest developed countries this concerns less than 5% of deaths | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__1" id="fnt__1" name="fnt__1">1)</a></sup>. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | Therefore, transforming existing technologies into mobile applications, robust and sensitive enough for the use outside of specified laboratories, may be a huge leap forward to improving general health all over the world. Outbreaks and spreading of potential epidemic diseases or sexually transmitted infections can be controlled by rapid diagnosis and appropriate treatment | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__2" id="fnt__2" name="fnt__2">2)</a></sup>. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="image_box left"> | ||
+ | <div class="thumb2 tcenter" style="width:450px"><div class="thumbinner"><a class="lightbox_trigger" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/db/Freiburg_STDs.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/db/Freiburg_STDs.png"><img alt="" class="mediabox2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/db/Freiburg_STDs.png" width="300"/></a><div class="thumbcaption"><div class="magnify"><a class="internal" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/db/Freiburg_STDs.png" title="vergrößern"><img alt="" height="11" src="/igem2015/lib/plugins/imagebox/magnify-clip.png" width="15"/></a></div></div></div></div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | To be used in low-resource settings <a class="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/Future_Directions" title="Outlook">future diagnostic</a> methods | + | <p> |
+ | A need for such technologies is urgent: 500 million people between the age of 15 to 49 are infected with curable sexually transmitted infections like chlamydia, gonorrhea, <a class="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/Diseases#Syphilis" title="syphilis">syphilis</a> or trichonomiasis each year | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__19" id="fnt__19" name="fnt__19">19)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>! | ||
+ | However, the currently available infrastructure for diagnosis of infectious diseases often prove to be too slow and expansive to be practicable for third world countries. To give you an example, the identification of pathogens of an infectious diarrhoe takes two to four days – even in the best developed-world laboratory | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__20" id="fnt__20" name="fnt__20">20)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | To be used in low-resource settings <a class="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/Future_Directions" title="Outlook">future diagnostic</a> methods should obtain the following features: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | + | <li> <strong>Speed</strong> - a fast diagnosis reduces time until the beginning of treatment, preventing the spread of epidemic diseases and reducing the severity of a disease. | |
− | + | </li> | |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | + | <li> <strong>Simplicity</strong> - the necessary handling should be as easy as possible. | |
− | + | </li> | |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | + | <li> <strong>Low-costs</strong> - <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Glossary" target="blank">point of care</a> diagnostics need to be affordable in developing countries. | |
− | + | </li> | |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | + | <li > <strong>Clearness</strong> - the output of <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Glossary" target="blank">point of care</a> tests needs the clarity and simplicity of a yes/no answer. | |
− | + | </li> | |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | + | <li> <strong>Storage under extreme conditions</strong> - As defined conditions may not be required, the device has to be stable under extreme conditions, with temperatures ranging from 10 to 40°C (50 to 104°F). | |
− | + | </li> | |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | + | <li> <strong>Multiplexed test</strong> - Covering a broad spectrum of possible diseases (ideally in one device) allows for a differential diagnosis even in the case of different diseases with similar symptoms. | |
− | + | </li> | |
</br> | </br> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="content_box"> | + | <div class="content_box"> |
<!-- EDIT4 SECTION "What are the limitations of currently available (immunodiagnostic) tests" [11353-16351] --> | <!-- EDIT4 SECTION "What are the limitations of currently available (immunodiagnostic) tests" [11353-16351] --> | ||
− | <h2 class="sectionedit5">How can our DiaCHIP contribute to the solution to these problems?</h2> | + | <span id="DiaCHIP_Contribution" class="anchor"></span> |
+ | <h2 class="sectionedit5">How can our DiaCHIP contribute to the solution to these problems?</h2> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | Our approach basically <strong>combines three promising techniques</strong> in <strong> one DiaCHIP device</strong>, offering a great potential to improve future diagnostics. | + | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/System">Our approach</a> basically <strong>combines three promising techniques</strong> in <strong> one DiaCHIP device</strong>, offering a great potential to improve future diagnostics. |
− | </ | + | </p> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <a style="float:left; clear:both;" class="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Results/Diagnostics" title="multiplexing"><strong>Miniaturized immunoassays combined with microfluidics</strong></a>: | |
− | </ | + | <p> Miniaturized immunoassays enable for immense multiplexing. By immobilizing hundreds of different antigens, it is possible to screen a patient’s sample for hundreds of potential antibodies and related diseases. |
+ | With small volumes of reagents and samples, a rapid delivery of results with fast turnover times and enormous multiplexing is possible with microfluidic based lab-on-a-chip systems. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | <strong><a class=" | + | <strong><a class="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/Cellfree_Expression" title="cell_free">Microarray Copying (generate proteins from DNA templates)</a></strong>: |
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Storing and handling problems of conventional peptide based microarrays are circumvented by directly producing our protein array from a DNA array via cell-free expression. As DNA is stable within a large range of temperatures, pH values and other environmental conditions, it proves to be the ideal molecule for storing protein information. This allows us to offer different combinations of antigens, providing the optimal detection system for most needs and producing them on demand. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <strong><a style="float:left; clear:both;" class="wikilink2" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/iRIf" title="iRif">iRIf detection method</a></strong>: | ||
+ | <p> This emerging detection method enables a fast, sensitive and label free detection of binding processes. Binding of the serum originated antibody can be detected directly, omitting the incubation of the sample with a second detection antibody, thus making the detecting cheaper and faster. If needed, the signal can be further amplified with a secondary antibody, if specificity of binding remains unclear or the signal needs to be enhanced. This secondary antibody does also not require any fluorescent or enzymatic labeling. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="content_box"> | + | <div class="content_box"> |
− | <!-- EDIT5 SECTION "How can our DiaCHIP contribute a solution to these problems" [16352-17909] --> | + | <!-- EDIT5 SECTION "How can our DiaCHIP contribute to a solution to these problems" [16352-17909] --> |
− | <h2 class="sectionedit6">Outlook</h2> | + | <span id="Outlook" class="anchor"></span> |
− | + | <h2 class="sectionedit6">Outlook</h2> | |
− | + | ||
− | </ | + | <div class="image_box right"> |
− | + | <br> | |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e8/Freiburg_outlook.jpeg" width="450px"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Core characteristics of the device are its simplicity, the low cost of the components and the | + | <p> |
− | </p> | + | The future of diagnostics may lie in home-care devices based on microfluidic lab-on-a-chip systems. These are supposed to perform assays at a sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility similar to those of central laboratory analyzers. However, the user only needs to apply one drop of blood. <br> |
+ | Especially people in developing countries could perform routine testing to detect the presence of infectious pathogens like influenza or sexually transmittable diseases like <a class="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/Diseases#AIDS" title="AIDS">AIDS</a> or <a clas="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/Diseases#Syphilis" title="Syphilis">syphilis</a> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_top" href="#fn__2" id="fnt__2" name="fnt__2">2)</a> | ||
+ | </sup>. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The DiaCHIP device may be scaled down to a size suitable for smaller medical practices or mobile applications. Thereby it complements the existing techniques that are either small and handy but are only able to detect a limited spectrum of antibodies or are so huge that an efficient use is only possible in clinical facilities. We showed the basic feasibility of such a device with our <a class="wikilink1" href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Results/Own_Device" title="own_device">rebuilt setup</a> and the successful <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Results">detection of anti-tetanus antibodies in human blood serum</a>. <br> | ||
+ | Core characteristics of the device are its simplicity, the low cost of the components and the rapid generation of a final evaluable result. Even though the DiaCHIP is still at an experimental stage, some improvements may render it easy to handle even for untrained users. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="content_box"> | ||
+ | <div class="footnotes"> | ||
+ | <h2>References</h2> | ||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__1" id="fn__1" name="fn__1">1)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/whr02_en.pdf?ua=1"> | ||
+ | WHO, 2002. World Health Report.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__2" id="fn__2" name="fn__2">2)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v442/n7101/abs/nature05064.html"> | ||
+ | Yager et al., 2006. Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for gloal public health. Nature.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__3" id="fn__3" name="fn__3">3)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adma.201100464/abstract"> | ||
+ | Gervais et al., 2011. Microfluidic Chips for Point-of-Care Immunodiagnostics. Adv. Mater.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | <div class=" | + | <div class="fn"> |
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__4" id="fn__4" name="fn__4">4)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2012/lc/c2lc21204h"> | ||
+ | Chin et al., 2011. Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Royal Society of Chemistry.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__5" id="fn__5" name="fn__5">5)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=9130472"> | ||
+ | Ring, 1997. Allergy and modern society: Does “‘Western life style’” promote the development of allergies? Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__6" id="fn__6" name="fn__6">6)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00640.x/abstract"> | ||
+ | Arbuckle et al., 1999. The development of lupus humoral autoimmunity for anti-Sm autoantibodies is consistent with predictable sequential B-cell epitope spreading. Scand J Immunol.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__7" id="fn__7" name="fn__7">7)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://www.clinchem.org/content/22/8/1243.abstract"> | ||
+ | Wisdom, 1976. Enzyme-immunoassay. Clinical Chemistry.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__8" id="fn__8" name="fn__8">8)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00430-006-0032-z"> | ||
+ | Sauerbrei et al., 2006. Herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus infections during pregnancy: current concepts of prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Part 2: Varicella-zoster virus infections. Med Microbiol Immunol.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__9" id="fn__9" name="fn__9">9)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093499000397"> | ||
+ | Usuda et al., 1999. Serological detection of hepatitis B virus genotypes by ELISA with monoclonal antibodies to type-specific epitopes in the preS2-region product. Journal Virol. Methods.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__10" id="fn__10" name="fn__10">10)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2395899/"> | ||
+ | Carlier et al., 1980. Evaluation of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and other serological tests for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Bull. World Health Organization.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__11" id="fn__11" name="fn__11">11)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/179/Supplement_1/S192.long"> | ||
+ | Ksiazek et al., 1999. ELISA for the detection of antibodies to Ebola viruses. Journal of Infectious Diseases</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__12" id="fn__12" name="fn__12">12)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/cleanup/nanotechnology/chapter-3-lab-on-a-chip.pdf"> | ||
+ | Lab-on-a-Chip systems.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__13" id="fn__13" name="fn__13">13)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://www.biochemia-medica.com/content/ilza-salamunic-laboratory-diagnosis-autoimmune-diseases-new-technologies-old-dilemmas"> | ||
+ | Salamunic, 2009. Laboratory diagnosis of autoimmune diseases – new technologies, old dilemmas. Biochemia Medica.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__14" id="fn__14" name="fn__14">14)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991778/"> | ||
+ | Mao & Huang, 2012. Exploiting mechanical biomarkers in microfluidics. Lab Chip.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__15" id="fn__15" name="fn__15">15)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2010/cs/b820557b"> | ||
+ | Roth et al., 2009. Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications. Chemical Society Reviews.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__16" id="fn__16" name="fn__16">16)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pabst-publishers.de/Medizin/buecher/3899671481_i.htm"> | ||
+ | Fritzler, 2014. New technologies in the detection of autoantibodies: Evaluation of addressable laser bead immunoassays (ALBIA).</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__17" id="fn__17" name="fn__17">17)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_Blank" href="http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/10342047"> | ||
+ | Meheus et al., 1999. Multicenter validation of recombinant, natural and synthetic antigens used in a single multiparameter assay for the detection of specific anti-nuclear antibodies in con- nective tissue disorders. Clin Exp Rheumatol.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__18" id="fn__18" name="fn__18">18)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_blank" href="http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/81965/1/9789241564588_eng.pdf"> | ||
+ | WHO, 2013. World Health Statistics Report.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__19" id="fn__19" name="fn__19">19)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a target="_blank" href="http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75181/1/9789241503839_eng.pdf"> | ||
+ | WHO, 2008. Global incidence and prevalence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="fn"> | ||
+ | <sup><a class="fn_bot" href="#fnt__20" id="fn__20" name="fn__20">20)</a></sup> | ||
+ | <a class="urlextern" href="http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/32/3/331.short"> | ||
+ | Guerrant et al., 2001. Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea. Clinical Infectious Diseases.</a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
<!-- Labjournal content ends here --> | <!-- Labjournal content ends here --> | ||
{{Freiburg/wiki_content_end}} | {{Freiburg/wiki_content_end}} |
Latest revision as of 13:37, 18 September 2015
Today's Applications of Immunodiagnostics
In the world's poorest countries more than half of the deaths are due to infectious diseases – in the wealthiest countries it is less than 5% 1) .
The Field of Diagnostics
Medical diagnostics comprise the whole process of tracing the source leading to a patient's symptoms. Usually, it is understood as the identification of a pathogen or a malfunction responsible for the illness.
To achieve an efficient disease treatment, clinical diagnostics are mostly divided into the following steps:
- A clinician, interviewing the patient and considering his medical history, risk factors and current problems, proposes a certain differential diagnosis, thus pre-limiting the spectrum of possible diseases.
- This is usually followed by the performance of diagnostic tests (normally in a central laboratory) to confirm the differential diagnosis and to clearly identify or at least further limit possible causes of the symptoms.
- Finally, this leads to a treatment consisting of medication, surgery, hospitalization or discharge.
Interest in the so called Point-Of-Care (POC) diagnostics increased dramatically
2)
3)
in the last decades. POC diagnostics (or bedside diagnostics) are diagnostic tests that can be performed directly at a patient's side or even bedside. The output of such a test is immediately available – thus circumventing the usually necessary sending of samples to external labs.
The term POC encompasses many possible end-use settings outside of a centralized testing facility like emergency settings, regional health clinics, medical practices as well as home or mobile use.
These tests consist of common devices that are present in everyday life, such as AB0-testing, blood glucose testing, blood gas and electrolytes analysis, pregnancy testing and cholesterol screening.
For the near future an increase in the amount of products for POC diagnostic is predicted
4)
,
thereby confirming the need for such applications.
In the face of aging populations, spreading of infectious diseases especially in the developing world, biohazard threats and increasing numbers of autoimmune diseases and allergies in the developed world
5)
6)
,
POC tests become inevitable.
But these devices also are convenient methods for improving everyday life: a drop of blood could easily reveal the physical cause of feelings of discomfort, such as a the lack of certain metabolic substances. A simple diet suggestion may thus increase life quality and health in one go.
Current Diagnostic Methods
The four most common centralized laboratory techniques are blood chemistry, immunoassays, nucleic-acid amplification tests and flow cytometry
2)
.
As the
DiaCHIP
is an immunodiagnostic method we will focus on this part of diagnostics and compare it to commonly applied methods in today's clinics and labs. Immunodiagnostics are based on antigen-antibody interactions, which might be present within the body fluids of a patient. By detecting and identifying key proteins within a patient's sample like blood or urine, these tests enable to distinguish between major classes of diseases like infectious diseases, metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases or cancer
3)
.
Immunodiagnostics are realized by immunoassays, which summarize a wide range of formats, allowing quantification and monitoring of small molecules, large proteins and even whole pathogens
2)
.
Three prominent examples of immunoassays are lateral flow tests, ELISAs and miniaturized immunoassays (microarrays).
Lateral flow test - simple and rapid, no multiplexing, limited sensitivity:
The lateral flow test is commonly known as strip test. It is rather complicated in its setup, but extremely easy to use as only a drop of liquid has to be added to get a result that is easy to interpret within minutes. The test confirms its validity and the presence or absence of the target molecule through the appeareance of colored stripes. Prominent examples are pregnancy tests, but also drug-abuse tests, HIV diagnostics in developing countries
4)
or blood-glucose tests. Stripe tests can be seen as the gold standard for Point-Of-Care devices - easy to store, use and easy to read out.
ELISA - sensitive but time consuming, no multiplexing:
The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is seen as the state-of-the-art technique for highly sensitive serological diagnosis. ELISA is based on the interaction of a pathogenic antigen and its corresponding antibodies.
The typically used “sandwich” ELISA requires an antigen with at least two binding sites and a pair of antibodies binding these sites. At first, a capture antibody is immobilized on the surface of a microplate well.
After incubation with the sample and the binding of the respective antigen, the seconardy antibody is added. Either this secondary antibody or a third one, binding the second, yields a signal enhancement, mostyl by enzyme coupled reactions, if the antigen was present in the sample. This procedure increases the sensitivity about 10,000 fold down to pg/ml scales
7)
.
ELISA is a very sensitive and specific test, most commonly used in serological diagnostics, e.g. for Varicella Zoster
8)
,
Hepatitis B
9)
,
Toxoplasmosis
10)
or Ebola
11)
.
Depending on the assay protocol used, a whole ELISA can be carried out within some hours to one day.
Miniaturized Immunoassay (Microarray) and Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC):
Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC) refers to the idea that many processes in the lab can be improved and automated by miniaturizing them on or into a chip. A microarry is a multiplexed or multiparallel LOC-device
12)
.
Many scientists consider LOC-based methods to be the most likely technological driver to fundamentally transform the Point-Of-Care diagnostic industry
4)
13)
.
Nowadays, miniaturized immunoassays are one of the most important analysis platforms for proteins
3)
.
The development of Lab-on-a-Chip systems is closely linked to the emergence of microfluidics. Microfluidic techniques use small, compact, low-power and mass-producible chips, which are designed for small sample sizes and rapid but at the same time sensitive analysis
14)
.
Various LOC diagnostic modules have been integrated within microfluidic chips, providing devices with immense multiplexing probabilities and high functionality
4)
.
However, up to date complex microfluidics and LOC systems have not yet fulfilled people’s expectations to revolutionize the healthcare industry, even though more simplistic lateral flow assays are a huge succes.
For diagnostic systems, a broad and diverse field of methods and techniques is available. As this is far more than we are able to describe here, we want to refer to the overview article of Roth et al.
15)
.
Furthermore, we will focus on immunodiagnostics as this is the main application field for the DiaCHIP. To begin we introduce one specific field of immunodiagnostics: the detection of autoimmune diseases.
Limitations of Currently Available (Immunodiagnostic) Tests
Even though current diagnostic methods provide reliable information on a broad range of diseases, there are still applications where current methods encounter various restrictions. The commonly used ELISA only provides a limited capacity for multiplexing (as only one interaction per well can be detected) and takes at least several hours. Additionally, large amounts of sample material as well as of antibodies (about 0.3 µg antibody per data point) are needed. Lateral flow tests are much faster but can only detect one molecule of interest and are known to perform poorly in terms of sensitivity. Miniaturized immunoassays (microarrays) combined with microfluidic bioanalysis have been shown to have a great potential regarding future diagnostics 3) . Yet, immunoassays based on peptides suffer from poor peptide purity (and thus high unspecificity), instability and storage issues. Furthermore, diagnostics via microarray based immunoassays is scarcely used for seldom diseases after conventional ELISA tests have proven no result.
In contrast, a fast diagnosis is essential for an immediate onset of an appropriate treatment that can be critical for the patients' health and life. Moreover, improved diagnostics are not only required regarding the health of a patient: 70% of healthcare expenses are linked to diagnostic tests 14) . Therefore, improvements in diagnostic technologies have the potential to drastically reduce the overall healthcare costs while increasing health as such. Diagnostic tests are usually developed for the utilization in air-conditioned laboratories with refrigerated storage of chemicals, a constant supply of calibrators and reagents, highly trained personal and rapid transportation of samples. This setting is not available for most developing countries 2) . Thus, most of the substantial progress that has been achieved in the public health and POC sector has only been advantageous to the more developed part of the world.
According to the WHO, 2.5 out of 6 billion people lack basic sanitation, 2 billions do not have access to electricity and more than 1 billion lack basic healthcare services and clean drinking water 18) . Moreover, 50% of all deaths in the most impoverished developing countries result from infectious diseases, whereas in the wealthiest developed countries this concerns less than 5% of deaths 1). Therefore, transforming existing technologies into mobile applications, robust and sensitive enough for the use outside of specified laboratories, may be a huge leap forward to improving general health all over the world. Outbreaks and spreading of potential epidemic diseases or sexually transmitted infections can be controlled by rapid diagnosis and appropriate treatment 2).
A need for such technologies is urgent: 500 million people between the age of 15 to 49 are infected with curable sexually transmitted infections like chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis or trichonomiasis each year 19) ! However, the currently available infrastructure for diagnosis of infectious diseases often prove to be too slow and expansive to be practicable for third world countries. To give you an example, the identification of pathogens of an infectious diarrhoe takes two to four days – even in the best developed-world laboratory 20) . To be used in low-resource settings future diagnostic methods should obtain the following features:
- Speed - a fast diagnosis reduces time until the beginning of treatment, preventing the spread of epidemic diseases and reducing the severity of a disease.
- Simplicity - the necessary handling should be as easy as possible.
- Low-costs - point of care diagnostics need to be affordable in developing countries.
- Clearness - the output of point of care tests needs the clarity and simplicity of a yes/no answer.
- Storage under extreme conditions - As defined conditions may not be required, the device has to be stable under extreme conditions, with temperatures ranging from 10 to 40°C (50 to 104°F).
- Multiplexed test - Covering a broad spectrum of possible diseases (ideally in one device) allows for a differential diagnosis even in the case of different diseases with similar symptoms.
How can our DiaCHIP contribute to the solution to these problems?
Our approach basically combines three promising techniques in one DiaCHIP device, offering a great potential to improve future diagnostics.
Miniaturized immunoassays combined with microfluidics:Miniaturized immunoassays enable for immense multiplexing. By immobilizing hundreds of different antigens, it is possible to screen a patient’s sample for hundreds of potential antibodies and related diseases. With small volumes of reagents and samples, a rapid delivery of results with fast turnover times and enormous multiplexing is possible with microfluidic based lab-on-a-chip systems.
Microarray Copying (generate proteins from DNA templates):Storing and handling problems of conventional peptide based microarrays are circumvented by directly producing our protein array from a DNA array via cell-free expression. As DNA is stable within a large range of temperatures, pH values and other environmental conditions, it proves to be the ideal molecule for storing protein information. This allows us to offer different combinations of antigens, providing the optimal detection system for most needs and producing them on demand.
iRIf detection method:This emerging detection method enables a fast, sensitive and label free detection of binding processes. Binding of the serum originated antibody can be detected directly, omitting the incubation of the sample with a second detection antibody, thus making the detecting cheaper and faster. If needed, the signal can be further amplified with a secondary antibody, if specificity of binding remains unclear or the signal needs to be enhanced. This secondary antibody does also not require any fluorescent or enzymatic labeling.
Outlook
The future of diagnostics may lie in home-care devices based on microfluidic lab-on-a-chip systems. These are supposed to perform assays at a sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility similar to those of central laboratory analyzers. However, the user only needs to apply one drop of blood.
Especially people in developing countries could perform routine testing to detect the presence of infectious pathogens like influenza or sexually transmittable diseases like AIDS or syphilis
2)
.
The DiaCHIP device may be scaled down to a size suitable for smaller medical practices or mobile applications. Thereby it complements the existing techniques that are either small and handy but are only able to detect a limited spectrum of antibodies or are so huge that an efficient use is only possible in clinical facilities. We showed the basic feasibility of such a device with our rebuilt setup and the successful detection of anti-tetanus antibodies in human blood serum.
Core characteristics of the device are its simplicity, the low cost of the components and the rapid generation of a final evaluable result. Even though the DiaCHIP is still at an experimental stage, some improvements may render it easy to handle even for untrained users.