Difference between revisions of "Team:British Columbia/Imidacloprid"
(19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<div style="clear: both;"></div> | <div style="clear: both;"></div> | ||
<div id="UBCbody"> | <div id="UBCbody"> | ||
− | <p> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e3/Flowchart_imida.png" width="440px"; align="left"; style="padding-right:10px"><p align="justify"> |
Imidacloprid is a neonicotinoid commonly used in pesticides around the world [1]. | Imidacloprid is a neonicotinoid commonly used in pesticides around the world [1]. | ||
Studies have shown that the use of this pesticide has adverse effects on insects since it acts as an neurotoxin by binding and blocking the nicotinergic neuronal pathway [2]. As a result, honeybees become paralyzed and eventually die [3]. Studies have shown that there are three cytochrome P450s (CYPs) capable of modifying imidacloprid into less toxic substances [4-6]. In light of such findings, experiments were conducted in order to demonstrate that CYP6G1, CYP2D6, and CYP6CM1 could modify imidacloprid into less toxic compounds. In order to test for such modifications, constructs were created to code for: 1) a cytochrome P450 (CYP), 2) a targeting signal sequence, pelB, and 3) an NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (CPR). | Studies have shown that the use of this pesticide has adverse effects on insects since it acts as an neurotoxin by binding and blocking the nicotinergic neuronal pathway [2]. As a result, honeybees become paralyzed and eventually die [3]. Studies have shown that there are three cytochrome P450s (CYPs) capable of modifying imidacloprid into less toxic substances [4-6]. In light of such findings, experiments were conducted in order to demonstrate that CYP6G1, CYP2D6, and CYP6CM1 could modify imidacloprid into less toxic compounds. In order to test for such modifications, constructs were created to code for: 1) a cytochrome P450 (CYP), 2) a targeting signal sequence, pelB, and 3) an NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (CPR). | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p align="justify"> |
In an attempt to improve CYP expression, pelB was added to the constructs. pelB targets the CYPs to the periplasm of the cell, where the CYPs are fully functional [7]. In addition, a P450 oxidoreductase (CPR) is also required to make the CYPs fully functional. AgCPR, a P450 oxidoreductase from <i>Anopheles gambiae</i>, reduces the CYPs by transferring two electrons from NADPH, a reaction necessary for the hydroxylation of imidacloprid by the CYPs [8]. As such, AgCPR was included in the constructs. | In an attempt to improve CYP expression, pelB was added to the constructs. pelB targets the CYPs to the periplasm of the cell, where the CYPs are fully functional [7]. In addition, a P450 oxidoreductase (CPR) is also required to make the CYPs fully functional. AgCPR, a P450 oxidoreductase from <i>Anopheles gambiae</i>, reduces the CYPs by transferring two electrons from NADPH, a reaction necessary for the hydroxylation of imidacloprid by the CYPs [8]. As such, AgCPR was included in the constructs. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p align="justify"> |
Final constructs were inserted into <i>E. coli</i> and tests were conducted to test the expression of the CYPs in <i>E. coli</i> as well as to test the degradative ability of the CYPs on imidacloprid. Two methods were used in the construction of the final constructs: 1) megaprimer mutagenesis PCR to insert pelB and 2) standard assembly to assemble the CYPs and the AgCPR. Gene expression was tested via SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and imidacloprid metabolism assays were conducted using HPLC. | Final constructs were inserted into <i>E. coli</i> and tests were conducted to test the expression of the CYPs in <i>E. coli</i> as well as to test the degradative ability of the CYPs on imidacloprid. Two methods were used in the construction of the final constructs: 1) megaprimer mutagenesis PCR to insert pelB and 2) standard assembly to assemble the CYPs and the AgCPR. Gene expression was tested via SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and imidacloprid metabolism assays were conducted using HPLC. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="width:900px; margin:auto;"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b0/Cyps_final_all_down_%281%29.jpg" width="900"></div> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<h2>Goals</h2> | <h2>Goals</h2> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p align="justify"> |
− | Three cytochrome P450s, CYP6CM1, CYP6G1 and CYP2D6, have been found to modify imidacloprid (IMI) into less toxic compounds, primarily 4- and 5-hydroxyimidacloprid. Our project goals were to: <br> | + | Three cytochrome P450s, CYP6CM1, CYP6G1 and CYP2D6, have been found to modify imidacloprid (IMI) into less toxic compounds, primarily 4- and 5-hydroxyimidacloprid. Our project goals were to:<br /> |
− | <LI> Optimize the CYPs for heterologous expression in <i>E. coli</i> through codon optimization. <br> | + | <OL> |
− | <LI> Create three <i>E. coli</i> strains, each expressing either CYP6CM1, CYP6G1 or CYP2D6 by using a BioBrick compatible expression system (pSCB1C3) to enable <i>E. coli</i> to modify imidacloprid.<br> | + | <br /><LI> Optimize the CYPs for heterologous expression in <i>E. coli</i> through codon optimization. <br /> |
− | <LI> Test for protein expression and characterize <i>in vivo</i> detoxification of imidacloprid in <i>E. coli</i> through SDS-PAGE and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), respectively. | + | <br /><LI> Create three <i>E. coli</i> strains, each expressing either CYP6CM1, CYP6G1 or CYP2D6 by using a BioBrick compatible expression system (pSCB1C3) to enable <i>E. coli</i> to modify imidacloprid.<br /> |
+ | <br /><LI> Test for protein expression and characterize <i>in vivo</i> detoxification of imidacloprid in <i>E. coli</i> through SDS-PAGE and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), respectively.<br /> | ||
+ | </OL> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<h2>Construct Development</h2> | <h2>Construct Development</h2> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p align="justify"> |
− | All constructs were made using restriction digest and ligation methods (standard assembly). pelB was inserted upstream of the CYPs and the AgCPR using megaprimer mutagenesis PCR. Please refer to | + | All constructs were made using restriction digest and ligation methods (standard assembly). pelB was inserted upstream of the CYPs and the AgCPR using megaprimer mutagenesis PCR. Please refer to "Table 1" for a complete list of construct designs. Refer to <a href='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/2f/Restriction_Digest_UBC.pdf'> Restriction Digest Protocol </a> for standard assembly methods. Further, refer to the <a href='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/fc/Mutagenesis_PCR_UBC.pdf'> Megaprimer Mutagenesis Protocol </a> used to insert pelB upstream of the CYPs and the AgCPR. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<div class="panel panel-default"> | <div class="panel panel-default"> | ||
Line 40: | Line 46: | ||
<h4 id="-collapsible-group-item-#3-" class="panel-title"> | <h4 id="-collapsible-group-item-#3-" class="panel-title"> | ||
<a class="collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapseThree" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="collapseThree"> | <a class="collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapseThree" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="collapseThree"> | ||
− | <h4> | + | <h4>Table 1: Construct List</h4> |
</a> | </a> | ||
<a class="anchorjs-link" href="#-collapsible-group-item-#3-"><span class="anchorjs-icon"></span></a></h4> | <a class="anchorjs-link" href="#-collapsible-group-item-#3-"><span class="anchorjs-icon"></span></a></h4> | ||
Line 103: | Line 109: | ||
<h2>Results</h2> | <h2>Results</h2> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p align="justify"> |
− | Please refer to | + | Please refer to "Table 2" for protein expression results and "Table 3" for imidacloprid degradation results. Further, refer to |
− | <a href= | + | <a href='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c7/SDS_Page_IMI_UBC.pdf'> SDS-PAGE Protocol </a> and <a href='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a5/HPLC_UBC.pdf'> HPLC Protocol </a> for the methods used to run gene expression and metabolism assays, respectively. Protein expression was tested using SDS-PAGE methods and imidacloprid metabolism assays were tested using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). No detectable protein levels were seen through expression experiments. Further, no detectable levels of imidacloprid metabolites were visible on HPLC traces. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<div class="panel panel-default"> | <div class="panel panel-default"> | ||
Line 111: | Line 117: | ||
<h4 id="-collapsible-group-item-#4-" class="panel-title"> | <h4 id="-collapsible-group-item-#4-" class="panel-title"> | ||
<a class="collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapseFour" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="collapseFour"> | <a class="collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapseFour" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="collapseFour"> | ||
− | <h4> | + | <h4>Table 2: Protein Expression Results</h4> |
</a> | </a> | ||
<a class="anchorjs-link" href="#-collapsible-group-item-#4-"><span class="anchorjs-icon"></span></a></h4> | <a class="anchorjs-link" href="#-collapsible-group-item-#4-"><span class="anchorjs-icon"></span></a></h4> | ||
Line 171: | Line 177: | ||
<h4 id="-collapsible-group-item-#5-" class="panel-title"> | <h4 id="-collapsible-group-item-#5-" class="panel-title"> | ||
<a class="collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapseFive" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="collapseFive"> | <a class="collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapseFive" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="collapseFive"> | ||
− | <h4> | + | <h4>Table 3: Imidacloprid Degradation Results</h4> |
</a> | </a> | ||
<a class="anchorjs-link" href="#-collapsible-group-item-#5-"><span class="anchorjs-icon"></span></a></h4> | <a class="anchorjs-link" href="#-collapsible-group-item-#5-"><span class="anchorjs-icon"></span></a></h4> | ||
Line 218: | Line 224: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="panel panel-default"> | ||
+ | <div class="panel-heading" role="tab" id="headingTen"> | ||
+ | <h4 id="-collapsible-group-item-#10-" class="panel-title"> | ||
+ | <a class="collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapseTen" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="collapseTen"> | ||
+ | <h4>HPLC Traces</h4> | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | <a class="anchorjs-link" href="#-collapsible-group-item-#10-"><span class="anchorjs-icon"></span></a></h4> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseTen" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingTen"> | ||
+ | <div class="panel-body"> | ||
+ | <p align="justify">Trace 1 was obtained after running HPLC with construct "BBa_K1813050" (ptac pelB CYP6G1). Imidacloprid has a retention rate of 5.128 minutes. An NADPH peak is seen at 0.8 minutes. A metabolite peak was expected to appear between 4-5 minutes. Seeing that there is almost no cell background noise between 4-5 minutes, the expected metabolite peak would be clear. Trace 2 was run with the same construct however no imidacloprid was added. </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="width:900px; margin:auto;"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/25/FINAL_CYPG%2BIMI%2BNADPH-1.jpg" width="900"><small> Trace 1: HPLC curve. </small></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="width:900px; margin:auto;"> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/93/CYPG%2BRED_Lys-1.jpg" width="900"><small> Trace 2: HPLC curve (without IMI). </small></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<h2>Protocol Optimization</h2> | <h2>Protocol Optimization</h2> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p align="justify"> |
Several aspects of the SDS-PAGE and HPLC protocols could be modified in order to optimize gene expression and imidacloprid degradation. For SDS-PAGE, delta-aminolevulinic acid was added during the growth phase of the bacteria [6]. The addition of this heme precursor would “lighten” the burden of the cells by allowing for the more efficient production of heme, a cofactor required by the CYPs. In addition, overnight culture times could be extended in order to acquire more cell mass. With regards to HPLC, and in addition to the SDS-PAGE optimizations, several aspects of the HPLC protocol could be modified in order to optimize for gene expression and the degradation of imidacloprid. Such modifications would include adding more or different protease inhibitor mixes, incubating the CYP/AgCPR/imidacloprid/NADPH mixture for longer times, and incubating the mixtures with different concentrations of imidacloprid. | Several aspects of the SDS-PAGE and HPLC protocols could be modified in order to optimize gene expression and imidacloprid degradation. For SDS-PAGE, delta-aminolevulinic acid was added during the growth phase of the bacteria [6]. The addition of this heme precursor would “lighten” the burden of the cells by allowing for the more efficient production of heme, a cofactor required by the CYPs. In addition, overnight culture times could be extended in order to acquire more cell mass. With regards to HPLC, and in addition to the SDS-PAGE optimizations, several aspects of the HPLC protocol could be modified in order to optimize for gene expression and the degradation of imidacloprid. Such modifications would include adding more or different protease inhibitor mixes, incubating the CYP/AgCPR/imidacloprid/NADPH mixture for longer times, and incubating the mixtures with different concentrations of imidacloprid. | ||
</p> | </p> |
Latest revision as of 02:59, 19 September 2015
Degradation of
Imidacloprid
Imidacloprid is a neonicotinoid commonly used in pesticides around the world [1]. Studies have shown that the use of this pesticide has adverse effects on insects since it acts as an neurotoxin by binding and blocking the nicotinergic neuronal pathway [2]. As a result, honeybees become paralyzed and eventually die [3]. Studies have shown that there are three cytochrome P450s (CYPs) capable of modifying imidacloprid into less toxic substances [4-6]. In light of such findings, experiments were conducted in order to demonstrate that CYP6G1, CYP2D6, and CYP6CM1 could modify imidacloprid into less toxic compounds. In order to test for such modifications, constructs were created to code for: 1) a cytochrome P450 (CYP), 2) a targeting signal sequence, pelB, and 3) an NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (CPR).
In an attempt to improve CYP expression, pelB was added to the constructs. pelB targets the CYPs to the periplasm of the cell, where the CYPs are fully functional [7]. In addition, a P450 oxidoreductase (CPR) is also required to make the CYPs fully functional. AgCPR, a P450 oxidoreductase from Anopheles gambiae, reduces the CYPs by transferring two electrons from NADPH, a reaction necessary for the hydroxylation of imidacloprid by the CYPs [8]. As such, AgCPR was included in the constructs.
Final constructs were inserted into E. coli and tests were conducted to test the expression of the CYPs in E. coli as well as to test the degradative ability of the CYPs on imidacloprid. Two methods were used in the construction of the final constructs: 1) megaprimer mutagenesis PCR to insert pelB and 2) standard assembly to assemble the CYPs and the AgCPR. Gene expression was tested via SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and imidacloprid metabolism assays were conducted using HPLC.
Goals
Three cytochrome P450s, CYP6CM1, CYP6G1 and CYP2D6, have been found to modify imidacloprid (IMI) into less toxic compounds, primarily 4- and 5-hydroxyimidacloprid. Our project goals were to:
- Optimize the CYPs for heterologous expression in E. coli through codon optimization.
- Create three E. coli strains, each expressing either CYP6CM1, CYP6G1 or CYP2D6 by using a BioBrick compatible expression system (pSCB1C3) to enable E. coli to modify imidacloprid.
- Test for protein expression and characterize in vivo detoxification of imidacloprid in E. coli through SDS-PAGE and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), respectively.
Construct Development
All constructs were made using restriction digest and ligation methods (standard assembly). pelB was inserted upstream of the CYPs and the AgCPR using megaprimer mutagenesis PCR. Please refer to "Table 1" for a complete list of construct designs. Refer to Restriction Digest Protocol for standard assembly methods. Further, refer to the Megaprimer Mutagenesis Protocol used to insert pelB upstream of the CYPs and the AgCPR.
iGEM Part Number | Type | Description | LacI Repressor | pelB |
---|---|---|---|---|
BBa_K1813003 | Coding | CYP6CM1 | No | No |
BBa_K1813004 | Coding | CYP6G1 | No | No |
BBa_K1813005 | Coding | HUMCYPDB1 | No | No |
BBa_K1813010 | Coding | A. gamb NADPH Reductase | No | No |
BBa_K1813011 | Composite | ptac CYP6CM1 term | No | No |
BBa_K1813012 | Composite | ptac CYP6G1 term | No | No |
BBa_K1813013 | Composite | ptac CYP2D6 term | No | No |
BBa_K1813018 | Composite | ptac AgambNADPH term | No | No |
BBa_K1813024 | Composite | LacI Reversed HUMCYPDB1 | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813025 | Composite | LacI Reversed CYP6G1 | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813027 | Composite | LacI Reversed CPY6CM1 | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813028 | Composite | LacI Reversed AgamNADPH Reductase | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813032 | Composite | LacIR AgCPR CYP2D6 | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813033 | Composite | LacIR AgCPR CYP6G1 | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813034 | Composite | LacIR AgCPR CYP6CM1 | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813046 | Coding | pelB CYP6G1 | No | No |
BBa_K1813050 | Composite | ptac pelB CYP6G1 | No | Yes |
BBa_K1813051 | Coding | pelB CYP6CM1 | No | Yes |
BBa_K1813052 | Composite | ptac pelB CYP6CM1 | No | Yes |
BBa_K1813053 | Coding | pelB AgCPR | No | Yes |
BBa_K1813054 | Composite | ptac pelB AgCPR | No | Yes |
BBa_K1813055 | Coding | pelB CYP2D6 | No | Yes |
BBa_K1813056 | Composite | ptac pelB CYP2D6 | No | Yes |
BBa_K1813057 | Composite | LacIR pelB CYP6G1 | Yes | Yes |
BBa_K1813058 | Composite | LacIR pelB CYP6CM1 | Yes | Yes |
BBa_K1813059 | Composite | LacIR pelB AgCPR | Yes | Yes |
BBa_K1813060 | Composite | LacIR pelB CYP2D6 | Yes | Yes |
BBa_K1813061 | Composite | ptac pelB AgCPR pelb CYP6G1 | No | Yes |
BBa_K1813062 | Composite | ptac pelB AgCPR pelb CYP6CM1 | No | Yes |
BBa_K1813063 | Composite | ptac pelB AgCPR pelb CYP2D6 | No | Yes |
BBa_K1813064 | Composite | LacIR pelB AgCPR ptac pelB-CYP6G1 | Yes | Yes |
BBa_K1813065 | Composite | LacIR pelB AgCPR ptac pelB CYP6CM1 | Yes | Yes |
BBa_K1813066 | Composite | LacIR pelB AgCPR ptac pelB CYP2D6 | Yes | Yes |
Results
Please refer to "Table 2" for protein expression results and "Table 3" for imidacloprid degradation results. Further, refer to SDS-PAGE Protocol and HPLC Protocol for the methods used to run gene expression and metabolism assays, respectively. Protein expression was tested using SDS-PAGE methods and imidacloprid metabolism assays were tested using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). No detectable protein levels were seen through expression experiments. Further, no detectable levels of imidacloprid metabolites were visible on HPLC traces.
iGEM Part Number | Type | Description | LacI Repressor | pelB | Sequenced Confirmed | Visible Expression |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBa_K1813011 | Composite | ptac CYP6CM1 term | No | No | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813012 | Composite | ptac CYP6G1 term | No | No | Yes - Mutation Occurred | No |
BBa_K1813013 | Composite | ptac CYP2D6 term | No | No | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813018 | Composite | ptac AgambNADPH term | No | No | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813052 | Composite | ptac pelB CYP6CM1 | No | Yes | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813050 | Composite | ptac pelB CYP6G1 | No | Yes | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813056 | Composite | ptac pelB HUMCYPDB1 | No | Yes | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813054 | Composite | ptac pelB AgCPR | No | Yes | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813057 | Composite | LacIR pelB CYP6G1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813058 | Composite | LacIR pelB CYP6CM1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813059 | Composite | LacIR pelB AgCPR | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813060 | Composite | LacIR pelB HUMCYPDB1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
iGEM Part Number | Type | Description | LacI Repressor | pelB | Sequenced | Detectable Degradative Ability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBa_K1813052 | Composite | ptac pelB CYP6CM1 | No | Yes | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813050 | Composite | ptac pelB CYP6G1 | No | Yes | Yes | No |
BBa_K1813054 | Composite | ptac pelB AgCPR | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Trace 1 was obtained after running HPLC with construct "BBa_K1813050" (ptac pelB CYP6G1). Imidacloprid has a retention rate of 5.128 minutes. An NADPH peak is seen at 0.8 minutes. A metabolite peak was expected to appear between 4-5 minutes. Seeing that there is almost no cell background noise between 4-5 minutes, the expected metabolite peak would be clear. Trace 2 was run with the same construct however no imidacloprid was added.
Protocol Optimization
Several aspects of the SDS-PAGE and HPLC protocols could be modified in order to optimize gene expression and imidacloprid degradation. For SDS-PAGE, delta-aminolevulinic acid was added during the growth phase of the bacteria [6]. The addition of this heme precursor would “lighten” the burden of the cells by allowing for the more efficient production of heme, a cofactor required by the CYPs. In addition, overnight culture times could be extended in order to acquire more cell mass. With regards to HPLC, and in addition to the SDS-PAGE optimizations, several aspects of the HPLC protocol could be modified in order to optimize for gene expression and the degradation of imidacloprid. Such modifications would include adding more or different protease inhibitor mixes, incubating the CYP/AgCPR/imidacloprid/NADPH mixture for longer times, and incubating the mixtures with different concentrations of imidacloprid.
References
- Elbert, A., Becker, B., Hartwig, J., Erdelen, C., 1991. Imidacloprid – a new systemic insecticide. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer 44, 113–135
- Liu, M.Y., Casida, J.E., 1993. High affinity binding of [3 H] imidacloprid in the insect acetylcholine receptor. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 46, 40–46.
- Ishaaya, I. (2001). Biochemical Sites of Insecticide Action and Resistance. Springer. ISBN 3540676252.
- Joußen, N., Heckel, D.G., Haas, M., Schuphan, I., Schmidt, B., 2008. Metabolism of imidacloprid and DDT by P450 CYP6G1 expressed in cell cultures of Nicotiana tabacum suggests detoxification of these insecticides in Cyp6g1-overexpressing strains of Drosophila melanogaster, leading to resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 64, 65–73
- Schulz-Jander, D.A., Casida, J.E., 2002. Imidacloprid insecticide metabolism: human cytochrome P450 isozymes differ in selectivity for imidazolidine oxidation versus nitroimine reduction. Toxicol. Lett. 132, 65–70.
- Karunker, Iris, Evangelia Morou, Dimitra Nikou, Ralf Nauen, Rotem Sertchook, Bradley J. Stevenson, Mark J.I. Paine, Shai Morin, and John Vontas. "Structural Model and Functional Characterization of the Bemisia Tabaci CYP6CM1vQ, a Cytochrome P450 Associated with High Levels of Imidacloprid Resistance." Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 39.10 (2009): 697-706. Elsevier. Web.
- Pritchard, Michael P., Lesley McLaughlin, and Thomas Friedberg. "Establishment of Functional Human Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenase Systems in Escherichia Coli." Ed. Ian R. Phillips and Elizabeth A. Shephard. 320 (2006): 19-29. Springer Link. Web.
- Nikou, Dimitra, Hilary Ranson, Janet Hemingway. “An adult-specific CYP6 P450 gene is overexpressed in a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae” Gene. 318 (2003): 91-102. Elsevier. Web.