Difference between revisions of "Team:Freiburg/Project/pOP-vector"
(comment) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | All the constructs we cloned for this year’s iGEM competition were meant to be used for overexpression of the respective proteins, either in a cell-free expression system or in an < | + | All the constructs we cloned for this year’s iGEM competition were meant to be used for overexpression of the respective proteins, either in a cell-free expression system or in an <i>E. coli</i> expression strain. Usually, vectors that are optimized for protein overexpression are low- to medium-copy plasmids. In contrast to cloning purposes, this is sufficient for protein expression. When a certain copy number is reached, the expression machinery of the cell is saturated and a further increase will not result in higher expression yields. High copy plasmids rather result in lower expression rates as more metabolic capacity is shared for replication. <br/> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | Many < | + | Many <i>E. coli</i> strains optimized for overexpression carry a chloramphenicol resistance gene as a selective marker. Plasmids carrying the same resistance are not suitable for protein expression for two reasons. First, double selection for successfully transformed colonies on a medium with two antibiotics is not possible. Second, there is no selective pressure that would make it an advantage for the cell to keep the plasmid.<br/> |
− | The iGEM standard vector pSB1C3 was designed for cloning purposes and | + | The iGEM standard vector pSB1C3 was designed for cloning purposes and is thus provided with an origin of replication yielding high plasmid copy numbers. Moreover, it carries a chloramphenicol resistance gene as selection marker what makes it a tough task to use this vector for successful expression purposes.<br/> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | Using a modified version of pSB1C3 (plasmid map pIG15_001) for overexpression resulted in an unsatisfying protein amount (link to an early SDS gel by ProtPur?). | + | Using a modified version of pSB1C3 (plasmid map pIG15_001) for overexpression resulted in an unsatisfying protein amount (link to an early SDS gel by ProtPur?). Therefore, we decided to use a common expression vector for further experiments. <br/> |
− | Obviously, it is a lot of work to clone every part we want to send to the registry into an expression vector and additionally into pSB1C3 which exhibits a completely different cloning site. For those reasons, we aimed to add a vector backbone to the iGEM | + | Obviously, it is a lot of work to clone every part we want to send to the registry into an expression vector and additionally into pSB1C3, which exhibits a completely different cloning site. For those reasons, we aimed to add a vector backbone to the iGEM Registry which is suitable for efficient protein overexpression and compatible for cloning parts derived from the Registry in a standardized procedure. <br/> |
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | The improved vector, called pOP – plasmid for Overexpression of Proteins (Fig. 1) - combines features needed for efficient overexpression of proteins with standardized elements derived from pSB1C3. Based on the commonly used expression vector pET22b+, some changes had to be applied to fit all the iGEM standards.<br/> | + | The improved vector, called <a class="urlextern" href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1621009" rel="nofollow" target="_Blank" title="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1621009">pOP</a> – plasmid for Overexpression of Proteins (Fig. 1) - combines features needed for efficient overexpression of proteins with standardized elements derived from pSB1C3. Based on the commonly used expression vector pET22b+, some changes had to be applied to fit all the iGEM standards.<br/> |
− | First, one of the standard cloning sites had to be inserted instead of the original multiple cloning site. <acronym title="Request for Comments">RFC</acronym>[25] seemed to be the most suitable for protein expression purposes | + | First, one of the standard cloning sites had to be inserted instead of the original multiple cloning site. <acronym title="Request for Comments">RFC</acronym>[25] seemed to be the most suitable for protein expression purposes. It allows the assembly of several coding sequences as the scar left between the sequences does not result in a frameshift or a stop codon. This is advantageous for expression of fusion proteins on the one hand and enables to genetically fuse the protein of interest to a specific tag for affinity purification or similar applications on the other hand. Additionally, signal sequences can be added to cause secretion of the protein, which is a tool commonly used for simplification of protein purification. <br/> |
− | Next, recognition sites for restriction enzymes | + | Next, recognition sites for restriction enzymes that are used for the insertion of coding sequences had to be eliminated in the backbone, so those enzymes (namely AgeI, EcoRI, NgoMIV, NotI, SpeI, PstI and XbaI) remain single cutters. <br/> |
− | To allow sequence analysis in a standardized way, the binding sites of the primers VF2 and VR as they are used by the iGEM | + | To allow sequence analysis in a standardized way, the binding sites of the primers VF2 and VR, as they are used by the iGEM Registry, have been inserted in an appropriate distance to the insertion site.<br/> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | The final vector was designed theoretically based on pET22b+. | + | The final vector was designed theoretically based on pET22b+. As the sites where adaptations had to be applied were distributed all over the vector, a multi-step mutagenesis approach would have been hard to realize. Instead, the vector was divided into five fragments that were pieced together in two steps by Gibson Assembly. The resulting plasmid is shown in figure x.<br/> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | Taken together, we designed an improved plasmid for the overexpression of proteins that is compatible with iGEM cloning standards. We are happy to provide this new backbone to the iGEM | + | Taken together, we designed an improved plasmid for the overexpression of proteins that is compatible with iGEM cloning standards. We are happy to provide this new backbone to the iGEM Registry and help future iGEM Teams to reach high expression yields in an easy way. |
</br> | </br> | ||
</br> | </br> |
Revision as of 19:20, 11 September 2015
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/85/Freiburg_wiki_background_2_parted_left.png)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f4/Freiburg_wiki_background_2_parted_right.png)
pOP – Protein Expression meets iGEM Standards
All the constructs we cloned for this year’s iGEM competition were meant to be used for overexpression of the respective proteins, either in a cell-free expression system or in an E. coli expression strain. Usually, vectors that are optimized for protein overexpression are low- to medium-copy plasmids. In contrast to cloning purposes, this is sufficient for protein expression. When a certain copy number is reached, the expression machinery of the cell is saturated and a further increase will not result in higher expression yields. High copy plasmids rather result in lower expression rates as more metabolic capacity is shared for replication.
Many E. coli strains optimized for overexpression carry a chloramphenicol resistance gene as a selective marker. Plasmids carrying the same resistance are not suitable for protein expression for two reasons. First, double selection for successfully transformed colonies on a medium with two antibiotics is not possible. Second, there is no selective pressure that would make it an advantage for the cell to keep the plasmid.
The iGEM standard vector pSB1C3 was designed for cloning purposes and is thus provided with an origin of replication yielding high plasmid copy numbers. Moreover, it carries a chloramphenicol resistance gene as selection marker what makes it a tough task to use this vector for successful expression purposes.
Using a modified version of pSB1C3 (plasmid map pIG15_001) for overexpression resulted in an unsatisfying protein amount (link to an early SDS gel by ProtPur?). Therefore, we decided to use a common expression vector for further experiments.
Obviously, it is a lot of work to clone every part we want to send to the registry into an expression vector and additionally into pSB1C3, which exhibits a completely different cloning site. For those reasons, we aimed to add a vector backbone to the iGEM Registry which is suitable for efficient protein overexpression and compatible for cloning parts derived from the Registry in a standardized procedure.
The improved vector, called pOP – plasmid for Overexpression of Proteins (Fig. 1) - combines features needed for efficient overexpression of proteins with standardized elements derived from pSB1C3. Based on the commonly used expression vector pET22b+, some changes had to be applied to fit all the iGEM standards.
First, one of the standard cloning sites had to be inserted instead of the original multiple cloning site. RFC[25] seemed to be the most suitable for protein expression purposes. It allows the assembly of several coding sequences as the scar left between the sequences does not result in a frameshift or a stop codon. This is advantageous for expression of fusion proteins on the one hand and enables to genetically fuse the protein of interest to a specific tag for affinity purification or similar applications on the other hand. Additionally, signal sequences can be added to cause secretion of the protein, which is a tool commonly used for simplification of protein purification.
Next, recognition sites for restriction enzymes that are used for the insertion of coding sequences had to be eliminated in the backbone, so those enzymes (namely AgeI, EcoRI, NgoMIV, NotI, SpeI, PstI and XbaI) remain single cutters.
To allow sequence analysis in a standardized way, the binding sites of the primers VF2 and VR, as they are used by the iGEM Registry, have been inserted in an appropriate distance to the insertion site.
The final vector was designed theoretically based on pET22b+. As the sites where adaptations had to be applied were distributed all over the vector, a multi-step mutagenesis approach would have been hard to realize. Instead, the vector was divided into five fragments that were pieced together in two steps by Gibson Assembly. The resulting plasmid is shown in figure x.
Taken together, we designed an improved plasmid for the overexpression of proteins that is compatible with iGEM cloning standards. We are happy to provide this new backbone to the iGEM Registry and help future iGEM Teams to reach high expression yields in an easy way.
Link to genebank file: BBa_K1621009.gb.