Difference between revisions of "Team:Glasgow/Interlab"
Line 473: | Line 473: | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/af/2015-Glasgow-interlab3.png" height=' | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/af/2015-Glasgow-interlab3.png" height='60%' width='60%'/> |
<figcaption>Table 1: Summary of the fluorescence readings of phiLOV protein. | <figcaption>Table 1: Summary of the fluorescence readings of phiLOV protein. | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b8/2015-Glasgow-interlab2.png" height=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b8/2015-Glasgow-interlab2.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> |
<figcaption>Figure 3: Calibration curve of fluorescence of phiLOV | <figcaption>Figure 3: Calibration curve of fluorescence of phiLOV | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
Line 492: | Line 492: | ||
The devices, as shown in Table 2, were prepared using BioBrick assembly. Parts J23101, J23106, J23117, I13504, I20270 and R0040 were taken from the iGEM distribution plates and each transformed into TOP-10 competent cells. The promoters were digested with Pst1 and Spe1 and the GFP part, I13504, was digested with Xba1 and Pst1. The I13504 part was then ligated into each promoter plasmid and transformed into TOP-10 cells to create the three required devices in pSB1C3 (Figure 4). Restreaks were carried out for one colony of each device and control and three colonies of each (labelled 1, 2 and 3) were picked and grown separately. Sequencing was carried out to check the correct devices had been created. | The devices, as shown in Table 2, were prepared using BioBrick assembly. Parts J23101, J23106, J23117, I13504, I20270 and R0040 were taken from the iGEM distribution plates and each transformed into TOP-10 competent cells. The promoters were digested with Pst1 and Spe1 and the GFP part, I13504, was digested with Xba1 and Pst1. The I13504 part was then ligated into each promoter plasmid and transformed into TOP-10 cells to create the three required devices in pSB1C3 (Figure 4). Restreaks were carried out for one colony of each device and control and three colonies of each (labelled 1, 2 and 3) were picked and grown separately. Sequencing was carried out to check the correct devices had been created. | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/70/2015-Glasgow-interlab4.jpg" height=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/70/2015-Glasgow-interlab4.jpg" height="40%" width="40%"/> |
<figcaption>Table 2: Summary of BioBrick used</figcaption> | <figcaption>Table 2: Summary of BioBrick used</figcaption> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/21/2015-Glasgow-interlab5.png" height=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/21/2015-Glasgow-interlab5.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> |
<figcaption>Figure 4: Device cloning strategy</figcaption> | <figcaption>Figure 4: Device cloning strategy</figcaption> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 536: | Line 536: | ||
<figcaption>Figure 5: Fluorescence readings of a dilution series of FAM labelled oligonucleotide. 10pmol = 10pmol FAM labelled oligonucleotide in 100µl PBS.</figcaption> | <figcaption>Figure 5: Fluorescence readings of a dilution series of FAM labelled oligonucleotide. 10pmol = 10pmol FAM labelled oligonucleotide in 100µl PBS.</figcaption> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f2/2015-Glasgow-Interlab20.png" height=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f2/2015-Glasgow-Interlab20.png" height="60%" width="60%"> |
<figcaption>Table 3: Fluorescence readings of FAM labelled oligonucleotide.</figcaption> | <figcaption>Table 3: Fluorescence readings of FAM labelled oligonucleotide.</figcaption> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0c/2015-Glasgow-interlab8.png" height=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0c/2015-Glasgow-interlab8.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> |
<figcaption>Figure 6: Confirmation of linear relationship between FAM labelled oligonucleotide concentration and measured fluorescence on the Typhoon. Gradient of this calibration curve is the conversion factor for fluorescence as measured by the Typhoon to equivalent pmol of FAM labelled oligo.</figcaption> | <figcaption>Figure 6: Confirmation of linear relationship between FAM labelled oligonucleotide concentration and measured fluorescence on the Typhoon. Gradient of this calibration curve is the conversion factor for fluorescence as measured by the Typhoon to equivalent pmol of FAM labelled oligo.</figcaption> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 559: | Line 559: | ||
The fluorescence was also measured (figure 7) and the resulting images converted to numerical readings (table 5). | The fluorescence was also measured (figure 7) and the resulting images converted to numerical readings (table 5). | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/75/2015-Glasgow-interlab10.png" height=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/75/2015-Glasgow-interlab10.png" height="70%" width="70%"/> |
<figcaption>Figure 7: Fluorescence results of the three devices and the positive and negative controls. A. Shows the image at low brightness to compare the J23101 and J23106 devises. B. Shows the image at high brightness to compare the J23117 device with the two brighter devices.</figcaption> | <figcaption>Figure 7: Fluorescence results of the three devices and the positive and negative controls. A. Shows the image at low brightness to compare the J23101 and J23106 devises. B. Shows the image at high brightness to compare the J23117 device with the two brighter devices.</figcaption> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/2015-Glasgow-interlab23.png" height=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/2015-Glasgow-interlab23.png" height="60%" width="60%"/> |
<figcaption>Table 5: Summary of fluorescence data measured for the three devices and controls.</figcaption> | <figcaption>Table 5: Summary of fluorescence data measured for the three devices and controls.</figcaption> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 579: | Line 579: | ||
4. Dividing these values by the conversion factor as determined from the FAM oligo dilutions (479,000) gives the absolute fluorescence equivalent to pmol of FAM oligo per A600 of cells (Table 6). | 4. Dividing these values by the conversion factor as determined from the FAM oligo dilutions (479,000) gives the absolute fluorescence equivalent to pmol of FAM oligo per A600 of cells (Table 6). | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/ff/2015-Glasgow-interlab21.png" height=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/ff/2015-Glasgow-interlab21.png" height="70%" width="70%"/> |
<figcaption>Table 6: Derived measurements of devices and controls.</figcaption> | <figcaption>Table 6: Derived measurements of devices and controls.</figcaption> | ||
</br> | </br> |
Revision as of 19:55, 13 September 2015
Interlab Study
Home > Measurement > Interlab Study
Overview
All 2015 iGEM teams have been invited to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology. Each lab will obtain fluorescence data for the same three GFP-coding devices with different promoters varying in strength. The objective is to assess the robustness of standard parts and the variability of measurements among different research groups using different lab techniques.
Introduction
This year iGEM Glasgow have participated in the InterLab study and Extra Credit. The three devices required were cloned, as specified, and using a plate reader measurements were obtained in absolute units in terms of moles of FAM labelled oligonucleotide.
Release
Individuals responsible for conducting InterLab study
Others who should be credited, e.g., in a publication based on this data
Dates of InterLab Study
Equipment
Equipment used to acquire measurements
o Incubator – 2cm shaking diameter o Spectrophotometer – Used to measure absorbance at 600nm of each sample. o Typhoon FLA 9500 - GE Healthcare Life Sciences. Wavelength used to excite cells - 475nm. Filter/channel used to capture the light emission from the cells - Filter BPB1 (530DF20).
Spectrophotometer calibration
Typhoon FLA 9500 calibration
Methodology
Protocol for cloning devices
Preparation for measurements
Protocol for measurements
The controls
Protocol for calculating a conversion factor for absolute units
Measurements
Direct Measurement (Raw Data)
Derived Measurements (Conversion to Absolute units)
Estimation of absolute number of GFP molecules per cell
References
Buckley, A. Petersen, J. Roe, A. Douce, G. Christie, J. (2015). LOV-based reporters for fluorescence imaging. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 27 (1), p39–45.