Difference between revisions of "Team:UMaryland/Design"

Line 163: Line 163:
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
Although the process of PCR, the necessary hardware needed to do it is relatively simple. <b>While different templates, primers, and polymerases can be used, a thermocycler capable of maintaining temperatures between 4 and 95 degrees is absolutely required</b>. Current thermocyclers cost thousands of dollars, which is often prohibitively expensive for a DIY Bio effort. Making the device cheaper would give more people accessibility to this valuable lab tool, enabling breakthrough research in more places around the globe.
+
Although the process of PCR, the necessary hardware needed to do it is relatively simple. While different templates, primers, and polymerases can be used, a thermocycler capable of maintaining temperatures between 4 and 95 degrees is absolutely required. Current thermocyclers cost thousands of dollars, which is often prohibitively expensive for a DIY Bio effort. Making the device cheaper would give more people accessibility to this valuable lab tool, enabling breakthrough research in more places around the globe.
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
Another consequence of expensive conventional thermocycling is the financial difficulty of bringing these machines into the classroom. PCR is an extremely important topic in biotechnology, but it is typically also one that requires one to "see it to believe it." However, schools often cannot afford to purchase thermocyclers due to their high cost. By manufacturing a cheap, DIY thermocycler that can be assembled at a low cost, we can help bring this technology into schools that would otherwise be unable to afford it.
 
Another consequence of expensive conventional thermocycling is the financial difficulty of bringing these machines into the classroom. PCR is an extremely important topic in biotechnology, but it is typically also one that requires one to "see it to believe it." However, schools often cannot afford to purchase thermocyclers due to their high cost. By manufacturing a cheap, DIY thermocycler that can be assembled at a low cost, we can help bring this technology into schools that would otherwise be unable to afford it.
Line 189: Line 189:
 
    
 
    
 
<p> We began by working out how to wire the hairdryer so that we could regulate the heating unit and the fan separately.  
 
<p> We began by working out how to wire the hairdryer so that we could regulate the heating unit and the fan separately.  
</br>
+
<br>
<strike>After a lot of soldering and reworking the internal safety measures inside the hairdryer, we were able to wire the system so that we could turn the heat on and off while running the fan continuously. Using autoclave tape, we secured a sheet of aluminium foil to the top of the heating unit of the hairdryer. The outer casing of the hairdryer had been removed. We placed a heat sensor inside the tin to measure the temperature of the air inside the machine.  By wiring the heat sensor to the arduino we were able to receive input/feedback from the sensor and adjust heating of the device to maintain our desired setpoints. We were able to regulate the heat of the machine in order to produce proper thermocycling. </strike>
+
After a lot of soldering and reworking the internal safety measures inside the hairdryer, we were able to wire the system so that we could turn the heat on and off while running the fan continuously. Using tape, we secured a sheet of aluminium foil to the top of the heating unit of the hairdryer. The outer casing of the hairdryer had been removed. We placed a heat sensor inside the tin to measure the temperature of the air inside the machine.  By wiring the heat sensor to the Arduino we were able to receive input/feedback from the sensor and adjust heating of the device to maintain our desired setpoints. We were able to regulate the heat of the machine in order to produce proper thermocycling.
</br>
+
<br>
At this point, we tried to perform our first PCR reaction<b>. U</b>nfortunately we soon found that we had melted our tube. We learned that the machine had difficulty with evenly distributing the heat<strike>, since the tin foil was a rudimentary cover with holes punched into it without a proper understanding of what these holes would do to the heat distribution(see picture below)</strike>. To better distribute the heat<b>,</b> we removed our tinfoil lid and replaced <b>it</b> with with a <b>cut</b> soda can. This can was designed with evenly spaced holes enabling for better heat distribution. Although we did not and still have not modeled the heat transfer of between the can's surface and the convection heating generated by the hair dryer, we were able to experimentally conclude that the heat distribution was more even across the can than the tin foil. <strike>For a better understanding we are currently in the process of modeling the heat transfer within the can to better design the apparatus.We are also in the process of milling aluminum with certain specifications in order to better regulate heat transfer.  </strike>
+
At this point, we tried to perform our first PCR reaction. Unfortunately, we soon found that we had melted our tube. We learned that the machine had difficulty with evenly distributing the heat. To better distribute the heat, we removed our tinfoil lid and replaced it with with a cut soda can. This can was designed with evenly spaced holes enabling for better heat distribution. Although we did not and still have not modeled the heat transfer of between the can's surface and the convection heating generated by the hair dryer, we were able to experimentally conclude that the heat distribution was more even across the can than the tin foil.
</br>
+
 
<div>
 
<div>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/01/IMG_07741.jpg" style="width:450px;height:450px;float:left;">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/01/IMG_07741.jpg" style="width:450px;height:450px;float:left;">
Line 199: Line 198:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</br>
 
</br>
  <p>After construction of the can based cover we tried PCR once more and still found that the reaction did not occur. We assumed that the heat sensor might have been an issue,; the sensor was exposed to the <b>moving</b><strike>convected </strike>air and was relaying information about the air temperature instead of the temperature inside of the PCR tubes. This meant that our feedback system was not accurately responding and controlling the temperature inside of the PCR tubes. Assuming the temperatures inside the machine were not representative of the temperatures inside the PCR tubes, we put the heat sensor inside a PCR tube with mineral oil and placed this inside one of the holes. We ran another PCR reaction, ran the products on a gel and saw a large band of the correct size, indicating that our machine worked <b>ONCE</b>.
+
  <p>After construction of the can based cover we tried PCR once more and still found that the reaction did not occur. We assumed that the heat sensor might have been an issue,; the sensor was exposed to the moving air and was relaying information about the air temperature instead of the temperature inside of the PCR tubes. This meant that our feedback system was not accurately responding and controlling the temperature inside of the PCR tubes. Assuming the temperatures inside the machine were not representative of the temperatures inside the PCR tubes, we put the heat sensor inside a PCR tube with mineral oil and placed this inside one of the holes. We ran another PCR reaction, ran the products on a gel and saw a large band of the correct size, indicating that our machine had worked.
 
</br>
 
</br>
 
<p style="text-align:center;font-size:32px;font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;"><b>Hardware</b>
 
<p style="text-align:center;font-size:32px;font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;"><b>Hardware</b>
Line 243: Line 242:
 
<p style="text-align:center;font-size:32px;font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;"><b>Problems and Current issues </b>
 
<p style="text-align:center;font-size:32px;font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;"><b>Problems and Current issues </b>
 
    
 
    
<p> We have had one successful amplification with our machine however we understand that repeatability is a vital component of all lab work and currently we are attempting to make our device repeatable. From our early days of testing we found that peltier units were not powerful enough to enable PCR tube to reach 95 degrees. <strike>Although conventional PCR machines use these units frequently they are often specialized and tailored made to perform PCR. With this tailoring comes a high price tag that does not suit the DIY market, and so we found a solution in the form of a hairdryer. </strike><b>On the other hand, t</b>he fan and heating element of a <b>cheap </b>hairdryer provide a control scheme that enables for <b>rapid</b> cycling of temperature<strike> rapidly and accurately and they are relatively inexpensive</strike>. We have found that developing a housing for the PCR tubes and enabling even heat distribution is challenging. We often have found that our temperature sensor and the pcr reaction tube are not at the same temperature and degree of difference is a delta of over 10 degrees celsius<b>It is therefore NOT accurate, as described in previous sentences</b>. We are currently working of milling a block of aluminum with better and more consistent heat transfer properties, and modeling the heat transfer within the can. Our ambition is that this will enable better control of temperature within the device.         
+
<p> We have had one successful amplification with our machine however we understand that repeatability is a vital component of all lab work and currently we are attempting to make our device repeatable. From our early days of testing we found that peltier units were not powerful enough to enable PCR tube to reach 95 degrees. On the other hand, the fan and heating element of a cheap hairdryer provide a control scheme that enables for rapid cycling of temperature. We have found that developing a housing for the PCR tubes and enabling even heat distribution is challenging. We often have found that our temperature sensor and the pcr reaction tube are not at the same temperature and degree of difference is a delta of over 10 degrees Celsius. We are currently working of milling a block of aluminum with better and more consistent heat transfer properties, and modeling the heat transfer within the can. Our ambition is that this will enable better control of temperature within the device.         
 
<br></br>
 
<br></br>
  

Revision as of 02:17, 19 September 2015