Difference between revisions of "Team:UMaryland/HokSok"
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li> 1. Full Hok-Sok sequence taken from Gerdes et al. Sequence is originally from the R1 plasmid of <i>E. coli K-12</i>.</li> | <li> 1. Full Hok-Sok sequence taken from Gerdes et al. Sequence is originally from the R1 plasmid of <i>E. coli K-12</i>.</li> | ||
− | <li> 2. g-Block of Hok-Sok sequence ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies, then assembled into pSB1C3 using the Gibson method.</li> | + | <li> 2. g-Block of Hok-Sok sequence ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies, then assembled into pSB1C3 using the Gibson Assembly method.</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <p style="font-size:24px; font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;">Prior to experimentation, we had to insert the Hok-Sok construct into pSB1C3 in order to make it a BioBrick. We originally planned to PCR amplify the cassette out of the R1 plasmid of <i>E. coli</i>, but we were unable to find an suitable wild-type strain that was easily available. Instead, we turned to synthesizing the construct as a gBlock from IDT. As a 580 bp dsDNA fragment, it was suitable for addition via Gibson Assembly</p> | + | <p style="font-size:24px;font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;">Prior to experimentation, we had to insert the Hok-Sok construct into pSB1C3 in order to make it a BioBrick. We originally planned to PCR amplify the cassette out of the R1 plasmid of <i>E. coli</i>, but we were unable to find an suitable wild-type strain that was easily available. Instead, we turned to synthesizing the construct as a gBlock from IDT. As a 580 bp dsDNA fragment, it was suitable for addition via Gibson Assembly into pSB1C3. After subsequent transformation, miniprep, and confirmation sequencing, we had the first piece of our testing puzzle.</p> |
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 05:47, 18 September 2015