Difference between revisions of "Team:British Columbia/Growing"

Line 15: Line 15:
 
<div id="UBCbody">
 
<div id="UBCbody">
 
<p>
 
<p>
For the probiotic, the β-proteobacteria, <i>Snodgrassella alvi</i>, and the γ-proteobacteria, <i>Gilliamella apicola</i>, were chosen since it is distinctly endogenous to the midgut of the European honey bee, <i>Apis mellifera</i> <a href="#ref">(1)</a>. Since these microaerophiles are native and unique to the honey bee gut, introducing imidacloprid and 6-CNA degradation genes into these candidate bacteria would minimize the chance of resistance genes spreading to other insects. Due to the limited amount of existing literature on <i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i>, the project focused on discovering methods to make these bacteria genetically tractable. This included culturing the bacteria on different growth mediums, testing methods to induce competence, and transformation techniques with a variety of plasmids.
+
The β-proteobacteria, <i>Snodgrassella alvi</i>, and the γ-proteobacteria, <i>Gilliamella apicola</i>, were chosen as candidates for our probeeotic due to their endogenous nature in relation to the midgut of the European honey bee, <i>Apis mellifera</i> <a href="#ref">(1)</a>. Native and unique to the honey bee gut, the introduction of imidacloprid and 6-CNA degradation genes into these candidate bacteria would minimize the chance of resistance genes spreading to other insects. Due to the limited amount of existing literature on <i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i>, the project focused on discovering methods to make these bacteria genetically tractable. This included culturing the bacteria on different growth media, testing methods of competence induction, and transformation techniques with a variety of plasmids.
  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<h2>Culturing</h2>
 
<h2>Culturing</h2>
<p>Due to the novel nature of using <i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i> for the project (as opposed to <i>E. coli</i>), the first step was to determine the optimal method of culturing either bacteria. </p>
+
<p>Due to the novelty of using <i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i> for the project (vs. <i>E. coli</i>), the first step was to identify the optimal method of culturing either bacteria. </p>
  
 
           <div class="tab-pane" id="a"><div class="panel-group" id="accordion" role="tablist" aria-multiselectable="true">
 
           <div class="tab-pane" id="a"><div class="panel-group" id="accordion" role="tablist" aria-multiselectable="true">
Line 32: Line 32:
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseOne" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingOne">
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseOne" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingOne">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
             <p><i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i> were streaked on TSA, LB, and blood agar (5% sheep) plates and stored and grown at 37°C in an anaerobic jar flushed with 5% CO2 balanced with N2. Growth was tested on a variety of media types in order to determine the best growing conditions. Based on the visual indication of colony size, number, and growing time, <i>G. apicola</i> grew the best on TSA plates, while <i>S. alvi</i> grew best on blood agar (5% sheep blood). <i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i> colonies gave distinct colonies after 48 and 96 hours, respectively, in the microaerophilic chamber.
+
             <p><i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i> were streaked on TSA, LB, and blood agar (5% sheep blood) plates and stored and grown at 37°C in an anaerobic jar flushed with 5% CO<sub>2</sub> balanced with N<sub>2</sub>. Growth was tested on a variety of media types to identify the best growing conditions. Based on the visual estimations of colony size, number, and growing time, <i>G. apicola</i> grew the best on TSA plates, while <i>S. alvi</i> grew best on blood agar (5% sheep blood). <i>G. apicola</i> and <i>S. alvi</i> colonies gave distinct colonies after 48 and 96 hours, respectively, in the microaerophilic chamber.
 
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
 
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
 
<div style="width:1000px;float:left;">
 
<div style="width:1000px;float:left;">
Line 57: Line 57:
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseTwo" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingTwo">
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseTwo" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingTwo">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
             <p>As no liquid growth medium for <i>S. alvi</i> or <i>G. apicola</i> have been reported in literature, a variety of liquid media growth conditions were tested (see Table 1). All liquid cultures were incubated at 37°C for 72 hours, or until a turbidity was visibly detected. <i>G. apicola</i> grew in TSB with an anaerobic environment. Whilst growing in liquid media, it was noted that <i>G. apicola</i> aggregated into dense snowflake-like colonies (Figure 3). <i>S. alvi</i> was not successfully cultivated in any liquid media tested. Colony PCR and plating on oxytetracycline plates under microaerophilic conditions were used to confirm growth was <i>G. apicola</i> or <i>S. alvi</i>.  
+
             <p>As no liquid growth medium for <i>S. alvi</i> or <i>G. apicola</i> have been reported in literature, a variety of liquid media growth conditions were tested (see Table 1). All liquid cultures were incubated at 37°C for 72 hours, or until turbidity could be visually detected. <i>G. apicola</i> grew in anaerobic TSB. During growth in liquid media, it was noted that <i>G. apicola</i> aggregated into dense snowflake-like colonies (Figure 3). <i>S. alvi</i> did not grow in any liquid media tested. Colony PCR and plating on oxytetracycline plates under microaerophilic conditions were used to confirm growth was <i>G. apicola</i> or <i>S. alvi</i>.  
 
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
 
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
 
<div style="width:1000px;float:left;">
 
<div style="width:1000px;float:left;">
Line 91: Line 91:
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
<h2>Growth Curve</h2>
 
<h2>Growth Curve</h2>
<p>The growth curve of <i>G. apicola</i> was monitored on a plate reader that measured the OD value at 600nm over 36 hours. <i>G. apicola</i> was inoculated into a TSB culture that was previously flushed with 5% CO<sub>2</sub> balanced with N<sub>2</sub>. Additionally, 5% CO<sub>2</sub> balanced with N<sub>2</sub> was blown onto the plate whilst sealing to ensure the lowest possible amount of oxygen was present in the plate.
+
<p>The growth of <i>G. apicola</i> was monitored on a plate reader that measured the OD value at 600nm over 36 hours, and plotted to a curve at fixed time points. For this, <i>G. apicola</i> was inoculated into a TSB culture that was previously flushed with 5% CO<sub>2</sub> balanced with N<sub>2</sub>. Additionally, 5% CO<sub>2</sub> balanced with N<sub>2</sub> was blown onto the plate whilst sealing to ensure the presence of a minimal amount of oxygen in the plate.
 
</p>     
 
</p>     
  
Line 113: Line 113:
  
 
<h2>Inducing Competence in <i>G.apicola</i> and <i>S.alvi</i></h2>
 
<h2>Inducing Competence in <i>G.apicola</i> and <i>S.alvi</i></h2>
<p>After identifying the optimal way to culture <i>G. apicola</i>, we moved on to attempting various ways of inducing competence in the bacteria. Due to no existing literature on methods of inserting a plasmid into <i>G. apicola</i>, various protocols known to work on other gram-negative gammaproteobacteria, as well as a protocol for microaerophilic bacteria were attempted. <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:British_Columbia/Notebook/Protocols">View our protocols here, under Genetic Tool Development.</a>   
+
<p>After identifying the optimal method to culture <i>G. apicola</i>, we moved on to attempting various ways of inducing competence in the bacteria. Due to the lack of existing literature on methods of inserting a plasmid into <i>G. apicola</i>, we tried various protocols known to work on other gram-negative gammaproteobacteria, and a protocol for microaerophilic bacteria were attempted. <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:British_Columbia/Notebook/Protocols">View our protocols here, under Genetic Tool Development.</a>   
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
       <div class="panel panel-default">
 
       <div class="panel panel-default">
Line 125: Line 125:
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseThree" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingThree">
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseThree" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingThree">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
             <p>Two protocols were attempted for creating electrocompetent cells (<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3b/UBC_compcellsprotocol.pdf">protocols</a>): one designed for <i>Campylobacter jejuni</i> (similar to <i>G. apicola</i> because it is a microaerophilic bacteria) and one designed for <i>Salmonella</i> (similar to <i>G. apicola</i> because it is also a γ-proteobacteria). </p>
+
             <p>Two protocols were attempted for the creation of electrocompetent cells (<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3b/UBC_compcellsprotocol.pdf">protocols</a>): one designed for <i>Campylobacter jejuni</i> (similar to <i>G. apicola</i> due to it's microaerophilicity) and one designed for <i>Salmonella</i> (similar to <i>G. apicola</i>, a γ-proteobacterium). </p>
  
 
<p>Following the protocol from Methods in Microbiology: Bacterial Pathogenesis for <i>Campylobacter jejuni</i> by Williams, P., Ketley, J., & Salmond, G. <a href="#ref">(2)</a>, <i>G. apicola</i> was grown on TSA for 48 hours at 37°C, after which the biomass was removed. Cells were washed with ice cold wash buffer of sucrose and glycerol. Competent cells were then stored at -80°C, or transformed immediately by electroporation.  </p>
 
<p>Following the protocol from Methods in Microbiology: Bacterial Pathogenesis for <i>Campylobacter jejuni</i> by Williams, P., Ketley, J., & Salmond, G. <a href="#ref">(2)</a>, <i>G. apicola</i> was grown on TSA for 48 hours at 37°C, after which the biomass was removed. Cells were washed with ice cold wash buffer of sucrose and glycerol. Competent cells were then stored at -80°C, or transformed immediately by electroporation.  </p>
Line 146: Line 146:
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseFour" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingFour">
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseFour" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingFour">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
             <p> One protocol for creating chemically competent cells was attempted (<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3b/UBC_compcellsprotocol.pdf">protocol</a>): designed for <i>E. coli</i> (similar to <i>G. apicola</i> because it is also a γ-proteobacteria). <i>G. apicola</i> was grown on TSA for 48 hours at 37C, after which the biomass was removed. Cells were then washed with a CaCl<sub>2</sub> buffer. Competent cells were stored at -80C, or transformed immediately by heat shock.
+
             <p> One protocol designed to create chemically competent cells of <i>E. coli</i> was attempted (<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3b/UBC_compcellsprotocol.pdf">protocol</a>), due to it's cladistic similarity to <i>G. apicola</i>. <i>G. apicola</i> was grown on TSA for 48 hours at 37C, after which the biomass was removed. Cells were then washed with a CaCl<sub>2</sub> buffer. Competent cells were stored at -80C, or transformed immediately by heat shock.
 
</p>  
 
</p>  
 
           </div>
 
           </div>
Line 155: Line 155:
  
 
<h2>Transformation</h2>
 
<h2>Transformation</h2>
<p> After creating the competent cells, we attempted a variety of transformation protocols. <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:British_Columbia/Notebook/Protocols">View our protocols here, under Genetic Tool Development.</a>   
+
<p> After creating the competent cells, a variety of transformation protocols were attempted. <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:British_Columbia/Notebook/Protocols">View our protocols here, under Genetic Tool Development.</a>   
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
 
<div class="panel panel-default">
Line 182: Line 182:
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseSix" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingSix">
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseSix" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingSix">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
             <p>Following a standard protocol for heat shocking <i>E. coli</i>, transformation with each plasmid   was tested with competent <i>G. apicola</i>. <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/71/UBC_heatshockprotocol.pdf">Click here</a> to view the protocol. Cells were recovered on a TSA plate for 24 hrs (or in anaerobic TSB for 1 hour) before biomass was harvested and a portion of the recovered cells were plated on the appropriate antibiotic plate for selection of transformants.
+
             <p>Following a standard protocol for the transformation of <i>E. coli</i> via heat shock, each procured plasmid was used in attempts to transform <i>G. apicola</i>. <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/71/UBC_heatshockprotocol.pdf">Click here</a> to view the protocol. Cells were recovered on a TSA plate for 24 hrs (or in anaerobic TSB for 1 hour) after which biomass was harvested and a portion of the recovered cells were plated on the appropriate antibiotic plate for selection of transformants.
 
</p>  
 
</p>  
 
           </div>
 
           </div>
Line 197: Line 197:
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseSeven" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingSeven">
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseSeven" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingSeven">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
             <p>Following a modified protocol that can be viewed <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b6/UBC_conjugationprotocol.pdf">here</a>, <i>G. apicola</i> was grown on a TSA plate for 48 hrs. Concurrently, a conjugative <i>E.coli</i> strain (SM10 or S17) harboring the desired plasmid to be mobilized was grown in 5 mL LB and antibiotic for 24 hrs. <i>G. apicola</i> (scraped off a TSA plate) and E. coli were combined and pelleted together, resuspended in 100 μL of LB, plated on TSA, and incubated in a microaerophilic environment for 24 hrs at 37C. Colonies were then replated on selective plates containing antibiotic specific to the plasmid used and oxytetracycline (30μg/mL) to select for <i>G. apicola</i>. <i>G. apicola</i> is naturally resistant to oxytetracycline<a href="#ref">(1)</a>.  
+
             <p>Following a modified protocol that can be viewed <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b6/UBC_conjugationprotocol.pdf">here</a>, <i>G. apicola</i> was grown on a TSA plate for 48 hrs. Concurrently, a conjugative <i>E.coli</i> strain (SM10 or S17) harbouring the desired plasmid to be mobilized was grown in 5 mL LB and antibiotic for 24 hrs. <i>G. apicola</i> (scraped off a TSA plate) and E. coli were combined and pelleted together, resuspended in 100 μL of LB, plated on TSA, and incubated in a microaerophilic environment for 24 hrs at 37C. Colonies were then replated on selective plates containing antibiotic specific to the plasmid used and oxytetracycline (30μg/mL) to select for <i>G. apicola</i>. <i>G. apicola</i> is naturally resistant to oxytetracycline<a href="#ref">(1)</a>.  
 
</p>  
 
</p>  
 
           </div>
 
           </div>
Line 213: Line 213:
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseNine" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingNine">
 
         <div style="height: 0px;" aria-expanded="false" id="collapseNine" class="panel-collapse collapse" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="headingNine">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
 
           <div class="panel-body">
             <p>Colonies forming on antibiotic plates were subject to two PCRs to confirm identity as <i>G. apicola</i> and for the presence of transformed plasmid. To confirm identity, a portion of the <i>G. apicola</i> 16S ribosomal subunit was amplified using specific primers<a href="#ref">(5)</a>. Length and sequence were confirmed by DNA agarose gel electrophoresis and sequencing. Additionally, the colonies were streaked out onto another antibiotic plate to ensure single colony morphology and stability of the plasmid. A second PCR was done to confirm presence of a plasmid. Primers specific for the plasmid were used to amplify a portion of the plasmid and confirmed by DNA agarose gel electrophoresis.  As a positive control, all protocols for inducing competence were tested on <i>E. coli</i> DH5α with plasmid pSB1A3. Selection of antibiotic and PCR were used to confirm that transformed <i>E. coli</i> were harboring the plasmid used. Competence was successful induced in a model gram-negative γ-proteobacteria, <i>E. coli</i>. Table 2 summarizes the variety of methods tested and results obtained. Unfortunately, there were no replicated successes.
+
             <p>Colonies forming on antibiotic plates were subject to two PCR reactions:one to confirm identity as <i>G. apicola</i> and another to test for the presence of transformed plasmid. To confirm bacterial identity, a portion of the <i>G. apicola</i> 16S ribosomal subunit was amplified using specific primers<a href="#ref">(5)</a>. Length and sequence were confirmed by DNA agarose gel electrophoresis and sequencing. Additionally, the colonies were streaked out onto another antibiotic plate to ensure single colony morphology and stability of the plasmid. A second PCR was done to confirm presence of a plasmid. Primers specific for the plasmid were used to amplify a portion of the plasmid and confirmed by DNA agarose gel electrophoresis.  As a positive control, all protocols for inducing competence were tested on <i>E. coli</i> DH5α with plasmid pSB1A3. Selection of antibiotic and PCR were used to confirm that transformed <i>E. coli</i> were harboring the plasmid used. Competence was successful induced in a model gram-negative γ-proteobacteria, <i>E. coli</i>. Table 2 summarizes the variety of methods tested and results obtained. Unfortunately, there were no replicated successes.
  
  

Revision as of 20:13, 18 September 2015

UBC iGEM 2015

 

Genetic Tool Development

 

The β-proteobacteria, Snodgrassella alvi, and the γ-proteobacteria, Gilliamella apicola, were chosen as candidates for our probeeotic due to their endogenous nature in relation to the midgut of the European honey bee, Apis mellifera (1). Native and unique to the honey bee gut, the introduction of imidacloprid and 6-CNA degradation genes into these candidate bacteria would minimize the chance of resistance genes spreading to other insects. Due to the limited amount of existing literature on G. apicola and S. alvi, the project focused on discovering methods to make these bacteria genetically tractable. This included culturing the bacteria on different growth media, testing methods of competence induction, and transformation techniques with a variety of plasmids.

Culturing

Due to the novelty of using G. apicola and S. alvi for the project (vs. E. coli), the first step was to identify the optimal method of culturing either bacteria.

Growth Curve

The growth of G. apicola was monitored on a plate reader that measured the OD value at 600nm over 36 hours, and plotted to a curve at fixed time points. For this, G. apicola was inoculated into a TSB culture that was previously flushed with 5% CO2 balanced with N2. Additionally, 5% CO2 balanced with N2 was blown onto the plate whilst sealing to ensure the presence of a minimal amount of oxygen in the plate.

Inducing Competence in G.apicola and S.alvi

After identifying the optimal method to culture G. apicola, we moved on to attempting various ways of inducing competence in the bacteria. Due to the lack of existing literature on methods of inserting a plasmid into G. apicola, we tried various protocols known to work on other gram-negative gammaproteobacteria, and a protocol for microaerophilic bacteria were attempted. View our protocols here, under Genetic Tool Development.

Transformation

After creating the competent cells, a variety of transformation protocols were attempted. View our protocols here, under Genetic Tool Development.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following people greatly for their assistance, suggestions, and providing the plasmids/materials for us to experiment with.

Walden Kwong for providing the strains of G. apicola and S. alvi.

Dr. Julian Davies for providing the RP1 plasmid.

Dr. John Smit and Dr. John Nomellini for providing the E.coli S17, and SM-10 strains. As well for providing the plasmids PBBR3, PBBR4, PKT210, and PRK293.

Dr. Rachel Fernandez for providing the PBBRMCS1-2 plasmid.

Dr. J. Thomas Beatty for providing the PIND4 plasmid.

Dr. Bob Hancock and Dr. Mangeet Bains for providing PBBR1MCS-3, PBBR1MCS-5, and PBSPIISK(-).

Dr. Michael Murphy and everyone in the Murphy Lab for being amazing hosts.

References

  1. Kwong, W., Engel, P., Koch, H., and Moran, N. (2014). Genomics and host specialization of honey bee and bumble bee gut symbionts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 11509-11514.
  2. Williams, P., Ketley, J., & Salmond, G. (Eds.). (1998). Bacterial Pathogenesis. London, UK: Academic Press.
  3. Nickoloff, J. A. (Ed.). (1995). Electroporation Protocol for Microorganisms. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc.
  4. Van der Geize, R. et al. (2002). Molecular and functional characterization of kshA and kshB, encoding two components of 3-ketosteroid 9α-hydroxylase, a class IA monooxygenase, in Rhodococcus erythropolis strain SQ1. Molecular Microbiology, 45(4). doi:0.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03069
  5. Koch, H. et al. (2013). Diversity and evolutionary patterns of bacterial gut associates of corbiculate bees. Molecular Ecology, 22(7). doi: 10.1111/mec.12209
  6. Cho, J. et al. (2003). The Effects of Altering Autoinducer-2 Concentration on Transfer Efficiencies of the F and RPI plasmids to the Quorum Sensing Recicpient Escherichia coli Strain AB1157. Journal of Experimental Microbiology and Immunology (JEMI), 3, pp. 8-14.
  7. Chan, V. et al. (2002). The Effect of Increasing Plasmid Size on Transformation Efficiency in Escherichia coli. Journal of Experimental Microbiology and Immunology (JEMI), 2, pp. 207-223.
  8. Rodriguez, R. L, & Denhardt, D. T. (1988). Vectors: A Survey of Molecular Cloning Vectors and Their Uses. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth Publishers.
  9. Plasmid map of pIND4 for Rhodobacter sphaeroides. (2005). Retrieved August 5, 2015.
  10. Schweizer, H. P. (2001). Vectors to express foreign genes and techniques to monitor gene expression in Pseudomonads. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12:439–445.
  11. Kovach, M.E., Elzer, P.H., Steven Hill, D., Robertson, G.T., Farris, M.A., Roop, R.M., and Peterson, K.M. (1995). Four New Derivatives of the Broad-Host-Range Cloning Vector pBBR1MCS, Carrying Different Antibiotic-Resistance Cassettes. Gene, 166(1). 175-176.