Honey Bee Silk

Background

Abstract

In addition to the more well known silks from spiders and silkworms, we decided to also explore silk from the honey bee Apis mellifera. We cloned the honey bee silk gene as well as several variants of it and submitted them as the first honey bee silk biobricks. To investigate its potential as a biomaterial, we expressed the silk protein and confirmed its presence using SDS PAGE.

Introduction

Silk from Apis Mellifera represents an intriguing alternative to silks from spiders or silkworms. Although it is not quite as strong as these other types of silks, working with honey bee silk has certain advantages over spider and silkworm silk. The size of the honey bee silk protein gene is considerably smaller than the silk genes of spiders or silkworms. More importantly, the gene sequence is non repetitive, which allows us to synthesize and make modifications to the gene without the complications that are inherent to repetitive DNA sequences (citation). Honey bee silk also has a very different secondary and tertiary structure than spider and silkworm silks. It forms primary alpha helices, and four silk proteins come together to form a coiled coil structure (Tara D. Sutherland et al. Mol Biol Evol 2007;24:2424-2432)(http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/11/2424/F8.large.jpg). In wild type honey bee silk these coiled coils are formed from four similar, yet unique proteins, Amelf 1-4. However, a study has shown that using one of these proteins, (Amelf3) is sufficient to reproduce the physical properties of the wild type fibers (citation). A major goal of our project is to give biological fibers entirely new functionalities. Therefore, in addition to expressing wild type honey bee silk, we have also created constructs in which honey bee silk protein is fused to other proteins. Our first fusion construct is honey bee silk fused to super folder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP), which will act as our proof of principle that silk can be functionalized while still maintaining exceptional physical properties. Our second fusion is silk fused to SpyCatcher protein, which would allow for the capture of any protein modified to contain the short SpyTag peptide.

Existing techniques seek to remove reliance of cloning on primer annealing (Tokareva et al, 2013). Generally, these techniques break the silk genetic into monomeric sequences, then assemble the monomers into the final construct. Head-to-tail cloning assembles gene constructs by ligating two plasmid halves together. Each half carries one of the silk monomers, and the resulting complete plasmid has been doubled. This technique can be used recursively to assemble increasingly large silk genes in a specified manner. Directional recursive ligation uses a similar tactic, where individual monomers are ligated one at a time into a receiving plasmid. Concatemerization is another technique where a pool of monomers are ligated in a single reaction, then cloned into plasmids. This particular technique is useful for creating a library of sizes and compositions.

These existing techniques are not ideal for engineering recombinant silks, because they require repeated and extensive cloning for large constructs, as in the case of head-to-tail assembly and directional recursive ligation, or do not offer any control over the length or genetic composition, as is the case for concatemerization. As it currently stands, there is no one technique that offers rapid and controllable assembly of recombinant spider silk genes.

Iterative Capped Assembly (ICA) is a cloning method that is used to sequentially assemble long, repetitive DNA sequences. This technique was developed by Briggs et al. in 2012 as a method to assemble Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs) which are sequence specific DNA binding proteins that consist of multiple repetitive monomers. Each repeat monomer is responsible for binding to a specific nucleotide in the target sequence. Due to the repetitive nature of TALE genes, conventional PCR is unable to reliably amplify these sequences due to non-specific primer binding.

Although ICA was developed using TALE construction as a model problem, this technique can be used to construct long, repetitive DNA constructs in a directly controllable fashion. ICA assembles repetitive sequences one monomer unit at a time, while preventing the elongation of incomplete nucleotide chains. The full length sequence is flanked by unique primer annealing sites, which allows the PCR amplification of the final product. This entire process is performed using a solid substrate, which greatly facilitates the construction of long sequences.

This summer, we adapt the use of Iterative Capped Assembly (ICA) as a technique for cloning recombinant spider silks in a time-efficient and specific manner that is unparalleled by existing methods. Our experience shows that ICA can be used as a method for the quick assembly of spider silk genes.

Methodology

1. Although previous literature has shown that wild type honeybee silk is composed of four highly similar proteins, we decided to only produce one. This decision was based on the result of Tara Sutherland's research, which claimed to be able to produce honeybee fibers with comparable physical properties to wild type fibers using only one of the four proteins. The protein they used was AmelF3, which is the protein we focused on. We obtained the sequence of the AmelF3 gene from genbank.( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/100192201), synthesized it using IDT’s synthesis service and used this construct as our baseline sequence from which to construct our biobricks. Because we aimed to express honeybee silk protein, we added regulatory elements such as promoters and ribosome binding sites to several our constructs. Two of our biobricks represent fusion proteins between silk and another functional protein. The first fusion biobrick is silk fused to sfGFP(http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763015), which will serve as our proof of principle that honeybee silk can be functionalized while still retaining its mechanical properties. The second fusion biobrick is honey bee silk fused to SpyCatcher protein, which allow for capture of and protein modified to contain a Spytag peptide. (http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763008) Please see our list of biobricks (Parts) and the respective biobrick pages for more detailed design information and characterization of each biobrick.



2. A basic biobrick for ICA consists of a gene monomer flanked by BsaI recognition and cleavage sites. While each of the core monomer is identical, the restriction sites are oriented such that digestion with BsaI yields distinct sticky ends for each of the three types of units. These pieces must be digested to reveal the sticky ends before assembly.
3. Accessory pieces required in ICA include the initiator, streptavidin coated beads, the terminator, and the capping oligos.
   1. The initiator is a dsDNA fragment made by annealing two ssDNA oligos together. The initiator is designed such that one end is biotinylated, for conjugation to streptavidin coated beads. The other end has a sticky overhang and is designed to anneal to the forward sticky end of the ‘A-type’ monomer unit. This end is 5’-phosphorylated to enable ligation. The initiator also contains a primer binding site that can be used for PCR amplification, as well as other accessory sequences such as affinity tags and the biobrick prefix.
   2. Streptavidin coated beads serve as a solid support for the elongating DNA chain during ICA. The biotinylated end of the initiator binds to streptavidin to anchor the nascent construct. The ability to physically separate the DNA from solution is needed due to repeated wash and ligation steps used during ICA.
   3. The terminator is constructed similarly to the initiator, but lacks biotinylation. One end of the terminator is compatible to the reverse sticky end of the ‘C-type’ monomer unit. This end is 5’-phosphorylated to enable ligation. The terminator also contains a primer binding site that can be used for PCR amplification, as well as the biobrick suffix.
   4. The capping oligos are comprised of a single 5’-phosphorylated ssDNA oligo that can form a stable stem loop structure with a unique sticky end. There are three distinct caps, each of which can bind to the A, B, or C sticky ends
4. In each extension step, the next sequential monomer (A, B, or C) is added onto the growing chain. Chains that failed to extend during the previous extension step are capped using a hair-pin oligo that prevents subsequent extension. These capped chains are still present in the mixture for the duration of ICA, but do not participate in any ligation event, and are not amplified in the final PCR. Each final construct is flanked by a biotinylated initiator oligo which allows immobilization onto streptavidin beads, and a terminator oligo. These two oligos provide primer annealing sites which can be used to amplify the sequence using conventional PCR.
5. A generalized workflow is demonstrated below:
   1. The initiator, terminator, and capping oligos are prepared ahead of time by mixing the relevant oligos and ramping down from 95 C to form the working oligos.
   2. Monomers of each type (A, B, C) are digested from plasmid with BsaI and purified prior to ICA. These are termed working monomers.
   3. The initiator is attached to the streptavidin coated beads.
   4. An ‘A-type’ monomer is ligated to the end of the initiator. Afterwards, any unreacted fragments, as well as the ligase are washed off.
   5. Next, the ‘B-type’ monomer is ligated to the end of the growing chain. In this reaction mixture, an ‘A-type’ cap is also included, to terminate any chains that failed to extend in the previous ‘A-type’ ligation. Again, unreacted fragments are removed by washing.
   6. Next, the ‘C-type’ monomer is ligated. This reaction mixture contains the ‘B-type’ cap.
   7. Next the ‘A-type’ monomer is ligated. This time, the ‘C-type’ cap is also included in the mixture.
   8. This proceeds in a repetitive fashion until the desired construct length is reached.
   9. The final constructed is eluted off the beads. The eluate is used as a template for PCR to amplify the construct. Only complete constructs that contain the initiator and terminator are amplified. Capped constructs do not amplify.
   10. The amplified construct can now be used for downstream cloning.

Results

We used standard restriction digest cloning to clone our five biobrick constructs. We sequence verified all our parts and submitted them to the registry. Here is a diagram of all of our sequence verified parts. From top to bottom they are the honey bee silk coding region, the coding region under control of lac promoter, the silk protein fused to Spycatcher, the coding region under control of a T7 promoter, and silk protein fused to sfGFP. We also successfully made competent BL21 (DE3) cells using the Zymo mix and go chemical competency kit. We performed a competency test and we determined that the competency of our cells was 3e7 colony forming units / microgram of DNA. (https://2015.igem.org/Team:UCLA/Notebook/Honeybee_Silk/12_July_2015) Finally, we were able to express our honeybee silk proteins and confirm its presence through SDS PAGE (https://2015.igem.org/File:UCLA_honeybee_Growth_optimization_37C.jpg?). We also obtained some rough estimate of protein yield by doing a BCA protein assay. This estimate may not be entirely reliable because we observed some contaminating bands on our SDS PAGE gels, indicating that there are proteins other than honeybee silk in the solution. From our BCA assay, we determined that we got around 12 mg of protein from a 300ml overnight cell culture. Future Directions Optimize protein expression and purification protocols for higher yields and greater purity Process purified silk proteins into materials such as films or fibers Assess the mechanical properties of these fibers Express and process functionalized silk proteins Assay functionalized honey bee silk materials for functionality

Achievements

1. Successfully improved last year’s biobrick BBa_K1384000
   1. Redesigned MaSp1 and MaSp2 monomers with modified sticky ends, and cloned these into biobricks.
2. Created a collection of parts to be used for Iterative Capped Assembly
3. Demonstrated that ICA is adaptable to silk using our designed sticky ends.
   1. Optimized ICA for use with spider silk genes to enable fast, efficient assembly of repetitive constructs.
4. Used ICA to assemble a variety of silk genetic constructs of different length and composition to examine their properties.
   1. Used ICA to create 10 different silk constructs ranging from 3-mers to 15-mers, and constructs with MaSp1 and MaSp2 in ratios of [1:2], [1:1] and [2:1].

List of Biobricks

• MaSp2 AB: BBa_K1763002
• MaSp2 BC: BBa_K1763003
• MaSp2 CA: BBa_K1763004
• MaSp2 SeqAB: BBa_K1763009
• MaSp1 AB: BBa_K1763010
• MaSp1 BC: BBa_K1763011
• MaSp1 CA: BBa_K1763012
• MaSp1 SeqAB2: BBa_K1763423
• M2-3(1C3): BBa_K1763424
• M2-3(T7): BBa_K1763425
• M2-6(1C3): BBa_K1763426
• M2-6(T7): BBa_K1763427
• M2-9(1C3): BBa_K1763428
• M2-9(T7): BBa_K1763429
• M2-12(1C3): BBa_K1763430
• M2-12(T7): BBa_K1763431
• M2-15(1C3): BBa_K1763432
• M2-15(T7): BBa_K1763433
• M1-9(1C3): BBa_K1763434
• M1-9(T7): BBa_K1763435
• M1-12(1C3): BBa_K1763436
• M1-12(T7): BBa_K1763437
• M1/2[2:1]-12(1C3): BBa_K1763438
• M1/2[2:1]-12(T7): BBa_K1763439
• M1/2[1:1]-12(1C3): BBa_K1763440
• M1/2[1:1]-12(T7): BBa_K1763441
• M1/2[1:2]-12(1C3): BBa_K1763442
• M1/2[1:2]-12(T7): BBa_K1763443

References

Briggs A., Rios X., Chari R., Luhan Y., Zhang F., Mali P., and Church G. Iterative capped assembly: rapid and scalable synthesis of repeat-module DNA such as TAL effectors from individual monomers. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40(15): e117

Hinman, M.B., Lewis, R. Isolation of a clone encoding a second dragline silk fibroin. Nephila clavipes dragline silk is a two-protein fiber. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267: 19320–19324.

Tokareva O., Michalczechen-Lacerda V., Rech E., and Kaplan D. Recombinant DNA production of spider silk proteins. Microbial Biotechnology. 2013;6(6): 651-663

Xu, M., Lewis, R.V. Structure of a protein superfiber: spider dragline silk. PNAS;1990;87, 7120.

FIGURES: I DON'T KNOW WHERE TO PUT THEM