Difference between revisions of "Team:Duke/Interlabstudy"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<p><font size=”2.5”>This year Duke iGEM took part in the InterLab Study. We linked three promoters to the fluorescent marker I13504 on pSB1C3. Then each construct was Sanger sequence verified and measured with three biological samples on a flow cytometer. The fluorescence information associated with each promoter is characterized in the table below.</font></p> | <p><font size=”2.5”>This year Duke iGEM took part in the InterLab Study. We linked three promoters to the fluorescent marker I13504 on pSB1C3. Then each construct was Sanger sequence verified and measured with three biological samples on a flow cytometer. The fluorescence information associated with each promoter is characterized in the table below.</font></p> | ||
| − | + | <center> | |
| − | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/64/2015DukeInterlabTable.jpeg"> | |
| − | + | </center> | |
<p><font size=”2.5”>For more information on the InterLab study project and protocol, please visit their website at <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/Interlab_study">here</a>.</font></p> | <p><font size=”2.5”>For more information on the InterLab study project and protocol, please visit their website at <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/Interlab_study">here</a>.</font></p> | ||
Latest revision as of 02:27, 19 September 2015
Interlab Study
This year Duke iGEM took part in the InterLab Study. We linked three promoters to the fluorescent marker I13504 on pSB1C3. Then each construct was Sanger sequence verified and measured with three biological samples on a flow cytometer. The fluorescence information associated with each promoter is characterized in the table below.
For more information on the InterLab study project and protocol, please visit their website at here.