Difference between revisions of "Team:Czech Republic/Practices"
(→Multinational general public vs. biologists GMO survey) |
(→Key outputs) |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{:Team:Czech_Republic/Template:Top|Human | + | {{:Team:Czech_Republic/Template:Top|Human Practices}} |
= Outreach strategy = | = Outreach strategy = | ||
| − | The IOD band presents a new approach to diagnostics and diagnostic engineering. So at Team Czech Republic we addressed engineers and medical experts to discuss the application and the novel engineering approach. In addition, Czech Republic teamed up with Chalmers Gothenburg to conduct a multinational survey on public | + | The IOD band presents a new approach to diagnostics and diagnostic engineering. So at Team Czech Republic we addressed engineers and medical experts to discuss the application and the novel engineering approach. In addition, Czech Republic teamed up with Chalmers Gothenburg to conduct a multinational survey on the public perception of Synthetic Biology. |
<html><div><div class="left"></html> | <html><div><div class="left"></html> | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[File:Czech_Republic_IODLecture.png|470px|link=]] | [[File:Czech_Republic_IODLecture.png|470px|link=]] | ||
| − | |||
| + | Since a lot of ideas behind IODs were built on the fundamentals of classical engineering, we wanted to present the concept of our project (from an engineering point-of-view) to young engineers and receive their feedback. We presented our project and synthetic biology in general at a lecture of the Introduction to Cybernetics class led by Prof. Ing. Miloš Schlegel CSc. After giving a 30-minute lecture on synthetic biology, we introduced our project. The response was surprisingly positive. Not only we were asked several to-the-point questions, but some of the students even showed a deeper interest in synthetic biology and individually contacted us after the talk. | ||
| − | = | + | <html></div><div class="right"></html> |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | == [[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/Interview|Medicine]] == | |
| + | [[File:Czech_Republic_Interview_introduction.png|475px|link=]] | ||
| − | + | In order to get a professional opinion on our project and to learn more about cancer and CTCs, we conducted an interview with two cancer specialists, Mgr. Pavel Pitule, Ph.D. and Mgr. Pavel Ostašov, Ph.D. The interview took place at the Biomedical Center of Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen. After introducing our project idea we discussed some particularly interesting points. This interview was not only helpful and enriching but also led to an agreement to collaborate with the Laboratory of Tumor Biology in the near future. | |
| − | |||
| + | <html></div><div style="clear: both;"></div><div class="left"></html> | ||
| + | ===Key outputs=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Most engineers are eager to see the immediate reaction of the system. '''Following the lectures such as the one for young engineers, we designed IODs as a fast diagnostic test'''. Also, the preliminary process is quick thanks to the clone-free preparation of required IODs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Questions we received''' during the lecture from students and teachers concerning current cancer diagnostics, their price, and efficiency '''were afterwards discussed with cancer specialists in the [[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/Interview| interview]]'''. | ||
[[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/Lecture | Read more about the lecture...]] | [[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/Lecture | Read more about the lecture...]] | ||
| Line 27: | Line 32: | ||
<html></div><div class="right"></html> | <html></div><div class="right"></html> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=== Key outputs === | === Key outputs === | ||
| − | ''' | + | '''We were recommended to use a color change instead of the agglutination as an indicator of CTCs' presence.''' |
| + | As a result, a group of experiments from module 2 was changed to use GFP as an indicator of successful communication between IODs. The use of color indication in the further research proved advantageous (at least partially), and the use of color indicators will always be considered in later experiments. | ||
| − | |||
| + | '''A recommendation was made to test the agglutination on a slide.''' | ||
| + | As a result, since we had the possibility to perform our experiments in microfluidics, we listened to this advice and used microfluidics as well as microscope slides in our agglutination experiments. | ||
| − | + | [[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/Interview | Read more about the interview...]] | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | [[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/Interview | Read the interview...]] | + | |
<html><div style="clear: both;"></html> | <html><div style="clear: both;"></html> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<html></div></div><div style="clear: both;"></div></div></html> | <html></div></div><div style="clear: both;"></div></div></html> | ||
| Line 61: | Line 51: | ||
= [[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/GMO_survey|Multinational general public vs. biologists GMO survey]] = | = [[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/GMO_survey|Multinational general public vs. biologists GMO survey]] = | ||
| − | Team Chalmers Gothenburg offered us to participate in their GMO survey. We asked 63 biologists and 50 respondents from general public to fill in the survey. Same thing was done in Sweden. Thanks to | + | Team Chalmers Gothenburg offered us to participate in their GMO survey. We asked 63 biologists and 50 respondents from the general public to fill in the survey. Same thing was done in Sweden. Thanks to this, we had the opportunity to compare GMO knowledge in Sweden and Czech Republic. Big thanks belongs to the team Chalmers Gothenburg for statistical evaluation of all data. |
| − | + | ===Key outputs=== | |
| − | The | + | The positive attitude and further interest of many respondents delighted us. |
| − | However the difference in opinions between biologists and general public is disturbing | + | However, although anticipated, the difference in opinions between biologists and the general public is disturbing. On that account, we are going to arrange more lectures about synthetic biology at our university and also for the general public in Czech Republic. |
[[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/GMO_survey|Read more about the survey...]] | [[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/GMO_survey|Read more about the survey...]] | ||
= [[Team:Czech_Republic/Safety|Safety]] = | = [[Team:Czech_Republic/Safety|Safety]] = | ||
| − | We | + | We did not only wholeheartedly followed standard lab safety techniques and complied with the national GMO laboratory regulations but also considered the broader safety assumptions of our technology. We discussed our idea with non-biological specialists as well as experts, which enabled us to improve the design and get a better grasp of the notion our project idea transmits. |
| + | |||
[[Team:Czech_Republic/Safety|Read more...]] | [[Team:Czech_Republic/Safety|Read more...]] | ||
{{:Team:Czech_Republic/Template:Bottom}} | {{:Team:Czech_Republic/Template:Bottom}} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:32, 19 September 2015
Human Practices
Contents
Outreach strategy
The IOD band presents a new approach to diagnostics and diagnostic engineering. So at Team Czech Republic we addressed engineers and medical experts to discuss the application and the novel engineering approach. In addition, Czech Republic teamed up with Chalmers Gothenburg to conduct a multinational survey on the public perception of Synthetic Biology.
Engineering
Since a lot of ideas behind IODs were built on the fundamentals of classical engineering, we wanted to present the concept of our project (from an engineering point-of-view) to young engineers and receive their feedback. We presented our project and synthetic biology in general at a lecture of the Introduction to Cybernetics class led by Prof. Ing. Miloš Schlegel CSc. After giving a 30-minute lecture on synthetic biology, we introduced our project. The response was surprisingly positive. Not only we were asked several to-the-point questions, but some of the students even showed a deeper interest in synthetic biology and individually contacted us after the talk.
Medicine
In order to get a professional opinion on our project and to learn more about cancer and CTCs, we conducted an interview with two cancer specialists, Mgr. Pavel Pitule, Ph.D. and Mgr. Pavel Ostašov, Ph.D. The interview took place at the Biomedical Center of Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen. After introducing our project idea we discussed some particularly interesting points. This interview was not only helpful and enriching but also led to an agreement to collaborate with the Laboratory of Tumor Biology in the near future.
Key outputs
Most engineers are eager to see the immediate reaction of the system. Following the lectures such as the one for young engineers, we designed IODs as a fast diagnostic test. Also, the preliminary process is quick thanks to the clone-free preparation of required IODs.
Questions we received during the lecture from students and teachers concerning current cancer diagnostics, their price, and efficiency were afterwards discussed with cancer specialists in the interview.
Read more about the lecture...
Key outputs
We were recommended to use a color change instead of the agglutination as an indicator of CTCs' presence. As a result, a group of experiments from module 2 was changed to use GFP as an indicator of successful communication between IODs. The use of color indication in the further research proved advantageous (at least partially), and the use of color indicators will always be considered in later experiments.
A recommendation was made to test the agglutination on a slide.
As a result, since we had the possibility to perform our experiments in microfluidics, we listened to this advice and used microfluidics as well as microscope slides in our agglutination experiments.
Read more about the interview...
Multinational general public vs. biologists GMO survey
Team Chalmers Gothenburg offered us to participate in their GMO survey. We asked 63 biologists and 50 respondents from the general public to fill in the survey. Same thing was done in Sweden. Thanks to this, we had the opportunity to compare GMO knowledge in Sweden and Czech Republic. Big thanks belongs to the team Chalmers Gothenburg for statistical evaluation of all data.
Key outputs
The positive attitude and further interest of many respondents delighted us.
However, although anticipated, the difference in opinions between biologists and the general public is disturbing. On that account, we are going to arrange more lectures about synthetic biology at our university and also for the general public in Czech Republic.
Safety
We did not only wholeheartedly followed standard lab safety techniques and complied with the national GMO laboratory regulations but also considered the broader safety assumptions of our technology. We discussed our idea with non-biological specialists as well as experts, which enabled us to improve the design and get a better grasp of the notion our project idea transmits.