Difference between revisions of "Team:Amsterdam/Project/Phy param/Ecoli"
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<div class="6u"> | <div class="6u"> | ||
<figure class ="image fit"> | <figure class ="image fit"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b2/Amsterdam_growth_curves_carbon.png" alt="E. coli growth"> |
<figcaption>Figure 1. - Growth of <i>E. coli</i> in BG-11 supplemented with ammonia and different concentrations of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate.</figcaption> | <figcaption>Figure 1. - Growth of <i>E. coli</i> in BG-11 supplemented with ammonia and different concentrations of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate.</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
+ | <div class="6u"> | ||
+ | <figure class ="image fit"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/fe/Amsterdam_HPLC_MG1655.png" alt="HPLC MG1655"> | ||
+ | <figcaption>Figure 5 - Growth of <i>E. coli</i> K-12 substrain MG1655 on various carbon sources. </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="6u"> | ||
+ | <figure class ="image fit"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c7/Amsterdam_HPLC_P4X%28B2%29.png" alt="HPLC P4XB2"> | ||
+ | <figcaption>Figure 6 - Growth of <i>E. coli</i> K-12 substrain MG1655, P4X and P4XB2 on acetate</figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="6u"> | <div class="6u"> | ||
<figure class ="image fit"> | <figure class ="image fit"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/68/Amsterdam_yield_carbon_large.png" alt="E. coli Yield"> |
<figcaption>Figure 2. - Biomass yields of <i>E. coli</i> in BG-11 supplemented with ammonia and different concentrations of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate. </figcaption> | <figcaption>Figure 2. - Biomass yields of <i>E. coli</i> in BG-11 supplemented with ammonia and different concentrations of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate. </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 104: | Line 111: | ||
<div class="6u"> | <div class="6u"> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | The problem that we are addressing is urgent, and we need a feasible solution fast! We think <i>E. coli</i> is the ideal candidate for this, as it can grow on many of the compounds that <i>Synechocystis</i> has been engineered to secrete [1], and is the workhorse of synthetic biology: most bio-bricks are developed for and tested in <i>E. coli</i>. Thus, in theory <i>E. coli</i> is the ideal chemoheterotroph for our consortium. However, if we want to create meaningful models that can help us to rationally design our consortium, we need to measure how <i>E. coli</i> will behave in conditions that would be used for co-culturing with cyanobacteria. To predict growth behaviour in co-culture, we need to know if <i>E. coli</i> can grow under these conditions, how fast it can grow on carbon compounds that <i>Synechocystis</i> could be engineered to secrete, and at what rates it will consume these substrates. Furthermore, we would like to measure these parameters not only for wild-type <i>E. coli</i>, but also for an arginine overproducing strain, that could be used in a consortia with an arginine auxotrophic <i>Synechocystis</i> | + | The problem that we are addressing is urgent, and we need a feasible solution fast! We think <i>E. coli</i> is the ideal candidate for this, as it can grow on many of the compounds that <i>Synechocystis</i> has been engineered to secrete [1], and is the workhorse of synthetic biology: most bio-bricks are developed for and tested in <i>E. coli</i>. Thus, in theory <i>E. coli</i> is the ideal chemoheterotroph for our consortium. However, if we want to create meaningful models that can help us to rationally design our consortium, we need to measure how <i>E. coli</i> will behave in conditions that would be used for co-culturing with cyanobacteria. To predict growth behaviour in co-culture, we need to know if <i>E. coli</i> can grow under these conditions, how fast it can grow on carbon compounds that <i>Synechocystis</i> could be engineered to secrete, and at what rates it will consume these substrates. Furthermore, we would like to measure these parameters not only for wild-type <i>E. coli</i>, but also for an arginine overproducing strain, that could be used in a consortia with an arginine auxotrophic <i>Synechocystis</i>. |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <div class="6u"> | |
− | + | <figure class ="image fit"> | |
− | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0f/Amsterdam_ecoli_batch.jpg" alt="Batch cultures in erlenmeyer flasks"> | |
− | + | </figure> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | </ | + | |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 231: | Line 232: | ||
0.013 ± 0.0004 | 0.013 ± 0.0004 | ||
1.6 | 1.6 | ||
+ | |||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 236: | Line 238: | ||
<div class="7u"> | <div class="7u"> | ||
<figure class ="image fit"> | <figure class ="image fit"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b2/Amsterdam_growth_curves_carbon.png" alt="E. coli growth"> |
<figcaption>Figure 1. - Growth of <i>E. coli</i> in BG-11 supplemented with ammonia and different concentrations of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate.</figcaption> | <figcaption>Figure 1. - Growth of <i>E. coli</i> in BG-11 supplemented with ammonia and different concentrations of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate.</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure class ="image fit"> | <figure class ="image fit"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/68/Amsterdam_yield_carbon_large.png" alt="E. coli Yield"> |
<figcaption>Figure 2. - Biomass yields of <i>E. coli</i> in BG-11 supplemented with ammonia and different concentrations of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate.</figcaption> | <figcaption>Figure 2. - Biomass yields of <i>E. coli</i> in BG-11 supplemented with ammonia and different concentrations of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate.</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="5u"> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <figure class ="image fit"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3c/Amsterdam_growth_nitrogen.png" alt="Ammonia growth"> | ||
+ | <figcaption>Figure 3 - Growth of <i>E. coli</i> in BG-11 supplemented with acetate and different concentrations of ammonia.</figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="5u"> | ||
+ | <figure class ="image fit"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/de/Amsterdam_yield_nitrogen.png" alt="Ammonia yield"> | ||
+ | <figcaption>Figure 4 - Biomass yields of <i>E. coli</i> in BG-11 supplemented with ammonia and different concentrations of ammonia.</figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="8u"> | <div class="8u"> | ||
− | + | <figure class ="image fit"> | |
− | <figure class ="image fit" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/fe/Amsterdam_HPLC_MG1655.png" alt="HPLC MG1655"> |
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <figcaption>Figure 5 - Growth of <i>E. coli</i> K-12 substrain MG1655 on various carbon sources. </figcaption> |
− | <figcaption>Figure | + | </figure> |
+ | <figure class ="image fit"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c7/Amsterdam_HPLC_P4X%28B2%29.png" alt="HPLC P4XB2"> | ||
+ | <figcaption>Figure 6 - Growth of <i>E. coli</i> K-12 substrain MG1655, P4X and P4XB2 on acetate</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Latest revision as of 18:50, 20 November 2015
E. coli physiological parameters
Counting cells, counting molecules
Overview
Background
One of the members of our consortium is the chemoheterotrophic bacterium Escherichia coli. This bacterium is able to grow on various carbon compounds, and many bio-bricks for production of desired compounds are available for E. coli – which makes it easy to implement a practical application of our consortium in the near future.
Aim
To characterize growth of E. coli in conditions that simulate those in possible consortia with a carbon compound producing photoautotroph.This means determining several physiological parameters, that can be used in models describing the population dynamics of the co-culture. We aimed to determine these parameters for a wild-type and an arginine overproducing strain of E. coli.
Approach
We have grown E. coli in batch cultures, with cultivation conditions that are normally used for growing Synechocystis. The medium was supplemented with glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate to simulate production of carbon compounds by Synechocystis.
Results
- We showed that E. coli is unable to grow with nitrate as a sole nitrogen source, while it is able to fully rely on ammonia as the nitrogen source.
- We determined biomass yields, growth rates and consumption rates from a wild-type E. coli grown at 30°C in BG-11 supplemented with ammonia and either glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate.
- We determined biomass yields and growth rates from an arginine producing E.coli strain on lactate and acetate, and the consumption rate of acetate by this strain.
Connections
- Engineering Romance: Estimate parameters of arginine producing E.coli strain.
- Simulating Romance: Provide parameters.
Introduction
The problem that we are addressing is urgent, and we need a feasible solution fast! We think E. coli is the ideal candidate for this, as it can grow on many of the compounds that Synechocystis has been engineered to secrete [1], and is the workhorse of synthetic biology: most bio-bricks are developed for and tested in E. coli. Thus, in theory E. coli is the ideal chemoheterotroph for our consortium. However, if we want to create meaningful models that can help us to rationally design our consortium, we need to measure how E. coli will behave in conditions that would be used for co-culturing with cyanobacteria. To predict growth behaviour in co-culture, we need to know if E. coli can grow under these conditions, how fast it can grow on carbon compounds that Synechocystis could be engineered to secrete, and at what rates it will consume these substrates. Furthermore, we would like to measure these parameters not only for wild-type E. coli, but also for an arginine overproducing strain, that could be used in a consortia with an arginine auxotrophic Synechocystis.
Methods summary
Cultivation conditions
E. coli is usually grown in rich media such as LB-medium at 37°C, providing enough nutrients to ensure fast growth. In our consortium, E. coli will be grown at conditions which are ideal for Synechocystis to ensure enough production of carbon compounds on which E. coli can feed. Cyanobacteria are usually grown at 30°C in BG-11 medium, a minimal medium containing some minerals and sodium nitrate as a source for nitrogen. However, E. coli grows slower at this temperature, is not able to grow without a carbon source such as glucose, and it can’t use nitrate as a source for nitrogen. Therefore, the BG-11 needs to be supplemented with a carbon source and an extra nitrogen source such as ammonium chloride. In our consortia, the carbon source would be provided by the cyanobacteria, but here the carbon compound was added artificially to mimic that scenario.
Pre-culture
To obtain enough viable cells for experiments, E. coli was grown overnight in LB medium in shaking (200 rpm) flasks at a temperature of 30°C. Cells were spinned down, washed twice in BG-11 and used to inoculate an overnight culture in BG-11 supplemented with 18mM ammonium chloride and 20-40 mM of either glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate. This culture was (after spinning down and washing twice in BG-11) used for experiments.
Estimating parameters
Experimental conditions
To show that E. coli is able to sustain growth in BG-11, E. coli grown in BG-11 supplemented with 18 mM ammonium chloride and 40 mM glucose was transferred for ten consecutive days to fresh BG-11 supplemented with 18 mM ammonium chloride and 40 mM glucose. For determination of biomass yields of E. coli on carbon compounds, cells from the pre-culture were inoculated in BG-11 supplemented with 5 mM ammonium chloride and between 0 - 5 mM of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate. For determination of biomass yields of E. coli on ammonium chloride, cells were inoculated in BG-11 supplemented with 40 mM glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate and 0 - 5 mM ammonium chloride. For measuring growth rates and the rate at which E. coli consumes the carbon compounds, cells from the pre-culture were inoculated in BG-11 supplemented with 3 or 5 mM ammonium chloride and 3 mM of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate.
Measurements
Growth was monitored by taking samples and measuring their optical density at 600 nm (OD600) with a spectrophotometer. For measurements of consumption rates, in addition samples were taken to be analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Results
Biomass yields
One important parameter for predicting how E. coli will behave in co-culture with a carbon compound generating Synechocystis is the biomass yield of E. coli, i.e. the amount of biomass that E. coli can make with a certain amount of substrate. To measure this, biomass formation needs to be monitored at different concentrations of the substrate. In figure 1 the growth curves are shown for E. coli strain K-12 MG1655 growing in BG-11 supplemented with 5 mM ammonium chloride and 0 - 5 mM of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate. The maximum OD600 reached during 2 days of monitoring growth under these conditions is shown in figure 2. Yields are listed in table 1. In figure 3, growth of E. coli is shown in BG-11 media supplemented with 40 mM acetate and 0 - 5 mM ammonium chloride. The maximum OD600 reached during this experiment is plotted in figure 4. The figures show that E. coli is unable to grow on BG-11 with only nitrate, and a linear increase of the amount of biomass formed with increasing ammonium chloride concentration, with a yield of 0.27 OD/mM ammonium. carbon source growth rate (h-1) uptake rate (mM/h/OD) acetate 0.031 ± 0.002 1.7 glucose 0.289 ± 0.014 1.4 glycerol 0.203 ± 0.030 1.8 lactate 0.144 ± 0.016 2.8
Growth rates and consumption rates
Two other important parameters that are needed to rationally design our consortia are the growth rate of E. coli and the rate at which it consumes the carbon source that Synechocystis would produce. Furthermore, we would like to know how these parameters differ for an arginine overproducing strain of E. coli (the arginine strain was kindly provided by Prof. Dr. D. Chalier from Brussels Free University [2]). In figure 5 (top plot) OD600 of three E. coli cultures grown in BG-11 supplemented with 5mM ammonia and 3 mM of glucose, glycerol, lactate or acetate are shown for the first 9 hours of the experiment. The growth rate was estimated by finding the best fit of an exponential curve to 3 consecutive time points, and are listed in table 2. The plot on the bottom (figure 5) shows the concentration of each carbon source as measured by HPLC. In figure 6 the same data is plotted for E. coli strain K-12 MG1655 grown on acetate, but also the “growth on” and “consumption of” acetate by E. coli strain K12 p4x and p4xb2. These are a wildtype (p4x) E. coli strain and a derivative strain (p4xb2) that overproduces arginine. Unfortunately, arginine could not be measured. Growth rates and uptake rates of the three strains are listed in table 3. strain growth rate (h-1) uptake rate (mM/h/OD) MG1655 0.031 ± 0.002 1.7 P4X 0.064 ± 0.06 0.008 P4XB2 0.013 ± 0.0004 1.6