Difference between revisions of "Team:UMaryland/Collaborations"

Revision as of 22:47, 17 September 2015

This year we had the amazing opportunity of hosting our first ever regional iGEM meetup at the University of Maryland. This meetup provided an opportunity for iGEM teams from around the region to come together mid-way through their projects to learn from each other, practice presenting, build relationships for future collaboration, and acquire valuable feedback from their peers. The University of Virginia, College of William and Mary, Duke University, and Rock Ridge high School were all in attendance. Each team gave a 25 minute presentation of their project including their progress, goals, and any difficulties they experience so far, followed by a Q&A period with the audience.

The College of William and Mary presented on their project of measuring the intrinsic noise generated by commonly used promoters in the iGEM registry.

Visit William and Mary's Wiki

Duke University presented on their project of applying dCas9 to the detection and elimination of antibiotic resistance in bacteria.

Visit Duke's Wiki

The University of Virginia presented on their project of using modified E. coli to prevent postprandial hyperglycemic spikes.

Visit UVA's Wiki

Our special high school guest team Rock Ridge added diversity to the meetup and presented on their project intended to help prevent and diagnose Lyme Disease, a particularly salient problem in their local community of Northern Virginia.

Visit Rock Ridge's Wiki

Guest Speakers

Supplementing the presentations given by each team were several guest speakers who kindly helped make the meetup a great and informative learning experience and expand the context of what we are doing with iGEM to issues beyond the lab on a national and global scale.

Special Agent Edward You of the FBI spoke about the relationship between iGEM and the future of national security as synthetic biology and DIY and community labs continue to grow with the growth of iGEM, and his work in creating a strong relationship between the biology community and the law enforcement to promote biosecurity without hindering progress.

Distinguished Professor Raymond St. Leger of the University of Maryland dept. of Entomology gave a presentation entitled "Designer Pathogens" featuring a vast array of his research group's synthetic biology projects. The main project involved a series of experiments that incorporated toxins from fungi and receptors from bacteria that would spread disease among mosquitos in Africa, combating the transmision malaria. Results proved effective enough to advance to open field trials.

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #FFFFFF 0%, #41CC6B 50%, #FFFFFF 100%);
 min-height:42px;
-top:-250px;
+top:-400px;
 }
 #layer2 {
@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #FFFFFF 0%, #46DBF2 50%, #FFFFFF 100%);
 min-height:42px;
-top:-250px;
+top:-400px;
 }
 #layer3 {
@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #FFFFFF 0%, #E6AC39 50%, #FFFFFF 100%);
 min-height:42px;
-top:-250px;
+top:-400px;
 }
 #layer4 {
@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #FFFFFF 0%, #FB7AFF 50%, #FFFFFF 100%);
 min-height:42px;
+top:-400px;
 }
 #contentbox{
@@ Line 87: / Line 88: @@
 background-size: 100% ;
 background-repeat: no-repeat;
-height: 100%;
 width:100%;
-min-height:900px;
+height:100%;
+min-height:800px;
 height:100%;
 color: #0DFF00;
 font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;
 font-size:xx-large;
-top:-250px;
+top:-400px;
 }
@@ Line 140: / Line 141: @@
 height:150px;
 position:absolute;
-top:275px;
+bottom:0px;
+text-shadow: 4px 4px 4px white;
 }
 #bubble{
@@ Line 148: / Line 150: @@
 display: inline-block;
 padding:10px;
-min-width:500px;
+min-width:450px;
 width:45%;
 margin:5px;
@@ Line 154: / Line 156: @@
 text-align: center;
 height:60%;
 }
 #bubble2{
@@ Line 161: / Line 164: @@
 display: inline-block;
 padding:10px;
-min-width:500px;
+min-width:450px;
 width:45%;
 margin:5px;
@@ Line 170: / Line 173: @@
 <div id='cover'>
-<br>
-<br>
-<br>
-<br>
-<br>
-<br>
 <div id='bar'>
 <p style="font-size:64px"><b>Mid-Atlantic iGEM Meetup 2015</b></style>
 </div>
-<br>
-<br>
 </div>
@@ Line 258: / Line 253: @@
 <p style="font-size: 18px;">Because of this meet-up, we were able to further collaborate in several ways with teams in attendance. We learned that Duke University was also attempting to build a DIY Thermocycler, We were able to offer some guidance to Rock Ridge High School, and had some collaboration on the Interlab Study with the College of William and Mary.
-Our collaboration with Duke started during the regional meet up. We came to an understanding that our machines were heading down similar paths, at the time. We understood that our teams had the same list of hardware, peltier elements, Arduino microprocessors, and motor controllers. Seeing that our goals were aligned we thought the best probability of success for our teams would come from a collaboration. We set up an email conversation with Duke and began exchanging weekly conversations about how we were progressing and sending each other pictures of our progress. When we ran into issues with our peltier units we spoke to Duke and warned them of the potential issues, and through the subsequent conversations with them we were able to conclude that the peltier platform was not ideal for PCR. We therefore switched gears and moved to designing a hairdryer based unit. Without a collaboration with Duke and the ability to have an open forum to discuss ideas we might have failed to recognize the short coming of our first device.
+<p style="font-size: 24px;">Duke and PCR
+<p style="font-size: 18px;">Our collaboration with Duke started during the regional meet up. We came to an understanding that our machines were heading down similar paths, at the time. We understood that our teams had the same list of hardware, peltier elements, Arduino microprocessors, and motor controllers. Seeing that our goals were aligned we thought the best probability of success for our teams would come from a collaboration. We set up an email conversation with Duke and began exchanging weekly conversations about how we were progressing and sending each other pictures of our progress. When we ran into issues with our peltier units we spoke to Duke and warned them of the potential issues, and through the subsequent conversations with them we were able to conclude that the peltier platform was not ideal for PCR. We therefore switched gears and moved to designing a hairdryer based unit. Without a collaboration with Duke and the ability to have an open forum to discuss ideas we might have failed to recognize the short coming of our first device.
+<p style="font-size: 24px;">W&M and Interlab
+<p style="font-size: 18px;">We asked for plasmid
 <br>
 <br>