Team:Czech Republic/Interlab study

{{{1}}}

Background

abdabdkjabfhbkjsb v jdkjaskdjsd

something

hdashdjhads

something

fsfa

Design

Materials and methods

Used plasmids

  1. Device 1 (20K+21J): J23101 + I13504, in the pSB1C3 backbone
  2. Device 2 (22A+21J): J23106 + I13504, in the pSB1C3 backbone
  3. Device 3 (22K+21J): J23117 + I13504, in the pSB1C3 backbone
  4. Positive control (C+): I20270, in the pSB1C3 backbone
  5. Negative control (C-): K823008, in the pSB1C3 backbone

Used strain

E. coli E5alpha

Used material

  1. LB-M agar plates with chloramphenicol
  2. LB-M agar plates with ampicillin
  3. 1,5 ml eppendorf tubes
  4. 0,5 ml PCR tubes
  5. 50 ml centrifuge conical base and rim tubes
  6. NucleoSpin Plasmid DNA, RNA, and protein purification Kit
  7. NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up Kit
  8. LB-M medium with chloramphenicol
  9. NaOH agarose gel and buffer
  10. Sphero Rainbow Calibration Particles, 8 Peaks, 3.0-3.4

Used methods (links)

  1. Transformation
  2. Miniprep
  3. Restriction digest
  4. Ligation
  5. NucleoSpin Gel Clean-up
  6. NucleoSpin Plasmid DNA purification
  7. Flow cytometry

All used protocols can be found here: Protocols

Used machines

  1. Incubator: Binder, ATP.line CB(E6), CO2 – Incubator with O2 control, model CB160, 230V
  2. Orbita Shaker PSU-10i, 280 rpm, 360deg
  3. Flow Cytometr C6
  4. Thermo-Shaker with cooling for microtubes and PCR plates TS-100C
  5. Centrifuge 5424/5424 R

Used software

  1. CFlow Plus
  2. Microsoft Excel
  3. Sphero PMT QC Template

Description

Plasmids containing promoters and GFP were taken from The 2015 DNA Distribution Kit and transformed into E. coli. Colonies were streaked for patches and amplified plasmids were obtained using NucleoSpin Plasmid DNA purification. Restriction digest followed using XbaI and PstI enzymes for digest of plasmid with GFP and SpeI and PstI ezymes for digest of plasmids containing promoters. Desired parts were then cut out of gel and purified using NucleoSpin Gel Clean-up. Ligation of Device 1 and 2 followed our standard protocol. However ligation of Device 3 had to be repeated several times and the protocol had to be modified (2 hours ligation, 5:1 insert:vector ratio). All devices were transformed into E.coli. Fluorescence of colonies was checked up under UV light. Plasmids were then obtained by NucleoSpin Plasmid DNA purification. Devices were verified on gel after restriction digest using SpeI and EcoRI enzymes and by sequencing.

Picture o patches (all together)

Picture of colonies????

All verified devices were again transformed into E. coli accompanied by positive and negative control. 5 ml of liquid LB-M medium with chloramphenicol were inoculated with three chosen colonies of each device. There were no biological replicates for positive and negative control. Liquid cultures were incubated for 17 hours in Orbita Shaker PSU-10i placed in incubator. OD of these cultures was measured and diluted to 0,1. Fluorescence of biological and also technical replicates was measured using Flow Cytometr C6 following our flow cytometry protocol.

Processing of data

Raw data obtained from Flow Cytometr C6 were transformed into MEFL (Molecules of Equivalent Fluorescein) unites. We used Sphero Rainbow Calibration Particles, 8 Peaks, 3.0-3.4 to obtain a Calibration Graph using Sphero PMT QC Template. MEFL data were then processed and visualized in Microsoft Excel.

Protocol (reference)

1. Run the 3.0 μm RCPs, which the MEFL are known. Adjust the signal settings such as laser power ….. to place all peaks within the 4-decade log scale. Record the fluorescence Mean Channel Number for each peak.

2. Plot the assigned MEFL value for each peak vs the Mean Channel Number on the SPHERO PMT QC Teplate to obtain a Calibration Graph.

3. Run the unknown sample using the same instrument settings (see Flow Cytometr protocol). Record the Mean Channel Number of sample.

4. Calculate the MEFL of the unknown by crosscalibrating its Mean Channel Number against the Calibration Graph of the RCPs. Calibration Graph + PeakChMEFL


Protocols

Results

Device Colony MEFL Mean of technical replicates SD Colony Mean of device SD Device
20K +21J (Device 1) Colony 1 I. 639549 657818 15504 664409 29185
II. 677453
III. 656453
Colony 2 I. 689717 702990 10067
II. 714084
III. 705169
Colony 3 I. 620331 632419 15053
II. 623286
III. 653639
22A+21J (Device 2) Colony 1 I. 481600 464304 12795 392603 50712
II. 460265
III. 451048
Colony 2 I. 346283 358070 9696
II. 357896
III. 370032
Colony 3 I. 354544 355433 4688
II. 350188
III. 361568
22K+21J (Device 3) Colony 1 I. 2635 2872 220 2229 454
II. 3165
III. 2814
Colony 2 I. 1786 1891 74
II. 1933
III. 1953
Colony 3 I. 1665 1926 204
II. 1948
III. 2163
Positive control Colony 1 I. 202361 196401 5853 196401 /
II. 188446
III. 198395
Negative control Colony 1 I. 224 213 8 213 /
II. 204
III. 211

graphs


It is noticeable that promoter of Device 1 is strongest followed by promoter of Device 3. Device 1 has the weakest promoter.

Picture of gel (all together)

Sequencing results

Reference

Appendix

Raw data

Flow cytometer graph example ????