Difference between revisions of "Team:Aachen/Lab/Methanol"
Tschwanemann (Talk | contribs) |
Tschwanemann (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
{{Team:Aachen/ReadMore|title=BioBricks|link=/Team:Aachen/Lab/Methanol/Biobricks|picture=rmHardware2|url=/wiki/images/5/51/Aachen_tile_Lab_Methanol_Biobricks.JPG}} | {{Team:Aachen/ReadMore|title=BioBricks|link=/Team:Aachen/Lab/Methanol/Biobricks|picture=rmHardware2|url=/wiki/images/5/51/Aachen_tile_Lab_Methanol_Biobricks.JPG}} | ||
<html></div></html> | <html></div></html> | ||
+ | |||
=Design= | =Design= | ||
+ | |||
Few methanol assimilation pathways are known to exist in nature. From literature references, we identified the ribulose monophosphate pathway (RuMP) to be the most efficient naturally occuring one<ref>Witthoff S, Schmitz K, Niedenführ S, Nöh K, Noack S, Bott M, Marienhagen J. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for methanol metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Mar;81(6):2215-25. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03110-14. Epub 2015 Jan 16. PubMed PMID: 25595770; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4345391.</ref><ref>Schrader J, Schilling M, Holtmann D, Sell D, Filho MV, Marx A, Vorholt JA. Methanol-based industrial biotechnology: current status and future perspectives of methylotrophic bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 2009 Feb;27(2):107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Dec 26. Review. PubMed PMID: 19111927.</ref>. Recently, a modification of the RuMP was discovered that theoretically improves the assimilation efficiency<ref>Bogorad IW, Chen CT, Theisen MK, Wu TY, Schlenz AR, Lam AT, Liao JC. Building carbon-carbon bonds using a biocatalytic methanol condensation cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):15928-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413470111. Epub 2014 Oct 29. PubMed PMID: 25355907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4234558.</ref>. The results of our [[Team:Aachen/Modeling|modeling]] confirmed the so called "major MCC" (Methanol Condensation Cycle) to be the most promising pathway. | Few methanol assimilation pathways are known to exist in nature. From literature references, we identified the ribulose monophosphate pathway (RuMP) to be the most efficient naturally occuring one<ref>Witthoff S, Schmitz K, Niedenführ S, Nöh K, Noack S, Bott M, Marienhagen J. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for methanol metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Mar;81(6):2215-25. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03110-14. Epub 2015 Jan 16. PubMed PMID: 25595770; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4345391.</ref><ref>Schrader J, Schilling M, Holtmann D, Sell D, Filho MV, Marx A, Vorholt JA. Methanol-based industrial biotechnology: current status and future perspectives of methylotrophic bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 2009 Feb;27(2):107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Dec 26. Review. PubMed PMID: 19111927.</ref>. Recently, a modification of the RuMP was discovered that theoretically improves the assimilation efficiency<ref>Bogorad IW, Chen CT, Theisen MK, Wu TY, Schlenz AR, Lam AT, Liao JC. Building carbon-carbon bonds using a biocatalytic methanol condensation cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):15928-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413470111. Epub 2014 Oct 29. PubMed PMID: 25355907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4234558.</ref>. The results of our [[Team:Aachen/Modeling|modeling]] confirmed the so called "major MCC" (Methanol Condensation Cycle) to be the most promising pathway. |
Revision as of 14:13, 18 September 2015