Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Project/VitaminA"

Line 50: Line 50:
  
 
<h1 class="date one">Comparative growth of WT and Vitamin A producing Yeast</h1><br>
 
<h1 class="date one">Comparative growth of WT and Vitamin A producing Yeast</h1><br>
−
We are using the strain IME167: Mata ura3-52 HIS3 LEU2 TRPl MAL2-8c SUC2 pUDE269 (2u URA3 pTDH3-crtYB-T2Al-crtl-T2A2-crtE-tTEF) described in Polycistronic expression of a beta-carotene biosynthetic pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae coupled to beta-ionone production (Beekwilder et al. 2014). This strain is carrying a high copy plasmid with the polycistronic construct.
+
<div class="column-left" align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5c/Growthcurvesforypdandvpyjb2015igempb.png" width="100%">
−
We were afraid that wild type yeast would have been able to out-compete the vitamin A producer yeast because of the burden that the synthesis could have put on the cell. We compared the growth speed of both the producer and a WT yeast (SK1) in YPD by measuring the variations of OD600nm over time.<br>
+
No differences were found between the growth rate of the 2 yeasts. This was a concern because a fitness cost would mean that wild type yeast would have slowly replaced the carotenoid producing yeast in the culture.</div>
−
<font align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5c/Growthcurvesforypdandvpyjb2015igempb.png" width="800px">
+
 
−
Not differences were found between the growth rate of the 2 yeasts. This was a concern because a fitness cost would mean that wild type yeast would have slowly replace the carotenoid producing yeasts in the culture. </font>
+
<div class="column-right" align="justify">We are using the strain IME167: Mata ura3-52 HIS3 LEU2 TRPl MAL2-8c SUC2 pUDE269 (2u URA3 pTDH3-crtYB-T2Al-crtl-T2A2-crtE-tTEF) described in "Polycistronic expression of a beta-carotene biosynthetic pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae coupled to beta-ionone production" (Beekwilder et al. 2014). This strain is carrying a high copy plasmid with the polycistronic construct.
 +
<br>We were afraid that wild type yeast would have been able to out-compete the vitamin A producer yeast because of the burden that the synthesis could have put on the cell. So we compared the growth speed of both the producer and a WT strain of <i>S. cerevisiae</i> (SK1) in YPD by measuring the variations of OD600nm over time.<br>
 +
</div>
 +
<div style="clear:both"></div>
 +
 
  
 
<h1 class="date one">Absorption spectrum of yeast extracts</h1>
 
<h1 class="date one">Absorption spectrum of yeast extracts</h1>

Revision as of 01:19, 19 September 2015

Motivation

Current situation
Vitamin A deficiency is a crucial issue in India, affecting millions of people.
The government developed different programs to provide people with vitamin A supplements, but they are not very convenient (people need to go to a center everyday to receive it), only help a small portion of the population, and the retinol present in the supplements is not as healthy as the ß-carotene found in food. Another solution which has been proposed is Golden Rice, a rice that have been genetically engineered to synthesize vitamin A. However, the Golden Rice is the subject of many controversies, and has not been implemented in India.

Our idea
Our idea is to have the vitamin A produced by the microbiome of fermented foods, and not by the cereal itself. It is much more easier, cheaper and faster to genetically engineer micro-organisms than plants. And for the consumer, it is much less intrusive and constraining to have a starter of yeast and bacteria which they can chose to add or not in their food at anytime, than to have to change their entire crops as proposed by the Golden Rice project.

Design

To produce vitamin A in idli, a popular indian rice cake that is fermented, we chose to use the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae since it is commonly found in idli batter (Soni and Sandhu, 1989 and Nout, 2009). So it has a better chance to grow well and not affect the taste of idli than a yeast that isn’t normally present in the batter. Though S. cerevisiae doesn’t naturally produces ß-carotene, it has been shown that with the introduction of two carotenogenic genes from the carotenoid-producing ascomycete Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, S. cerevisiae could synthesize ß-carotene (Verwaal et al., 2007). These two genes are crtYB which codes for phytoene synthase and lycopene cyclase, and crtI, which encodes phytoene desaturase.

Additional overexpression of crtE (GGPP synthase) from X. dendrorhous, and an additional copy of a truncated 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase gene (tHMG1) from S. cerevisiae were both reported to increase the carotenoid production levels in S. cerevisiae (Verwaal et al., 2007). A more recent study also showed that ß-carotene synthesis in this yeast could also be increased with codon-optimization of crtI and crtYB, and by introducing the HMG-CoA reductase (mva) from Staphyloccocus aureus rather than the truncated HMG-CoA reductase (tHMG1) from S. cerevisiae (Li, 2013).


HMG-CoA: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A
HMG1 and HMG2 (paralogs): HMG-CoA reductase
IPP: isopentenyl pyrophosphate
DMAPP: dimethylallyl pyrophosphate
GPP: geranyl diphosphate
FPP: farnesyl pyrophosphate
GGPP: geranylgeranyl-diphosphate
CrtE: GGPP synthase
CrtYB: lycopene cyclase/phytoene synthase
CrtI: phytoene desaturase


The polycistron


In 2014, Beekwilder & als. assembled the crtE, crtYB and crtI genes into a polycistronic construct where the individual Crt proteins were separated by the T2A sequences of the Thosea asigna virus.
Their polycistron is under the regulation of the strong yeast promoter TDH3, and the terminator TEF1. The three genes are involved in the lasts steps of the beta carotene synthesis and it has have been shown that their addition to Saccharomyces cerevisiae was enough to make it produce ß-carotene.
2A sequences or cis-acting hydrolase element:
2A like sequences are able to force the ribosome to "skip" a codon. The ribosome releases the part that it has already translated and to keep translating the mRNA. It allows transcription of multiple proteins from only 1 mRNA with 1 promoter, like bacterial polycistronic elements, but also with only one kozac sequence (yeast RBS) which ensures that the quantities of all the translated product are the same.

Comparative growth of WT and Vitamin A producing Yeast


No differences were found between the growth rate of the 2 yeasts. This was a concern because a fitness cost would mean that wild type yeast would have slowly replaced the carotenoid producing yeast in the culture.
We are using the strain IME167: Mata ura3-52 HIS3 LEU2 TRPl MAL2-8c SUC2 pUDE269 (2u URA3 pTDH3-crtYB-T2Al-crtl-T2A2-crtE-tTEF) described in "Polycistronic expression of a beta-carotene biosynthetic pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae coupled to beta-ionone production" (Beekwilder et al. 2014). This strain is carrying a high copy plasmid with the polycistronic construct.
We were afraid that wild type yeast would have been able to out-compete the vitamin A producer yeast because of the burden that the synthesis could have put on the cell. So we compared the growth speed of both the producer and a WT strain of S. cerevisiae (SK1) in YPD by measuring the variations of OD600nm over time.

Absorption spectrum of yeast extracts

In order to quantify the production of carotenoids of the IME167 strain we extracted the carotenoid content of the cells with hexane. The control was the same SK1 strain that has been used in the growth experiment.
align="center">
The peak of absorbency at 449nm can be linked to the concentration of carotenoids using the following formula :
Total carotenoids (in µg/g[dw]) = (A449 x mL hexane) / (0.2702 x g [dw])
here the dry weight is 0.8g an the volume of hexane used to extract the vitamin is 2mL. The absorbance is peaking at 1.2 at 449nm.
The total carotenoid content is then (1.2*2)/(0.2702*0.8)=11ug/g of dry weight.

Further improvements

An optimized polycistron
The current strain is not producing enough beta-carotene and to meet to daily requirement we would have to add more yeasts in the batter and this could have effects on the taste and texture of idli. This is why we aimed to strongly increase the ß-carotene yield of those yeast.
For this purpose, we designed a construct very similar to theirs, except that we moved the crtE gene to the first place of the polycistron, in order to increase the carotenoid yield. Indeed, it has been shown that the efficiency of translation decreases after every 2A sequence (de Felipe et al. 2006), and that an increase of CrtE may improve the ß-carotene production (Verwaal et al. 2007). We kept the same 2A sequences between the cistrons, as well as the same terminator TEF1. In order to synthesize the whole construct though, we had to change the TDH3 promoter: like most yeast promoters it has a very low GC content, which makes it very difficult to synthesize. So we used the ADH1 promoter instead, which is another strong promoter for yeast.
We also codon-optimized the three genes for S. cerevisiae, using the IDT codon-optimization tool, in order to increase the genes expression. The study from Li et al. (2013) had shown that the optimization of 5 codons in the sequence of crtI, and 8 codons in the sequence of crtYB had increased the ß-carotene production in S. cerevisiae by 200%, so we had high hopes that codon-optimizing the whole genes would lead to even better yield.
The whole construct we designed was synthesized by IDT in 5 gBlocks.




An optimized HMG gene
Additionally, we codon-optimized for S. cerevisiae the HMG-CoA reductase gene from S. aureus that had been used by Li & al. in 2013. Indeed, their study had shown that S. cerevisiae transformed with this gene had a better ß-carotene yield than the ones transformed by the tHMG1 from S. cerevisiae; it is highly probable than a codon-optimized version of this gene from S. aureus would produce even more ß-carotene.
Chromosomal integration
In the strain containing the polycistron designed by Beekwilder, the polycistronic construct is on a plasmid (pUDC082). But since in our final product we would like our yeast to grow on non selective media and to keep the polycistron, we designed a way to integrate the construct in the yeast chromosome. Our plan was to use the HO-Poly-KanMX4-HO plasmid (AddGene plasmid #51662) as a backbone for our construct: it's a yeast plasmid for chromosomal integration into the HO locus, with a selection marker for yeast (KanMX4). This plasmid also has an origin of replication for E. coli and a selection marker for bacteria (Ampicillin).

Map of the HO-Poly-KanMX4-HO plasmid containing our optimized polycistron:


Mutation optimization
Another very different way to improve the sequence of the pathway would be to replace the regions that are the most likely to mutate by alternative, more stable versions. Indeed, our strain is meant to be released in the environment without containment and to be consumed by people, so if mutations were to happen in the genes we have engineered, the yeast's ability to produce ß-carotene could be greatly reduced, or lost.
To address this problem, we made a collaboration with the Vanderbilt iGEM Team 2015, who invented an algorithm to scan the sequences looking for regions that are likely to mutate. Thanks to their software they were able to find alternative versions of the crtE, crtI, crtYB and HMG-CoA genes that were more robust and durable.



Bibliography

  • Li, Q., Sun, Z., Li, J. & Zhang, Y. Enhancing beta-carotene production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering. FEMS Microbiology Letters 345, 94-101 (2013).
  • Beekwilder, J. et al. Polycistronic expression of a ß-carotene biosynthetic pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae coupled to ß-ionone production. Journal of Biotechnology (2014).
  • Voth, W.P., Richards, J.D., Shaw, J.M. & Stillman, D.J. Yeast vectors for integration at the HO locus. Nucleic acids research 29, E59-E59 (2001).
  • Gietz, R.D. & Schiestl, R.H. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc / SS carrier DNA / PEG method. Nature Protocols 2, 31-35 (2008).