Difference between revisions of "Team:Aachen/Design"

 
(22 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Team:Aachen/Header}}
 
{{Team:Aachen/Header}}
  
By talking about your design work on this page, there is one medal criterion that you can attempt to meet, and one award that you can apply for. If your team is going for a gold medal by building a functional prototype, you should tell us what you did on this page. If you are going for the Applied Design award, you should also complete this page and tell us what you did.
+
{{Team:Aachen/StartTour}}
  
 +
Products from the bioeconomy play an important role in a sustainable future, but are dependent on cheap and available biomass as a carbon source. The availability of sustainable biomass, though, is limited by the arable area of our planet. Even by deforestation and setting up new agricultural area, we cannot provide enough arable land for both biomass for the bioindustry and food crops to solve the problem of world hunger. So if we hardly manage to feed the population, how can we guarantee the supply of biomass for biotechnological products?
  
Text from Judging Applied Design award:
 
Best Applied Design: This is a prize for the team that has developed a synbio product to solve a real world problem in the most elegant way. The students will have considered how well the product addresses the problem versus other potential solutions, how the product integrates or disrupts other products and processes, and how its lifecycle can more broadly impact our lives and environments in positive and negative ways.
 
  
 +
{{Team:Aachen/Figure|Aachen_BG01.jpg|title=Deforestation|subtitle=|size=large}}
  
=Introduction=
+
Although the farming of algae is a potential solution to this global problem, because they do not depend on agricultural area, they are still highly limited by the natural photosynthesis. The scale of a production facility that would replace our daily demand for oil would still cover millions of hectare.
  
Products from the bioeconomy play an important role in a sustainable future, but are dependent on cheap and available biomass as a carbon source. The availability of sustainable biomass, though, is limited by the arable area of our planet. Even by deforestation and setting up new agricultural area, we cannot provide enough arable land for both biomass for the bioindustry and food crops to solve the problem of world hunger. So if we hardly manage to feed the population, how can we guarantee the supply of biomass for other biotechnological products?
 
  
 +
So would not it be great to convert CO{{sub|2}} from the air into other carbon compounds by using new technologies that require not only less space but also exceed the efficiency of photosynthesis by multiples? The technical process of fixing CO{{sub|2}} that precedes our process, for example through the sunfire company, is far more efficient compared to plants. The efficency of converting electrical energy into chemical energy is about 80 times higher than the conversion of CO{{sub|2}} into biomass through plants and even 18 times higher than the maximal efficieny natural photosynthesis can theoretically have<ref>Die natürliche Photosynthese: Ihre Effizienz und die Konsequenzen - Hartmut Michel</ref>.
  
Another important aspect to consider is that most of our everyday products are mainly based on fossil resources. The main source for sustainable products today are plants. However, they are really inefficent in fixing CO{{sub|2}} and need a lot of time, water and space.
 
  
 +
The process produces different hydrocarbons, but can easily be configurated to produce only methanol. This is where our project comes in. Instead of providing complex biomass, we convert methanol into the sustainable and universal carbon source, glycogen.
  
The best option would be to use CO{{sub|2}} from the air to form products. Recent technological advancements made it possible to convert CO{{sub|2}} into methanol with a great efficieny. This is where our project comes in. To take a step forward in solving this complex problem, we wanted to develop our ''E.&nbsp;coli'' that converts methanol to glycogen.
 
  
 +
{{Team:Aachen/Figure|Aachen_BG10.jpg|title=Glycogen<ref>https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0d/Glycogen.png|size=large</ref>|size=small}}
  
Glycogen is a sugar polymer that is safe to handle and can be easily converted into glucose. Therefore, it can then be used as a carbon source for almost all existing bioprocessess since those rely on sugar. Our project has the potential to make the bioindustry independent from plants and instead use CO{{sub|2}} from the air. Thereby not only methanol is opened up as a new carbon source but also the CO{{sub|2}} level in the atmosphere is reduced. We connect the bioeconomy with advanced technologies of CO{{sub|2}} fixation.  
+
Glycogen is a sugar polymer that is safe to handle and can be easily converted into glucose. Therefore, it can then be used as a carbon source for almost all existing bioprocesses since those rely on sugar. Our project has the potential to make the bioeconomy independent from plants and instead use CO{{sub|2}} from the air.
  
  
We decided to use the newly developed, ATP-neutral Methanol Condensation Cycle<ref>Bogorad IW, Chen CT, Theisen MK, Wu TY, Schlenz AR, Lam AT, Liao JC. Building carbon-carbon bonds using a biocatalytic methanol condensation cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):15928-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413470111. Epub 2014 Oct 29. PubMed PMID: 25355907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4234558.</ref> to enable ''E.&nbsp;coli'' to take up methanol. Glycogen accumulation was achieved by combining knocking out one degradation enzyme and overexpressing the synthesis genes.
+
We decided to use the newly developed, ATP-neutral Methanol Condensation Cycle <ref>Bogorad IW, Chen CT, Theisen MK, Wu TY, Schlenz AR, Lam AT, Liao JC. Building carbon-carbon bonds using a biocatalytic methanol condensation cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):15928-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413470111. Epub 2014 Oct 29. PubMed PMID: 25355907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4234558.</ref> to enable ''E.&nbsp;coli'' to take up methanol. Glycogen accumulation was achieved by combining knocking out one degradation enzyme and overexpressing the synthesis genes.
  
  
The main advantage of our product is that it addresses the problem in various ways because not only can the potential of methanol as a carbon source be exploited but also... ( the bioeconomy can get independent of plants and competition of resources between bioindustry products and food products will decrease.)
+
The huge advantage of our approach is that it addresses the problem in various ways. Not only can the potential of methanol as a carbon source be exploited but also the surplus CO{{sub|2}} in the atmosphere is utilized. Likewise, it has to be considered that by fixing the CO{{sub|2}} technically, non-arable areas like deserts can be used. In addition compared to the other approaches, our project is based on a CO{{sub|2}} fixing method that is far more efficient than plants. Finally, the production of glycogen from methanol with our bacteria is independent from the restricted arable land available.
  
* Other potential solutions to this global problem are for example the approach of iGEM team Amsterdam where cyanobacteria produce simple carbon compounds using CO{{sub|2}} and sunlight however the technichal process of fixing CO{{sub|2}} that precedes our process, for example the company sunfire, is far more efficient also compared to plants.
+
{{Team:Aachen/Figure|Aachen_BG11.jpg|title=cycle from CO{{sub|2}} to biotechnological product|subtitle=|size=large}}
  
 +
The most important impact of our project is, that arable land will no longer be used to supply the bioeconomy’s demand for a carbon source. It can again be used to grow food crops to feed a rapidly growing world population.
  
The efficency of energy that is converted into chemical energy is about 80 times higher than the conversion of CO{{sub|2}} to biomass through plants and even 18 times higher than the maximal efficieny natural photosynthesis can theoretically have.<ref>Die natürliche Photosynthese: Ihre Effizienz und die Konsequenzen - Hartmut Michel</ref>
 
team amsterdam: algen für biomasse farmen
 
anbau energy crops, dafür regenwald abholzen
 
* syngas auf methan basis, dafür existierende biomasse verwenden: der syngas zwisvhenschritt nimmt viel energie raus
 
*
 
  
 
+
=References=
* how its lifecycle can more broadly impact our lives and environments in positive and negative ways?
+
 
+
==References==
+
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  

Latest revision as of 03:22, 19 September 2015

Products from the bioeconomy play an important role in a sustainable future, but are dependent on cheap and available biomass as a carbon source. The availability of sustainable biomass, though, is limited by the arable area of our planet. Even by deforestation and setting up new agricultural area, we cannot provide enough arable land for both biomass for the bioindustry and food crops to solve the problem of world hunger. So if we hardly manage to feed the population, how can we guarantee the supply of biomass for biotechnological products?


Aachen BG01.jpg
Deforestation

Although the farming of algae is a potential solution to this global problem, because they do not depend on agricultural area, they are still highly limited by the natural photosynthesis. The scale of a production facility that would replace our daily demand for oil would still cover millions of hectare.


So would not it be great to convert CO2 from the air into other carbon compounds by using new technologies that require not only less space but also exceed the efficiency of photosynthesis by multiples? The technical process of fixing CO2 that precedes our process, for example through the sunfire company, is far more efficient compared to plants. The efficency of converting electrical energy into chemical energy is about 80 times higher than the conversion of CO2 into biomass through plants and even 18 times higher than the maximal efficieny natural photosynthesis can theoretically have[1].


The process produces different hydrocarbons, but can easily be configurated to produce only methanol. This is where our project comes in. Instead of providing complex biomass, we convert methanol into the sustainable and universal carbon source, glycogen.


Aachen BG10.jpg
Glycogen[2]

Glycogen is a sugar polymer that is safe to handle and can be easily converted into glucose. Therefore, it can then be used as a carbon source for almost all existing bioprocesses since those rely on sugar. Our project has the potential to make the bioeconomy independent from plants and instead use CO2 from the air.


We decided to use the newly developed, ATP-neutral Methanol Condensation Cycle [3] to enable E. coli to take up methanol. Glycogen accumulation was achieved by combining knocking out one degradation enzyme and overexpressing the synthesis genes.


The huge advantage of our approach is that it addresses the problem in various ways. Not only can the potential of methanol as a carbon source be exploited but also the surplus CO2 in the atmosphere is utilized. Likewise, it has to be considered that by fixing the CO2 technically, non-arable areas like deserts can be used. In addition compared to the other approaches, our project is based on a CO2 fixing method that is far more efficient than plants. Finally, the production of glycogen from methanol with our bacteria is independent from the restricted arable land available.

Aachen BG11.jpg
cycle from CO2 to biotechnological product

The most important impact of our project is, that arable land will no longer be used to supply the bioeconomy’s demand for a carbon source. It can again be used to grow food crops to feed a rapidly growing world population.


References

  1. Die natürliche Photosynthese: Ihre Effizienz und die Konsequenzen - Hartmut Michel
  2. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0d/Glycogen.png%7Csize=large
  3. Bogorad IW, Chen CT, Theisen MK, Wu TY, Schlenz AR, Lam AT, Liao JC. Building carbon-carbon bonds using a biocatalytic methanol condensation cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):15928-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413470111. Epub 2014 Oct 29. PubMed PMID: 25355907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4234558.