Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Design"
Line 200: | Line 200: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | In India, the FSSIE (Food Safety and Standard Authority in India) told us the safety needed to be established in order for our product to be authorized. Both Dr. A. K. Sharma from the FSSAI and Dr. Sunita Grover the Dairy Microbiology Division at the National Dairy Research Institute advised us to chose micro-organisms that were already present in the fermented foods we were targeting, which we did. These organisms are all in Risk Group 1 (Unlikely to cause human disease.), and have the GRAS status (Generally Considered As Safe). | + | In India, the FSSIE (Food Safety and Standard Authority in India) told us the safety needed to be established in order for our product to be authorized. Both Dr. A. K. Sharma from the FSSAI and Dr. Sunita Grover the Dairy Microbiology Division at the National Dairy Research Institute <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Acceptance">advised us to chose micro-organisms that were already present in the fermented foods</a> we were targeting, which we did. These organisms are all in Risk Group 1 (Unlikely to cause human disease.), and have the GRAS status (Generally Considered As Safe). |
<br>We also found out that the Indian law currently doesn’t allow GM microorganisms because of the use of antibiotic markers that makes them unsafe to eat. | <br>We also found out that the Indian law currently doesn’t allow GM microorganisms because of the use of antibiotic markers that makes them unsafe to eat. | ||
− | <br>But <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Acceptance">according to Samir K. Brahmachari</a>, former director of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research in India, our product has a greater chance to be authorized if there is no more live bacteria in the final form of the dish, that is actually eaten. We checked this affirmation and found out this regulation: | + | <br><br>But <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Acceptance">according to Samir K. Brahmachari</a>, former director of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research in India, our product has a greater chance to be authorized if there is no more live bacteria in the final form of the dish, that is actually eaten. We checked this affirmation and found out this regulation: |
<br><br><div align="center"><i>‘...food stuffs...derived from Living Modified Organisms where the end product is NOT a Living Modified Organism are exempted from mandatory approval of the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee.’</i></div> | <br><br><div align="center"><i>‘...food stuffs...derived from Living Modified Organisms where the end product is NOT a Living Modified Organism are exempted from mandatory approval of the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee.’</i></div> | ||
<div align="right">Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)<br> | <div align="right">Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)<br> |
Revision as of 10:04, 19 November 2015