Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Design"
(22 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<h1 class="date one">Introduction</h1><br> | <h1 class="date one">Introduction</h1><br> | ||
− | + | <p>Despite many efforts from the indian government and NGO's to decrease the micronutrient deficiencies in India, there are two major limitations that prevent the vast majority of the population to access sufficient sources of vitamins and iron or phytic acid: <b>cost</b>, and <b>distribution</b>. Our project proposes an elegant solution to address both those issues, via a cost-effective biosynthesis of vitamins and phytic acid by micro-organisms, which can be cultivated in everyone’s home without any need of external infrastructure. | |
− | <p> | + | <br><br>We decided to re-think the universal tradition of food fermentation to expand it with new possibilities. With |
− | Despite many efforts from the indian government and NGO to decrease the micronutrient deficiencies in India, there are two major limitations that prevent the vast majority of the population to access sufficient sources of vitamins and iron or phytic acid: <b>cost</b>, and <b>distribution</b>. Our project proposes an elegant solution to address both those issues, via a cost-effective biosynthesis of vitamins and phytic acid by micro-organisms, which can be cultivated in everyone’s home without any need of external infrastructure. | + | |
− | <br><br>We decided to re-think the universal tradition of food fermentation | + | |
community acceptance in mind, we developed a product that can work sustainably in the hands of people with | community acceptance in mind, we developed a product that can work sustainably in the hands of people with | ||
minimal equipment, and fits equally well into the existing infrastructure set up by the Indian government to | minimal equipment, and fits equally well into the existing infrastructure set up by the Indian government to | ||
Line 37: | Line 35: | ||
<h1 class="date three">Distribution & Availability</h1> | <h1 class="date three">Distribution & Availability</h1> | ||
− | < | + | <br> <div class="column-left" align="justify"><b>The Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) programme</b> |
− | + | <br>An important problem we wanted to tackle with our product is the access Indian people have to sources of vitamins. Indeed, we researched what structures and programs already exist in India, and found that it was a major issue. | |
− | + | ||
<br>One of the most important governmental programs for vitamin supplementation is the | <br>One of the most important governmental programs for vitamin supplementation is the | ||
Line 62: | Line 59: | ||
the nearest center everyday if they want to receive the supplements, which is not convenient | the nearest center everyday if they want to receive the supplements, which is not convenient | ||
especially in rural areas. | especially in rural areas. | ||
− | <b>Vitamins in everyone’s home</b> | + | <br><br><b>Vitamins in everyone’s home</b> |
− | <br>This observation held a major role in our design of a product that can be grown at home, in every village or household. A culture of microorganisms doesn’t require an expensive infrastructure; in fact, most Indian families have already been growing microbial cultures that are several generations old by using a part of their daily yogurt as a starter for the fermentation of the next day’s yogurt. A great part of our project was dedicated to find a cheap and edible medium in which the microbes could be cultivated at home, and to manufacture a simple and practical way to distribute our engineered yeast and bacteria (See Manufacturing page). We found that a microbial culture could be grown in a very simple medium like potato juice, and that the yeast could be lyophilized, mixed with rice flour and water, and distributed in the form of small cubes. | + | <br>This observation held a major role in our design of a product that can be grown at home, in every village or household. A culture of microorganisms doesn’t require an expensive infrastructure; in fact, most Indian families have already been growing microbial cultures that are several generations old by using a part of their daily yogurt as a starter for the fermentation of the next day’s yogurt. A great part of our project was dedicated to find a cheap and edible medium in which the microbes could be cultivated at home, and to manufacture a simple and practical way to distribute our engineered yeast and bacteria (See <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Project/Manufacturing">Manufacturing page</a>). We found that a microbial culture could be grown in a very simple medium like potato juice, and that the yeast could be lyophilized, mixed with rice flour and water, and distributed in the form of small cubes. |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 69: | Line 66: | ||
<br><br>We believe that a culture of yeast and bacteria that can be grown at home and supplements | <br><br>We believe that a culture of yeast and bacteria that can be grown at home and supplements | ||
− | fermented foods with vitamins could reach far more people than the <i>anganwadi</i>centers: | + | fermented foods with vitamins could reach far more people than the <i>anganwadi</i> centers: |
those cultures would only need to be distributed once, which would not be very costly as the | those cultures would only need to be distributed once, which would not be very costly as the | ||
packages can be made to be very small and light and one culture would act as a starter culture | packages can be made to be very small and light and one culture would act as a starter culture | ||
Line 101: | Line 98: | ||
<h2>People's opinion</h2> | <h2>People's opinion</h2> | ||
− | <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt | + | <div class="column-left" align="justify">Since the very beginning of our project, we researched which solution would be convenient and acceptable to them, by asking them about their habits and opinions. For this we interviewed local indian citizens, and well as local authorities in India (find the details on the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Acceptance">Acceptance page</a>). |
+ | |||
+ | <br><br>We found out that people in India don’t want GMO to be associated with farmers, and they don’t want them to be dependent on one company that would have monopoly on the product. This fitted well with the idea of strains that can be grown at home by everyone. By focusing on yeast and bacteria that are kept in pots and that can be added in a dish at the user’s convenience, we are not targeting the farmers specifically, and we are not affecting the crops at all; and we are giving people an independence and way to chose at any time whether or not they want to eat the GMO.</div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="column-right" align="justify">Most of the indian people we interviewed also told us that they would try our idea of adding a vitamin-producing bacteria, as long as it is proven efficient and harmless for human health. They said that a slight change in the recipe of a dish (aka adding the yeast a bacteria so that they would ferment and produce the vitamins in the dish) would not bother them as long as the taste is not changed. | ||
+ | <br>In order to not affect the taste, we chose to modify micro-organisms already present in the dish instead of adding new ones, in order to not disrupt the microbiome of the fermented dish. To check if high amounts of vitamins could change the taste, we also tasted <i>idlis</i> (fermented rice cakes) in which vitamin A, B2 and B12 bought in a supermarket had been added in quantities equivalent to the required daily amount, and did a blind test: people found no difference in taste at all with and without vitamins.</div> | ||
+ | <div style="clear:both"></div> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 150: | Line 153: | ||
<a name="safety" class="anchor"><h1></h1></a> | <a name="safety" class="anchor"><h1></h1></a> | ||
− | <h1 class="date two">Safety & Regulations</h1> | + | <h1 class="date two" id="safety">Safety & Regulations</h1> |
Line 181: | Line 184: | ||
the forms of B12 present in food and supplements. | the forms of B12 present in food and supplements. | ||
<br>The same is not true of vitamin A, though: most vitamin pills contain retinol, which is the form | <br>The same is not true of vitamin A, though: most vitamin pills contain retinol, which is the form | ||
− | of vitamin A that is used by the human body, and which can be toxic at very high dose. The ß-carotene produced by our yeast though is not toxic, since the body only converts what it | + | of vitamin A that is used by the human body, and which can be toxic at very high dose. The ß-carotene produced by our yeast though is not toxic, since the body only converts what it needs into retinol. |
− | <br>The vitamin B2 that our micro-organism is producing is riboflavin, which can be toxic at very | + | <br>The vitamin B2 form that our micro-organism is producing is riboflavin, which can be toxic at very |
− | high dose. However it is very unlikely that | + | high dose. However it is very unlikely that the bacteria will produce a couple of orders of magnitude more than the daily requirement (about |
− | 1.2mg/day), | + | 1.2mg/day), contrary to the vitamin pills that often contain a |
lot more, from 10 to 100 mg. | lot more, from 10 to 100 mg. | ||
Line 193: | Line 196: | ||
In order to evaluate the feasibility of our product’s implementation, we researched the european and indian regulations concerning the production and distribution of genetically engineered micro-organisms. | In order to evaluate the feasibility of our product’s implementation, we researched the european and indian regulations concerning the production and distribution of genetically engineered micro-organisms. | ||
− | <br>We found that the EU directive 90/219/ | + | <br>We found that the <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-1/dir_1990_219/dir_1990_219_en.pdf">EU directive 90/219/EEC</a> of the European Economic Community relative to the contained use of GMO would allow production of this product within the european market. This directive is enforced in each of the EU member’s national regulations. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | In India, the | + | In India, the FSSAI (Food Safety and Standard Authority in India) told us that the safety is needed to be established in order for our product to be authorized. Both Dr. A. K. Sharma from the FSSAI and Dr. Sunita Grover the Dairy Microbiology Division at the National Dairy Research Institute <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Acceptance">advised us to chose micro-organisms that were already present in the fermented foods</a> we were targeting, which is what we did. These organisms are all in Risk Group 1 (Unlikely to cause human disease.), and have the GRAS status (Generally Considered As Safe). |
− | <br>We also found out that the Indian law currently doesn’t allow GM microorganisms because of the use of antibiotic markers that makes them unsafe to eat. But according to Samir K. Brahmachari, former director of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research in India, our product has a greater chance to be authorized if there is no more live bacteria in the final form of the dish, that is actually eaten. Since the idli is steamed for 10 to 15 minutes before it is eaten, we made an experiment to assess the presence of yeasts and bacteria in the steamed idli, and found out that the steaming process effectively sterilizes the idli and eliminates the microbes present in the batter. | + | <br>We also found out that the Indian law currently doesn’t allow GM microorganisms because of the use of antibiotic markers that makes them unsafe to eat. |
+ | <br><br>But <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Acceptance">according to Samir K. Brahmachari</a>, former director of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research in India, our product has a greater chance to be authorized if there is no more live bacteria in the final form of the dish, that is actually eaten. We checked this affirmation and found out this regulation: | ||
+ | <br><br><div align="center"><i>‘...food stuffs...derived from Living Modified Organisms where the end product is NOT a Living Modified Organism are exempted from mandatory approval of the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee.’</i></div> | ||
+ | <div align="right">Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)<br> | ||
+ | Notification no. S. O. 1519(E) dated 23-8- 2007 in the Gazette of India</div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br>Since the idli is steamed for 10 to 15 minutes before it is eaten, we made an experiment to assess the presence of yeasts and bacteria in the steamed idli, and found out that the steaming process effectively sterilizes the idli and eliminates the microbes present in the batter. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"><b>Plates of different media, 36h after being inoculated with idli batter, before and after the batter was steamed for 10 minutes</b> | ||
+ | <br><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/82/ParisBettencourt_plate_after_cooking.png" width="800px"></img></div> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | We can see than nothing grew in the plates inoculated with steamed idli batter, which indicates that all the micro-organisms present in the batter were killed during the steaming process. | ||
− | + | <br> | |
<a name="continuity" class="anchor"><h1></h1></a> | <a name="continuity" class="anchor"><h1></h1></a> | ||
Line 213: | Line 227: | ||
functions and to easily make organisms that can be homegrown and used | functions and to easily make organisms that can be homegrown and used | ||
for nutrient production. | for nutrient production. | ||
− | This way we hope that people will feel ownership on the product and | + | <br>This way we hope that people will feel ownership on the product and |
− | trust that it only serves their own interests. | + | trust that it only serves their own interests. <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Project/Continuity">Learn more...</a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
{{Paris_Bettencourt/footer}} | {{Paris_Bettencourt/footer}} |
Latest revision as of 01:21, 21 November 2015