Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Sustainability/Continuity"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<p>When going from labs lead by specialists to the users community, a lot of technical challenges arise. When inventing new biotechnological devices, biologists have access to biosafety cabinets, powerful freezers and autoclaves, but the people who need our product the most won't have these. For a biological product to leave the benches and actually reach the population, it's essential to foresee its life in the hands of the people who will cultivate it and make sure it stays alive all along. Here, we provide strategies to create an durable, usable product.</p> | <p>When going from labs lead by specialists to the users community, a lot of technical challenges arise. When inventing new biotechnological devices, biologists have access to biosafety cabinets, powerful freezers and autoclaves, but the people who need our product the most won't have these. For a biological product to leave the benches and actually reach the population, it's essential to foresee its life in the hands of the people who will cultivate it and make sure it stays alive all along. Here, we provide strategies to create an durable, usable product.</p> | ||
<h2 id="specification">Specification</h2> | <h2 id="specification">Specification</h2> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<h3 id="from-the-lab-to-the-real-world">From the lab to the real world</h3> | <h3 id="from-the-lab-to-the-real-world">From the lab to the real world</h3> | ||
Line 13: | Line 11: | ||
<p>Let's consider the following scenario: a wild type organism sneaks into the incubator and starts to replicate along with the engineered organism. This contaminant has been selected precisely for its ability to sneak into environments and replicate, during hundreds of years, while our organism has the burden of producing tons of enzymes to make the precious vitamins. Only the fittest survives, and we simply can't compete. After a couple of growth cycle, the worst seems unavoidable: the micro-organism that will be distributed will not be the right one. Not only this one doesn't produce nutrients, but it might not ferment the rice well or even be pathogenic.</p> | <p>Let's consider the following scenario: a wild type organism sneaks into the incubator and starts to replicate along with the engineered organism. This contaminant has been selected precisely for its ability to sneak into environments and replicate, during hundreds of years, while our organism has the burden of producing tons of enzymes to make the precious vitamins. Only the fittest survives, and we simply can't compete. After a couple of growth cycle, the worst seems unavoidable: the micro-organism that will be distributed will not be the right one. Not only this one doesn't produce nutrients, but it might not ferment the rice well or even be pathogenic.</p> | ||
<p>To prevent this from happening, we identified three critical points that we have to master: - Can a contamination occur in the fermenter? - Will this contamination grow faster than the modified micro-organism? - Can the replacement go unidentified and gets distributed?</p> | <p>To prevent this from happening, we identified three critical points that we have to master: - Can a contamination occur in the fermenter? - Will this contamination grow faster than the modified micro-organism? - Can the replacement go unidentified and gets distributed?</p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<h4 id="a-barrier-against-contaminants">A barrier against contaminants</h4> | <h4 id="a-barrier-against-contaminants">A barrier against contaminants</h4> | ||
Line 23: | Line 17: | ||
<h4>Reducing the fitness burden</h4> Mastering the second critical point equals to improve the fitness of the micro-organism on the medium, or -more likely- to make it so our modifications come with a minimal fitness cost. Modified micro-organisms usually have much more work to do than their wild-type counterparts: all their resources should be dedicated to the production of vitamins. Additionally, unnatural proteins and metabolites can have toxic effects when their production rate is high. It is therefore expected that our deeply repurposed bacterium or yeast would grow slower or would be less resistant to stress and growth condition changes than the natural micro-organisms.</p> | <h4>Reducing the fitness burden</h4> Mastering the second critical point equals to improve the fitness of the micro-organism on the medium, or -more likely- to make it so our modifications come with a minimal fitness cost. Modified micro-organisms usually have much more work to do than their wild-type counterparts: all their resources should be dedicated to the production of vitamins. Additionally, unnatural proteins and metabolites can have toxic effects when their production rate is high. It is therefore expected that our deeply repurposed bacterium or yeast would grow slower or would be less resistant to stress and growth condition changes than the natural micro-organisms.</p> | ||
+ | |||
<h4 id="quality-control">Quality control</h4> | <h4 id="quality-control">Quality control</h4> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<h3 id="an-extensible-framework">An extensible framework</h3> | <h3 id="an-extensible-framework">An extensible framework</h3> | ||
Revision as of 01:22, 16 September 2015