Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Project/VitaminA"
Jeanbcaron (Talk | contribs) |
Jeanbcaron (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
<div style="clear:both"></div> | <div style="clear:both"></div> | ||
− | + | <h1 class="date two">Further improvements </h1></div> | |
<div class="column-left" align="justify"> | <div class="column-left" align="justify"> | ||
− | + | ||
<div style="clear:both"></div> | <div style="clear:both"></div> | ||
<div class="column-left" align="justify"> | <div class="column-left" align="justify"> | ||
<b>An optimized polycistron</b> | <b>An optimized polycistron</b> | ||
− | <br>The | + | <br>The current strain is not producing enough beta-carotene and to meet to daily requirement we would have to add more yeasts in the batter and this could have effects on the taste and texture of idli. This is why we aimed to strongly increase the ß-carotene yield of those yeast. |
<br>For this purpose, we designed a construct very similar to theirs, except that we moved the crtE gene to the first place of the polycistron, in order to increase the carotenoid yield. Indeed, it has been shown that the efficiency of translation decreases after every 2A sequence (de Felipe et al. 2006), and that an increase of CrtE may improve the ß-carotene production (Verwaal et al. 2007). We kept the same 2A sequences between the cistrons, as well as the same terminator TEF1. In order to synthesize the whole construct though, we had to change the TDH3 promoter: like most yeast promoters it has a very low GC content, which makes it very difficult to synthesize. So we used the ADH1 promoter instead, which is another strong promoter for yeast. | <br>For this purpose, we designed a construct very similar to theirs, except that we moved the crtE gene to the first place of the polycistron, in order to increase the carotenoid yield. Indeed, it has been shown that the efficiency of translation decreases after every 2A sequence (de Felipe et al. 2006), and that an increase of CrtE may improve the ß-carotene production (Verwaal et al. 2007). We kept the same 2A sequences between the cistrons, as well as the same terminator TEF1. In order to synthesize the whole construct though, we had to change the TDH3 promoter: like most yeast promoters it has a very low GC content, which makes it very difficult to synthesize. So we used the ADH1 promoter instead, which is another strong promoter for yeast. | ||
<br>We also codon-optimized the three genes for <i>S. cerevisiae</i>, using the IDT codon-optimization tool, in order to increase the genes expression. The study from Li et al. (2013) had shown that the optimization of 5 codons in the sequence of crtI, and 8 codons in the sequence of crtYB had increased the ß-carotene production in <i>S. cerevisiae</i> by 200%, so we had high hopes that codon-optimizing the whole genes would lead to even better yield. | <br>We also codon-optimized the three genes for <i>S. cerevisiae</i>, using the IDT codon-optimization tool, in order to increase the genes expression. The study from Li et al. (2013) had shown that the optimization of 5 codons in the sequence of crtI, and 8 codons in the sequence of crtYB had increased the ß-carotene production in <i>S. cerevisiae</i> by 200%, so we had high hopes that codon-optimizing the whole genes would lead to even better yield. |
Revision as of 00:53, 19 September 2015