Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Sustainability/Continuity"

Line 5: Line 5:
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
<p>When going from labs lead by specialists to the users community, a lot of technical challenges arise. When inventing new biotechnological devices, biologists have access to biosafety cabinets, powerful freezers and autoclaves, but the people who need our product the most won't have these. For a biological product to leave the benches and actually reach the population, it's essential to foresee its life in the hands of the people who will cultivate it and make sure it stays alive all along. Here, we provide strategies to create an durable, usable product.</p>
+
<p>There is a typical metaphor in the field of synthetic biology that compares bacteria to tiny factories, capable of creating copies of themselves. The reality is more complicated, because we are working with a living organism.</p>
 
+
<p>We want to gain trust from the population, and for that the technology should belong to everyone. In a way similar to the open-source software industry, people should be able to improve our project or create <em>forks</em> of it. This idea of openness is very common among the community of synthetic biologists, but a lot of pitfalls have to be overcome to make it a sustainable reality.</p>
 +
<p>A parallel could be drawn with electronics in the 1960's, when computer programming was extremely low-level and belonged to the realm of academia. Since then, it has reached a way wider population, thanks to the creation of frameworks allowing for abstraction of the most technical parts. How could the same principles be applied to synthetic biology, in the context of metabolic engineering and vitamins production?</p>
 +
<p>Even though a lot of lab strains designed for easier modification have been designed in the past, they usually have a very general purpose and biotechnology remains a matter of specialists where every modification has to be made from scratch. We imagined a repurposed organism made especially for the quick construction of these <em>self-replicative tiny factories</em>, that could be easily used by startups, community labs or just by enthusiasts. In the following section we discuss the constraints associated with it, and what such an organism could look like.</p>
 
<h1 class="date one" id="specification">Specification</h1>
 
<h1 class="date one" id="specification">Specification</h1>
 +
<h2 id="from-the-lab-to-the-world">From the lab to the world</h2>
  
 
<div class="column-left">
 
<div class="column-left">
<h2 id="from-the-lab-to-the-real-world">From the lab to the world</h2>
+
<p>For a biological product to leave the benches and actually reach the population, it's essential to foresee its life in the hands of the people who will cultivate it and make sure it stays alive all along. Our design must therefore provide strategies to create an durable, usable product. On paper, the plan is simple: the manufacturers grow the micro-organism, distribute it and save a little fraction to start a new culture with. This could in principle last forever, but in reality the universal rules of biology soon kick back in.</p>
<p>On paper, the plan is simple: volunteers grow the micro-organism, distribute it to the rest of the town and save a little fraction to start a new culture with. This could in principle last forever, but in reality the universal rules of biology soon kick back in.</p>
+
<p>Let's consider the following scenario: a wild type organism sneaks into the incubator and starts to replicate along with the engineered organism. Our microbe cannot compete: this contaminant has been selected precisely for its ability to sneak into environments and replicate, during hundreds of years, while our microbe has the burden of producing tons of enzymes to make the precious vitamins. Additionally, unnatural proteins and metabolites can have toxic effects when their production rate is high. After a couple of growth cycle, the worst seems unavoidable: the micro-organism that will be distributed will not be the right one. Not only this one doesn't produce nutrients, but it might not ferment the rice well or even be pathogenic.</p>
<p>Let's consider the following scenario: a wild type organism sneaks into the incubator and starts to replicate along with the engineered organism. This contaminant has been selected precisely for its ability to sneak into environments and replicate, during hundreds of years, while our organism has the burden of producing tons of enzymes to make the precious vitamins. Only the fittest survives, and we simply can't compete. After a couple of growth cycle, the worst seems unavoidable: the micro-organism that will be distributed will not be the right one. Not only this one doesn't produce nutrients, but it might not ferment the rice well or even be pathogenic.</p>
+
<p>These contamination events bring a lot of hassle for the manufacturer, so our design must provide solutions for making them as rare as possible.</p>
<p>To prevent this from happening, we identified three critical points that we have to master:
+
<p>Our approaches is based on two strategies:</p>
<ul>
+
<dl>
<li>- Can a contamination occur in the fermenter?</li>
+
<dt>Reducing the fitness burden:To make our micro-organism more resistant to contamination, we need to design it so our modifications come with a minimal fitness cost.<br />
<li>- Will this contamination grow faster than the modified micro-organism?</li>
+
Identifying the contamination:If a contamination occurs, it is essential that it does not go unnoticed. Our design must allow the manufacturer to detect contamination, and check that what he is growing is exactly what he wants to grow.</dt>
<li>- Can the replacement go unidentified and gets distributed?</li>
+
</dl>
</ul>
+
</p>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 
<div class="column-right">
 
<div class="column-right">
 
+
<h2 id="all-in-one">All in one</h2>
<h3 id="a-barrier-against-contaminants">A barrier against contaminants</h3>
+
<p>make manufacturing simpler only one production line</p>
<p>Completely mastering the first critical point is not an easy task for hacklabs in the south of India. If we can't afford a biosafety cabinet, we can at least take the maximum precautions so the contaminations are as rare as possible.</p>
+
<h2 id="an-extensible-chassis">An extensible chassis</h2>
 
+
<p>limit R&amp;D expenses</p>
<h3 id="reducing-the-fitness-burden">Reducing the fitness burden</h3>
+
<div class="figure">
<p>Mastering the second critical point equals to improve the fitness of the micro-organism on the medium, or -more likely- to make it so our modifications come with a minimal fitness cost. Modified micro-organisms usually have much more work to do than their wild-type counterparts: all their resources should be dedicated to the production of vitamins. Additionally, unnatural proteins and metabolites can have toxic effects when their production rate is high. It is therefore expected that our deeply repurposed bacterium or yeast would grow slower or would be less resistant to stress and growth condition changes than the natural micro-organisms.</p>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/PB_framework_construction.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/PB_framework_construction.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/PB_framework_construction.png" />
 
+
<p class="caption">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/PB_framework_construction.png</p>
<h3 id="quality-control">Quality control</h3>
+
Ham prosciutto andouille pork loin ribeye shoulder, doner frankfurter beef filet mignon pork. Frankfurter sausage hamburger meatball t-bone short loin. Filet mignon hamburger kielbasa, pork belly swine picanha pancetta cupim ham hock tri-tip sausage. Hamburger t-bone ball tip bacon tongue porchetta.
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
 
 
<div class="column-right">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/PB_framework_construction.png" title="fig:legend here" alt="legend here" width="400" />
 
</div>
 
<div class="column-left">
 
<h2 id="an-extendable-chassis">An extensible chassis</h2>
 
Ham prosciutto andouille pork loin ribeye shoulder, doner frankfurter beef filet mignon pork. Frankfurter sausage hamburger meatball t-bone short loin. Filet mignon hamburger kielbasa, pork belly swine picanha pancetta cupim ham hock tri-tip sausage. Hamburger t-bone ball tip bacon tongue porchetta.
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div style="clear:both"></div>
 
<div style="clear:both"></div>
  
<h2 id="all-in-one">All in one</h2>
 
<p>make manufacturing simpler only one production line</p>
 
 
<h1 class="date two" id="our-design">Our design</h1>
 
<h1 class="date two" id="our-design">Our design</h1>
<h3 id="overview">Overview</h3>
+
<h2 id="overview">Overview</h2>
 
<p>It seems impossible to make a strain that fullfills its nutrient-producing functions while growing as fast as the wild type, so we found a workaround: the cells that people use are not the cells that people grow. We embedded a differentiation system into our organism, so the vitamin-producing pathways are only expressed after a recombination event. The cells that are grown are almost identical to the wild-type cells. The battle against contaminants is now a fair fight.</p>
 
<p>It seems impossible to make a strain that fullfills its nutrient-producing functions while growing as fast as the wild type, so we found a workaround: the cells that people use are not the cells that people grow. We embedded a differentiation system into our organism, so the vitamin-producing pathways are only expressed after a recombination event. The cells that are grown are almost identical to the wild-type cells. The battle against contaminants is now a fair fight.</p>
 
<center>
 
 
<div class="figure">
 
<div class="figure">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/88/PB_growth.png" title="caption goes here" alt="caption goes here" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/88/PB_growth.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/88/PB_growth.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/88/PB_growth.png" />
<p class="caption">caption goes here</p>
+
<p class="caption">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/88/PB_growth.png</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
<center>
+
<p>It is inspired by the Brainbow system, initially developed for tracking the axons of neurons in mammalian's brain. We modified it so it becomes extensible.</p>
 
+
<p>This system is randomized on a single-cell level, so each cell produce one, and only one, vitamin pathway. Having one cell expressing only one pathway should theoretically preclude unexpected interactions between different pathways, thus making an extensible framework where every synthesis function is decoupled.</p>
<p>This system is randomized on a single-cell level so each cell produce one, and only one, vitamin pathway. This way we avoid unwanted interaction between the different pathways, thus making an extensible framework were every synthesis function is decoupled.</p>
+
<p>How does this all work?</p>
 
+
<h2 id="the-chassis">The chassis</h2>
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/16/PB_prototype.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/PB_framework_construction.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/PB_framework_construction.png" />
+
 
+
</p>
+
<h3 id="the-chassis">The chassis</h3>
+
 
<div class="figure">
 
<div class="figure">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/14/PB_chassis.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/14/PB_chassis.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/14/PB_chassis.png" />
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/14/PB_chassis.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/14/PB_chassis.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/14/PB_chassis.png" />
 
<p class="caption">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/14/PB_chassis.png</p>
 
<p class="caption">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/14/PB_chassis.png</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
<h4 id="orthogonal-recombination-sites">Orthogonal recombination sites</h4>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/ee/PB_1.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/ee/PB_1.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/ee/PB_1.png" /> <strong>Constitutive promoter</strong></p>
<h4 id="allowing-for-quality-control">Allowing for quality control</h4>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c8/PB_2.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c8/PB_2.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c8/PB_2.png" /> <strong>The Lox Array</strong> Each lox site is made of one <em>overlap region</em> surrounded by two complementary <em>flanking regions</em>. The flanking regions cannot be mutated and determine the specificity for one recombination enzyme. The overlap region can be modified, but two LoxP sites will recombine together only if it's identical for both. (richier 2015) LoxP: ATAACTTCGTATAATGTATGCTATACGAAGTTAT Lox2272: ATAACTTCGTATAAAGTATCCTATACGAAGTTAT LoxN: ATAACTTCGTATAAGGTATACTATACGAAGTTAT Lox5171: ATAACTTCGTATAATGTGTACTATACGAAGTTAT</p>
<h3 id="landing-pads">Landing pads</h3>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e6/PB_3.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e6/PB_3.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e6/PB_3.png" /> <strong>The ID gene</strong></p>
<p>quick forking in a lot of parallel projects <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/75/PB_landingpad.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/75/PB_landingpad.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/75/PB_landingpad.png" /> Having one cell expressing only one pathway should theoretically preclude unexpected interactions between different pathways</p>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8d/PB_4.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8d/PB_4.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8d/PB_4.png" /> <strong>The landing pad</strong> Landing pad A: attB: GTGCGGGTGCCAGGGCGTGCCC<strong>TT</strong>GGGCTCCCCGGGCGCGTACTCCA attP: AGTGCCCCAACTGGGGTAACCT<strong>TT</strong>GAGTTCTCTCAGTTGGGGGCGT</p>
<h3 id="division-of-labour">Division of labour</h3>
+
<p>Landing pad B: attB: GTGCGGGTGCCAGGGCGTGCCC<strong>CC</strong>GGGCTCCCCGGGCGCGTACTCCA attP: AGTGCCCCAACTGGGGTAACCT<strong>CC</strong>GAGTTCTCTCAGTTGGGGGCGT</p>
<p>Three different strains mean three different production lines at least three sterile incubators. Having only one strain that does everything hugely simplifies the process, because only one incubator, centrifuge and dryer is needed. This makes it accessible to local hacklabs/NGO.</p>
+
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/PB_5.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/PB_5.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/PB_5.png" /> <strong>CRE-recombinase</strong></p>
 +
<h2 id="division-of-labour">Division of labour</h2>
 +
<p>Three different strains mean three different production lines at least three sterile incubators. Having only one strain that does everything hugely simplifies the process, because only one bioreactor and one production line is needed. This makes it accessible to community labs or NGOs that would want to start producing their own version of our product.</p>
 
<div class="figure">
 
<div class="figure">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/65/PB_brainbow.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/65/PB_brainbow.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/65/PB_brainbow.png" />
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/65/PB_brainbow.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/65/PB_brainbow.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/65/PB_brainbow.png" />
 
<p class="caption">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/65/PB_brainbow.png</p>
 
<p class="caption">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/65/PB_brainbow.png</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
<ul>
+
<h3 id="chemical-absence-of-chemical">Chemical / Absence of chemical</h3>
<li>Chemical / Absence of chemical</li>
+
<h3 id="heat">Heat</h3>
<li>Heat</li>
+
<h3 id="light">Light</h3>
<li>Light</li>
+
<h3 id="constitutive">Constitutive</h3>
<li>Constitutive</li>
+
<p>leakiness</p>
</ul>
+
<p>decoupling the different metabolic pathways <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/16/PB_prototype.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/16/PB_prototype.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/16/PB_prototype.png" /></p>
<h3 id="genetic-stability">Genetic stability</h3>
+
<h2 id="landing-pads">Landing pads</h2>
 +
<p>quick forking in a lot of parallel projects <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/75/PB_landingpad.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/75/PB_landingpad.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/75/PB_landingpad.png" /></p>
 +
<h2 id="genetic-stability">Genetic stability</h2>
 
<p>Now we protected our product against foreign organisms, but one threat remains: our organism's own mutants. If a mutation occurs in the active site of an enzyme, or in the promoter of an operon, the functionality of the organism might be impaired. Moreover, the ID gene doesn't account for this.</p>
 
<p>Now we protected our product against foreign organisms, but one threat remains: our organism's own mutants. If a mutation occurs in the active site of an enzyme, or in the promoter of an operon, the functionality of the organism might be impaired. Moreover, the ID gene doesn't account for this.</p>
 
<p>How can we prevent our organism from mutating?</p>
 
<p>How can we prevent our organism from mutating?</p>
 
<p>Fortunately, our friends at the Vanderbilt University iGEM team worked precisely on that problem this summer. We worked hand in hand with them to see what a real-life application of their invention would mean practically.</p>
 
<p>Fortunately, our friends at the Vanderbilt University iGEM team worked precisely on that problem this summer. We worked hand in hand with them to see what a real-life application of their invention would mean practically.</p>
<h2 id="results">Results</h2>
+
<h1 class="date three" id="results">Results</>
<h3 id="construction-of-the-system">Construction of the system</h3>
+
<h2 id="construction-of-the-system">Construction of the system</h2>
<p>In order to test for the functionality of this system, we built a cassette comprising an ID gene, <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8f/PB_colibow_sequence.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8f/PB_colibow_sequence.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8f/PB_colibow_sequence.png" /></p>
+
<p>We succesfully assembled a prototype version of this system in the model bacteria <em>Escherichia coli</em>. The genes involved in vitamin production are replaced with fluorescent proteins, allowing for easy monitoring of their production. Our construct contains mCherry as a reporter gene, and two other fluorescent proteins to mimick pathways operons. It also has a phage PhiC31 integration site for subsequent addition of new genes.</p>
<h4 id="integration-in-the-bacterial-cells">Integration in the bacterial cells</h4>
+
 
<div class="figure">
 
<div class="figure">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/PB_colibow_integrated.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/PB_colibow_integrated.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/PB_colibow_integrated.png" />
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8f/PB_colibow_sequence.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8f/PB_colibow_sequence.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8f/PB_colibow_sequence.png" />
<p class="caption">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/PB_colibow_integrated.png</p>
+
<p class="caption">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8f/PB_colibow_sequence.png</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
<h4 id="integrity-of-the-cassette">Integrity of the cassette</h4>
+
<p>This cassette was constructed by Gibson Assembly and assembled in a self-integrating plasmid vector which integrates in the site of the phage HK022 in <em>E. coli</em>'s chromosome. This plasmid was electroporated in the bacteria and the phage HK022 integrase was induced.</p>
 +
<h3 id="integration-in-the-bacterial-cells">Integration in the bacterial cells</h3>
 +
<p>To check that the cassette has correctly been integrated in the right locus, we performed an analytical PCR on the whole genome of the transformants, with a set of four primers mixed altogether. <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/PB_colibow_integrated.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/PB_colibow_integrated.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/PB_colibow_integrated.png" /></p>
 +
<h3 id="integrity-of-the-cassette">Integrity of the cassette</h3>
 
<p>fluorescent proteins are present <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/PB_colibow_proteins.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/PB_colibow_proteins.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/PB_colibow_proteins.png" /></p>
 
<p>fluorescent proteins are present <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/PB_colibow_proteins.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/PB_colibow_proteins.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/PB_colibow_proteins.png" /></p>
<h4 id="sequencing-of-the-lox-array">Sequencing of the Lox Array</h4>
+
<h3 id="sequencing-of-the-lox-array">Sequencing of the Lox Array</h3>
<p>coming soon</p>
+
<p>To investigate whether unexpected recombination occured within the LoxP sites due to homologous recombination, we performed sequencing on the first part of the integrated cassette, where the Lox Array is. This way we could make sure that it was still intact.</p>
<h3 id="function-of-the-promoter">Function of the promoter</h3>
+
<h2 id="function-of-the-promoter">Function of the promoter</h2>
 
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/95/PB_lox_charac.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/95/PB_lox_charac.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/95/PB_lox_charac.png" /> BBa_K1678005</p>
 
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/95/PB_lox_charac.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/95/PB_lox_charac.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/95/PB_lox_charac.png" /> BBa_K1678005</p>
<p>During the transcription, the RNA polymerase has to go through the LoxP array, which is made of repetitive sequences that are likely to form a hairpin. We show that this has an impact on the transcription efficiency (Mann-Whitney test, p-value < 10<sup>-6</sup>), as the amount of protein is reduced on average by 9 %. However, it still allows for strong protein expression and the 91 % of RNA polymerases that get through should be more than enough for our design. The LoxP array does not theoretically interfere with translation, as in prokaryotes the 30S subunit of the ribosome binds directly to the ribosome binding site even if it is not right at the beginning of the mRNA transcript.</p>
+
<p>The LoxP array does not theoretically interfere with translation, as in prokaryotes the 30S subunit of the ribosome binds directly to the ribosome binding site even if it is not right at the beginning of the mRNA transcript. It can however interfere with the transcription. During the transcription, the RNA polymerase has to go through the LoxP array, which is made of repetitive sequences that are likely to form a hairpin. We show that this has an impact on the transcription efficiency (Mann-Whitney test, p-value < 10<sup>-6</sup>), as the amount of protein is reduced on average by 9%. However, it still allows for strong protein expression and the 91% of RNA polymerases that get through should be more than enough for our design.</p>
 
<p>We have also sequenced it.</p>
 
<p>We have also sequenced it.</p>
 
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/be/PB_colibow_fluorescence.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/be/PB_colibow_fluorescence.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/be/PB_colibow_fluorescence.png" /> When integrated (Mann-Whitney test, p-value < 10<sup>-6</sup>)</p>
 
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/be/PB_colibow_fluorescence.png" title="fig:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/be/PB_colibow_fluorescence.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/be/PB_colibow_fluorescence.png" /> When integrated (Mann-Whitney test, p-value < 10<sup>-6</sup>)</p>
 
<p>suitability for quality control DIlambda</p>
 
<p>suitability for quality control DIlambda</p>
<h3 id="induction-of-the-differentiation">Induction of the differentiation</h3>
+
<h2 id="induction-of-the-differentiation">Induction of the differentiation</h2>
 
<div class="figure">
 
<div class="figure">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/PB_empty.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/PB_empty.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/PB_empty.png" />
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/PB_empty.png" title="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/PB_empty.png" alt="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/PB_empty.png" />
 
<p class="caption">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/PB_empty.png</p>
 
<p class="caption">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/PB_empty.png</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
<h3 id="effects-on-growth">Effects on growth</h3>
+
<h2 id="effects-on-growth">Effects on growth</h2>
<h2 id="outlook">Outlook</h2>
+
<h1 class="date one" id="outlook">Outlook</h1>
 
<p>link</p>
 
<p>link</p>
  

Revision as of 00:15, 18 September 2015

There is a typical metaphor in the field of synthetic biology that compares bacteria to tiny factories, capable of creating copies of themselves. The reality is more complicated, because we are working with a living organism.

We want to gain trust from the population, and for that the technology should belong to everyone. In a way similar to the open-source software industry, people should be able to improve our project or create forks of it. This idea of openness is very common among the community of synthetic biologists, but a lot of pitfalls have to be overcome to make it a sustainable reality.

A parallel could be drawn with electronics in the 1960's, when computer programming was extremely low-level and belonged to the realm of academia. Since then, it has reached a way wider population, thanks to the creation of frameworks allowing for abstraction of the most technical parts. How could the same principles be applied to synthetic biology, in the context of metabolic engineering and vitamins production?

Even though a lot of lab strains designed for easier modification have been designed in the past, they usually have a very general purpose and biotechnology remains a matter of specialists where every modification has to be made from scratch. We imagined a repurposed organism made especially for the quick construction of these self-replicative tiny factories, that could be easily used by startups, community labs or just by enthusiasts. In the following section we discuss the constraints associated with it, and what such an organism could look like.

Specification

From the lab to the world

For a biological product to leave the benches and actually reach the population, it's essential to foresee its life in the hands of the people who will cultivate it and make sure it stays alive all along. Our design must therefore provide strategies to create an durable, usable product. On paper, the plan is simple: the manufacturers grow the micro-organism, distribute it and save a little fraction to start a new culture with. This could in principle last forever, but in reality the universal rules of biology soon kick back in.

Let's consider the following scenario: a wild type organism sneaks into the incubator and starts to replicate along with the engineered organism. Our microbe cannot compete: this contaminant has been selected precisely for its ability to sneak into environments and replicate, during hundreds of years, while our microbe has the burden of producing tons of enzymes to make the precious vitamins. Additionally, unnatural proteins and metabolites can have toxic effects when their production rate is high. After a couple of growth cycle, the worst seems unavoidable: the micro-organism that will be distributed will not be the right one. Not only this one doesn't produce nutrients, but it might not ferment the rice well or even be pathogenic.

These contamination events bring a lot of hassle for the manufacturer, so our design must provide solutions for making them as rare as possible.

Our approaches is based on two strategies:

Reducing the fitness burden:To make our micro-organism more resistant to contamination, we need to design it so our modifications come with a minimal fitness cost.
Identifying the contamination:If a contamination occurs, it is essential that it does not go unnoticed. Our design must allow the manufacturer to detect contamination, and check that what he is growing is exactly what he wants to grow.

All in one

make manufacturing simpler only one production line

An extensible chassis

limit R&D expenses

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/PB_framework_construction.png

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/98/PB_framework_construction.png

Our design

Overview

It seems impossible to make a strain that fullfills its nutrient-producing functions while growing as fast as the wild type, so we found a workaround: the cells that people use are not the cells that people grow. We embedded a differentiation system into our organism, so the vitamin-producing pathways are only expressed after a recombination event. The cells that are grown are almost identical to the wild-type cells. The battle against contaminants is now a fair fight.

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/88/PB_growth.png

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/88/PB_growth.png

It is inspired by the Brainbow system, initially developed for tracking the axons of neurons in mammalian's brain. We modified it so it becomes extensible.

This system is randomized on a single-cell level, so each cell produce one, and only one, vitamin pathway. Having one cell expressing only one pathway should theoretically preclude unexpected interactions between different pathways, thus making an extensible framework where every synthesis function is decoupled.

How does this all work?

The chassis

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/14/PB_chassis.png

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/14/PB_chassis.png

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/ee/PB_1.png Constitutive promoter

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c8/PB_2.png The Lox Array Each lox site is made of one overlap region surrounded by two complementary flanking regions. The flanking regions cannot be mutated and determine the specificity for one recombination enzyme. The overlap region can be modified, but two LoxP sites will recombine together only if it's identical for both. (richier 2015) LoxP: ATAACTTCGTATAATGTATGCTATACGAAGTTAT Lox2272: ATAACTTCGTATAAAGTATCCTATACGAAGTTAT LoxN: ATAACTTCGTATAAGGTATACTATACGAAGTTAT Lox5171: ATAACTTCGTATAATGTGTACTATACGAAGTTAT

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e6/PB_3.png The ID gene

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8d/PB_4.png The landing pad Landing pad A: attB: GTGCGGGTGCCAGGGCGTGCCCTTGGGCTCCCCGGGCGCGTACTCCA attP: AGTGCCCCAACTGGGGTAACCTTTGAGTTCTCTCAGTTGGGGGCGT

Landing pad B: attB: GTGCGGGTGCCAGGGCGTGCCCCCGGGCTCCCCGGGCGCGTACTCCA attP: AGTGCCCCAACTGGGGTAACCTCCGAGTTCTCTCAGTTGGGGGCGT

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9d/PB_5.png CRE-recombinase

Division of labour

Three different strains mean three different production lines at least three sterile incubators. Having only one strain that does everything hugely simplifies the process, because only one bioreactor and one production line is needed. This makes it accessible to community labs or NGOs that would want to start producing their own version of our product.

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/65/PB_brainbow.png

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/65/PB_brainbow.png

Chemical / Absence of chemical

Heat

Light

Constitutive

leakiness

decoupling the different metabolic pathways https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/16/PB_prototype.png

Landing pads

quick forking in a lot of parallel projects https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/75/PB_landingpad.png

Genetic stability

Now we protected our product against foreign organisms, but one threat remains: our organism's own mutants. If a mutation occurs in the active site of an enzyme, or in the promoter of an operon, the functionality of the organism might be impaired. Moreover, the ID gene doesn't account for this.

How can we prevent our organism from mutating?

Fortunately, our friends at the Vanderbilt University iGEM team worked precisely on that problem this summer. We worked hand in hand with them to see what a real-life application of their invention would mean practically.

Results

Construction of the system

We succesfully assembled a prototype version of this system in the model bacteria Escherichia coli. The genes involved in vitamin production are replaced with fluorescent proteins, allowing for easy monitoring of their production. Our construct contains mCherry as a reporter gene, and two other fluorescent proteins to mimick pathways operons. It also has a phage PhiC31 integration site for subsequent addition of new genes.

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8f/PB_colibow_sequence.png

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8f/PB_colibow_sequence.png

This cassette was constructed by Gibson Assembly and assembled in a self-integrating plasmid vector which integrates in the site of the phage HK022 in E. coli's chromosome. This plasmid was electroporated in the bacteria and the phage HK022 integrase was induced.

Integration in the bacterial cells

To check that the cassette has correctly been integrated in the right locus, we performed an analytical PCR on the whole genome of the transformants, with a set of four primers mixed altogether. https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/PB_colibow_integrated.png

Integrity of the cassette

fluorescent proteins are present https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/PB_colibow_proteins.png

Sequencing of the Lox Array

To investigate whether unexpected recombination occured within the LoxP sites due to homologous recombination, we performed sequencing on the first part of the integrated cassette, where the Lox Array is. This way we could make sure that it was still intact.

Function of the promoter

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/95/PB_lox_charac.png BBa_K1678005

The LoxP array does not theoretically interfere with translation, as in prokaryotes the 30S subunit of the ribosome binds directly to the ribosome binding site even if it is not right at the beginning of the mRNA transcript. It can however interfere with the transcription. During the transcription, the RNA polymerase has to go through the LoxP array, which is made of repetitive sequences that are likely to form a hairpin. We show that this has an impact on the transcription efficiency (Mann-Whitney test, p-value < 10-6), as the amount of protein is reduced on average by 9%. However, it still allows for strong protein expression and the 91% of RNA polymerases that get through should be more than enough for our design.

We have also sequenced it.

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/be/PB_colibow_fluorescence.png When integrated (Mann-Whitney test, p-value < 10-6)

suitability for quality control DIlambda

Induction of the differentiation

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/PB_empty.png

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/PB_empty.png

Effects on growth

Outlook

link