An important problem we wanted to tackle with our product is the access Indian people have to sources of vitamins. Indeed, we researched what structures and programs already exist in India, and found that it was a major issue.
One of the most important governmental programs for vitamin supplementation is the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) program, which has existed in India since 1975. This program monitors the growth and development of children, and provides supplementary nutrition as well as education and primary health care for children under six and pregnant and lactating mothers. The program is implemented through a network of community-level anganwadi centers (AWC), which provides daily supplements both in the center as well as through take-home rations. Those supplements include doses of vitamin A and tablets of iron and folic acid, in order to prevent xerophtalmia - which can lead to blindness - and anaemia.
However, the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) held in 2005-2006 in India reports that only 28% of children received those supplements and health care even though 4/5 of children under six lived in a region covered by an anganwadi center. In the 6 months preceding the survey, only 1/4 of the children between 12-35 months were given vitamin A supplements - and in 9 Indian states, this number falls to less than 20%. The access to ICDS has been improved in recent years, however, although access is still far from being universal (2). According to a national survey held in 2013-14, 46% of children aged 6-59 months had received doses vitamin A.
As for folic acid, the 2013-14 survey reports only 14% of children aged 6-59 months having received iron and folic acid supplements.

Though the program holds great promise and has implemented more than a million anganwadi centers, it is clear that people’s access to them is still very limited. People have to walk to the nearest center everyday if they want to receive the supplements, which is not convenient especially in rural areas.

Idli (or idly) is a small steamed cake made with fermented rice and black lentils (called urad dal or dal). It is a very popular breakfast food across India, mostly in the south, and is often eaten with chutney.
We wanted our product to truly fit the traditions and tastes of the people we were targeting, and idli appeared to be the ideal dish. It is a very popular staple of the Indian diet, along with the crepe-like dosa, which is made of a similar but less coarse batter. Its two ingredients (rice and dal) are very cheap and widely available resources, and idli is commonly eaten by people who lack other types of food and who suffer from vitamin deficiencies. There is even a program that distributes free rice to the poorest populations in the country, the Public Distribution System (PDS); and in the city of Chennai and its suburbs, canteens called Amma Unavagam sell idli and other foods for very low prices (Rs1 for 1 idli).

Besides its popularity and easy accessibility, the most interesting property of idli is that it is fermented. To cook idli, people soak rice and dal separately, then grind and mix them together, then let the batter ferment overnight. In the hot Indian climate, the batter ferments quickly and its volume can triple overnight.
Many studies have been made on the microbiome of idli batter. Though the strains found in idli can be highly variable from one study to another, probably because the microbiome varies from different regions, we found that Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus plantarum are among the most common fermentative bacteria found in idli batter, while in the yeast population, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was always present. ADD SOURCES Since we wanted our product to disrupt as little as possible the idli's taste, we chose these organisms for production of the different vitamins and to improve iron availability, instead of adding new micro-organisms that weren’t already present in the idli batter that may have influenced the microbiome in an unpredictable manner. Many people who reviewed our project said that taste was of high importance, and would prefer that we modified microbes already present in the idli rather than add new ones.
+ should we talk about the advantages of fermented foods?

Since our product is meant to be used freely in households without containment, and to be eaten by people, safety is a major element we had to address. In this optic we chose to implement our pathways in Generally Considered As Safe (GRAS) organisms: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactococcus lactis and Propionibacterium freudenreichii are all GRAS, commonly found in food.
We used Escherichia Coli to assemble our plasmids because this bacteria is easy to work with, but our goal is to have the vitamins produced by GRAS only.
A further step to our project would be to implement the pathways in wild type strains directly taken from fermented foods, instead of lab strains. or would it change anything if we did that, in regards to safety and regulations?? I don’t know