Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Practices/Workshops"
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<p>On July 11th, we hosted a workshop at the NightScience event organized by the CRI (Center of Interdisciplinary Researches). This workshop was made to present our project along with the different disciplines and topics that gravitate around it (synthetic biology, microorganisms, fermentation and nutrition) and to collect people point of view about them. With the presentations, we made a cooking workshop to introduce people to Indian fermented food (Idli and Dosa) and we realized a little cookbook so they could try the recipes at home. We made at the same time a small workshop with volunteers to build our DIY spectrophotometer. </p> | <p>On July 11th, we hosted a workshop at the NightScience event organized by the CRI (Center of Interdisciplinary Researches). This workshop was made to present our project along with the different disciplines and topics that gravitate around it (synthetic biology, microorganisms, fermentation and nutrition) and to collect people point of view about them. With the presentations, we made a cooking workshop to introduce people to Indian fermented food (Idli and Dosa) and we realized a little cookbook so they could try the recipes at home. We made at the same time a small workshop with volunteers to build our DIY spectrophotometer. </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="column- | + | <div class="column-left"> |
<p>In an attempt to see if they acquired some knowledge with the presentations, we decided to give them twice the same questionnaire, before and after the presentation, but due to the little number of participants, we couldn't get any significant results. Nevertheless, we could understand how non-scientific people see our project when they answered the open questions. The following graph show the evolution of the answers on one question regarding the microbiome. We can see that the number of people getting the right answer after the talk increased.</p> | <p>In an attempt to see if they acquired some knowledge with the presentations, we decided to give them twice the same questionnaire, before and after the presentation, but due to the little number of participants, we couldn't get any significant results. Nevertheless, we could understand how non-scientific people see our project when they answered the open questions. The following graph show the evolution of the answers on one question regarding the microbiome. We can see that the number of people getting the right answer after the talk increased.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <div class="column- | + | <div class="column-right"> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b5/GraphgoodanswersPBettencourt2015.jpg" width="600px"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b5/GraphgoodanswersPBettencourt2015.jpg" width="600px"/> | ||
− | + | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
<h1 class="date one"> September </h1> | <h1 class="date one"> September </h1> | ||
<h2> Lunch with the M1 AIV at the CRI </h2> | <h2> Lunch with the M1 AIV at the CRI </h2> |
Revision as of 23:46, 18 September 2015