Difference between revisions of "Team:Cambridge-JIC/Safety"

 
(21 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
</br>
 
</br>
<div style="float:right"> <img src="//2015.igem.org/wiki/images/e/ea/CamJIC-health_and_safety.jpg" style="height:320px;margin:10px"> <p> Note: Do not do this at the lab or home </p> </div>
+
<div style="float:right"> <img src="//2015.igem.org/wiki/images/e/ea/CamJIC-health_and_safety.jpg" style="height:320px;margin:10px"> <p style="font-size:80%"> Note: Do not do this at the lab or home </p> </div>
             <p style="font-size: 120%">
+
             <p>
In any synthetic biology project, safety will always be an important consideration. In most countries there are strict laws and regulations in regards to development and handling of genetically engineered organisms. These are in place to prevent the cause of harm to people or the environment. It is vital that any iGEM team not put itself or others at any risk through its work.
+
It is vital that any iGEM team not put itself or others at any risk through its work. The Hardware track has fewer associated safety risks than would be found in a purely biological project. In fact, our project involved significantly fewer transformations and much less handling of biological materials than a typical iGEM project. Nevertheless, we considered any possible risks that our project could pose and adopted a number of practices in order to minimise these.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p style="font-size: 120%">
 
<p style="font-size: 120%">
The Hardware track has fewer associated safety risks than would be found in a purely biological project. DNA manipulation in living organisms is kept to a minimal in our project. The small amount that is carried out is routine and safety measures easily monitored. We have considered any possible risks that our project could pose and adopted a number of practices in order to minimise these.
+
<i>The nature of our project makes it inherently impossible for anyone, even with malicious intentions, to cause harm to others or the environment.</i>
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<br>
 
<br>
</br>
 
 
<br>
 
<br>
</br>
 
            <h3>Safety concerns in our project</h3>
 
            <p style="font-size: 120%">
 
Microscopy is a now well-established field, dating back hundreds of years. Techniques used are common practice and as a result safety concerns associated with these techniques have now been significantly reduced. The two main potential safety hazards are illumination damage to eyes or skin, and possible electric shock.</p>
 
 
<br>
 
<br>
<h4><b>Lighting safety</b></h4>
 
<p style="font-size: 120%">
 
Some fluorescent compounds require UV light in order to excite them. UV light can be potentially harmful to the eyes and skin if not used with caution. In the project low power (1 watt) UV LEDs are used. These emit light at 395nm. This is much higher than the range of 260-270nm [1], which is considered most harmful to humans. All LEDs in the final design of OpenScope are contained within the epi-cube casing and so the user will not come into contact with any direct light. However, care must be taken putting together the epi-cube when building the microscope, protective eye wear should be worn as a precaution.</p>
 
 
<br>
 
<br>
<h4><b>Electrical safety</b></h4>
+
            <h3>Safety concerns in our Project</h3>
<p style="font-size: 120%">
+
<h4><b>Lighting</b></h4>
Components of OpenScope, such as motors and lighting, are electrically powered. The electricity supply used to power the microscope is no higher than 12V DC. However, a high current of 1A in present within the hardware. When building the microscope from scratch extreme safety must be taken to prevent electrocution. Wiring instructions provided on the wiki are simple, clear and designed to minimise these risks.
+
<p>
</p>
+
Some fluorescent molecules require UV light in order to excite them. UV light can be potentially harmful to the eyes and skin if not used with caution. In the project only near-UV LEDs are used, which have a peak in emission at 395nm and are considered safe, as this lies out of the range of 260-270nm [1], which is most harmful to humans. Regardless, all LEDs in the final design of OpenScope are contained within the plastic casing, so the user would not come into contact with any direct light. </p>
<p style="font-size: 120%">
+
<br>
The nature of our project makes it inherently impossible for anyone, even with malicious intentions, to cause harm to others, or the environment.
+
<h4><b>Electronics</b></h4>
 +
<p>
 +
OpenScope is a digital microscope, and as such is based on a number of electronics: Raspberry Pi, Raspberry Pi camera, Arduino, stepper motors, etc. The Arduino and the Raspberry Pi boards have 5V/2A power supplies, or alternmatively can be plugged into 9V batteries. These components are to be handled as typical home electronic devices. Detailed wiring instructions are available on the <a href="//2015.igem.org/Team:Cambridge-JIC/Make_Your_Own" class="blue">Make Your Own</a> page to ensure that any potential users do not misuse the equipment.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 +
 
<br>
 
<br>
<h4><b>Biosafety</b></h4>
+
<h4><b>Biological</b></h4>
<p style="font-size: 120%">
+
<p>
TThe biological side of our project involves standard, routine transformations with fluorescent proteins. For testing of parts of our equipment pre-transformed, GFP-expressing <i>Marchantia</i> were provided to us. However for collaboration with the William and Mary iGEM team transformations of <i>E.coli</i> were carried out. This was done following their same protocol and using standard safety procedures. For more information see our <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Cambridge-JIC/Collaborations" class="blue">Collaborations Page</a>.
+
The biological side of our project involves standard, routine transformations with fluorescent proteins. For testing of some of our equipment pre-transformed, GFP-expressing <i>Marchantia polymorpha</i> was provided to us. However, as part of our collaboration with the William and Mary iGEM team, we carried out transformations of <i>E.coli</i>. We did this following the same protocol as them and following standard safety procedures. For more information see our <a href="//2015.igem.org/Team:Cambridge-JIC/Collaborations" class="blue">Collaborations Page</a>.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<style type="text/css">
 
<style type="text/css">
Line 68: Line 63:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<h4><b>Glass Cutting</b></h4>
 
<h4><b>Glass Cutting</b></h4>
<p style="font-size: 120%">
+
<p>
In order to tailor dichroic mirrors to our Epi-cube design, glass cutting was necessary. Small fragments of cut glass therefore posed a risk to the eyes and skin of those involved in cutting the glass, and if not removed to the environment potentially to other lab users. To address there risks, glass cutting as carried out in a large tray to prevent stray glass fragments reaching the lab bench. Persons involved in glass cutting wore lab safety glasses at all times, and were equipped with two layers of gloves and lab coats to prevent damage to skin. Glass cutting was supervised at all times by trained first-aiders, and the area cleaned after use. Risk assessments were completed and all the students were supervised at all times. These can be found below (note: signatures were removed from the forms for privacy reasons). </p>
+
Glass cutting was carried out to adapt the shape of dichroic mirrors to fit within the epicube that we designed for fluorescence microscopy. Precautions were taken to ensure that small fragments of glass do not come into contact with eyes or skin. Glass cutting was carried out on a large tray, preventing stray glass fragments being left around the lab; safety glasses, two pairs of gloves and a lab coat were worn at all times when cutting glass. Risk assessments were completed for the activity and students were supervised by the first-aider on hand. These can be found below (note: signatures were removed from the forms for privacy reasons). </p>
</p>
+
<p>In the final design of the epicube, the mirrors are incorporated into plastic drawers, so the user does not come in direct contact with any pieces of glass.</p>
 
+
<div style="width:15%;float:right">
<div class="factcol" style="background-color:#1B3056;color:#1B3056;width:30%;float:right">
+
<a class="btn btn-default" href="//2015.igem.org/wiki/images/d/d1/CamJIC-Glass_Cutting_Risk_Assessment.pdf" role="button" style="color:#123a68;border-color:#123a68">risk assessment</a>
 
+
<style>
+
ul{
+
list-style:none;color:white
+
}
+
</style>
+
<center>
+
<ul>
+
<li><p><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d1/CamJIC-Glass_Cutting_Risk_Assessment.pdf" style="color:white">Glass Cutting Risk Assessment</a></li></p>
+
</ul>
+
</center>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<br>
 
<br>
</br>             
+
<br>             
 
             <h3>How secure is our lab?</h3>
 
             <h3>How secure is our lab?</h3>
             <p style="font-size: 120%">
+
             <p>
All of our work took place in the Teaching Lab at the Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge. This lab is GM-certified, meaning that it was designed with work on genetically modified organisms in place. For example, its windows cannot be opened so that any organisms developed within it cannot escape through that route.
+
<p>Our work took place in the Teaching Lab, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge. The lab is GM certified and biosafety level 1 certified, and so is designed with safety precautions in place for working with genetically modified organisms.</p>
The lab is certified for biosafety level 1, meaning that it can only be used to handle biological agents which are harmless to individuals and to the public. </p>
+
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
</br>
 
</br>
 
             <h3>What safety practices have we adopted?</h3>
 
             <h3>What safety practices have we adopted?</h3>
             <p style="font-size: 120%">
+
             <p>
Safety was high in our minds while we were selecting our project. Several ideas were discarded during our brainstorming sessions at the start of the project because they wouldn’t be safe enough.
+
Safety was a high priority when selecting a project to work on. Due to safety concerns several project ideas were discarded during brainstorming. Before carrying out any lab work we were given an extensive safety briefing and lab induction by the departmental safety officer. Standard laboratory procedures were followed at all times. Correct equipment was worn when doing any wet lab work. Cleaning and disposal of equipment was carried out appropriately by considering the hazard level associated. All relevant laws and regulations regarding biosafety were followed.
We were all given a lab induction and a safety briefing before we were allowed to handle any potentially dangerous materials. All of the department’s safety policies were explained to us and we were introduced to the departmental safety officer.
+
</p>
+
<p style="font-size: 120%">
+
All standard laboratory procedures were followed at all times. Lab coats were worn at all times while doing any wet work and all equipment was cleaned before leaving the lab. The hazard level of any waste was evaluated before disposing of it appropriately. Of course, all relevant laws and regulations regarding biosafety were followed and were generally part of our normal lab procedures.
+
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<h3>Outreach day</h3>
 
<h3>Outreach day</h3>
<p style="font-size: 120%">
+
<center>
We hosted an outreach day on the 11th of September for visiting secondary students from a range of schools throughout the UK. A total of 18 students, supervised by their teachers, were invited to participate in two workshops organised by the Cambridge-JIC iGEM team. For more information on the Outreach day, visit our <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Cambridge-JIC/Outreach" class="blue">Outreach Page</a>.  Risk assessments were completed and all the students were supervised at all times. These can be found below (note: signatures were removed from the forms for privacy reasons).  
+
<div class="factcol" style="width:25%;float:right">
 +
 
 +
<a class="btn btn-default" href="//2015.igem.org/wiki/images/0/0f/CamJIC-Arduino_workshop_Risk_Assessment.pdf" role="button" style="color:#123a68;border-color:#123a68">Arduino risk assessment</a>
 +
<br><br>
 +
<a class="btn btn-default" href="//2015.igem.org/wiki/images/b/b4/CamJIC-microscopy_workshop_Risk_Assessment.pdf" role="button" style="color:#123a68;border-color:#123a68">Microscopy risk assessment</a>
 +
<br><br>
 +
<a class="btn btn-default" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/db/CamJIc-coshh.pdf" role="button" style="color:#123a68;border-color:#123a68">COSHH</a>
 +
 
 +
</div></center>
 +
<p>
 +
The team hosted an Outreach day on the 11th of September for secondary school students from Cambridge and the surrounding area. A total of 18 students, supervised by their teachers, were invited to participate in two workshops organised by the team. For more information on the Outreach day, visit our <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Cambridge-JIC/Outreach" class="blue">Outreach</a> PageWe completed risk assessments for all activities and supervised the students at all times. These can be found below (note: signatures were removed from the forms for privacy reasons).  
 
</p>
 
</p>
<div class="factcol" style="background-color:#1B3056;color:#1B3056;width:30%;float:right">
 
 
<style>
 
ul{
 
list-style:none;color:white
 
}
 
</style>
 
<center>
 
<ul>
 
<li><p><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0f/CamJIC-Arduino_workshop_Risk_Assessment.pdf" style="color:white">Arduino Workshop Risk Assessment</a></li></p>
 
<li><p><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b4/CamJIC-microscopy_workshop_Risk_Assessment.pdf" style="color:white">Microscopy Workshop Risk Assessment</a>
 
</li></p>
 
<li><p><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/9a/CamJIC-Cambridge_microscopy_workshop_COSHH.pdf" style="color:white">Microscopy Workshop COSHH Form</a>
 
</li></p>
 
</ul>
 
</center>
 
</div>
 
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
  <h4>References</h4>
 
  <h4>References</h4>

Latest revision as of 01:15, 19 September 2015

Safety



Note: Do not do this at the lab or home

It is vital that any iGEM team not put itself or others at any risk through its work. The Hardware track has fewer associated safety risks than would be found in a purely biological project. In fact, our project involved significantly fewer transformations and much less handling of biological materials than a typical iGEM project. Nevertheless, we considered any possible risks that our project could pose and adopted a number of practices in order to minimise these.

The nature of our project makes it inherently impossible for anyone, even with malicious intentions, to cause harm to others or the environment.





Safety concerns in our Project

Lighting

Some fluorescent molecules require UV light in order to excite them. UV light can be potentially harmful to the eyes and skin if not used with caution. In the project only near-UV LEDs are used, which have a peak in emission at 395nm and are considered safe, as this lies out of the range of 260-270nm [1], which is most harmful to humans. Regardless, all LEDs in the final design of OpenScope are contained within the plastic casing, so the user would not come into contact with any direct light.


Electronics

OpenScope is a digital microscope, and as such is based on a number of electronics: Raspberry Pi, Raspberry Pi camera, Arduino, stepper motors, etc. The Arduino and the Raspberry Pi boards have 5V/2A power supplies, or alternmatively can be plugged into 9V batteries. These components are to be handled as typical home electronic devices. Detailed wiring instructions are available on the Make Your Own page to ensure that any potential users do not misuse the equipment.


Biological

The biological side of our project involves standard, routine transformations with fluorescent proteins. For testing of some of our equipment pre-transformed, GFP-expressing Marchantia polymorpha was provided to us. However, as part of our collaboration with the William and Mary iGEM team, we carried out transformations of E.coli. We did this following the same protocol as them and following standard safety procedures. For more information see our Collaborations Page.


Organism used
Biosafety level
Risk assessment
Marchantia polymorpha Level 1 No individual or community risk
Escherichia coli K12 Level 1 No individual or community risk

Glass Cutting

Glass cutting was carried out to adapt the shape of dichroic mirrors to fit within the epicube that we designed for fluorescence microscopy. Precautions were taken to ensure that small fragments of glass do not come into contact with eyes or skin. Glass cutting was carried out on a large tray, preventing stray glass fragments being left around the lab; safety glasses, two pairs of gloves and a lab coat were worn at all times when cutting glass. Risk assessments were completed for the activity and students were supervised by the first-aider on hand. These can be found below (note: signatures were removed from the forms for privacy reasons).

In the final design of the epicube, the mirrors are incorporated into plastic drawers, so the user does not come in direct contact with any pieces of glass.



How secure is our lab?

Our work took place in the Teaching Lab, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge. The lab is GM certified and biosafety level 1 certified, and so is designed with safety precautions in place for working with genetically modified organisms.



What safety practices have we adopted?

Safety was a high priority when selecting a project to work on. Due to safety concerns several project ideas were discarded during brainstorming. Before carrying out any lab work we were given an extensive safety briefing and lab induction by the departmental safety officer. Standard laboratory procedures were followed at all times. Correct equipment was worn when doing any wet lab work. Cleaning and disposal of equipment was carried out appropriately by considering the hazard level associated. All relevant laws and regulations regarding biosafety were followed.


Outreach day

The team hosted an Outreach day on the 11th of September for secondary school students from Cambridge and the surrounding area. A total of 18 students, supervised by their teachers, were invited to participate in two workshops organised by the team. For more information on the Outreach day, visit our Outreach Page. We completed risk assessments for all activities and supervised the students at all times. These can be found below (note: signatures were removed from the forms for privacy reasons).


References

[1] International program on chemical safety, “Environmental health criteria 160 - Ultraviolet radiation,” World Health Organization 1994, http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc160.htm.