Difference between revisions of "Team:Cambridge-JIC/Design"
m (fixed some formatting issues) |
(fixed formatting, headers) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<div class="slide"> | <div class="slide"> | ||
<div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | <div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | ||
− | <h1>Problem statement</ | + | <h1>Design</h1> |
+ | <h2>Problem statement</h2> | ||
<p>The use of fluorescent markers is central to many iGEM projects. In fact, the most widely used coding BioBrick on the iGEM Parts Registry is that encoding GFP, with 514 uses. However, the tool generally used to characterise a construct’s fluorescence - a fluorescence microscope - is prohibitively expensive for most iGEM teams, costing over $30,000.</p> | <p>The use of fluorescent markers is central to many iGEM projects. In fact, the most widely used coding BioBrick on the iGEM Parts Registry is that encoding GFP, with 514 uses. However, the tool generally used to characterise a construct’s fluorescence - a fluorescence microscope - is prohibitively expensive for most iGEM teams, costing over $30,000.</p> | ||
<p>Therefore the problem we set out to tackle was <i> to design a cost-effective but precise method of quantifying fluorescence from the fluorescent proteins most commonly used in iGEM. </i></p> | <p>Therefore the problem we set out to tackle was <i> to design a cost-effective but precise method of quantifying fluorescence from the fluorescent proteins most commonly used in iGEM. </i></p> | ||
Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
<div class="slide"> | <div class="slide"> | ||
<div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | <div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | ||
− | < | + | <h2>Design criteria</h2> |
<p>The criteria any design <b>must</b> meet are: </p> | <p>The criteria any design <b>must</b> meet are: </p> | ||
<ul><li><p>Able to characterise GFP fluorescence</li></p></ul> | <ul><li><p>Able to characterise GFP fluorescence</li></p></ul> | ||
<p>Other desired characteristics of our product were:</p> | <p>Other desired characteristics of our product were:</p> | ||
− | <center><div style="margin-right: 40px"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c8/CamJIC-Design-Table.png" style="width: | + | <center><div style="margin-right: 40px"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c8/CamJIC-Design-Table.png" style="width:100%; max-width: 800px"> |
− | <p> | + | <p>Table of our design criteria.</p></div></center> |
</div></div></section> | </div></div></section> | ||
Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
<div class="slide"> | <div class="slide"> | ||
<div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | <div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | ||
− | < | + | <h3>Potential Solutions</h3> |
<p>We designed a low-cost, open-source fluorescence microscope built mainly out of off-the-shelf and 3D-printable components. Anyone with access to our designs and a 3D printer should be able to build one for themselves. We compared how our design fared on our design criteria to a conventional fluorescence microscope: | <p>We designed a low-cost, open-source fluorescence microscope built mainly out of off-the-shelf and 3D-printable components. Anyone with access to our designs and a 3D printer should be able to build one for themselves. We compared how our design fared on our design criteria to a conventional fluorescence microscope: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<center><div style="margin-right: 40px"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/51/CamJIC-Design-Conventional.png" style="width:100%; max-width: 800px"> | <center><div style="margin-right: 40px"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/51/CamJIC-Design-Conventional.png" style="width:100%; max-width: 800px"> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>A traditional fluorescence microscope scores 19 points.</p></div></center> |
<center><div style="margin-right: 40px"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/45/CamJIC-Design-New.png" style="width:100%; max-width: 800px"> | <center><div style="margin-right: 40px"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/45/CamJIC-Design-New.png" style="width:100%; max-width: 800px"> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>Our OpenScope design scores 24 points, making it a better design.</p></div></center> |
</div></div></section> | </div></div></section> | ||
Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
<div class="slide"> | <div class="slide"> | ||
<div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | <div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | ||
− | < | + | <h2>Design Implications</h2> |
<p>OpenScope has the potential to change many areas beyond our initial goal of making fluorescence imaging accessible to iGEM team. Its low cost and ease of assembly open up many opportunities:</p> | <p>OpenScope has the potential to change many areas beyond our initial goal of making fluorescence imaging accessible to iGEM team. Its low cost and ease of assembly open up many opportunities:</p> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
Line 50: | Line 51: | ||
<div class="slide"> | <div class="slide"> | ||
<div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | <div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | ||
− | < | + | <h3>Environmental Impact</h3> |
<p>We looked at the potential environmental effects of all the components of OpenScope throughout their lifetime. Most of these components are mass-produced (with the exception of the 3D printed chassis) so the start of OpenScope’s lifecycle is managed already to industry standards.</p> | <p>We looked at the potential environmental effects of all the components of OpenScope throughout their lifetime. Most of these components are mass-produced (with the exception of the 3D printed chassis) so the start of OpenScope’s lifecycle is managed already to industry standards.</p> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
Line 62: | Line 63: | ||
<div class="slide"> | <div class="slide"> | ||
<div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | <div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | ||
− | < | + | <h3>Social Impact</h3> |
<p>OpenScope, if it becomes widespread, has the potential to greatly expand the scope of fluorescence microscopy. The cost of fluorescence microscopes will no longer be as much of a barrier to synthetic biology research, making this kind of research much more accessible and widespread. Other tools can be developed which incorporate OpenScope, leading to other useful equipment being developed. The open-source licensing strategy we’ve used means anyone can develop on our hardware and software, leading to more equipment being developed based on OpenScope and some of our changes being introduced in other commercial initiatives as well. </p> | <p>OpenScope, if it becomes widespread, has the potential to greatly expand the scope of fluorescence microscopy. The cost of fluorescence microscopes will no longer be as much of a barrier to synthetic biology research, making this kind of research much more accessible and widespread. Other tools can be developed which incorporate OpenScope, leading to other useful equipment being developed. The open-source licensing strategy we’ve used means anyone can develop on our hardware and software, leading to more equipment being developed based on OpenScope and some of our changes being introduced in other commercial initiatives as well. </p> | ||
</div></div></section> | </div></div></section> | ||
Line 86: | Line 87: | ||
<div class="slide"> | <div class="slide"> | ||
<div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | <div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | ||
− | < | + | <h2>Useful Software</h2> |
<p>Below is a list of software programs that we have found useful for developing open-source hardware, supplemented with other commonly used programs:</p> | <p>Below is a list of software programs that we have found useful for developing open-source hardware, supplemented with other commonly used programs:</p> | ||
<ol> | <ol> |
Revision as of 10:47, 14 September 2015