Difference between revisions of "Team:Cambridge-JIC/Measurement"
KaterinaMN (Talk | contribs) |
KaterinaMN (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<div class="slide" style="min-height:0px"> | <div class="slide" style="min-height:0px"> | ||
<div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | <div style="width: 80%; margin: 30px 50px;color:#000"> | ||
− | <div style="float:right;background-color:#fff;border: | + | <div style="float:right;background-color:#fff;border:5px solid #000;padding:1em 2em"> |
<center><h4> Camera Specifications </h4> | <center><h4> Camera Specifications </h4> | ||
<table class="rl"> | <table class="rl"> | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<p> The resolution can be limited by two independent factors: </p> <ul><li><p>pixel size;</p></li><li><p>diffraction effects.</p></li></ul> | <p> The resolution can be limited by two independent factors: </p> <ul><li><p>pixel size;</p></li><li><p>diffraction effects.</p></li></ul> | ||
<div style="float:left"> <img src="//2015.igem.org/wiki/images/8/8b/CamJIC-Resolution.jpg" style="height:300px;margin:20px"> </div> <p> The larger of these determines the actual limitation of the system. In our case we know that the pixel size is 1.4 μm, so we now need to work out the diffraction limit, that is the smallest spot size which can be produced by the lens with the given specs. To calculate this, recall the Rayleigh criterion for a circular aperture: | <div style="float:left"> <img src="//2015.igem.org/wiki/images/8/8b/CamJIC-Resolution.jpg" style="height:300px;margin:20px"> </div> <p> The larger of these determines the actual limitation of the system. In our case we know that the pixel size is 1.4 μm, so we now need to work out the diffraction limit, that is the smallest spot size which can be produced by the lens with the given specs. To calculate this, recall the Rayleigh criterion for a circular aperture: | ||
− | sinθ=1.22 λ ⁄ d. Here | + | sinθ=1.22 λ ⁄ d. Here λ~550nm is the wavelength of light, taking green for the middle of the visible spectrum, d=1.25mm is the diameter of the aperture and θ (small angle) is the angular radius of the spot, that is tanθ=r ⁄ L. Here r is the radius of the spot projected at a distance L from the aperture, which in our setup is actually the focal length f of the Raspberry Pi camera lens (and the spot is projected onto the CCD sensor). |
From first approximation for a small angle: sinθ≈tanθ, so 1.22 λ ⁄ d=r ⁄ f. Rearranging this equation and plugging in the numbers gives the following diameter of the smallest resolvable spot: 2r≈3.8μm. This is almost three times the size of the pixel on the CCD, which imposes the actual limit on the resolution. The pixels of the CCD outresolve the theoretical lens limits.</p> | From first approximation for a small angle: sinθ≈tanθ, so 1.22 λ ⁄ d=r ⁄ f. Rearranging this equation and plugging in the numbers gives the following diameter of the smallest resolvable spot: 2r≈3.8μm. This is almost three times the size of the pixel on the CCD, which imposes the actual limit on the resolution. The pixels of the CCD outresolve the theoretical lens limits.</p> | ||
<p><center><h4 style="padding:2em 0"> Final resolution estimate of a microscope based on Raspberry Pi camera: 3.8μm </h4> </center></p> | <p><center><h4 style="padding:2em 0"> Final resolution estimate of a microscope based on Raspberry Pi camera: 3.8μm </h4> </center></p> | ||
<div style="float:right"> <img src="//2015.igem.org/wiki/images/7/78/CamJIC-SpirogyraZoomIn.png" style="height:200px;margin:20px"> </div> | <div style="float:right"> <img src="//2015.igem.org/wiki/images/7/78/CamJIC-SpirogyraZoomIn.png" style="height:200px;margin:20px"> </div> | ||
− | <p> Compare this with a typical size of a chloroplast: 5-8μm diameter [1]. Our resolution will be just enough to image them, which is exactly what we have managed to do on this picture of Spirogyra cells. Note that these are larger than typical chloroplasts though. To obtain a better resolution, a lens with either larger aperture and/or shorter focal distance can be used, without the need of a better CCD. However, this is a tradeoff in terms of worse aberration and contrast. An improvement to the resolution will however be required in order to image bacteria, for example, which are of the order of | + | <p> Compare this with a typical size of a chloroplast: 5-8μm diameter [1]. Our resolution will be just enough to image them, which is exactly what we have managed to do on this picture of Spirogyra cells. Note that these are larger than typical chloroplasts though. To obtain a better resolution, a lens with either larger aperture and/or shorter focal distance can be used, without the need of a better CCD. However, this is a tradeoff in terms of worse aberration and contrast. An improvement to the resolution will however be required in order to image bacteria, for example, which are of the order of 1μm in diameter [2].</p> |
<p> [1] Wise, R. and Hoober, J. (2006). The structure and function of plastids. Dordrecht: Springer. <br> [2] Encyclopedia Britannica, (2015). bacteria :: Diversity of structure of bacteria. <a href="http://www.britannica.com/science/bacteria/Diversity-of-structure-of-bacteria" class="blue">[online]</a> [Accessed 30 Jul. 2015].</p> | <p> [1] Wise, R. and Hoober, J. (2006). The structure and function of plastids. Dordrecht: Springer. <br> [2] Encyclopedia Britannica, (2015). bacteria :: Diversity of structure of bacteria. <a href="http://www.britannica.com/science/bacteria/Diversity-of-structure-of-bacteria" class="blue">[online]</a> [Accessed 30 Jul. 2015].</p> | ||
<h3> Inverting the Lens: Why and How: </h3> | <h3> Inverting the Lens: Why and How: </h3> |
Revision as of 12:59, 30 July 2015