Difference between revisions of "Team:UCSF/Practices"

Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
     <p class="content1">
 
     <p class="content1">
Every year, iGEM teams across the world work diligently all summer long on their individual projects. And every year, these projects are documented on each team’s wiki page. Although wikis are a great, and open-source way to depict all aspects of a team’s project, it still requires a scientific background to fully understand, making it less accessible to a non-specialist audience.
+
Our project explores complex communication in yeast communities, but the communication between science and nonscience communities is commonly overlooked. Throughout the course of our project, we looked at the myriad of ways scientists (within and outside of the iGEM team) communicate their thoughts, projects, and ideas amongst each other. Some of these commonly used outlets include, but are not limited to, lectures, seminars, and published journal articles. However, social media is becoming a more prominent source of scientific outreach. More and more scientists are using websites such as Youtube, Facebook, and Twitter to convey their research.
    </p>
+
 
+
    <p class="content1">
+
For UCSF iGEM’s Policy and Practices this year, we are addressing issues of communication, specifically between the scientific community and the general public. We believe that by translating a team’s wiki page into a short, interesting video, we can better communicate our projects to everyone. UCSF iGEM encourages your team to be as creative as possible! This is a fantastic way to effectively convey your project not just to the iGEM community, but to the whole world in short, easy minutes. You want your video to be informative, but also easily comprehensible for ANY viewer out there. Take this as an opportunity to explore new ways to communicate your awesome projects!
+
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
  

Revision as of 21:36, 14 September 2015

HUMAN RACTICES

Our project explores complex communication in yeast communities, but the communication between science and nonscience communities is commonly overlooked. Throughout the course of our project, we looked at the myriad of ways scientists (within and outside of the iGEM team) communicate their thoughts, projects, and ideas amongst each other. Some of these commonly used outlets include, but are not limited to, lectures, seminars, and published journal articles. However, social media is becoming a more prominent source of scientific outreach. More and more scientists are using websites such as Youtube, Facebook, and Twitter to convey their research.