Difference between revisions of "Team:HKUST-Rice/Phosphate Sensor PphoA"

Line 27: Line 27:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
 
<p><i>phoAp</i> promoter (Hsieh, Y. J., & Wanner, B. L.,2010).is cross-regulated by <i>phoB</i> and <i>phoR</i>, and is usually repressed under high phosphate concentration. PhoR behaves as an activator as well as an inactivator for PhoB. When phosphate is limited, <i>phoR</i> will phosphorylate PhoB and the phosphorylated PhoB will directly activate the expression of <i>phoAp</i> promoter. In contrast, when there is phosphate, <i>phoR</i> will repress PhoB phosphorylation which in turns inactivates <i>phoAp</i> promoter.  
+
<p><i>phoAp</i> promoter (Hsieh, Y. J., & Wanner, B. L.,2010) is cross-regulated by <i>phoB</i> and <i>phoR</i>, and is usually repressed under high phosphate concentrations. PhoR behaves as an activator as well as an inactivator for PhoB. When phosphate is limited, PhoR will phosphorylate PhoB and the phosphorylated PhoB will directly activate the <i>phoAp</i> promoter. In contrast, when there is phosphate, PhoR will repress PhoB phosphorylation which in turn inactivates the <i>phoAp</i> promoter.  
  
<br><br>For the constructs design, we have ligated GFP generator to the <i>phoAp</i> promoter. As a result, when under high phosphate concentration, the green fluorescence intensity will be repressed, while under low phosphate concentration, the situation will be vice versa.
+
<br><br>For the constructs design, we have ligated GFP generator to the <i>phoAp</i> promoter. As a result, under high phosphate concentrations, the green fluorescence intensity will be repressed; while under low phosphate concentrations, green fluorescence will be expressed.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
 
Line 38: Line 38:
 
<p>We have done a characterization on pSB1C3-<i>phoAp</i>-BBa_I13504 using Luria broth (LB) medium. Quantitative characterization on the promoter was done by measuring the fluorescence signal intensity using an EnVision multilabel reader.
 
<p>We have done a characterization on pSB1C3-<i>phoAp</i>-BBa_I13504 using Luria broth (LB) medium. Quantitative characterization on the promoter was done by measuring the fluorescence signal intensity using an EnVision multilabel reader.
  
<br><br><i>E. coli</i> strain DH10B was used, and the concentration of the characterization of <i>phoAp</i> promoter was from 0 to 300 µM phosphate, with an intervals of 50µM.
+
<br><br><i>E. coli</i> strain DH10B was used, and the concentration of the characterization of <i>phoAp</i> promoter was from 0 to 300 µM phosphate, with intervals of 50 µM.
<p style="font-size:200%"><u>Preparing test medium with different concentration of phosphate</u></p>
+
<p style="font-size:200%"><u>Preparing test medium with different concentrations of phosphate</u></p>
<p>We have prepared a solution of M9 minimal medium (J. Sambrook & D.W. Russell, 2001) and a solution of M9 minimal medium with Tris replacing phosphate. Test medium with different concentration of phosphate (0, 10, 30, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300 µM) were made by mixing the 2 solution in the following ratio. </p>
+
<p>We have prepared a solution of M9 minimal medium (J. Sambrook & D.W. Russell, 2001) and a solution of M9 minimal medium with Tris replacing phosphate. Test medium with different concentration of phosphate (0, 10, 30, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 µM) were made by mixing the 2 solutions in the following ratio: </p>
  
 
                                 <table border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:150%">
 
                                 <table border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:150%">
 
                                 <tr>
 
                                 <tr>
                                   <td><b>Final Phosphate concentration (μM)</b></td>
+
                                   <td><b>Final phosphate concentration (μM)</b></td>
 
                                   <td><b>M9 minimal medium added (μl)</b></td>
 
                                   <td><b>M9 minimal medium added (μl)</b></td>
 
                                   <td><b>M9 minimal medium without phosphate (replaced by Tris) added (ml)</b></td>
 
                                   <td><b>M9 minimal medium without phosphate (replaced by Tris) added (ml)</b></td>
                                   <td><b>150 ng/μl Chloramphenicol Antibiotics added (μl)</b></td>
+
                                   <td><b>150 ng/μl chloramphenicol antibiotics added (μl)</b></td>
 
                                 </tr>
 
                                 </tr>
 
                                 <tr>
 
                                 <tr>
Line 106: Line 106:
 
                                 </tr>
 
                                 </tr>
 
                                   </table>
 
                                   </table>
       <p style="font-size:200%"><u><i>phoAp</i> promoter Characterization</u></p>
+
       <p style="font-size:200%"><u><i>phoAp</i> characterization</u></p>
<p>pSB1C3-<i>phoAp</i>-BBa_I13504, positive control and negative control were first grown overnight in 5 ml Luria Broth (LB) medium containing chloramphenicol at 37<sup>o</sup>C. The bacteria were then washed twice with 3 ml M9 minimal medium without phosphate (replaced by Tris), containing Ampicillin. Then, the cells were resuspended in 5ml M9 minimal medium without phosphate(replaced by Tris) to obtain a final  OD<sub>600</sub> of 4. 50 μl of the prepared cell suspension were then added into 950μl of test medium with different concentrations of phosphate (containing Chloramphenicol) in the 96-well deep well plate and further incubate at 37<sup>o</sup>C until the OD<sub>600</sub> of the cells reaches the mid-log phase. The fluorescence output were then measured using EnVision multilabel reader.  
+
<p>For the pSB1C3-<i>phoAp</i>-BBa_I13504 construct, positive and negative controls were first grown overnight in 5 ml Luria Broth (LB) medium containing chloramphenicol at 37<sup>o</sup>C. The bacteria were then washed twice with 3 ml M9 minimal medium without phosphate (replaced by Tris), containing ampicillin. Then, the cells were resuspended in 5 ml M9 minimal medium without phosphate (replaced by Tris) to obtain a final  OD<sub>600</sub> of 4. 50 μl of the prepared cell suspension were then added into 950 μl of test medium with different concentrations of phosphate (containing chloramphenicol) in a 96-well deep well plate and further incubated at 37<sup>o</sup>C until the OD<sub>600</sub> of the cells reached the mid-log phase. The fluorescence output was then measured using EnVision multilabel reader.  
  
 
<br><br>This result was obtained by combining 3 characterization trials.</p>
 
<br><br>This result was obtained by combining 3 characterization trials.</p>

Revision as of 07:02, 30 August 2015


Phosphate Sensor - phoAp

Introduction

Phosphorus is vital to plant growth and is found in every living plant cell. It is a component of the nucleic acid structure of plants, which regulates protein synthesis. Therefore, it is important in cell division and development of new tissue. It is also associated with complex energy transformations in the plant. Plants deficient in phosphorus are stunted in growth and often have an abnormal dark-green color.


Phosphate sensor Design

image caption

phoAp promoter (Hsieh, Y. J., & Wanner, B. L.,2010) is cross-regulated by phoB and phoR, and is usually repressed under high phosphate concentrations. PhoR behaves as an activator as well as an inactivator for PhoB. When phosphate is limited, PhoR will phosphorylate PhoB and the phosphorylated PhoB will directly activate the phoAp promoter. In contrast, when there is phosphate, PhoR will repress PhoB phosphorylation which in turn inactivates the phoAp promoter.

For the constructs design, we have ligated GFP generator to the phoAp promoter. As a result, under high phosphate concentrations, the green fluorescence intensity will be repressed; while under low phosphate concentrations, green fluorescence will be expressed.


Experiment that we did

We have done a characterization on pSB1C3-phoAp-BBa_I13504 using Luria broth (LB) medium. Quantitative characterization on the promoter was done by measuring the fluorescence signal intensity using an EnVision multilabel reader.

E. coli strain DH10B was used, and the concentration of the characterization of phoAp promoter was from 0 to 300 µM phosphate, with intervals of 50 µM.

Preparing test medium with different concentrations of phosphate

We have prepared a solution of M9 minimal medium (J. Sambrook & D.W. Russell, 2001) and a solution of M9 minimal medium with Tris replacing phosphate. Test medium with different concentration of phosphate (0, 10, 30, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 µM) were made by mixing the 2 solutions in the following ratio:

Final phosphate concentration (μM) M9 minimal medium added (μl) M9 minimal medium without phosphate (replaced by Tris) added (ml) 150 ng/μl chloramphenicol antibiotics added (μl)
0 0.00 60 60
10 8.58 60 60
30 25.73 60 60
50 42.85 60 60
100 85.71 60 60
150 130.43 60 60
200 171.42 60 60
250 216.26 60 60
300 260.87 60 60

phoAp characterization

For the pSB1C3-phoAp-BBa_I13504 construct, positive and negative controls were first grown overnight in 5 ml Luria Broth (LB) medium containing chloramphenicol at 37oC. The bacteria were then washed twice with 3 ml M9 minimal medium without phosphate (replaced by Tris), containing ampicillin. Then, the cells were resuspended in 5 ml M9 minimal medium without phosphate (replaced by Tris) to obtain a final OD600 of 4. 50 μl of the prepared cell suspension were then added into 950 μl of test medium with different concentrations of phosphate (containing chloramphenicol) in a 96-well deep well plate and further incubated at 37oC until the OD600 of the cells reached the mid-log phase. The fluorescence output was then measured using EnVision multilabel reader.

This result was obtained by combining 3 characterization trials.


Result obtained

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, pro aeque temporibus eu, eum qualisque assueverit te. Ad est admodum epicuri suscipit, te alterum aliquando adversarium usu, pro ex omnesque luptatum comprehensam. In vix alia percipit gloriatur, no ferri lorem aliquando cum. Fugit concludaturque sed ne, ea sumo dico adolescens eos, quo eu pertinax expetendis. An his omnes instructior, vide possim eam id. Te cum enim sale offendit, vocent copiosae luptatum ut per. Eam in alienum accusamus, et probo reque vix. Vivendum necessitatibus qui ad, no vis enim veniam perpetua. Eu pri habemus senserit, dicit tation expetenda usu et. Sea eu dolor deserunt dissentias, sed an oportere moderatius assueverit. Usu te tation gloriatur, vidit tollit utinam mea id.

image caption

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, pro aeque temporibus eu, eum qualisque assueverit te. Ad est admodum epicuri suscipit, te alterum aliquando adversarium usu, pro ex omnesque luptatum comprehensam. In vix alia percipit gloriatur, no ferri lorem aliquando cum. Fugit concludaturque sed ne, ea sumo dico adolescens eos, quo eu pertinax expetendis. An his omnes instructior, vide possim eam id. Te cum enim sale offendit, vocent copiosae luptatum ut per. Eam in alienum accusamus, et probo reque vix. Vivendum necessitatibus qui ad, no vis enim veniam perpetua. Eu pri habemus senserit, dicit tation expetenda usu et. Sea eu dolor deserunt dissentias, sed an oportere moderatius assueverit. Usu te tation gloriatur, vidit tollit utinam mea id.