Difference between revisions of "Team:HKUST-Rice/Practices"
SabrinaTam (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<div class="project_row"><br> | <div class="project_row"><br> | ||
<h1>Introduction</h1> | <h1>Introduction</h1> | ||
| − | <p>This year human practices project focuses on public perception. Although the technical aspects of synthetic biology are important, spanning controversies on sociotechnical implications, biosecurity & biosafety concerns, ethics and fundamental questions about what applications of synthetic biology would advance societal goals and be considered sustainable | + | <p>This year, our human practices project focuses on public perception. Although the technical aspects of synthetic biology are important, spanning controversies on sociotechnical implications, biosecurity & biosafety concerns, ethics and fundamental questions about what applications of synthetic biology would advance societal goals and be considered sustainable should not be ignored. There are three impressions on synthetic biology, which bring us much concerns. People think synthetic biology is complex, risky and uncertain. We adopt a problem-solving approach in dealing with complexity i.e. debating; and an issue-based approach in dealing with risk and uncertainty.</p> |
Revision as of 09:50, 30 August 2015
Scroll down to learn more
Human Practices
Introduction
This year, our human practices project focuses on public perception. Although the technical aspects of synthetic biology are important, spanning controversies on sociotechnical implications, biosecurity & biosafety concerns, ethics and fundamental questions about what applications of synthetic biology would advance societal goals and be considered sustainable should not be ignored. There are three impressions on synthetic biology, which bring us much concerns. People think synthetic biology is complex, risky and uncertain. We adopt a problem-solving approach in dealing with complexity i.e. debating; and an issue-based approach in dealing with risk and uncertainty.
iGEM Biosensors
In the past few years, plentiful participants in iGEM competition were constructing biosensors by genetic engineering. These biosensors are targeting on a huge range of analytes with the use of various biocatalysts.
Exploratory Research
The primary focus of HKUST-Rice 2015 iGEM Team is to develop an NPK microbial biosensor to detect bioavailable NPK concentrations in soil, thus monitoring soil quality. It is believed that the application can be far beyond agricultural purposes, such as in water quality surveillance or sewage management. The team has no plan to reverse the preliminary design of the NPK microbial biosensor; this notwithstanding, the human practices team explores further including opinions from stakeholders who require soil or water management.
More information on Exploratory Research.
Results
Graph 2.The paradigm of the interviewees’ perceptions on the in-field application of NPK microbial sensor
The paradigm above illustrates interviewees’ perceptions on the in-field use of NPK microbial biosensors in their field (Graph 2).
More information on Exploratory Research – Result.
Bioethical Debate
The HKUST-Rice iGEM team collaborated with the Rice University Institute of Biosciences and Bioengineering (IBB) Girls’ BioScience STEM initiative program, a weeklong summer camp held each year for economically disadvantaged girls at César Chávez High School in Houston, Texas. These students were presented following the question for the debate: “Is it ethical to treat micro-organisms as a machine for the betterment of agriculture?”
More information on Bioethical Debate.