Difference between revisions of "Team:HKUST-Rice/Expression"
SabrinaTam (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
<div class="project_row"> | <div class="project_row"> | ||
<h1>Expression platform</h1> | <h1>Expression platform</h1> | ||
− | <p>To examine the possible effects of | + | <p>To examine the possible effects of parallel sensing, the dose-dependent fluorescence response of one construct in a single plasmid was compared to that of two constructs in a single plasmid. The purpose of the comparison relates to the design of our potassium, phosphate and nitrate (NPK) sensor, which aims to combine three constructs characterized by different outputs within a single plasmid. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
<div class="des"> | <div class="des"> | ||
<p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 1. Brief diagrams of single and double constructs.</strong></p></div> | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 1. Brief diagrams of single and double constructs.</strong></p></div> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>As the substitute of the KPN inducible promoters, well-characterised promoters <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> and <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> were used as their biological mechanisms are better understood. </p> |
<div class="project_image"> | <div class="project_image"> | ||
<img style="width:80%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1c/Team_HKUST-Rice_2015_araCfinal.PNG" alt="image caption"> | <img style="width:80%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1c/Team_HKUST-Rice_2015_araCfinal.PNG" alt="image caption"> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="des"> | <div class="des"> | ||
− | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 2a. Schematic diagram of the inducible <i>P<sub> | + | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 2a. Schematic diagram of the inducible <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFP construct.</strong> In the absence of L-Arabinose, AraC is constitutively produced, repressing <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i>. In the presence of L-Arabinose, AraC protein driven by the constitutive promoter binds with L-Arabinose and induces <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i>, triggering the production of GFP.</p></div> |
<div class="project_image"> | <div class="project_image"> | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
</div>\ | </div>\ | ||
<div class="des"> | <div class="des"> | ||
− | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 2b. Schematic diagram of the inducible <i>P<sub> | + | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 2b. Schematic diagram of the inducible <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP construct.</strong> In the absence of Isopropyl b-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), LacI represses <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i>. When IPTG is present, LacI protein is repressed, triggering the production of mRFP.</p></div> |
− | <p>The construction of a double construct <i>P<sub> | + | <p>The construction of a double construct <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFPmut3b - <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP allowed for a comparison between GFPmut3b and mRFP measurements while changing concentrations of inducers. Dose response curve for both single and double constructs could then be analysed and compared. </p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="project_row"> | <div class="project_row"> | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="des"> | <div class="des"> | ||
− | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 3. Inducible double construct <i>P<sub> | + | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 3. Inducible double construct <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFP - <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP.</strong>.</p></div> |
<div class="project_image"> | <div class="project_image"> | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="des"> | <div class="des"> | ||
− | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 4. Inducible construct (a) <i>P<sub> | + | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 4. Inducible construct (a) <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFP and (b) <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i>- mRFP.</strong>.</p></div> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
<hr class="para"> | <hr class="para"> | ||
<h1 id="co-expression">Results</h1> | <h1 id="co-expression">Results</h1> | ||
− | <p >After obtaining characterization data for the <i>P<sub> | + | <p >After obtaining characterization data for the <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFPmut3b single construct, the dose response curve was compared with that expressed in a double construct (with <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP). |
</p> | </p> | ||
<div class="project_image"> | <div class="project_image"> | ||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="des"> | <div class="des"> | ||
− | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 5 . Response curve of <i>P<sub> | + | <p style="font-size:110%"><strong>Figure 5 . Response curve of <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFP in single construct compared with in double construct plasmid (a) Co-expressed construct (<i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP) with full induction (5 mM IPTG) (b) co-expressed construct without induction</strong>.</p></div> |
− | <p>From Figure 5a, it can be observed that in a double construct, the maximum expression of the reporter decreases for the L-Arabinose inducible <i>P<sub> | + | <p>From Figure 5a, it can be observed that in a double construct, the maximum expression of the reporter decreases for the L-Arabinose inducible <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> system. Furthermore, from Figure 5b, it is shown that when the co-expressed system is under full induction, the curve for the double construct <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> shifts to the right compared to both the single construct and double construct without induction, indicating a decrease in sensitivity. |
− | <br><br>In order to further investigate the effect of induction level of the co-expressed <i>P<sub> | + | <br><br>In order to further investigate the effect of induction level of the co-expressed <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP construct on the GFPmut3b expression of the double construct <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> system, experiments were carried out using varying IPTG concentrations. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<div class="project_image"> | <div class="project_image"> | ||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <p>Figure 6 exhibits that varying the induction level of the co-expressed <i>P<sub> | + | <p>Figure 6 exhibits that varying the induction level of the co-expressed <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP construct seems to have an effect on the expression level of <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFPmut3b in a double construct. At a higher IPTG concentration, the maximum expression of GFPmut3b decreases. However, no trend can be observed for the horizontal shift of the curve, except at the highest IPTG concentration (2<sup>2</sup> mM) where the graph shifts to the right. No significant shift was observed at lower IPTG concentrations. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
<hr class="para"> | <hr class="para"> | ||
<h1>Conclusion</h1> | <h1>Conclusion</h1> | ||
− | <p>By using the <i>P<sub> | + | <p>By using the <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFPmut3b and <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP inducible systems, the possible difference of dose dependent fluorescence expression in a double construct and single construct was investigated. In a double construct, the maximal expression was lower than the single construct induced <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFPmut3b, whether or not the co-expressed construct was induced. We conjecture that it is possibly due to the limited cellular resources (e.g. amino acids, enzymes required for gene translation/transcription etc.) and the synthesized proteins (e.g. lacI, mRFP) that could increase the cell load and affect its growth. However, since the investigation was done focusing only on one combination of inducible constructs(<i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFPmut3b and <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP), the data obtained cannot be assumed to apply to all instances of expressing a characterized construct in a double construct, including that for the NPK construct. Thus, further improvements should be made.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="project_row"> | <div class="project_row"> | ||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
<h1>Further Improvements</h1> | <h1>Further Improvements</h1> | ||
− | <p>Since characterization data from one combination of double construct cannot be applied to all double constructs in general, characterization of more combinations of inducible reporter systems (eg. <i>P<sub>luxR</sub></i> - GFPmut3 - <i>P<sub> | + | <p>Since characterization data from one combination of double construct cannot be applied to all double constructs in general, characterization of more combinations of inducible reporter systems (eg. <i>P<sub>luxR</sub></i> - GFPmut3 - <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP, <i>P<sub>tetO</sub></i> - GFPmut3b - <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP) is required. |
− | <br><br>Charaterize <i>P<sub> | + | <br><br>Charaterize <i>P<sub>BAD</sub></i> - GFPmut3b <i>P<sub>lac</sub></i> - mRFP with a third construct (i.e. <i>P<sub>tetO</sub></i> and <i>P<sub>luxR</sub></i>) |
This will give a more reliable comparison for a triple construct NPK promoter system, as | This will give a more reliable comparison for a triple construct NPK promoter system, as | ||
opposed to a double system. | opposed to a double system. |
Revision as of 15:25, 15 September 2015
Parallel Sensor
Expression platform
To examine the possible effects of parallel sensing, the dose-dependent fluorescence response of one construct in a single plasmid was compared to that of two constructs in a single plasmid. The purpose of the comparison relates to the design of our potassium, phosphate and nitrate (NPK) sensor, which aims to combine three constructs characterized by different outputs within a single plasmid.
Figure 1. Brief diagrams of single and double constructs.
As the substitute of the KPN inducible promoters, well-characterised promoters PBAD and Plac were used as their biological mechanisms are better understood.
Figure 2a. Schematic diagram of the inducible PBAD - GFP construct. In the absence of L-Arabinose, AraC is constitutively produced, repressing PBAD. In the presence of L-Arabinose, AraC protein driven by the constitutive promoter binds with L-Arabinose and induces PBAD, triggering the production of GFP.
Figure 2b. Schematic diagram of the inducible Plac - mRFP construct. In the absence of Isopropyl b-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), LacI represses Plac. When IPTG is present, LacI protein is repressed, triggering the production of mRFP.
The construction of a double construct PBAD - GFPmut3b - Plac - mRFP allowed for a comparison between GFPmut3b and mRFP measurements while changing concentrations of inducers. Dose response curve for both single and double constructs could then be analysed and compared.
Constructs
Constructs were built by digestion and ligation method.
Figure 3. Inducible double construct PBAD - GFP - Plac - mRFP..
Figure 4. Inducible construct (a) PBAD - GFP and (b) Plac- mRFP..
Experiments performed
For all experiments, the bacteria were first grown overnight, then a 25-fold dilution was carried out using M9 minimal medium with specific inducers and concentrations. After that, they were transferred into a 96-well deep well plate for overnight induction. The samples were then further diluted ten-fold the next day. The cells were allowed to grow from lag phase to log phase for several hours. Ultimately, the result was gathered using a EnVision® Multilabel Reader. Data collected was plotted as graphs for further analysis.
Please visit Parallel Sensor Experiment Protocol for more details.
Results
After obtaining characterization data for the PBAD - GFPmut3b single construct, the dose response curve was compared with that expressed in a double construct (with Plac - mRFP).
Figure 5 . Response curve of PBAD - GFP in single construct compared with in double construct plasmid (a) Co-expressed construct (Plac - mRFP) with full induction (5 mM IPTG) (b) co-expressed construct without induction.
From Figure 5a, it can be observed that in a double construct, the maximum expression of the reporter decreases for the L-Arabinose inducible PBAD system. Furthermore, from Figure 5b, it is shown that when the co-expressed system is under full induction, the curve for the double construct PBAD shifts to the right compared to both the single construct and double construct without induction, indicating a decrease in sensitivity.
In order to further investigate the effect of induction level of the co-expressed Plac - mRFP construct on the GFPmut3b expression of the double construct PBAD system, experiments were carried out using varying IPTG concentrations.
Figure 6 exhibits that varying the induction level of the co-expressed Plac - mRFP construct seems to have an effect on the expression level of PBAD - GFPmut3b in a double construct. At a higher IPTG concentration, the maximum expression of GFPmut3b decreases. However, no trend can be observed for the horizontal shift of the curve, except at the highest IPTG concentration (22 mM) where the graph shifts to the right. No significant shift was observed at lower IPTG concentrations.
Conclusion
By using the PBAD - GFPmut3b and Plac - mRFP inducible systems, the possible difference of dose dependent fluorescence expression in a double construct and single construct was investigated. In a double construct, the maximal expression was lower than the single construct induced PBAD - GFPmut3b, whether or not the co-expressed construct was induced. We conjecture that it is possibly due to the limited cellular resources (e.g. amino acids, enzymes required for gene translation/transcription etc.) and the synthesized proteins (e.g. lacI, mRFP) that could increase the cell load and affect its growth. However, since the investigation was done focusing only on one combination of inducible constructs(PBAD - GFPmut3b and Plac - mRFP), the data obtained cannot be assumed to apply to all instances of expressing a characterized construct in a double construct, including that for the NPK construct. Thus, further improvements should be made.
Further Improvements
Since characterization data from one combination of double construct cannot be applied to all double constructs in general, characterization of more combinations of inducible reporter systems (eg. PluxR - GFPmut3 - Plac - mRFP, PtetO - GFPmut3b - Plac - mRFP) is required.
Charaterize PBAD - GFPmut3b Plac - mRFP with a third construct (i.e. PtetO and PluxR)
This will give a more reliable comparison for a triple construct NPK promoter system, as
opposed to a double system.
Co-express potassium, phosphate and nitrate sensors and their respective inducers.
References
Ang, J., Harris, E., Hussey, B. J., Kil, R., & McMillen, D. R. (2013). Tuning response curves for synthetic biology. ACS synthetic biology, 2(10), 547-567.
Wang, B., Barahona, M., & Buck, M. (2013). A modular cell-based biosensor using engineered genetic logic circuits to detect and integrate multiple environmental signals. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 40(1), 368-376.
Wang, B., Barahona, M., & Buck, M. (2015). Amplification of small molecule-inducible gene expression via tuning of intracellular receptor densities. Nucleic acids research, gku1388.